切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华介入放射学电子杂志 ›› 2021, Vol. 09 ›› Issue (03) : 288 -293. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-5782.2021.03.009

血管介入

3D旋转DSA在前列腺动脉栓塞术中的应用价值分析
刘凯1, 李晋1,(), 蒋贝1, 袁生武1, 汤超1, 郭征昂1, 方机成1, 王倩倩1, 吕军1   
  1. 1. 450000 河南郑州,郑州大学第五附属医院介入科
  • 收稿日期:2020-07-05 出版日期:2021-08-25
  • 通信作者: 李晋

Analysis of the application value of 3D rotational DSA in prostate artery embolization

Kai Liu1, Jin Li1,(), Bei Jiang1, Shengwu Yuan1, chao Tang1, Zhengang Guo1, Jicheng Fang1, Qianqian Wang1, Jun Lv1   

  1. 1. Department of Intervention, the Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan Zhengzhou 450000, China
  • Received:2020-07-05 Published:2021-08-25
  • Corresponding author: Jin Li
引用本文:

刘凯, 李晋, 蒋贝, 袁生武, 汤超, 郭征昂, 方机成, 王倩倩, 吕军. 3D旋转DSA在前列腺动脉栓塞术中的应用价值分析[J]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2021, 09(03): 288-293.

Kai Liu, Jin Li, Bei Jiang, Shengwu Yuan, chao Tang, Zhengang Guo, Jicheng Fang, Qianqian Wang, Jun Lv. Analysis of the application value of 3D rotational DSA in prostate artery embolization[J]. Chinese Journal of Interventional Radiology(Electronic Edition), 2021, 09(03): 288-293.

目的

探讨3D旋转DSA在前列腺动脉栓塞术(PAE)中的应用价值。

方法

选取2016年8月至2020年6月在我科行PAE治疗的良性前列腺增生(BPH)患者73例,所有患者行常规二维DSA(2D-DSA),以正位血管图像为重点,通过对C型臂旋转完成图像采集,将采集的图片发送到三维工作站,完成前列腺动脉血管重建。所有图片均由介入科2位具有高级职称的医师完成阅片,观察常规2D-DSA和3D旋转DSA成像中前列腺动脉数量、起源及与邻近动脉的吻合支。

结果

2位医师阅片识别前列腺动脉一致性的Kappa值为0.734。142侧髂内动脉,经常规2D-DSA和3D旋转DSA共准确识别前列腺动脉148支,其中,经3D旋转DSA准确识别前列腺动脉143支(96.62%,143/148),而经常规2D-DSA准确识别的为116支(78.38%,116/148),差异有统计学意义(χ2 = 22.517,P < 0.001);有26侧(18.31%,26/142)髂内动脉发出的28支前列腺动脉(18.92%,28/148)仅经3D旋转DSA识别,有4侧(2.82%,4/142)的4支(2.70%,4/148)仅经常规2D-DSA识别,差异有统计学意义(χ2 = 20.182,P < 0.001),经常规2D-DSA识别而被3D旋转DSA排除的前列腺动脉为6支(4.92%,6/122);9侧(6.16%,9/146)髂内动脉发出的10支前列腺动脉仅经3D旋转DSA准确识别其起源;经3D旋转DSA准确识别的前列腺动脉与邻近动脉存在吻合支的为57支(39.86%,57/143),高于常规2D-DSA的32支(27.59%,32/116),差异有统计学意义(χ2 = 4.278,P = 0.039);经对3D旋转DSA图像分析,143支前列腺动脉最佳投射角度(患者身体向同侧倾斜)为20°~45°,其中,61支(42.66%,61/143)前列腺动脉31°~35°投射角度最佳,26°~30°次之,为38支(26.57%,38/143)。

结论

3D旋转DSA应用于PAE术中,可更为清楚地识别前列腺动脉数量、起源及其复杂的解剖结构,从而对提高栓塞效果具有重要意义。

Objective

To investigate the application value of 3D rotational DSA in prostate artery embolization (PAE).

Methods

A total of 73 cases of patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) treated with PAE were selected in the Department of Interventional Therapy, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University from August 2016 to June 2020. All patients were accepted conventional two-dimensional DSA (2D-DSA). Subsequently, focusing on the orthotopic blood vessel image, the image was acquired by rotating the C-arm, and the acquired imageswere sent to the 3D workstation to complete the reconstruction of the prostate artery. All pictures were reviewed by two physicians with advanced professional titles in the Department of Interventional Therapy. The number, origin, and anastomotic branch with adjacent arteries of the prostatic arteries in conventional 2D-DSA and 3D rotational DSA imaging were observed.

Results

The Kappa value of 2 doctors in the interventional department reading the film to identify the consistency of the prostate artery was 0.734. 148 prostate arterieswere demonstrated in 142 lateral internal iliac arteries by conventional 2D-DSA and 3D rotational DSA. The 3D rotational DSAdemonstrated 143 (96.62%, 143/148), while the conventional 2D-DSA demonstrated 116 (78.38%, 116/148), the difference was statistically significant (χ2 = 22.517, P < 0.001). 28 (18.92%, 28/148) prostate arteries in 26 lateral internal iliac arteries (18.31%, 26/142) were only identified by the 3D rotational DSA, while 4 (2.82%, 4/142) in 4 lateral internal iliac arteries were only identified by the conventional 2D-DSA, the difference was statistically significant (χ2 = 20.182, P < 0.001). 6 (4.92%, 6/122) prostate arteries were indentified by the conventional 2D-DSA while excluded by 3D rotational DSA. The origins of 10 prostate arteries in 9 lateral internal iliac arteries (6.16%, 9/146) were only accurately identified by 3D rotational DSA. 57 prostate arteries which were anastomose with adjacent arteries were accurately identified by 3D rotational DSA, which was higher than that of the conventional 2D-DSA (27.59%, 32/116), the difference was statistically significant (χ2 = 4.278, P = 0.039). By analysis of 3D rotational DSA image, the optimal projection angle of 143 prostate arteries (the patient's body was inclined to the same side) was 20°~45°, among which, the optimal projection angle of 61 (42.66%, 61/143) prostate arterieswas31°~35°, and then was 26°~30°, which was 38 (26.57%, 38/143).

Conclusions

3D rotational DSA applied in PAE surgery can more clearly identify the number and origin of prostate artery and its complex anatomical structure. Therefore, it is of great significance to improve the effect of embolization.

图1 患者,男,48岁,常规2D-DSA造影
图2 患者,男,48岁,3D旋转DSA造影
图3 同一患者同一前列腺动脉2D图像与3D图像对比(在2D图像上前列腺动脉无法判断开口位置,而在3D图像上可以清晰观察到前列腺动脉起自臀阴干)
[1]
Das AK, Leong JY, Roehrborn CG. Office-based therapies for benign prostatic hyperplasia: a review and update[J]. Can J Urol, 2019, 26(4S1): 2-7.
[2]
王茂强. 值得关注新兴血管内介入微创技术—前列腺动脉栓塞术治疗良性前列腺增生症[J]. 中华保健医学杂志, 2019, 21(2): 89-92.
[3]
陶瑞瑞,张国栋,王茂强, 等. C臂锥形束CT成像在前列腺动脉栓塞术中的应用价值[J]. 中华放射学杂志, 2016, 50(3): 209-212.
[4]
王福安,黄文诺,吕朋华, 等. C臂锥体束CT技术在前列腺动脉栓塞术中的应用价值[J]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2017, 5(2): 79-82.
[5]
杜希剑,余开湖,章凯敏, 等. DSA应用于颅内复杂动脉瘤介入杂交手术中的临床价值[J]. 中国CT和MRI杂志, 2016, 14(5): 23-25.
[6]
杨净松,陈超,赵卫, 等. 基底动脉穿支动脉显微解剖与DSA研究[J]. 介入放射学杂志, 2018, 27(11): 1068-1071.
[7]
沈华,高鹏,李翔, 等. 多模式DSA技术在脑血管疾病诊断中的应用[J]. 吉林医学, 2018, 39(8): 1416-1417.
[8]
朱聪辉,林文集,黄志扬, 等. 前列腺动脉栓塞术与经尿道前列腺切除术治疗良性前列腺增生的前瞻性随机对照研究[J]. 中国介入影像与治疗学, 2018, 15(3): 134-138.
[9]
Sabharwal T, Popert R. Prostate artery embolization[J]. BJU Int, 2018, 122(2): 167-168.
[10]
权晖,陈述,罗晓辉, 等. 前列腺动脉栓塞术治疗ASA高评级良性前列腺增生患者的短期效果评价[J]. 现代泌尿外科杂志, 2018, 23(1): 19-22.
[11]
Anract J, Amouyal G, Peyromaure M, et al. Study of the intra-prostatic arterial anatomy and implications for arterial embolization of benign prostatic hyperplasia[J]. Prog Urol, 2019, 29(5): 263-269.
[12]
张金龙,王茂强,段峰, 等. 盆腔对比剂增强磁共振血管成像对前列腺动脉栓塞术的价值分析[J]. 中华医学杂志, 2018, 98(47): 3848-3852.
[13]
Guberina N, Lechel U, Forsting M, et al. Dose comparison of classical 2-plane DSA and 3D rotational angiography for the assessment of intracranial aneurysms[J]. Neuroradiology, 2016, 58(7): 673-678.
[14]
徐耀端,尚子奎,黄维鑫, 等. D-CTA与3D-DSA检查在脑动脉瘤显微夹闭术中的评估价值[J]. 中华神经外科疾病研究杂志, 2018, 17(2): 122-125.
[15]
张金龙,辛海南,袁冰, 等. 前列腺动脉栓塞术后阴茎缺血的处理一例[J]. 中华放射学杂志, 2018, 52(11): 880-881.
[1] 黄斌, 曹南, 刘德林, 孙希希, 孔梓祥, 王健生. 超声引导下经会阴激光消融治疗良性前列腺增生(附2例报告)[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2018, 15(11): 869-873.
[2] 郐海洋, 马志方, 冯对平, 余立冲, 杭天昆, 石明凯. 超选择性前列腺动脉栓塞术治疗超大体积前列腺增生的疗效分析[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(05): 383-387.
[3] 刘存祥, 姜波, 高健刚. 超选择前列腺动脉栓塞术后急性肾损伤一例报告[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(02): 161-162.
[4] 张宁, 张梦菲, 邱建新, 高闫尧, 陈育, 高靖榆. 腹腔镜下经尿道等离子电切术联合疝环充填式无张力疝修补术治疗腹股沟斜疝合并前列腺良性增生[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 441-444.
[5] 裴胜利, 柯超, 王芳芳, 阮艳玲, 谢兴旺. 腹股沟无张力疝修补术联合经尿道等离子双极电切术对腹股沟疝合并良性前列腺增生患者的治疗效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(06): 599-603.
[6] 何应英, 丁洪. 经尿道等离子电切术联合无张力疝修补术治疗良性前列腺增生合并腹股沟疝的疗效[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(05): 448-451.
[7] 韩毅力, 赵佳晖, 罗勇, 李明川, 魏德超, 姜永光. 经腹途径机器人辅助前列腺增生切除术初步经验[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 15(02): 106-109.
[8] 邱涛, 王峰, 史振峰, 张建军, 马合苏提, 文彬, 李鸣. 钬激光剜除与经典经尿道前列腺切除术在逼尿肌功能不全患者中手术结果的比较[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2017, 10(03): 155-159.
[9] 陈毅, 李雷, 王嵘, 赵超, 冯对平. 超选择前列腺动脉栓塞术治疗TURP术后复发的前列腺增生的临床疗效[J]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2022, 10(02): 185-189.
[10] 林佳丽, 方主亭. 前列腺动脉栓塞术治疗前列腺增生引起的下尿路症状研究进展[J]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2022, 10(01): 65-69.
[11] 申虎, 朱磊, 潘小平. 分心木联合动脉栓塞术治疗良性前列腺增生的临床观察[J]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2018, 06(01): 37-39.
[12] 周学鲁, 周上军, 占平, 叶淦, 张继峰, 张剑锋, 胡灏. 中药白芨用于前列腺动脉栓塞治疗良性前列腺增生的临床研究[J]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2017, 05(02): 89-93.
[13] 闫忠孝. 经尿道钬激光膀胱肿瘤切除术与等离子膀胱肿瘤切除术治疗老年前列腺增生的疗效比较[J]. 中华老年病研究电子杂志, 2022, 09(03): 42-45.
[14] 汤庆峰, 黄晓科, 刘承万, 赖维奇, 李亮. 低功率钬激光前列腺剜除术治疗老年良性前列腺增生临床分析[J]. 中华老年病研究电子杂志, 2022, 09(03): 37-41.
阅读次数
全文


摘要