切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华介入放射学电子杂志 ›› 2015, Vol. 03 ›› Issue (03) : 148 -153. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-5782.2015.03.009

所属专题: 文献

非血管介入

恶性梗阻性黄疸经皮肝穿刺胆汁引流前瞻性对照研究
张东坡1, 翟仁友2,(), 李建军3, 戴定可2, 于平2   
  1. 1. 100022 北京市垂杨柳医院放射科
    2. 100020 首都医科大学附属北京朝阳医院放射科
    3. 100069 首都医科大学附属北京佑安医院肿瘤肝胆微创介入中心
  • 收稿日期:2014-12-15 出版日期:2015-08-01
  • 通信作者: 翟仁友

Prospective control study of PTBD for the malignant obstructive jaundice

Dongpo Zhang1, Renyou Zhai2,(), Jianjun Li3, Dingke Dai2, Ping Yu2   

  1. 1. Department of Radiology, Beijing Chuiyangliu Hospital, Beijing 100022, China
  • Received:2014-12-15 Published:2015-08-01
  • Corresponding author: Renyou Zhai
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Zhai Renyou, Email:
引用本文:

张东坡, 翟仁友, 李建军, 戴定可, 于平. 恶性梗阻性黄疸经皮肝穿刺胆汁引流前瞻性对照研究[J]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2015, 03(03): 148-153.

Dongpo Zhang, Renyou Zhai, Jianjun Li, Dingke Dai, Ping Yu. Prospective control study of PTBD for the malignant obstructive jaundice[J]. Chinese Journal of Interventional Radiology(Electronic Edition), 2015, 03(03): 148-153.

目的

通过前瞻性临床对照研究,比较经皮肝穿胆道引流术(PTBD)不同引流方法治疗恶性梗阻性黄疸的近期疗效。

方法

应用PTBD治疗符合入组标准的恶性梗阻性黄疸病例91例,男性57例,女性34例,年龄范围30~81岁,平均(60.4±11.6)岁。行PTIEBD(内外引流)的患者随机入组:IED-A组(餐后关闭引流2 h)20例、IED-B组(日间关闭引流)20例、IED-C组(持续关闭引流)15例;行PTEBD(外引流)患者36例。对术前3天内、术后2~4天、术后8~10天、术后1个月血清总胆红素(TBIL)、直接胆红素(DBIL)、谷草转氨酶(AST)、碱性磷酸酶(ALP)进行统计学方差分析。

结果

术前3天内各组肝功能各指标差异无显著性(P>0.05)。术后1个月TBIL、DBIL水平IED-B组>IED-A组>ED组,各组间两两比较均有显著性差异(P<0.05);AST水平ED组>IED-A组>IED-B组;IED-A组、B组与ED组比较有显著性差异(P<0.05);ALP水平IED-B组>IED-A组>ED组,ED组、IED-A组与IED-B组比较差异显著(P<0.05)。与术前相比,IED-C组患者术后2~4天TBIL、DBIL、AST、ALP均无明显降低(P均>0.05)。

结论

不同的引流方法各有其特点,可根据临床情况选择不同的引流方法。IED-C组引流方法不宜采用。

Objective

To evaluate the effect of the different methods of percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) to treat the patients with the malignant obstructive jaundice throught this prospective clinical control study.

Methods

There are 91 consecutive cases with the malignant objective jaundice (M:F=57:34), mean age (60.4±11.6 years) who were selected by our standard were accepted PTBD therapy. The patients who undergo PTIEBD will be send into three group at random: group IED-A (turn off drainage for 2 h after each meal) 20 cases, group IED-B (turn off drainage duaring daytime) 20 cases, group IED-C (turn off drainage persistently) 15 cases. Thirty-six patients underwent PTIEBD. TBIL, DBIL, AST, ALP before operation and 2—4 days, 8—10 days, and 1 month after the operation were analyzed by ANOVA test.

Results

There is no obvious difference in TBIL, DBIL, AST, ALP among these groups before operation (P>0.05). At 1 month after PTBD, the level of TBIL, DBIL: group IED-B>group IED-A>group ED, and the difference between three group is obvious(P<0.05); the level of AST: group ED>group IED-A>group IED-B, and comparing group ED with group IED-A or group IED-B, the difference is obvious(P<0.05); the level of ALP: group IED-B>group IED-A>group ED, and comparing group IED-B with group IED-A or group ED, the difference is obvious (P<0.05). TBIL、DBIL、AST、ALP did not descend obviously after operation in IED-C group (P>0.05).

Conclusions

The different drainage has its own benefit, we should adopt the drainage according to the patient’s situation. Turn-off drainage is not recommended.

图1 患者女性,57岁,胆囊癌,肝门水平梗阻,右侧入路置入一外引流管(A);术后3天外引流管移位后,重新置入内外引流管(B)
图2 患者女性,64岁,胆囊癌肝转移,肝内水平梗阻,经右侧入路置入一内外引流管(A),后改行胆道内支架治疗,置入2枚支架(B)
图3 患者男性,55岁,胰腺癌,肝外水平梗阻,右侧入路置入一外引流管
表1 各引流组病例数变化情况表(例)
表2 各引流组间性别、年龄、梗阻时间及梗阻水平配伍情况表
表3 各引流组日平均胆汁引流量情况(±s, ml)
表4 PTBD前后各组各肝功能指标的检测结果(±s
1
Zhai RY, Qian XJ, Dai DK, et al. Malignant biliary obstruction: treatment with interventional radiology[J]. Chin Med J (Engl), 2003,116(6):888-892.
2
Zhai RY, Dai DK, Yu P. Malignant biliary obstruction treated with metallic stents[J]. Chin J Radiol (Chinese), 1997,31(11):734-736.
3
Qian XJ, Dai DK, Zhai RY. Efficacy of percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage for treatment of malignant obstructive jaundice[J]. Chin J Hepatobiliary Surg, 2004,10(11):752-755.
4
Wen Li, Chung SC. An improved rat model of obstructive jaundice and its reversal by internal and external drainage[J]. J Surg Res, 2001,101(1):4-15.
5
杨毅军,谢树民,崔炳生,等.恶性梗阻性黄疸患者血清内毒素和肿瘤坏死因子的检测[J].中国普通外科杂志,2002,11(2):46-48.
6
戴定可,翟仁友,于平.恶性梗阻性黄疸的介入治疗[J].临床放射学杂志,2001,20(4):305-307.
7
于平,戴定可,翟仁友.经皮胆管引流及支架置入术并发症分析[J].临床放射学杂志,1997,16(6):368-370.
8
Xu C, Huang XE, Wang SX, et a1. Comparison of infection between internal-external and external percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage in treating patients with malignant obstructive jaundice[J]. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 2015,16(6):2543-2546.
[1] 孙龙, 郝迎学, 王明启. 介入技术结合腔内修复手术治疗复杂腹主动脉瘤26例临床随访分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(04): 464-467.
[2] 陈明. 66例肝门胆管癌合并阻塞性黄疸病例介入治疗的回顾性分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(05): 501-503.
[3] 冯健, 赵向前, 张航宇, 梁斌, 卢实春. 胰十二指肠切除术后门静脉系统严重出血诊断与治疗[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2018, 07(06): 482-485.
[4] 唐晖, 丁凡, 姜在波, 赵辉, 李华, 易述红, 杨扬, 陈规划, 许赤. 切割球囊治疗肝移植术后胆管吻合口狭窄[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2017, 06(05): 389-392.
[5] 张永杰, 邱应和, 沈宁佳. 胆胰外科术后迟发型性出血的介入治疗[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2017, 06(03): 164-167.
[6] 瞿虎, 徐丽南, 王晶, 何科, 苏中振, 江春强. 肝细胞癌经导管动脉化疗栓塞术后紫尿袋症患者的诊治体会[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2015, 04(06): 357-359.
[7] 魏强, 陈强谱, 管清海, 孙宝房, 朱文涛. 增味小承气汤对梗阻性黄疸大鼠腹部切口愈合的影响[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(12): 930-937.
[8] 中国医师协会介入医师分会. 中国肝细胞癌经动脉化疗栓塞治疗临床实践指南[J]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2019, 07(03): 178-184.
[9] 唐郁宽, 张艳, 黄晨, 庄炜钊, 冯惠岗, 钟伟锋, 陈汉威, 黄益. 双向内膜下血管成形术治疗下肢动脉闭塞性疾病的临床应用[J]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2016, 04(02): 77-81.
[10] 秦月兰, 刘艳辉, 莫伟, 阳秀春. SBAR沟通模式提升介入血管外科护士评判性思维倾向的研究[J]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2015, 03(03): 161-163.
[11] 武京鹏, 何东风. 恶性梗阻性黄疸患者胆汁细菌培养及耐药性分析[J]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2015, 03(03): 154-158.
[12] 穆永旭, 李启民, 刘海艳, 张磊, 何俊峰, 闫瑞强. 介入手术方式对子宫腺肌症患者的临床疗效分析[J]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2015, 03(03): 132-134.
[13] 杨伟利, 黄强, 王剑锋, 王欣, 翟仁友. 肝门区恶性梗阻性黄疸不同经皮经肝穿刺胆道引流术疗效对比[J]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2015, 03(01): 18-22.
[14] 王浩, 陈光, 高海军, 伊正甲, 温连芳, 王鹏辉, 杨颐馨, 张丽. 急症动脉性消化道大出血的介入治疗价值分析[J]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2015, 03(01): 4-8.
[15] 钱晓军, 高堃, 陶然, 戴定可, 翟仁友, 张秋红. 加贝酯在经皮肝穿刺胆管引流术中预防急性胰腺炎的作用[J]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2014, 02(04): 30-32.
阅读次数
全文


摘要