| [1] |
Obrzut B, Obrzut M. Is there still a place for reconstructive surgery in distal tubal disease?[J]. J Clin Med, 2022, 11(12): 3278.
|
| [2] |
Ng KYB, Cheong Y. Hydrosalpinx-salpingostomy, salpingectomy or tubal occlusion[J]. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol, 2019, 59: 41-47.
|
| [3] |
Palagiano A, Cozzolino M, Ubaldi FM, et al. Effects of hydrosalpinx on endometrial implantation failures: evaluating salpingectomy in women undergoing in vitro fertilization[J]. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet, 2021, 43(4): 304-310.
|
| [4] |
Palagiano A, Cozzolino M, Ubaldi FM, et al. Effects of hydrosalpinx on endometrial implantation failures: evaluating salpingectomy in women undergoing in vitro fertilization[J]. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet, 2021,43(4): 304-310.
|
| [5] |
Revzin MV, Moshiri M, Katz DS, et al. Imaging evaluation of fallopian tubes and related disease: a primer for radiologists[J]. Radiographics, 2020, 40(5): 1473-1501.
|
| [6] |
Bontis JN, Theodoridis TD. Laparoscopic management of hydrosalpinx[J]. Ann N Y Acad Sci, 2006, 1092: 199-210.
|
| [7] |
Igbodike EP, Badejoko OO, Fasubaa OB, et al. Correlation between hysterosalpingography diagnosis and final hysterolaparoscopy with dye-test diagnosis in women with utero-tubal infertility: a cross-sectional study of the implication for which test should be the first-line investigation[J]. SAGE Open Med, 2022, 10: 20503121221104434.
|
| [8] |
Zhang J, Lan W, Wang Y, et al. Ethiodized poppyseed oil-based contrast medium is superior to water-based contrast medium during hysterosalpingography regarding image quality improvement and fertility enhancement: a multicentric, randomized and controlled trial[J]. EClinicalMedicine, 2022, 46: 101363.
|
| [9] |
Tan J, Deng M, Xia M, et al. Comparison of hysterosalpingography with laparoscopy in the diagnosis of tubal factor of female infertility[J]. Front Med (Lausanne), 2021, 8: 720401.
|
| [10] |
Grigovich M, Kacharia VS, Bharwani N, et al. Evaluating fallopian tube patency: what the radiologist needs to know[J]. Radiographics, 2021, 41(6): 1876-1896.
|
| [11] |
Makwe CC, Ugwu AO, Sunmonu OH, et al. Hysterosalpingography findings of female partners of infertile couple attending fertility clinic at Lagos University Teaching Hospital[J]. Pan Afr Med J, 2021, 40: 223.
|
| [12] |
Strandell A, Lindhard A. Why does hydrosalpinx reduce fertility? The importance of hydrosalpinx fluid[J]. Hum Reprod, 2002, 17(5): 1141-1145.
|
| [13] |
van Rijswijk J, Pham CT, Dreyer K, et al. Oil-based or water-based contrast for hysterosalpingography in infertile women: a cost-effectiveness analysis of a randomized controlled trial[J]. Fertil Steril, 2018, 110(4): 754-760.
|
| [14] |
Wang R, van Welie N, van Rijswijk J, et al. Effectiveness on fertility outcome of tubal flushing with different contrast media: systematic review and network meta-analysis[J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2019, 54(2): 172-181.
|
| [15] |
Lu J, Qi D, Xu W. Fertility-enhancing effect of oil-based contrast agents during hysterosalpingography and the variation of this effect within a 3-year follow-up period in infertile patients[J]. Front Med (Lausanne), 2022, 9: 948945.
|
| [16] |
Zhang J, Lan W, Wang Y, et al. Ethiodized poppyseed oil-based contrast medium is superior to water-based contrast medium during hysterosalpingography regarding image quality improvement and fertility enhancement: a multicentric, randomized and controlled trial[J]. EClinicalMedicine, 2022, 46: 101363.
|
| [17] |
Tan Y, Zheng S, Lei W, et al. Ethiodized poppyseed oil versus ioversol for image quality and adverse events in hysterosalpingography: a prospective cohort study[J]. BMC Med Imaging, 2019, 19(1): 50.
|
| [18] |
Igbodike EP, Badejoko OO, Fasubaa OB, et al. Correlation between hysterosalpingography diagnosis and final hysterolaparoscopy with dye-test diagnosis in women with utero-tubal infertility: a cross-sectional study of the implication for which test should be the first-line investigation[J]. SAGE Open Med, 2022, 10: 20503121221104434.
|
| [19] |
Antonisamy N, Reddy NS, Chinta P, et al. Role of hysterosalpingography in diagnosing tubal blockage-a prospective diagnostic study[J].J Hum Reprod Sci, 2021, 14(4): 386-391.
|
| [20] |
Onwuchekwa CR, Oriji VK. Hysterosalpingographic (HSG) pattern of infertility in women of reproductive age[J]. J Hum Reprod Sci, 2017, 10(3): 178-184.
|
| [21] |
Streda R, Mardesic T, Kult D, et al. The diagnostic value of hysterosalpingography in the diagnosis of tubal disease[J]. Ceska Gynekol, 2009, 74(1): 18-21.
|
| [22] |
Simpson WL Jr, Beitia LG, Mester J. Hysterosalpingography: a reemerging study[J]. Radiographics, 2006, 26(2): 419-431.
|
| [23] |
Li YZ, Qiu J, Ma B, et al. The role of diagnostic magnetic resonance hysterosalpingography in the evaluation of fallopian tubal occlusion of female infertility: a meta-analysis[J]. Clin Imaging, 2021, 72: 11-18.
|
| [24] |
Ma L, Wu G, Wang Y, et al. Fallopian tubal patency diagnosed by magnetic resonance hysterosalpingography[J]. J Reprod Med, 2012, 57(9-10): 435-440.
|
| [25] |
De Felice C, Rech F, Marini A, et al. Magnetic resonance hysterosalpingography in the evaluation of tubal patency in infertile women: an observational study[J]. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol, 2012, 39(1): 83-88.
|
| [26] |
梁娜, 吴青青. 三维子宫输卵管超声造影临床应用及进展[J]. 中国医学影像学杂志,2010, 18(4): 306-309.
|
| [27] |
Arya S, Kupesic Plavsic S. Preimplantation 3D ultrasound: current uses and challenges[J]. J Perinat Med, 2017, 45(6): 745-758.
|
| [28] |
Devine K, Dolitsky S, Ludwin I, et al. Modern assessment of the uterine cavity and fallopian tubes in the era of high-efficacy assisted reproductive technology[J]. Fertil Steril, 2022, 118(1): 19-28.
|
| [29] |
李宏波, 张玫玫, 强也, 等. 两种球囊导管在三维子宫输卵管超声造影中的应用研究[J]. 东南大学学报(医学版), 2019, 38(3): 494-497.
|