切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华介入放射学电子杂志 ›› 2014, Vol. 02 ›› Issue (03) : 20 -23. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-5782.2014.03.006

所属专题: 专题评论 文献

肿瘤介入

恶性梗阻性黄疸介入治疗联合灌注化疗疗效评估
牛洪涛1, 翟仁友2,(), 王剑锋2, 黄强2   
  1. 1. 066000 秦皇岛市第一医院放射科
    2. 100020 北京 首都医科大学附属北京朝阳医院放射科
  • 收稿日期:2013-07-05 出版日期:2014-08-01
  • 通信作者: 翟仁友
  • 基金资助:
    国家"十一五"科技支撑计划(2007BAI05B06)

Therapeutic evaluation in malignant obstructive jaundice with PTBD and PTBS combined with intraarterial chemoperfusion and chemoembolization.

Hongtao Niu1, Renyou Zhai2,(), Jianfeng Wang2, Qiang Huang2   

  1. 1. Department of Radiology, The First Hospital of Qinhuangdao, Qinhuangdao 066000, China
  • Received:2013-07-05 Published:2014-08-01
  • Corresponding author: Renyou Zhai
  • About author:
    Corresponding author:Zhai Renyou, Email:
引用本文:

牛洪涛, 翟仁友, 王剑锋, 黄强. 恶性梗阻性黄疸介入治疗联合灌注化疗疗效评估[J/OL]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2014, 02(03): 20-23.

Hongtao Niu, Renyou Zhai, Jianfeng Wang, Qiang Huang. Therapeutic evaluation in malignant obstructive jaundice with PTBD and PTBS combined with intraarterial chemoperfusion and chemoembolization.[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Interventional Radiology(Electronic Edition), 2014, 02(03): 20-23.

目的

探讨胆道介入减黄治疗联合以吉西他滨为基础药物的灌注化疗(栓塞)治疗恶性梗阻性黄疸的疗效。

方法

选择60例经皮肝穿刺胆汁引流术和/或经皮肝穿刺胆道支架治疗成功减黄的患者(总胆红素<50 μmol/L),对原发肿瘤行灌注化疗(栓塞)治疗。进行随访直至患者死亡。随访内容包括:患者一般健康情况、实验室检查、影像学检查、支架开通情况、患者生存期,随访资料填入患者病例报告表。并与单纯行介入减黄治疗患者比较生存期、生活质量及支架开通率。

结果

60例患者行PTBD治疗27例,胆道支架治疗33例。大部分患者均行2~3次灌注化疗(栓塞)术。主要毒性反应包括:①骨髓抑制,②消化道反应,③皮疹,④肝功能受损,大部分为Ⅰ~Ⅱ度。平均生存期(311.03±170.23)天,1个月、3个月,6个月以及12个月生存率分别为100%、93.33%、78.33%和28.33%。化疗灌注组生存率明显优于单纯减黄治疗组(χ2=8.693,P=0.003)。胆道支架平均开通时间为(238.48±171.26)天,1个月、3个月,6个月以及12个月开通率分别为100%、90.91%、57.58%和9.09%。与单纯PTBS减黄治疗比较,二组间支架开通率无明显差异(χ2=0.975,P=0.324)。灌注化疗后患者KPS评分83.05±6.38,与治疗前(64.28±5.51)比较有明显差异(t=12.79,P<0.001)。

结论

以吉西他滨为基础化疗药物的TACE(TAI)治疗毒副作用较轻,患者对治疗的耐受性和依从性好;能够明显延长MOJ患者的生存期,提高患者的生活质量;在延长胆道支架的开通时间方面未能发现明显作用。

Objective

To explore the therapeutic effect in malignant obstructive jaundice with PTBD and PTBS combined with gemcitabine-base intraarterial chemoperfusion and chemoembolization.

Methods

We choosed 240 patients with malignant obstructive jaundice who had been successfully drained(TBIL<50umol/L), and performed intraarterial chemoperfusion and chemoembolization. Patients were back in the outpatient clinic for a follow-up visit at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months and 24 months thereafter. Contents included general health related questions, laboratory results, image examination, drainage catheter, patency of stent and treatment of stent obstruction. Records were entered into CRF for subsequent processing and analysis. Compare survival, quality of life and rate of stent patency with non-perfusing chemotherapy group.

Results

Of the 60 patients 27 were initially treated with PTBD and 33 with PTBS. Most of them received intraarterial chemoperfusion and chemoembolization for 2-3 times. Major toxicities included myelosuppress, digestive reaction, rash and lesion of hepatic function, and most of them belonged to 1 to 2 grade. The mean survival was (311.03±170.23) d. The rate of survival was 100%, 93.33%, 78.33% and 28.33% for 1 month, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months, respectively. The Kaplan-Meier analysis showed survival rate of chemoperfusion group was prior to non-chemoperfusion group (χ2=8.693, P=0.003). The mean stent patency time was (238.48±171.26) d. The rate of patency was 100%, 90.91%, 57.58 and 9.09% for 1 month, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months, respectively. Stent patency times between two groups were not different statistically by log-rank test (χ2=0.975, P=0.324). Karnofsky index was 83.05±6.38 after intraarterial chemoperfusion and chemoembolization, and was significantly higher than pretherapy (t=12.79, P<0.001).

Conclusions

Patients received gemcitabine-base intraarterial chemoperfusion and chemoembolization had the low toxic effects and high rate of clinical benefit. It could significantly prolong stent patency time.

表1 吉西他滨为基础治疗MOJ的毒性作用
1
Cherqui D,Tantawi B,Alon R, et al. Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Results of aggressive surgical management[J]. Arch Surg, 1995,130: 1073-1078.
2
王建华, 王小林, 颜志平, 等. 腹部介入放射学[M].上海: 上海医科大学出版社, 1998: 113。
3
Herber S,Otto G,Schneider J, et al. Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) for inoperable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma[J]. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol, 2007, 30:1156-1165.
4
Parker SL,Tong T,Bolden S, et al. Cancer statistics, 1997[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 1997,47:5-27.
5
Lau W,Leung K,Leung TW, et al. A logical approach to hepato -cellular carcinoma presenting with jaundice[J]. Ann Surg, 1997, 225: 281-285.
6
Gudjonsson B. Editorial: Pancreatic cancer. The need for critical reassessment[J]. J Clin Gastroenterol, 1996, 23:2-6.
7
严律南.恶性梗阻性黄疸的综合治疗[J].中国实用外科杂志, 2001, 21:473.
8
Suzuki S,Inaba K,Yokoi Y, et al. Photodynamic therapy for malignant biliary obstruction: a case series[J]. Endoscopy, 2004, 36:83-87.
9
张福君,吴沛宏,顾仰葵, 等.恶性梗阻性黄疸患者内支架植入术后近距离治疗的临床价值[J].癌症, 2004,23: 1567-1571.
10
Collins JM. Pharmacologic rationale for regional drug delivery[J]. J Clin Oncol,1984,2:498-504.
11
Skitzki JJ,Chang AE. Hepatic artery chemotherapy for colorectal liver metastases: technical considerations and review of clinical trials[J]. Surg Oncol, 2002,11:123-135.
12
Plunkett W,Huang P,Searcy CE, et al. Gemcitabine: preclinical pharmacology and mechanisms of action[J]. Semin Oncol, 1996, 23: 3-15.
13
Schuller J,Cassidy J,Dumont E, et al. Preferential activation of capecitabine in tumor following oral administration to colorectal cancer patients[J]. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol, 2000,45:291-297.
14
王小林,陈颐,王建华, 等. 肝门部肝癌合并梗阻性黄疸的介入治疗[J]. 中国医学计算机成像杂志, 2005,11:412-415.
15
Qian XJ,Zhai RY,Dai DK, et al. Treatment of malignant biliary obstruction by combined percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage with local tumor treatment[J]. World J Gastroenterol, 2006,12:331-335.
16
Herber S,Otto G,Schneider J, et al. Transarterial chemo- embolization (TACE) for inoperable intrahepatic cholangio-carcinoma. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol, 2007, 30:1156-1165.
17
Miura Y,Endo I,Togo S,et al. Adjuvant therapies using biliary stenting for malignant biliary obstruction[J].J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg, 2001,8:113-117.
18
Qin LX,Tang ZY. Hepatocellular carcinoma with obstructive jaundice: diagnosis, treatment and prognosis[J]. World J Gastroenterol, 2003,9:385-389.
19
丁田贵,尹立杰,高众, 等.胆道介入支架联合立体定向放射治疗恶性梗阻性黄疸[J].中华放射医学与防护杂志, 2006,26:265-266.
[1] 吴令杰, 陈瑞烈, 肖湘明, 郭耿龙, 林钟滨, 张海生, 周敏, 陈妙华. 2005至2021年广东省汕头市某综合医院人类免疫缺陷病毒感染/获得性免疫缺陷综合征患者流行病学特征及高效抗逆转录病毒治疗后生存状况影响因素[J/OL]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 207-214.
[2] 李佳隆, 韩青雷, 宋铭杰, 古丽米拉·亚森江, 钟锴, 蒋铁民, 郭强, 吐尔干艾力·阿吉, 邵英梅. Bismuth-Corlette Ⅱ型肝门部胆管癌行扩大肝切除与围肝门切除的临床疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 438-443.
[3] 鲁鑫, 杨琴, 许佳怡. 不同术式治疗恶性梗阻性黄疸疗效及对免疫功能的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 180-183.
[4] 尚培中, 张润萍, 张伟, 贾国洪, 李晓武, 苗建军, 刘冰. 梗阻性黄疸临床防治新技术单中心应用研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 104-107.
[5] 晏晴艳, 雍晓梅, 罗洪, 杜敏. 成都地区老年转移性乳腺癌的预后及生存因素研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 636-638.
[6] 宋小飞, 巫嘉文, 孙阳. 输尿管开口周围膀胱黏膜预离断联合早期膀胱灌注化疗在上尿路尿路上皮癌根治术中的应用[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 479-484.
[7] 潘兴赫, 董翔, 杨海洋, 张雪斌, 甘卫东. 超选择性前列腺动脉栓塞治疗伴急性尿潴留的高危高龄前列腺增生[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 237-242.
[8] 刘康, 洪礼虎, 刘根, 彭力, 李祥攀. 复方红豆杉胶囊联合GP化疗对晚期NSCLC疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(02): 284-287.
[9] 公宇, 廖媛, 尚梅. 肝细胞癌TACE术后复发影响因素及预测模型建立[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 818-824.
[10] 王礼光, 严庆, 廖珊, 符荣党, 陈焕伟. 微血管侵犯及手术切缘对肝细胞癌患者术后生存预后的影响[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(02): 151-157.
[11] 朱军, 宋家伟, 乔一桓, 郭雅婕, 刘帅, 姜玉, 李纪鹏. M2型巨噬细胞特征基因与结肠癌免疫微环境研究[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(04): 303-311.
[12] 程璞, 郑朝旭. 伴有错配修复缺陷的病理Ⅱ期结直肠癌临床病理特征分析及生存分析[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(03): 236-241.
[13] 梁文龙, 曹杰, 黄庆, 林泳, 黄红丽, 杨平, 李冠炜, 胡鹤. 信迪利单抗联合瑞戈非尼治疗晚期结直肠癌的疗效与安全性分析[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 409-413.
[14] 方辉, 李菲, 张帆, 魏强, 陈强谱. 外源性瘦素对梗阻性黄疸大鼠肠黏膜增殖的影响[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 575-580.
[15] 崔伟, 叶苏意, 邓屹, 陈晓明, 张靖, 李静, 许荣德. 载药微球支气管动脉化疗栓塞术治疗难治性非小细胞肺癌的临床疗效及安全性[J/OL]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2024, 12(04): 311-316.
阅读次数
全文


摘要