切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华介入放射学电子杂志 ›› 2016, Vol. 04 ›› Issue (02) : 63 -66. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-5782.2016.02.002

所属专题: 文献

非血管介入

两种途径球囊扩张术治疗胆总管结石的临床效果比较
吕朋华1, 王立富1, 邓登豪2, 王书祥1, 孙陵1, 刘军2, 蔡明玉1, 耿素萍1, 黄文诺1   
  1. 1. 225001 江苏省苏北人民医院,扬州大学临床医学院介入放射科
    2. 225001 江苏省苏北人民医院,扬州大学临床医学院消化内科
  • 收稿日期:2016-02-20 出版日期:2016-05-01

Balloon dilatation treating common bile duct stones: comparison of two methods

Penghua Lyu1, Lifu Wang1, Denghao Deng2, Shuxiang Wang1, Ling Sun1, Jun Liu2, Ming yu Cai1, Suping Geng1, Wennou Huang1   

  1. 1. Department of Interventional Radiology, Northern Jiangsu people's hospital, Clinical Medical school and Affiliated hospital to Yangzhou university, Yangzhou 225001, China
    2. Department of Gastroenterology, Northern Jiangsu people's hospital, Clinical Medical school and Affiliated hospital to Yangzhou university, Yangzhou 225001, China
  • Received:2016-02-20 Published:2016-05-01
引用本文:

吕朋华, 王立富, 邓登豪, 王书祥, 孙陵, 刘军, 蔡明玉, 耿素萍, 黄文诺. 两种途径球囊扩张术治疗胆总管结石的临床效果比较[J]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2016, 04(02): 63-66.

Penghua Lyu, Lifu Wang, Denghao Deng, Shuxiang Wang, Ling Sun, Jun Liu, Ming yu Cai, Suping Geng, Wennou Huang. Balloon dilatation treating common bile duct stones: comparison of two methods[J]. Chinese Journal of Interventional Radiology(Electronic Edition), 2016, 04(02): 63-66.

目的:

比较经皮经肝球囊扩张和内镜下球囊扩张术治疗胆总管结石的临床效果。

方法:

自2013年1月—2015年1月,25例胆总管结石患者采用经皮经肝途径取石,纳入A组。选取同期经内镜途径球囊扩张术治疗的60例胆总管结石患者,纳入B组。

结果:

A组胆总管结石取净率为100%,B组为96.7%,差异无统计学意义(P=1.000);A组近期并发症发生率12%(3/25),B组10%(6/60),两组差异无统计学意义(校正χ2=0.073,P>0.05),B组发生2例胰腺炎,A组发生1例肝脓肿。A组平均手术时间(50±8) min,长于B组(39±6) min。随访1年,A组有1例患者胆总管结石复发,B组发生1例返流性胆管炎。

结论:

经皮经肝胆途径取石具有与内镜下球囊扩张术取石相同的手术成功率以及较低的并发症发生率,可以作为不适合内镜治疗或者内镜治疗失败的胆总管结石患者的治疗措施。

Objective:

This study is to compare the clinical efficacy of percutaneous transhepatic balloon dilatation(PTBD)and endoscopic papillary balloon dilatation(EPBD) in treating common bile duct(CBD)stones.

Methods:

Between January 2013 and January 2015,a comparison study was conducted among 25 patients with CBD stones who underwent PTBD treatment and were listed in Group A while 60 patients who underwent EPBD treatment and were listed in Group B.

Results:

Clearance of CBD stones in Group A patients was 100% ,and 96.7% in group B (P=1.000), with no significant statistical difference. The average time of the procedure was (50±8) minutes and (39±6) minutes, respectively. The short-term incidence of complications in group A was 12%(3/25),and 10%(6/60)in Group B(P>0.05). However,one hepatic abscess occurred in group A and two cases of pancreatitis occurred in group B. A one-year follow-up study demonstrated one gallstone recurrence in group A and one cholangitis in group B.

Conclusions:

Percutaneous transhepatic removal of CBD stones has a high success rate with low complications . It is an effective alternative strategy for CBD treatment, especially when endoscopic procedure fails or is not feasible.

表1 2组患者的临床资料
图1 PTBD途径结石取出术。A:胆道穿刺造影见胆总管中段两枚结石(箭头所示)。B:柱状球囊扩张十二指肠乳头。C:取石球囊推送结石。D:胆总管结石顺利推送入肠道。
表1 2组患者并发症的发生情况
1
Zhao HC, He L, Zhou DC, et al. Meta-analysis comparison of endoscopic papillary balloon dilatation and endoscopic sphincteropapillotomy[J]. World J Gastroenterol, 2013, 19(24): 3883-3891. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i24.3883.
2
Lu Y, Wu JC, Liu L, et al. Short-term and long-term outcomes after endoscopic sphincterotomy versus endoscopic papillary balloon dilation for bile duct stones[J]. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2014, 26(12): 1367-1373. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000000218.
3
Testoni PA, Mariani A, Aabakken L, et al. Papillary cannulation and sphincterotomy techniques at ERCP: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Clinical Guideline[J]. Endoscopy, 2016, 48(7): 657-683. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-108641.
4
姚朝光,尹毅霞,欧琴,等.十二指肠镜2种方法治疗胆管结石的比较[J].现代消化及介入诊疗,2012,17(2):86-88. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-2159.2012.02.008.
5
Lai KH, Chan HH, Tsai TJ, et al. Reappraisal of endoscopic papillary balloon dilation for the management of common bile duct stones[J]. World J Gastrointest Endosc, 2015, 7(2): 77-86. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v7.i2.77.
6
Peng YC, Chow WK. Alternative percutaneuous approach for endoscopic inaccessible common bile duct stones[J]. Hepatogastroenterology, 2011, 58(107-108): 705-708.
7
Kint JF, van den Bergh JE, van Gelder RE, et al. Percutaneous treatment of common bile duct stones: results and complications in 110 consecutive patients[J]. Dig Surg, 2015, 32(1): 9-15. doi: 10.1159/000370129.
8
李胜勇,耿建利,李玉亮,等.经皮经肝球囊扩张术治疗胆总管结石的临床研究[J].中华普通外科杂志,2013,28(7):497-499. doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-631X.2013.07.004.
9
唐万峰,依玛木买买提江·阿布拉,王海久,等.胆总管结石患者的内镜逆行胰胆管造影联合内镜括约肌切开术取石的效果研究[J].中国内镜杂志,2016,5(5):47-51. 10.3969/j.issn.1007-1989.2016.05.010.
[1] 蔡茗, 俞亚红. 胆总管结石术后复发危险因素的研究进展[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2022, 16(06): 438-442.
[2] 周标, 陈达伟, 汤晓东, 陈胜, 刘双海. BillrothⅡ式胃大部切除术后行腹腔镜胆总管切开取石的体会[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2022, 16(06): 432-434.
[3] 尼加提江·艾比不拉, 艾尔哈提·胡赛音, 阿依甫汗·阿汗. 胆总管结石内镜逆行胰胆管造影术后行胆道支架置入和鼻胆管引流并发症的比较[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2022, 16(01): 46-49.
[4] 李晓玉, 江庆, 汤海琴, 罗静枝. 围手术期综合管理对胆总管结石并急性胆管炎患者ERCP +LC术后心肌损伤的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 57-60.
[5] 张建波, 东爱华. 不同腹腔镜手术治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石的疗效及并发症对比[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 693-696.
[6] 朱俊杰, 王斌, 刘覃, 蔡志杰. LC联合LCBDE对急性结石性胆囊炎合并胆总管结石的临床疗效[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(04): 458-461.
[7] 韩凤梅, 王颖, 索晶晶. PTCSL与LD治疗胆总管结石的近中期随访比较[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(02): 207-209.
[8] 马良丰, 马召峰. 腹腔镜胆总管探查治疗胆总管结石胆管闭合方式的选取比较[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(06): 693-695.
[9] 张天献, 吕云福, 郑进方. 胆总管结石微创治疗进展[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(05): 585-588.
[10] 周标, 陈达伟, 汤晓东, 陈胜, 刘双海, 邓志成. 腹腔镜下经胆囊管汇入部微切开取石在细径胆总管结石合并胆囊结石中的应用[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(04): 422-426.
[11] 姚礼, 吴金秀, 唐流康, 谢峰. 胆总管一期缝合在腹腔镜联合胆道镜治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石中的应用[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(01): 73-76.
[12] 冯其柱, 王思雨, 袁文康, 张超. 腹腔镜胆总管探查一期缝合在正常直径胆总管结石患者中的应用[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(01): 68-72.
[13] 林颖, 林显艺, 陈荣, 潘雪梅. ERCP在胆囊切除术后胆总管结石治疗中的应用[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2021, 10(05): 502-505.
[14] 吴志明, 黄洪军, 孟兴成, 葛佳皓, 沈丽青, 胡常恩, 虞洪. ERAS理念在腹腔镜胆总管切开取石一期缝合术中的应用[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2021, 10(05): 474-478.
[15] 董浩, 张文刚, 刘圣圳, 李笑, 冯宇杰, 王佳凤, 赵晨怡, 柴宁莉, 令狐恩强. 胆道镜直视下胆总管结石取出术的初步探索[J]. 中华胃肠内镜电子杂志, 2023, 10(02): 92-96.
阅读次数
全文


摘要