切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华介入放射学电子杂志 ›› 2021, Vol. 09 ›› Issue (04) : 447 -451. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-5782.2021.04.018

介入护理

DSA引导在儿科PICC困难置管中的应用体会
刘婷1, 郭磊1, 张兆芳2,(), 徐群2, 赵肖群1, 刘宝燕1   
  1. 1. 250022 山东济南,山东大学齐鲁儿童医院血管瘤科&介入医学科
    2. 250022 山东济南,山东大学齐鲁儿童医院护理部
  • 收稿日期:2021-04-20 出版日期:2021-11-25
  • 通信作者: 张兆芳

Application of DSA guidance in pediatric patients with difficult PICC catheterization

Ting Liu1, Lei Guo1, Zhaofang Zhang2,(), Qun Xu2, Xiaoqun Zhao1, Baoyan Liu1   

  1. 1. Department of Vascular Anomalies and Interventional Radiology, Qilu Children's Hospital of Shandong University, Shandong Jinan 250022, China
    2. Nursing Department, Qilu Children's Hospital of Shandong University, Shandong Jinan 250022, China
  • Received:2021-04-20 Published:2021-11-25
  • Corresponding author: Zhaofang Zhang
引用本文:

刘婷, 郭磊, 张兆芳, 徐群, 赵肖群, 刘宝燕. DSA引导在儿科PICC困难置管中的应用体会[J]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2021, 09(04): 447-451.

Ting Liu, Lei Guo, Zhaofang Zhang, Qun Xu, Xiaoqun Zhao, Baoyan Liu. Application of DSA guidance in pediatric patients with difficult PICC catheterization[J]. Chinese Journal of Interventional Radiology(Electronic Edition), 2021, 09(04): 447-451.

目的

总结6例PICC置管困难患儿数字减影血管造影机(DSA)引导下介入置管的应用体会经验。

方法

回顾性分析自2017年11月至2019年11月我院小儿外科PICC置管过程中出现导管推送困难的病例。

结果

本组6例置管困难患儿,其中5例在DSA引导下置管成功,1例经静脉造影明确导管推送困难原因为头臂静脉闭塞,更换为下肢大隐静脉穿刺后置管成功。术后随访7 d,6例患儿均无术中并发症及中期并发症。

结论

对于儿童PICC置管过程中推送导管困难的情况,选择DSA设备引导下送管或实施静脉造影,能正确调整儿童PICC头端异位或明确原因,可解决不同原因引起的送管困难。

Objective

To summarize the experience of 6 pediatric patients with PICC catheterization difficulties under DSA guidance.

Methods

The data of 6 pediatric patients with catheterization difficulties during the insertion of PICC in our hospital from November 2017 to November 2019 were retrospectively analyzed, and the application methods of DSA devices in the pediatric PICC catheterization difficulties were summarized.

Results

Among the 6 cases of pediatric patients with PICC catheterization difficulties, 5 of which were successfully catheterized under DSA guidance. and 1 case had difficulty in catheter pushing due to brachiocephalic vein cava occlusion by venography, which was replaced by lower extremity great saphenous vein puncture. There were no intraoperative complications or intermediate complications in 6 cases after 7 days follow-up.

Conclusions

For children with difficulties in PICC catheterization, choosing DSA devices to guide catheterization or performing venous angiography can correctly adjust the ectopic location of the PICC tip or clarify the causes, and solve the catheterization difficulties caused by different reasons.

表1 患者一般资料
[1]
Yamaguchi RS, Noritomi DT, Degaspare NV, et al. Peripherally inserted central catheters are associated with lower risk of bloodstream infection compared with central venous catheters in paediatric intensive care patients: a propensity-adjusted analysis[J]. Intensive Care Med, 2017, 43(8): 1097-1104.
[2]
Campagna S, Gonella S, Berchialla P, et al. A retrospective study of the safety of over 100 000 peripherally-inserted central catheters days for parenteral supportive treatments[J]. Res Nurs Health, 2019, 42(3): 198-204.
[3]
Rainey SC, Deshpande G, Boehm H, et al. Development ofa pediatric PICC team under an existing sedation service: a 5-year experience[J]. Clin Med Insights Pediatr, 2019, 13: 1-5.
[4]
张莹. 不同干预法在预防PICC导管致机械性静脉炎的效果观察[J]. 护理研究, 2017, 32(31): 4156-4157.
[5]
Borretta L, Macdonald T, Digout C, et al. Peripherally inserted central catheters in pediatric oncology patients: a 15-year population-based review from maritimes, Canada[J]. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol, 2018, 40(1): e55-e60.
[6]
Evans RS, Sharp JH, Linford LH, et al. Risk of symptomatic DVT associated with peripherally inserted central catheters[J]. Chest, 2010, 138(4): 803-810.
[7]
白家瑢,吴琳. 儿童先天性心脏病介入治疗中的辐射防护[J]. 中华儿科杂志, 2017, 55(10): 796-799.
[8]
李红,王芳,熊云兰. PICC置管送管困难的护理研究进展[J]. 护理研究, 2019, 7(33): 1176-1179.
[9]
刘芬,周志斐,邬礼政, 等. 西安市1002名家长对儿童牙科全身麻醉技术认知及接受度调查[J]. 临床口腔医学杂志, 2013, 29(3): 156-158.
[10]
姜浩丰,沈露,秦丹, 等. 重庆地区患儿家长对牙科全身麻醉技术治疗儿童牙病的接受度调查及影响因素分析[J]. 暨南大学学报, 2018, 39(6): 535-541.
[11]
王芳会,张洁,肖谧,等. 咪达唑仑滴鼻用于新生儿磁共振镇静的效果研究——前瞻性单盲随机对照研究[J]. 中国当代儿科杂志, 2020, 22(5): 56-60.
[12]
Lee-Kim SJ, Fadavi S, Punwani I, et al. Nasal versus oral midazolam sedation for pediatric dental patients[J]. J Dent Child, 2004, 71(2): 126-130.
[13]
Mataftsi A, Malamaki P, Prousali E, et al. Safety and efficacy of chloral hydrate for procedural sedation in paediatric ophthalmology: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Brit J Ophthalmol, 2017, 101(10): 1423-1430.
[14]
屈双权,王瑞珂,肖婷, 等. 水合氯醛和咪达唑仑用于儿科门诊镇静的给药途径研究[J]. 儿科药学杂志, 2016, 22(7): 17-19.
[15]
Delgado J, Toro R, Rascovsky S, et al. Chloral hydrate in pediatric magnetic resonance imaging: evaluation of a 10-year sedation experience administered by radiologists[J]. Pediatric Radiology, 2015, 45(1): 108-114.
[16]
Sharp R, Cummings M, Fielder A, et al. The catheter to vein ratio and rates of symptomatic venous thromboembolism in patients with a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC): a prospective cohort study[J]. Int J Nurs Stud, 2015, 52(3): 677-685.
[17]
杨莉,郑丽娜. 不撤导丝透视下调整PICC异位的尝试[J].吉林医学, 2010, 31(7): 1000-1001.
[18]
陆海燕,王丽英,薛嵋. PICC继发性导管异位的观察与处理[J]. 介入放射学杂志, 2019, 28(4): 390-393.
[19]
何玮,王国蓉,杨晓玲, 等. DSA引导的PICC置管效益及安全性评价研究[J]. 护理学杂志, 2019, 34(7): 47-50.
[20]
刘晓晗,王子军. 数字减影血管造影低剂量技术在儿童介入诊疗中的应用[J]. 中国医学装备, 2015, 12(4): 71-73.
[1] 罗刚, 泮思林, 陈涛涛, 许茜, 纪志娴, 王思宝, 孙玲玉. 超声心动图在胎儿心脏介入治疗室间隔完整的肺动脉闭锁中的应用[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(06): 605-609.
[2] 徐松城, 叶瑞忠, 贾田爽, 王立刚, 王珍珍, 吕亚儿, 李建春, 孙立涛. 经直肠双平面超声在盆腔疾病诊疗中的应用价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(05): 483-486.
[3] 张伟, 王莉, 安彩霞, 王俭勤. 不同辐射防护措施对降低儿童先天性心脏病介入诊疗过程中辐射剂量的应用价值[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(04): 455-463.
[4] 魏小勇. 原发性肝癌转化治疗焦点问题探讨[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 602-607.
[5] 廖梅, 张红君, 金洁玚, 吕艳, 任杰. 床旁超声造影对肝移植术后早期肝动脉血栓的诊断价值[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 630-634.
[6] 丁倩, 王谦, 郭春彦, 张怡, 梁宇光. 基于SWOT分析法探讨儿科临床药师在药物临床研究中的作用[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 581-586.
[7] 许少睿, 孔杰, 马骏, 尚金林, 苏浩波. 西门子Artis Zee系列神经介入术专属透视策略的创建与应用[J]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2023, 11(04): 318-323.
[8] 田佳丽, 陈晓波. 卵圆孔未闭隧道特点对介入封堵术的影响因素分析[J]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2023, 11(04): 346-351.
[9] 吴雅琴, 莫伟, 向华, 李琴, 李玉莲, 周碧芳. 肝癌患者介入术后股动脉穿刺处出血的研究进展[J]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2023, 11(04): 352-356.
[10] 李世凯, 梁佳, 何艳艳, 于毅, 李天晓, 常金龙, 贺迎坤. 兔颈动脉粥样硬化性狭窄模型在介入治疗的应用进展[J]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2023, 11(04): 357-362.
[11] 王玲, 张程智, 王艳丽, 段旭华, 韩新巍, 焦德超. 二维码辅助技术在三阶段介入医学进修生手术室培养的价值[J]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2023, 11(04): 363-367.
[12] 郝莉茹, 林永俭, 马英东, 陈卓萍, 刘丽. 高龄微创经股静脉经导管二尖瓣夹合术患者一例的术中护理配合[J]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2023, 11(04): 372-376.
[13] 张德伟, 雷毅, 江哲宇, 王黎洲, 许国辉, 周石. 杂交手术治疗下肢深静脉血栓合并下肢急性动脉血栓一例[J]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2023, 11(04): 380-384.
[14] 姜新鹏, 李晓明, 杨航, 宫一宸, 傅元豪, 傅瑜, 张喆. 单纯经胸超声心动图引导卵圆孔未闭封堵术早期安全性及有效性分析[J]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 320-324.
[15] 庄宗, 祝琦, 那世杰, 刘涛, 凌海平, 张玉华, 曹博强, 杭春华, 张庆荣. 破裂性小脑后下动脉远端动脉瘤的个体化治疗策略[J]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 200-206.
阅读次数
全文


摘要