切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华介入放射学电子杂志 ›› 2023, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (04) : 341 -345. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-5782.2023.04.009

影像诊断

选择性输卵管造影术用于输卵管近端梗阻的临床价值
郑国(), 李爽, 贾微霞, 章建昌, 邱刚, 吕明丽, 赵亮   
  1. 050091 河北石家庄,河北生殖妇产医院放射介入科
    050091 河北石家庄,河北以岭医院风湿免疫科
    050051 河北石家庄,河北省人民医院放射治疗科
    050000 河北石家庄,石家庄市妇产医院放射介入科
  • 收稿日期:2023-04-24 出版日期:2023-11-25
  • 通信作者: 郑国
  • 基金资助:
    河北省医学科学研究重点课题计划项目(20191435)

Clinical value of selective salpingography for proximal tubal obstruction

Guo Zheng(), Shuang Li, Weixia Jia, Jianchang Zhang, Gang Qiu, Mingli Lv, Liang Zhao   

  1. Department of Interventional Radiology, Hebei Maternity Hospital, Hebei Shijiazhuang 050091
    Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, Hebei Yiling Hospital, Hebei Shijiazhuang 050051
    Department of Radiotherapy, Hebei General Hospital, Hebei Shijiazhuang 050051
    Department of Interventional Radiology, Shijiazhuang Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Hebei Shijiazhuang 050000, China
  • Received:2023-04-24 Published:2023-11-25
  • Corresponding author: Guo Zheng
引用本文:

郑国, 李爽, 贾微霞, 章建昌, 邱刚, 吕明丽, 赵亮. 选择性输卵管造影术用于输卵管近端梗阻的临床价值[J]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2023, 11(04): 341-345.

Guo Zheng, Shuang Li, Weixia Jia, Jianchang Zhang, Gang Qiu, Mingli Lv, Liang Zhao. Clinical value of selective salpingography for proximal tubal obstruction[J]. Chinese Journal of Interventional Radiology(Electronic Edition), 2023, 11(04): 341-345.

目的

探讨选择性输卵管造影术(selective salpingography,SSG)用于输卵管近端梗阻(proximal tubal obstruction,PTO)的临床价值。

方法

回顾性分析河北生殖妇产医院自2021年9月至2022年10月期间257例因子宫输卵管造影术(hysterosalpingography,HSG)诊断PTO而行SSG检查的结果。其中发生近端梗阻的输卵管共计373条,双侧同时发生PTO 232条,单侧发生PTO 141条,均于我院行SSG进一步检查。观察SSG术后输卵管是否恢复通畅,以及恢复通畅后输卵管形态学表现,并对SSG术后的表现归类比较。根据HSG所在不同医疗中心的分为本院组和外院组,根据病变累计范围分为单侧组和双侧组,比较观察不同组别PTO行SSG后表现的差异。

结果

根据是否与术前HSG诊断一致、是否恢复通畅以及恢复通畅后输卵管形态学情况,把PTO患者的SSG术后表现分为3大类和A、B、C、D、E、F等6个亚型,3大类表现包括梗阻型、通畅型和不全梗阻型,A、B、C为梗阻型,D、E为通畅型,F为不全梗阻型。梗阻型占比25.20%,通畅型占比64.61%,不全梗阻型占比10.19%。双侧病变的SSG术后呈梗阻型表现的占比高于单侧,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。不同医疗中心患者的SSG术后结局有差异,其恢复通畅的概率不同,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。

结论

SSG具备输卵管疏通和HSG质量控制的双重作用,其最重要的临床意义是明确输卵管梗阻的定位及定性诊断。

Objective

To investigate the clinical value of selective salpingography (SSG) in proximal tubal obstruction (PTO).

Methods

A retrospective analysis was performed for the results of SSG examination in 257 cases of PTO diagnosed by hysterosalpingography (HSG) at Hebei Maternity Hospital from September 2021 to October 2022. Among them,there were a total of 373 fallopian tubes with proximal obstruction, 232 with bilateral PTO and 141 with unilateral PTO.All of them underwent further examined by SSG in our hospital.Whether the fallopian tubes were restored to patency after SSG and the morphological manifestations of the fallopian tubes after the restoration of patency were observed, and the manifestations after SSG were classified and compared. The patients were divided into the local hospital group and the erternal hospital group according to the different medical centers where HSG examinations were performed, and were divided into the unilateral group and the bilateral group according to the cumulative extent of lesions. The differences in the outcomes of PTO after SSG in different groups were observed and compared.

Results

According to whether it was consistent with the preoperative diagnosis of HSG, whether patency was restored, and the morphology of the fallopian tubes after restoration of patency, the postoperative SSG manifestations of PTO patients were divided into three categories and six subtypes of A, B, C, D, E, and F. The three main categories of manifestations included obstructive, patency and incomplete obstruction, A, B, and C are obstructive types, D and E are patency types, and F are incomplete obstructive type. The obstruction type accounted for 25.20%, the patency type accounted for 64.61%, and the incomplete obstruction type accounted for 10.19%. The proportion of bilateral lesions with obstructive manifestations after SSG was higher than that of unilateral lesions, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). The postoperative outcomes of SSG varied between different medical scenters, and the probability of postoperative recovery was different,with statistically significant difference (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

The SSG has the dual role of tubal unclogging and HSG quality control, and its most important clinical significance is to clarify the localization and qualitative diagnosis of tubal obstruction.

表1 373条PTO输卵管SSG术后表现分类
图1 PTO在SSG术后的不同表现1A:SSG术后右侧输卵管远端梗阻、积水;1B:SSG术后右侧输卵管峡部,未形成积水;1C:SSG术后左侧输卵管恢复通畅,且形态规则;1D:SSG术后左侧输卵管恢复通畅,但壶腹部形态不规则扩张;1E:SSG术后右侧输卵管仍不全梗阻,壶腹部团绕,伞端对比剂弥散不良。
表2 单侧病变与双侧病变的SSG术后结局比较[条(%)]
表3 不同医疗中心HSG诊断的PTO经SSG术后结局比较[条(%)]
[1]
中国妇幼保健协会放射介入专业委员会. 输卵管造影技术规范中国专家共识(2022年版)[J]. 中国实用妇科与产科杂志, 2022, 38(2): 165-169.
[2]
林小娜,黄国宁,孙海翔,等. 输卵管性不孕诊治的中国专家共识[J]. 生殖医学杂志, 2018, 27(11): 1048-1056.
[3]
陈俊, 侯海燕, 陈亚琼. 输卵管再通术在输卵管近端阻塞中的应用[J]. 国际生殖健康计划生育杂志, 2016, 35(3): 221-225.
[4]
王添平, 张国福. 输卵管阻塞性不孕的介入治疗[J]. 中国实用妇科与产科杂志, 2019, 35(1): 83-86.
[5]
翁宁, 许薇, 刘同庆. 输卵管近端阻塞诊治及辅助生殖助孕策略[J]. 中国计划生育和妇产科, 2022, 14(6): 38-40.
[6]
Pyra K, Szmygin M, Dymara-Konopka W,et al. The pregnancy rate of infertile patients with proximal tubal obstruction 12 months following selective salpingography and tubal catheterization[J]. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 2020, 254: 164-169.
[7]
Lazer T, Meltzer S, Saar-Ryss B, et al. The place of selective hysterosalpingography and tubal canalization among sub-fertile patients diagnosed with proximal tubal occlusion[J]. Arch Gynecol Obstet, 2016, 293(5): 1107-1111.
[8]
韦旖旎, 邓姗. HSG双侧输卵管根部梗阻的"假阳性"[J].生殖医学杂志, 2021, 30(1): 107-109.
[9]
Das S, Nardo LG, Seif MW. Proximal tubal disease: the place for tubal cannulation[J]. Reprod Biomed Online, 2007, 15(4):383-388.
[10]
Rijswijk JV, Welie NV, Dreyer K, et al. Tubal flushing with oil based or water-based contrast at hysterosalpingography for infertility:long-term reproductive outcomes of a randomized trial[J]. Fertil Steril, 2020, 114(1): 155-162.
[11]
Palagiano A, Cozzolino M, Ubaldi FM, et al. Effects of hydrosalpinx on endometrial implantation failures: evaluating salpingectomy in women undergoing in vitro fertilization[J]. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet, 2021, 43(4): 304-310.
[12]
李翠芬, 陈雪梅, 邓智心, 等. 输卵管积水对妊娠结局的影响及治疗研究新进展[J]. 新医学, 2022, 53(6): 404-407.
[13]
孙巍, 梁宏元, 王希海, 等. DSA下不同方案栓塞输卵管积水的疗效对比[J]. 中国临床医学影像杂志, 2022, 33(11):797-800.
[14]
Zafarani F, Ghaffari F, Ahmadi F, et al. Hysterosalpingography in the assessment of proximal tubal pathology: a review of congenital and acquired abnormalities[J]. Br J Radiol, 2021, 94(1122): 20201386.
[15]
方玲. 选择性输卵管造影术的诊断及治疗意义[J]. 中国实用妇科与产科杂志, 2004, 20(1): 49-50.
[1] 韩雪盈, 马春燕, 程燕, 杨帆, 闵玲, 黄子星. 《美国放射学院适宜性标准:女性不孕》2020年版要点解读[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2020, 16(05): 527-534.
[2] 边锦霞, 侯静, 白宝艳, 陈延平, 王胜利. 实时三维子宫输卵管超声造影术对女性不孕因素分析的临床价值[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2019, 15(06): 716-720.
[3] 陈欣. 子宫输卵管超声造影术对于临床诊断输卵管堵塞所致不孕症的研究进展[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2016, 12(04): 479-483.
[4] 张昌余, 白万晶, 宁刚, 李开明, 赵福敏, 李学胜. 不同碘对比剂在子宫输卵管造影术中的对比研究[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2015, 11(03): 393-397.
[5] 祝茹, 严琴, 汪艳, 朱慧芬, 慈靖, 韩文晖, 朱红云. 自助推药器在子宫输卵管造影中的应用[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2013, 09(06): 825-827.
[6] 张仙, 程丽琴, 刘小乐. 预防性应用头孢氨苄联合甲硝唑对子宫输卵管造影术后急性盆腔炎性疾病的影响[J]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(04): 321-325.
[7] 郑国, 金钊, 齐静怡, 张芸. 输卵管妊娠后慢性输卵管炎的造影分析[J]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2021, 09(01): 75-79.
阅读次数
全文


摘要