切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华介入放射学电子杂志 ›› 2021, Vol. 09 ›› Issue (02) : 144 -149. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-5782.2021.02.005

所属专题: 文献

血管介入

介入治疗在腹部外科术后前哨出血中的应用探究
杨安1, 申景2, 刘玉娥2,()   
  1. 1. 030001 山西太原,山西医科大学医学影像学院;030012 山西太原,山西医科大学附属人民医院介入治疗科
    2. 030012 山西太原,山西医科大学附属人民医院介入治疗科
  • 收稿日期:2021-02-27 出版日期:2021-05-25
  • 通信作者: 刘玉娥

Application of interventional therapy in sentinel hemorrhage after abdominal surgery

An Yang1, Jing Shen2, Yu'e Liu2,()   

  1. 1. Department of Medical Imaging, Shanxi Medical University, Shanxi Taiyuan 030001; Department of Interventional Therapy, Affiliated People's Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Shanxi Taiyuan 030012, China
    2. Department of Interventional Therapy, Affiliated People's Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Shanxi Taiyuan 030012, China
  • Received:2021-02-27 Published:2021-05-25
  • Corresponding author: Yu'e Liu
引用本文:

杨安, 申景, 刘玉娥. 介入治疗在腹部外科术后前哨出血中的应用探究[J/OL]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2021, 09(02): 144-149.

An Yang, Jing Shen, Yu'e Liu. Application of interventional therapy in sentinel hemorrhage after abdominal surgery[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Interventional Radiology(Electronic Edition), 2021, 09(02): 144-149.

目的

评估数字减影血管造影(DSA)作为腹部外科术后前哨出血患者初始诊断工具的有效性和介入治疗在此类疾病中的临床应用价值。

方法

收集2018年7月至2020年11月我科诊治的45例腹部外科术后前哨出血患者的病例资料,回顾性分析其DSA造影结果及介入治疗疗效。

结果

DSA首次血管造影发现45例患者中,31例表现为对比剂外溢20例、假性动脉瘤6例和间接出血征象5例,阳性率为68.9%(31/45);其余14例首次血管造影阴性的患者中有6例出现迟发性出血,随后行DSA造影显示对比剂外溢2例,假性动脉瘤1例,动脉管壁不光整3例;8例未再出血经保守治疗后好转。DSA造影发现有出血征象的37例患者中有4例因腹腔感染行外科手术,其余33例患者均首选血管腔内治疗,其中2例因介入术中止血困难转外科手术,技术成功率为93.9%(31/33)。31例患者中有24例仅行介入治疗后取得临床成功,临床成功率为77.4%(24/31)。7例患者介入治疗后发生再出血,其中4例经重复栓塞后止血成功,3例介入止血失败转外科手术。单纯介入治疗组死亡率为17.6%(5/28),外科手术死亡率为55.5%(5/9),P = 0.041。

结论

DSA可作为腹部外科术后前哨出血患者的一线诊断工具,在血管造影的基础上选择恰当的介入治疗对降低腹部外科术后迟发性大出血患者的死亡率具有重要的临床价值。

Objective

To evaluate the effectiveness of DSA as an initial diagnostic tool for patients with sentinel hemorrhage after abdominal surgery and the clinical value of interventional therapy in such diseases.

Methods

The data of 45 patients with postoperative bleeding after abdominal surgery in our department from July 2018 to December 2020 were collected. The results of DSA and interventional therapy were analyzed retrospectively.

Results

Among the 45 patients detected by DSA for the first time, the 14 patients showed negative angiography and the other 31 cases showed contrast extravasation (n = 20), pseudoaneurysm (n = 6), irregular arterial wall and disordered distal branches (n = 5), with a positive rate of 68.9% (31/45). Among the other 14 patients with negative angiography for the first time, the delayed hemorrhage occurred in 6 cases whose subsequent DSA showed contrast extravasation in 2 cases, pseudoaneurysm in 1 case, uneven arterial wall in 3 cases, and 8 cases without rebleeding were improved after conservative treatment. Among the 37 patients with signs of bleeding found by DSA, 4 patients underwent surgery because of abdominal infection, while the other 33 patients preferred endovascular treatment, of whom 2 cases were converted to surgery because of hemostasis difficulties during interventional operation, resulting ina technical success rate of 93.9% (31/33). Among the 31 patients, 24 patients achieved clinical success only by interventional therapy, with a clinical success rate of 77.4% (24/31). Rebleeding occurred in 7 patients after interventional therapy, of which 4 cases were successfully stopped by repeated embolization, and 3 failed cases were converted to surgery. The mortality rate was 17.6% (5/28) in the interventional therapy group, and 55.5% (5/9) in the surgical mortality, P = 0.041.

Conclusions

DSA can be used as a first-line diagnostic tool for patients with sentinel hemorrhage after abdominal surgery. Choosing appropriate interventional therapy on the basis of angiography has important clinical value in reducing the mortality of patients with delayed massive hemorrhage after abdominal surgery.

图1 45例患者临床治疗路线图
图2 患者行胆管癌根治切除手术
表1 37例造影阳性患者DSA结果
图3 患者因腹盆闭合性外伤行手术探查、胰尾部脾切除手术,DSA造影见第一空肠动脉分支造影剂外溢(箭头),因超选择困难且主干栓塞可导致肠梗死,转外科手术。
图4 患者行根治性全胃联合脾脏切除、胆囊切除手术
图5 患者行胰十二指肠切除+左半肝切除+部分横结肠切除+残胃切除+区域淋巴结清扫手术
[1]
屈新才,郑启昌,余建明, 等. 超选择性动脉血管造影及栓塞治疗胃切除术后大出血[J]. 中华外科杂志, 2003(05): 62-64.
[2]
霍砚淼,池嘉昌,杨建宇, 等. 胰十二指肠切除术后迟发性出血的血管介入治疗[J]. 中华普通外科杂志, 2019(03): 208-212.
[3]
Brodsky JT, Turnbull AD. Arterial hemorrhage after pancreatoduodenectomy. The 'sentinel bleed'[J]. Arch Surg, 1991, 126(8): 1037-1040.
[4]
Biondetti P, Fumarola EM, Ierardi AM, et al. Bleeding complications after pancreatic surgery: interventional radiology management[J]. Gland Surg, 2019, 8(2): 150-163.
[5]
Angle JF, Siddiqi NH, Wallace MJ, et al. Quality improvement guidelines for percutaneous transcatheter embolization: Society of Interventional Radiology Standards of Practice Committee[J]. J Vasc Interv Radiol, 2010, 21(10): 1479-1486.
[6]
沈柏用,陈亚进,彭兵, 等. 胰十二指肠切除术后出血的预防及处理[J]. 中华消化外科杂志, 2018, 17(07): 682-686.
[7]
王志军,王茂强,宋鹏, 等. 急诊介入治疗在胰腺疾病外科术后大出血中的应用研究[J]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2013, 1(02): 92-98.
[8]
Roulin D, Cerantola Y, Demartines N, et al. Systematic review of delayed postoperative hemorrhage after pancreatic resection[J]. J Gastrointest Surg, 2011, 15(6): 1055-1062.
[9]
Khalsa BS, Imagawa DK, Chen JI, et al. Evolution in the treatment of delayed postpancreatectomy hemorrhage: surgery to interventional radiology[J]. Pancreas, 2015, 44(6): 953-958.
[10]
Rumstadt B, Schwab M, Korth P, et al. Hemorrhage after pancreatoduodenectomy[J]. Ann Surg, 1998, 227(2): 236-241.
[11]
Gralnek IM, Neeman Z, Strate LL. Acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding[J]. N Engl J Med, 2017, 376(11): 1054-1063.
[12]
Miura F, Asano T, Amano H, et al. Management of postoperative arterial hemorrhage after pancreato-biliary surgery according to the site of bleeding: re-laparotomy or interventional radiology[J]. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg, 2009, 16(1): 56-63.
[13]
Tien YW, Wu YM, Liu KL, et al. Angiography is indicated for every sentinel bleed after pancreaticoduodenectomy[J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2008, 15(7): 1855-1861.
[14]
Mine T, Murata S, Ueda T, et al. Contribution of extrahepatic collaterals to liver parenchymal circulation after proper hepatic artery embolization[J]. J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2014, 29(7): 1515-1521.
[15]
Sato A, Yamada T, Takase K, et al. The fatal risk in hepatic artery embolization for hemostasis after pancreatic and hepatic surgery: importance of collateral arterial pathways[J]. J Vasc Interv Radiol, 2011, 22(3): 287-293.
[16]
朱帝文,谭永华,顾俊鹏, 等. 介入治疗胰十二指肠切除术后晚期出血[J]. 中国介入影像与治疗学, 2020, 17(09): 543-547.
[17]
Cho SK, Kim SS, Do YS, et al. Ischemic liver injuries after hepatic artery embolization in patients with delayed postoperative hemorrhage following hepatobiliary pancreatic surgery[J]. Acta Radiol, 2011, 52(4): 393-400.
[18]
Ching KC, Santos E, Mccluskey KM, et al. Covered stents and coil embolization for treatment of postpancreatectomy arterial hemorrhage[J]. J Vasc Interv Radiol, 2016, 27(1): 73-79.
[19]
Gwon DI, Ko GY, Sung KB, et al. Endovascular management of extrahepatic artery hemorrhage after pancreatobiliary surgery: clinical features and outcomes of transcatheter arterial embolization and stent-graft placement[J]. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2011, 196(5): W627-W634.
[20]
Wolk S, Radosa CG, Distler M, et al. Risk factors for in-hospital mortality after transarterial intervention after postpancreatectomy hemorrhage[J]. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol, 2020, 43(9): 1342-1352.
[1] 陆婷, 范晴敏, 王洁, 万晓静, 许春芳, 董凤林. 超声引导下经皮穿刺置管引流对重症急性胰腺炎的疗效及应用时机的选择[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(05): 511-516.
[2] 王友芳, 李兴超, 刘清敏, 刘德彬, 刘松伍, 郭冬冬, 车峰远. 应激性高血糖指数对经皮冠状动脉介入术后急性心肌梗死患者发生主要不良心脑血管事件的预测价值[J/OL]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(02): 124-129.
[3] 吴俊嶺, 孟科, 刘江涛, 孙刚. 基于HVPG分层的门脉高压内镜治疗中远期疗效研究[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(02): 100-105.
[4] 邢颖, 程石. 巨脾外科治疗现状与介入治疗序贯手术策略[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(03): 253-258.
[5] 唐必英, 李钢. 治疗时机对动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血患者预后的影响[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2024, 10(04): 213-219.
[6] 杨金朔, 吴桥伟, 王春雷, 史怀璋. 脑血管内支架成形术后再狭窄的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2024, 10(03): 174-179.
[7] 浦路桥, 李川, 齐宝闯, 卜鹏飞, 蔡兴博, 白艳, 罗欢, 徐永清. 改良与传统股方肌骨瓣治疗青壮年股骨头坏死的临床疗效比较[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(03): 165-170.
[8] 牟超鹏, 宗斌, 刘奕, 史美英, 徐杜娟, 冯春光. 经远端桡动脉与经常规桡动脉行急诊冠脉介入诊疗后穿刺部位血肿的对比[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 275-282.
[9] 陈芳, 王建英, 曹建用, 刘丽, 罗晓琴. 基于分析-设计-开发-实施-评价模式的叙事护理培训在产科预防性介入治疗中的应用[J/OL]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2024, 12(04): 392-396.
[10] 李超迪, 刘娟芳, 闫肃, 秦胜东, 张镐哲, 常琼方, 韩新巍, 张建好. 血管性介入治疗在宫颈癌大出血患者中的临床疗效[J/OL]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2024, 12(03): 217-220.
[11] 周宝林, 刘曦, 谌浩, 王金, 马雪琴. 温敏水凝胶在血管内栓塞治疗中的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2024, 12(03): 244-249.
[12] 刘一人, 崔世军, 佟铸, 郭建明, 杨盛家, 谷涌泉, 郭连瑞. 急性肠系膜上动脉栓塞的介入治疗[J/OL]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2024, 12(02): 131-136.
[13] 郭方明, 赵明俐, 颜凡辉, 刘萌萌, 王阳, 赵英杰, 刘远航, 张艳芬, 詹景冬. 光学相干断层成像在急性心肌梗死冠状动脉分层斑块病变中的应用[J/OL]. 中华诊断学电子杂志, 2024, 12(02): 73-79.
[14] 单兴华, 唐文栋, 赵仙先. 延伸导管在室间隔穿孔介入治疗的新应用一例[J/OL]. 中华心脏与心律电子杂志, 2024, 12(02): 126-128.
[15] 周洪千, 张煜坤, 顾天舒, 胡苏涛, 姜超, 张雪, 张昊, 陶华岳, 刘行, 刘彤, 陈康寅. 既往出血性脑卒中患者行经皮冠脉介入治疗后不良事件的危险因素分析[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 323-329.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?