切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华介入放射学电子杂志 ›› 2016, Vol. 04 ›› Issue (02) : 59 -62. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-5782.2016.02.001

所属专题: 文献

神经介入

介入再通治疗非急性期基底动脉闭塞的中长期随访研究
贺迎坤1, 李天晓1, 王子亮1, 常凯涛1, 朱良付1, 薛绛宇1, 白卫星1,(), 李钊硕1, 许斌1   
  1. 1. 450001 郑州大学人民医院介入科脑血管病区,河南省人民医院国家高级卒中中心,河南省介入治疗中心
  • 收稿日期:2016-02-13 出版日期:2016-05-01
  • 通信作者: 白卫星
  • 基金资助:
    河南省重点科技攻关项目(152102310416、162102310268); 河南省卫生科技攻关项目(201403191)

Medium and long term follow-up of revascularization and stenting of nonacute basilar artery occlusion

Yingkun He1, Tianxiao Li1, Ziliang Wang1, Kaitao Chang1, Liangfu Zhu1, Jiangyu Xue1, Weixing Bai1,(), Zhaoshuo Li1, Bin Xu1   

  1. 1. Cerebrovascular Division of Interventional Therapy Center, Zhengzhou University People's Hospital, Zhengzhou 450003, China
  • Received:2016-02-13 Published:2016-05-01
  • Corresponding author: Weixing Bai
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Bai Weixing, Email:
引用本文:

贺迎坤, 李天晓, 王子亮, 常凯涛, 朱良付, 薛绛宇, 白卫星, 李钊硕, 许斌. 介入再通治疗非急性期基底动脉闭塞的中长期随访研究[J/OL]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2016, 04(02): 59-62.

Yingkun He, Tianxiao Li, Ziliang Wang, Kaitao Chang, Liangfu Zhu, Jiangyu Xue, Weixing Bai, Zhaoshuo Li, Bin Xu. Medium and long term follow-up of revascularization and stenting of nonacute basilar artery occlusion[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Interventional Radiology(Electronic Edition), 2016, 04(02): 59-62.

目的:

评价介入再通治疗非急性期基底动脉闭塞的中长期临床疗效。

方法:

收集2010年2月—2012年4月在我中心行介入再通治疗的闭塞超过24 h的非急性期基底动脉闭塞患者12例。记录围手术期并发症、随访期间短暂性脑缺血发作及卒中发生情况,使用非参数秩和检验比较手术前后及随访期间的改良Rankin量表(mRS)评分变化情况。

结果:

12例患者中有11例闭塞动脉(91.7%)成功开通。围手术期并发症发生2例,导致患者病情加重。8例患者获得影像学随访,中位随访时间12(6~30)个月,再狭窄2例,均为症状性。12例患者获得临床随访,中位随访时间51.5(0.5~73)个月,再发同侧性卒中2例,同侧性短暂性脑缺血发作1例。存活患者中,术后1周的mRS评分低于术前,术后3个月的mRS评分低于术后1周,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。

结论:

介入再通治疗非急性期基底动脉闭塞可在中远期预防再发缺血事件的发生,同时术后3月内患者的残疾功能改善明显,但再狭窄问题值得进一步关注。

Objective:

To evaluate the medium and long term outcome of revascularization and stenting of nonacute basilar artery occlusion.

Methods:

12 cases of nonacute basilar artery occlusion for over 24 hours treated by endovascular revascularization in our center were retrospectively collected and analyzed. Complications and recurrent ischemic events during the follow-up period were recorded. The modified Rankin scale (mRS) scores were used to compare the relative changes of pre- and post-procedure.

Results:

Among the 12 patients, 11 (91.7%) obtained successful recanalization. However, 2 patients developed procedural complications that worsened their situation. 8 patients received imaging follow-up during the median 12 months, restenosis occurred in 2 cases, and both are symptomatic.In the subsequent clinical follow-up after the procedure, 2 ipsilateral strokes and 1 ipsilateral transient ischemic attack occurred. The mRS scores decreased significantly in the first 3 months after the procedure in survivors.

Conclusions:

Revascularization and stenting of nonacute basilar artery occlusion can prevent recurrent ipsilateral ischemic event and improve recovery, but re-occurring stenosis should draw more attention.

表1 患者各个阶段的mRS评分比较分析
图1 典型病例(40岁男性)手术前后DSA和CTA图示
1
Lindsberg PJ, Soinne L, Roine RO,et al. Options for recanalization therapy in basilar artery occlusion[J]. Stroke, 2005, 36(2): 203-204.
2
贺迎坤,王子亮,李天晓,等.非急性期基底动脉闭塞的腔内再通治疗[J].介入放射学杂志,2014,23(1):5-7.doi:10.3969/j.issn.1008-794X.2014.01.002.
3
He Y, Bai W, Li T, et al. Perioperative complications of recanalization and stenting for symptomatic nonacute vertebrobasilar artery occlusion[J]. Ann Vasc Surg, 2014, 28(2): 386-393. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2013.03.014.
4
He Y, Wang Z, Li T, et al. Revascularization with stenting of the nonacute vertebrobasilar artery occlusion[J]. Int J Stroke,2013,8(7):E42. doi: 10.1111/ijs.12075.
5
He Y, Wang Z, Li T, et al. Preliminary findings of recanalization and stenting for symptomatic vertebrobasilar artery occlusion lasting more than 24h: a retrospective analysis of 21 cases[J]. Eur J Radiol,2013,82(9):1481-1486. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2013.04.021.
6
贺迎坤,王子亮,李天晓,等.非急性期颅内椎基底动脉闭塞的腔内再通研究[J].中华放射学杂志,2013,47(12):1120-1123.doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1005-1201.2013.12.016.
7
贺迎坤,王子亮,李天晓,等.亚急性及慢性椎动脉和基底动脉闭塞支架再通治疗的初步研究[J].中华放射学杂志,2012,46(9):825-829.doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1005-1201.2012.09.012.
8
贺迎坤,李钊硕,李天晓,等.非急性期颅内椎-基底动脉闭塞支架再通术围手术期并发症分析[J].介入放射学杂志,2012,21(10):797-801.doi:10.3969/j.issn.1008-794X.2012.10.001.
9
Schonewille WJ, Wijman CA, Michel P, et al. Treatment and outcomes of acute basilar artery occlusion in the Basilar Artery International Cooperation Study (BASICS): a prospective registry study[J]. Lancet Neurol,2009 ,8(8):724-730. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(09)70173-5.
10
Goyal M, Demchuk AM, Menon BK, et al. Randomized assessment of rapid endovascular treatment of ischemic stroke[J]. N Engl J Med,2015,372(11):1019-1030. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1414905.
11
Saver JL, Goyal M, Bonafe A, et al. Stent-retriever thrombectomy after intravenous t-PA vs. t-PA alone in stroke[J]. N Engl J Med, 2015, 372(24): 2285-2295. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1415061.
12
中华医学会神经病学分会,中华医学会神经病学分会神经血管介入协作组,急性缺血性脑卒中介入诊疗指南撰写组.中国急性缺血性脑卒中早期血管内介入诊疗指南[J].中华神经科杂志,2015,48(5):356-361.doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1006-7876.2015.05.002.
13
He Y, Li T, Schonewille WJ, et al. Predicting outcome after acute basilar artery occlusion based on admission characteristics[J]. Neurology, 2012, 79(13): 1410.
14
Singer OC, Berkefeld J, Nolte CH, et al. Mechanical recanalization in basilar artery occlusion: the ENDOSTROKE study[J]. Ann Neurol,2015,77(3):415-424. doi: 10.1002/ana.24336.
15
高峰,孙瑄,莫大鹏,等.SolitaireTM支架取栓治疗急性基底动脉闭塞研究[J].中国卒中杂志,2015,10(7):543-549.
16
Hui FK, Zhu X, Jones SE, et al. Early experience in high-resolution MRI for large vessel occlusions[J]. J Neurointerv Surg,2015,7(7):509-516. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2014-011142.
17
杨博文,白卫星,李天晓,等.椎-基底动脉夹层动脉瘤的临床与影像学特点分析[J]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志,2016,4(1):5-9.doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-5782.2016.01.002.
18
Hopkins LN, Budny JL. Complications of intracranial bypass for vertebrobasilar insufficiency[J]. J Neurosurg, 1989, 70(2): 207-211.
19
Jørgensen HS, Nakayama H, Raaschou HO, et al. Outcome and time course of recovery in stroke. Part II: Time course of recovery. The Copenhagen Stroke Study[J]. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 1995, 76(5): 406-412.
[1] 陆婷, 范晴敏, 王洁, 万晓静, 许春芳, 董凤林. 超声引导下经皮穿刺置管引流对重症急性胰腺炎的疗效及应用时机的选择[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(05): 511-516.
[2] 王友芳, 李兴超, 刘清敏, 刘德彬, 刘松伍, 郭冬冬, 车峰远. 应激性高血糖指数对经皮冠状动脉介入术后急性心肌梗死患者发生主要不良心脑血管事件的预测价值[J/OL]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(02): 124-129.
[3] 邢颖, 程石. 巨脾外科治疗现状与介入治疗序贯手术策略[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(03): 253-258.
[4] 唐必英, 李钢. 治疗时机对动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血患者预后的影响[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2024, 10(04): 213-219.
[5] 杨金朔, 吴桥伟, 王春雷, 史怀璋. 脑血管内支架成形术后再狭窄的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2024, 10(03): 174-179.
[6] 高振轩, 谢晨, 曹绍东, 甘中伟, 周倍, 罗朝川, 王子齐, 葛煜彤, 张伟光. 高分辨率核磁共振在颅颈大动脉狭窄介入治疗中的临床应用进展[J/OL]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(02): 112-119.
[7] 陈雪梅, 潘晓虎, 杨明刚, 刘邦勇, 曹月洲, 贾振宇, 赵林波, 刘圣. 不同基底动脉弯曲度对急性基底动脉闭塞患者取栓治疗的影响[J/OL]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(02): 93-99.
[8] 牟超鹏, 宗斌, 刘奕, 史美英, 徐杜娟, 冯春光. 经远端桡动脉与经常规桡动脉行急诊冠脉介入诊疗后穿刺部位血肿的对比[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 275-282.
[9] 陈芳, 王建英, 曹建用, 刘丽, 罗晓琴. 基于分析-设计-开发-实施-评价模式的叙事护理培训在产科预防性介入治疗中的应用[J/OL]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2024, 12(04): 392-396.
[10] 李超迪, 刘娟芳, 闫肃, 秦胜东, 张镐哲, 常琼方, 韩新巍, 张建好. 血管性介入治疗在宫颈癌大出血患者中的临床疗效[J/OL]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2024, 12(03): 217-220.
[11] 周宝林, 刘曦, 谌浩, 王金, 马雪琴. 温敏水凝胶在血管内栓塞治疗中的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2024, 12(03): 244-249.
[12] 张长东, 李庚, 钟禹成, 田军, 尚小珂, 董念国. 2023年先天性心脏病介入治疗年度报告[J/OL]. 中华心脏与心律电子杂志, 2024, 12(02): 72-78.
[13] 单兴华, 唐文栋, 赵仙先. 延伸导管在室间隔穿孔介入治疗的新应用一例[J/OL]. 中华心脏与心律电子杂志, 2024, 12(02): 126-128.
[14] 周洪千, 张煜坤, 顾天舒, 胡苏涛, 姜超, 张雪, 张昊, 陶华岳, 刘行, 刘彤, 陈康寅. 既往出血性脑卒中患者行经皮冠脉介入治疗后不良事件的危险因素分析[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 323-329.
[15] 段丽娟, 蒋艳, 樊朝凤, 曹华. 颅内动脉瘤介入治疗术后不留置导尿管的效果及安全性[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 104-109.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?