切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华介入放射学电子杂志 ›› 2025, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (04) : 296 -302. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-5782.2025.04.004

血管介入

AcoStream联合置管溶栓对于急/亚急性下肢深静脉血栓疗效对比
齐文翔, 黄昊, 顾建平, 周阳逸, 陆照璇, 苏浩波()   
  1. 210006 江苏南京,南京医科大学附属南京医院(南京市第一医院)介入血管科
  • 收稿日期:2025-02-05 出版日期:2025-11-25
  • 通信作者: 苏浩波

Comparative analysis of the efficacy of AcoStream combined with catheter-directed thrombolysis in the treatment of acute/subacute deep venous thrombosis of the lower extremities

Wenxiang Qi, Hao Huang, Jianping Gu, Yangyi Zhou, Zhaoxuan Lu, Haobo Su()   

  1. Department of Interventional Radiology, Nanjing First Hospital , Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210006, China
  • Received:2025-02-05 Published:2025-11-25
  • Corresponding author: Haobo Su
引用本文:

齐文翔, 黄昊, 顾建平, 周阳逸, 陆照璇, 苏浩波. AcoStream联合置管溶栓对于急/亚急性下肢深静脉血栓疗效对比[J/OL]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2025, 13(04): 296-302.

Wenxiang Qi, Hao Huang, Jianping Gu, Yangyi Zhou, Zhaoxuan Lu, Haobo Su. Comparative analysis of the efficacy of AcoStream combined with catheter-directed thrombolysis in the treatment of acute/subacute deep venous thrombosis of the lower extremities[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Interventional Radiology(Electronic Edition), 2025, 13(04): 296-302.

目的

探讨Acostream血栓抽吸联合导管接触溶栓(catheter directed thrombolysis, CDT)对急/亚急性下肢深静脉血栓(deep vein thrombosis, DVT)的疗效。

方法

收集2020年3月至2023年11月南京医科大学附属南京医院治疗的急/亚急性DVT患者,据治疗方案分为CDT组(A组,n=48)、手动抽吸(manual aspiration thrombectomy,MAT)联合CDT组(B组,n=27)、Acostream血栓抽吸联合CDT组(C组,n=27),对血栓清除率、溶栓药物用量及时长、随访情况、血栓后综合征(post-thrombotic syndrome,PTS)发生率等进行对比分析。

结果

C组术后即刻血栓清除率(58.9%±12.7%)高于B组(35.1%±13.1%);出院时血栓清除率C组(75.1%±15.3%)高于B组(57.9%±19.2%)和A组(48.3%±16.6%),差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。C组阿替普酶用量(38.9±18.9) mg少于A组(73.1±34.2) mg和B组(59.6±30.2) mg;溶栓天数(3.0±1.5)d短于A组(5.1±2.1)d和B组(4.5±2.1)d;平均住院时长(9.8±2.2)d少于A组(11.8±2.6)d和B组(11.9±4.7)d;手术时间(155.6±60.5) min长于A组(88.4±34.4) min和B组(101.9±34.9) min,差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。C组治疗费用(8.1±2.0)万元高于A组(5.7±1.4)万元和B组(6.9±2.3)万元,差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。C组术中失血量(209.3±49.9)mL多于B组(153.5±51.1)mL,差异有统计学意义(P<0.001)。3组平均随访时长、出血事件及PTS发生率均无统计学差异(均P>0.05)。

结论

Acostream血栓抽吸联合CDT可安全高效清除急/亚急性下肢深静脉血栓,减少溶栓药物用量及时长,但其手术时间较长,术中失血量及费用较高。

Objective

To investigate the efficacy of Acostream thrombus aspiration device combined with catheter-directed thrombolysis in the treatment of acute/subacute lower extremity deep venous thrombosis(DVT).

Methods

Patients with acute/subacute lower extremity DVT treated at Nanjing First Hospital from March 2020 to November 2023 were enrolled. According to the treatment plan, they were divided into three groups: CDT alone (Group A, n=48), manual aspiration thrombectomy (MAT) + CDT (Group B, n=27), and AcoStream thrombus aspiration + CDT (Group C, n=27). Thrombus clearance rate, thrombolytic drug dosage, treatment duration, follow-up, and incidence of post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) were compared and analyzed.

Results

The immediate thrombus clearance rate in Group C (58.9%±12.7%) was higher than in Group B (35.1%±13.1%, P<0.001). At discharge, the thrombus clearance rate in Group C (75.1±15.3%) was higher than in Group B (57.9%±19.2%, P=0.005) and Group A (48.3%±16.6%, P<0.001), with statistically significant differences. The dosage of alteplase in Group C (38.9±18.9 mg) was lower than in Group A (73.1±34.2 mg, P<0.001) and Group B (59.6±30.2 mg, P=0.026). The thrombolytic duration in Group C (3.0±1.5 days) was shorter than in Group A (5.1±2.1 days, P<0.001) and Group B (4.5±2.1 days, P=0.031). The length of hospital stay in Group C (9.8±2.2 days) was shorter than in Group A (11.8±2.6 days, P=0.044) and Group B (11.9±4.7 days, P=0.011). The operation time in Group C (155.6±60.5 min) was longer than in Group A (88.4±34.4 min, P<0.001) and Group B (101.9±34.9 min, P=0.002). The treatment cost in Group C (CNY 81 000±20 000) was higher than in Group A (CNY 57 000±14 000, P<0.001) and Group B (CNY 69 000±23 000, P=0.019). Intraoperative blood loss in Group C (209.3±49.9 mL) was greater than in Group B (153.5±51.1 mL, P<0.001). The incidence of bleeding complications was 20.8% (10/48) in Group A, 11.1% (3/27) in Group B, and 14.8% (4/27) in Group C, with no significant difference among the groups (P=0.531). The average follow-up durations were 5.3±2.5 months, 5.1±2.5 months, and 4.9±2.3 months, respectively, with no significant difference (P=0.818). The incidences of PTS were 17.1% (7/41), 8.7% (2/23), and 12.5% (3/24), respectively, also with no significant difference (P=0.633).

Conclusion

AcoStream thrombus aspiration combined with CDT is safe and effective for the treatment of acute/subacute deep venous thrombosis. It improves thrombus clearance and reduces the dosage of thrombolytic drugs and thrombolysis duration. However, it is associated with longer operation time, greater intraoperative blood loss, and higher treatment costs.

表1 3组患者基本资料比较
表2 3组患者治疗效果比较(
±s
图1 患者手术前后影像学检查及术后取出血栓。 1A~1C:术前经足背静脉造影示患者左侧腘、股浅、髂外、髂总静脉闭塞,内可见大量充盈缺血影,左下肢血流主要经大隐静脉、盆壁侧枝静脉汇至对侧髂静脉回流;2A~2C:导丝穿通血栓段后使用Acostream抽吸导管由腘静脉至髂静脉逐段抽吸血栓;3A~3C:术后即刻经溶栓导管造影,髂股腘静脉主干已显影,血栓量较前明显减少;4A~4C:除下腔静脉滤器前经左足背造影示:髂股腘静脉主干显影,仅残余少许附壁血栓;5:术后收集罐中所取出大量血栓。
[1]
顾建平, 徐克, 滕皋军. 下肢深静脉血栓形成介入治疗规范的专家共识(第2版)[J]. 介入放射学杂志, 2019, 28(1): 1-10.
[2]
殷敏毅, 叶开创. 急性下肢深静脉血栓形成腔内治疗专家共识[J]. 血管与腔内血管外科杂志, 2023, 9(5): 513-519.
[3]
Khan F, Tritschler T, Kahn S R, et al. Venous thromboembolism.[J] Lancet, 2021, 398(10294): 64-77.
[4]
彭义盛, 楼文胜, 顾建平, 等. 改良手动抽吸治疗急性髂股静脉血栓形成对照研究[J]. 介入放射学杂志, 2018, 27(6): 510-515.
[5]
曾金福, 黄永豪, 黄伟, 等. AcoStream血栓抽吸装置用于下肢深静脉血栓治疗的疗效以及安全性分析[J]. 临床普外科电子杂志, 2023, 11(3): 61-64.
[6]
Gloviczki P. Classification and reporting standards for venous disease.[J] Mayo Clin Proc, 1996, 71(4): 422-342.
[7]
Di Nisio M, van Es N, Büller H R. Deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism.[J] Lancet, 2016, 388(10063): 3060-3073.
[8]
李晓强, 张福先, 王深明. 深静脉血栓形成的诊断和治疗指南(第三版)[J]. 中国血管外科杂志(电子版), 2017, 9(4): 250-257.
[9]
Diniz J, Coelho A, Mansilha A. Endovascular treatment of iliofemoral deep venous thrombosis: is there enough evidence to support it? A systematic review with meta-analysis.[J] Int Angiol, 2020, 39(2): 93-104.
[10]
Goldhaber S Z, Magnuson E A, Chinnakondepalli K M, et al. Catheter-directed thrombolysis for deep vein thrombosis: 2021 update.[J] Vasc Med, 2021, 26(6): 662-669.
[11]
陆信武, 叶开创. 提高下腔-髂股静脉血栓形成的血栓清除效率[J]. 中国血管外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 14(3): 193-194.
[12]
徐一丁, 胡波, 仲斌演, 等. AngioJet机械吸栓联合导管接触溶栓与单纯导管接触溶栓治疗急性下肢深静脉血栓形成的meta分析[J]. 介入放射学杂志, 2020, 29(9): 888-893.
[13]
Li W, Zaid Al-Kaylani A, Zeebregts C J, et al. Effectiveness and safety of catheter-directed thrombolysis in conjunction with percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy for acute iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis: A meta-analysis.[J] J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord, 2023, 11(4): 843-853. e2.
[14]
徐淼, 张喜成, 陈兆雷, 等. 大腔导管手动抽吸和经皮机械血栓清除术治疗髂静脉闭塞继发髂股静脉血栓形成的比较[J]. 中国普通外科杂志, 2021, 30(6): 663-669.
[15]
Gong M, Fu G, Liu Z, et al. AngioJet rheolytic thrombectomy for the treatment of deep vein thrombosis in elderly patients: Increase the risk of acute kidney injury?[J]. Digit Health, 2023, 9: 20552076231154691.
[16]
Shen Y, Wang X, Jin S S, et al. Increased risk of acute kidney injury with percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy using AngioJet compared with catheter-directed thrombolysis.[J] J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord, 2019, 7(1): 29-37.
[17]
赵呈祥, 段友良. Indigo经皮机械血栓抽吸术治疗May-Thurner综合征合并急性髂股静脉血栓[J]. 中国介入影像与治疗学, 2023, 20(10): 634-636.
[18]
袁园, 黄昊, 顾建平, 等. AcoStream血栓抽吸装置治疗急性下肢缺血6例[J]. 介入放射学杂志, 2022, 31(12): 1151-1154.
[1] 中国医师协会血管外科医师分会静脉学组. 常见静脉疾病诊治规范(2022年版)[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2022, 16(04): 255-272.
[2] 关雪, 于颖, 李京, 刘莹, 崔亚娟, 刘名鹤. 肝移植受者术后下肢深静脉血栓形成风险预测模型的建立[J/OL]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(03): 138-144.
[3] 宋碧萱, 郭海川, 韩子钰, 周瑞娟, 李承思, 姬晨妮. 开放式楔形胫骨高位截骨术后下肢深静脉血栓形成的危险因素分析及预测列线图的构建[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2023, 09(04): 226-232.
[4] 张兴华, 严海涛, 刘圣, 祖庆泉, 施海彬. 经导管接触溶栓治疗中危急性肺栓塞的有效性及安全性[J/OL]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2025, 13(01): 30-34.
[5] 葛静萍, 尹媛媛, 李燕. 梯度压力袜联合间歇充气加压在老年新型冠状病毒肺炎患者预防下肢深静脉血栓形成中的应用[J/OL]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2024, 12(01): 70-74.
[6] 王勇, 王丽. 导管接触性溶栓治疗下肢深静脉血栓安全性和有效性的系统评价再评价[J/OL]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2024, 12(01): 58-63.
[7] 郑景达, 黄金旗, 张庆贤, 陈煌, 高晓杰. 小腿深静脉入路AngioJet一站式血栓清除治疗全肢型急性下肢深静脉血栓形成患者的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2023, 11(04): 305-309.
[8] 张德伟, 雷毅, 江哲宇, 王黎洲, 许国辉, 周石. 杂交手术治疗下肢深静脉血栓合并下肢急性动脉血栓一例[J/OL]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2023, 11(04): 380-384.
[9] 彭波, 卡德尔江·木沙, 刘娜, 于长辉, 喻天启, 范红友, 李智. 新疆克州静脉血栓栓塞症的危险因素及发病特征分析[J/OL]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2022, 10(03): 250-253.
[10] 唐茂舜, 李建平, 黄文健, 梁连英. 经动脉序贯静脉置管溶栓治疗急性混合型下肢深静脉血栓26例的初步临床疗效观察[J/OL]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2020, 08(04): 315-320.
[11] 钱成, 楼文胜, 陈国平, 汪涛, 李英豪. 逆行置管溶栓治疗下肢深静脉血栓的疑虑[J/OL]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2020, 08(02): 120-124.
[12] 刘晓丽, 张波. 球囊扩张联合导管接触溶栓治疗动静脉内瘘狭窄闭塞的手术护理技巧[J/OL]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2018, 06(03): 255-258.
[13] 李开龙, 宋兵, 王少春. 超声对左下肢深静脉血栓合并Cockett综合征的临床诊断价值[J/OL]. 中华诊断学电子杂志, 2017, 05(03): 183-187.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?