切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华介入放射学电子杂志 ›› 2018, Vol. 06 ›› Issue (03) : 204 -208. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-5782.2018.03.005

所属专题: 经典病例 文献

专题研究·妇产科介入

刮宫术前行子宫动脉栓塞术治疗347例子宫瘢痕妊娠的临床价值研究
孙增涛1, 张垒1,(), 刘薇1, 李继军1, 王银昌1   
  1. 1. 250021 山东省医学影像学研究所介入科
  • 收稿日期:2018-04-06 出版日期:2018-08-01
  • 通信作者: 张垒

Clinical value of uterine artery embolization before uterine curettage with cesarean scar pregnancy

Zengtao Sun1, Lei Zhang1,(), Wei Liu1, Jijun Li1, Yinchang Wang1   

  1. 1. Department of Interventional Radiology, Shandong Medical Imaging Research Institute, Ji'nan 250021, China
  • Received:2018-04-06 Published:2018-08-01
  • Corresponding author: Lei Zhang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Zhang Lei,Email:
引用本文:

孙增涛, 张垒, 刘薇, 李继军, 王银昌. 刮宫术前行子宫动脉栓塞术治疗347例子宫瘢痕妊娠的临床价值研究[J]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2018, 06(03): 204-208.

Zengtao Sun, Lei Zhang, Wei Liu, Jijun Li, Yinchang Wang. Clinical value of uterine artery embolization before uterine curettage with cesarean scar pregnancy[J]. Chinese Journal of Interventional Radiology(Electronic Edition), 2018, 06(03): 204-208.

目的:

探讨于刮宫术前行子宫动脉栓塞术治疗子宫瘢痕妊娠的临床价值及其中的技术要点。

方法:

选取2012年1月至2017年1月我科收治的子宫瘢痕妊娠患者共347例,使用可吸收明胶海绵颗粒"层叠式"栓塞子宫供血动脉,并在栓塞术后72 h内于超声监测下完成刮宫术。分析患者数字减影血管造影(DSA)

结果

、子宫动脉栓塞手术结果、栓塞后疼痛情况、刮宫术中出血量及随访资料。结果:347例患者均成功接受造影检查,其中343例成功进行栓塞术,技术成功率98.85%(343/347)。4例患者造影检查后未实施栓塞治疗。347例中有22例存在异生血管,占6.34%;有异生血管的患者刮宫术中出血量高于无异生血管者。347例患者均成功在超声监视下行刮宫术,刮宫术中出血量10~2000 ml,其中302例出血量≤50 ml,33例50~600 ml,12例≥600 ml。栓塞后≤24 h行刮宫术者74例,24~48 h 234例,48~72 h 39例。栓塞后不同时间段行刮宫术的出血量差异无统计学意义。妊娠6周内与7~9周的刮宫术中出血量无统计学意义;而妊娠10~12周刮宫术中的出血量明显大于妊娠9周以内的患者,差异有统计学意义。321例患者栓塞术后下腹部疼痛程度轻微,无需药物处理。栓塞术后卵巢功能未受到明显影响。

结论:

术前72 h内预先栓塞子宫供血动脉能有效预防刮宫术中大出血,且未明显影响到卵巢功能。

Objective:

To investigate the clinical value and technical essentials of uterine arterial embolization before curettage in patients with cesarean scar pregnancy.

Methods:

A total of 347 patients with cesarean scar pregnancy from January 2012 to January 2017 were collected and treated with "layered" absorbable gelatin sponge particles to embolize the uterine artery, and curettage was performed under ultrasound scanning within 72 h after embolization. The results of digital subtraction angiography (DSA) and embolization, the pain after embolization, the amount of bleeding in curettage and the related follow-up data were analyzed.

Results:

Among the 347 patients who successfully received DSA, embolization was successfully performed in 343 cases. The technical success rate was 98.85% (343/347) . Four cases were not treated with embolization after DSA. Among the 347 cases, 22 cases had abnormal blood vessels, accounting for 6.34%. And the patients with heterogeneous blood vessels had higher blood loss than those with undifferentiated blood vessels. The 347 patients were successfully performed with curettage under ultrasound scanning, the amount of bleeding in curettage was 10-2 000 ml. Among the 347 patients, 302 cases were less than 50 ml, 33 cases were 50-600 ml, and 12 cases were more than 600 ml. After embolization, 74 cases were treated within less than 24 h, 234 cases were treated within 24-48 h, and 39 cases were within 48-72 h. There was no statistically significant difference in the amount of blood loss at different time intervals after embolization. There was no significant difference in the amount of blood loss between the 6th week of pregnancy and the 7th to 9th week of curettage. The amount of blood loss in the curettage at 10 to 12 weeks of pregnancy was significantly greater than that of patients within 9 weeks of pregnancy. The difference was statistically significant.

Conclusion:

Pre-embolization of the uterine feeding artery within 72 h before surgery can effectively prevent major bleeding during curettage and does not significantly affect ovarian function.

表1 栓塞后不同时间段内行刮宫术中出血量比较(例)
表2 不同孕周患者刮宫术中的出血量比较
表3 栓塞前后子宫动脉血流参数对比(±s
表4 栓塞前后卵巢动脉血流参数对比(±s
表5 栓塞治疗组与对照组的E2、FSH、LH及AMH水平比较(±s
图1 典型病例(女,31岁,两次瘢痕妊娠入院,间隔7个月+11天)行双侧子宫动脉栓塞后刮宫术
[1]
Yang XY,Yu H,Li KM,et al. Uteine artery embolisation combined with local methotrexate for treatment of caesarean scar pregnancy[J]. BJOG,2010,117(8):990-996.
[2]
Rotas MA,Haberman S,Levgur M,et al. Cesarean ectopie pregnancies etiology,diagnosis,and management[J]. Obstet Gynecol,2006,107(1):1373-1381.
[3]
Liu W,Shen L,Wang Q,et al. Uterine artery embolization combined with curettage vs. methotrexate plus curettage for cesarean scar pregnancy[J]. Arch Gynecol Obstet,2016,294(1):71-76.
[4]
王燕捷,翟妍,张震宇.剖宫产瘢痕妊娠的临床特征与处理结局[J].中华医学杂志,2017,97(13):986-990.
[5]
邵华江,马建婷,徐丽萍,等.剖宫产瘢痕妊娠治疗方法与疗效综合分析[J].中华医学杂志,2017,92(31):2191-2194.
[6]
中华医学会妇产科学分会计划生育学组.剖宫产术后子宫瘢痕妊娠诊治专家共识(2016)[J].中华妇产科杂志,2016,51(8):568-572.
[7]
Nawroth F,Foth D,Wilhelm L,et al.Conservative treatment of ectopic pregnancy in a cesarean section sear with methotrexate:a case report[J].Eur Obstet Gynecol Repred Biol,2001,99(1):135-137.
[8]
张磊,穆永旭,闫瑞强,等.经血管介入法联合刮宫术治疗剖宫产瘢痕妊娠的临床效果观察[J/CD].中华介入放射学电子杂志,2016,4(1):21-23.
[9]
刘炳光,曹满瑞,张玉霞,等.子宫动脉栓塞与化疗栓塞治疗瘢痕妊娠疗效比较[J].介入放射学杂志,2015,(7):588-591.
[10]
邵华江,马建婷,扬秀儿,等.剖宫产瘢痕妊娠诊治方法探讨[J].中华医学杂志,2017,90(37):2616-2619.
[11]
向阳.关于剖宫产瘢痕妊娠的分型与治疗方法的选择[J].中国妇产科临床杂志,2012,13(6):401-404.
[12]
韦晓昱,于晓兰.停经7周以内的Ⅱ型和Ⅲ型剖宫产术后子宫瘢痕妊娠两种治疗方法的安全性比较[J].中华妇产科杂志,2017,52(7):449-454.
[1] 王玉琳, 尹立雪, 李梅, 吴越, 郭智宇. 三维斑点追踪成像对早发性卵巢功能不全患者左心室心肌收缩功能的评价[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2021, 18(06): 590-596.
[2] 陈雨婷, 杨烨, 谢奇君, 凌秀凤. 女性不孕不育相关疾病患者的生殖道微生物组成异常研究现状[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2022, 18(05): 615-620.
[3] 徐瑞涓, 林渝, 谭世桥. 富血小板血浆在妇科疾病治疗中应用及其研究现状[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2022, 18(03): 255-261.
[4] 张碧云, 肖小敏, 钟兴明, 苗竹林, 李蕾蕾, 黄丽艳. 肠道菌群紊乱与女性生殖内分泌疾病相关性研究现状[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2021, 17(04): 488-491.
[5] 魏双双, 张治芬, 李鼎恒, 黄坚, 金雪静. 剖宫产瘢痕处双胎异位妊娠患者诊治研究并文献复习[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2021, 17(04): 453-458.
[6] 许可, 宁刚. 不同栓塞剂对子宫动脉化疗栓塞术联合超声引导下清宫术治疗剖宫产瘢痕妊娠患者的出血量影响[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2019, 15(05): 520-526.
[7] 秦真岳, 王慧慧, 陈继明, 鲍明月, 郑亚峰, 肖惠超, 马洋, 蒋云芬, 施如霞. 单孔腹腔镜手术治疗Ⅲ型(包块型)子宫瘢痕妊娠[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 14(02): 122-126.
[8] 白宇鸽, 徐玲, 刘荫华, 段学宁, 叶京明, 刘倩, 程元甲, 辛灵. 年轻乳腺癌患者生育能力保护的研究进展[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(02): 118-122.
[9] 林琼燕, 郝世辉, 谭琳, 刘娟. 高强度超声聚焦对剖宫产瘢痕部位妊娠的治疗效果[J]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2019, 08(02): 116-120.
[10] 徐少锋, 王致强, 胡红杰. 疤痕妊娠明胶海绵介入栓塞后子宫动脉再通的影响因素[J]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2023, 11(01): 30-34.
[11] 王建爽, 张海静, 王雪松, 文颖, 周子敬. 不同预处理方式联合超声监测下清宫术治疗外生型CSP的疗效及安全性[J]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2021, 09(04): 371-375.
[12] 李陆鹏, 曹广劭, 刘建文, 刘玉岩, 刘瑞青, 曹会存, 李天晓. 子宫动静脉畸形介入栓塞治疗19例临床研究[J]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2020, 08(03): 237-239.
[13] 曾庆红, 王毅堂. 介入治疗输卵管积水所致不孕的临床效果[J]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2019, 07(03): 231-233.
[14] 刘育昕, 王子晗, 张艺馨, 栾永婕, 孟凯. 肾母细胞瘤基因1在卵巢疾病发病机制中的研究进展[J]. 中华诊断学电子杂志, 2023, 11(03): 178-183.
[15] 阿孜古丽·阿力木江, 买买提·依斯热依力, 王婧, 王永康, 陆萍, 克力木·阿不都热依木. 心理应激对雌性小鼠胃黏膜炎症和卵巢功能早衰的影响[J]. 中华胃食管反流病电子杂志, 2023, 10(02): 69-76.
阅读次数
全文


摘要