[1] |
Birch PK, Hoffmann E, Rifbjerg LC, et al. Cesarean scar pregnancy: a systematic review of treatment studies[J]. Fertil Steril, 2016, 105(4): 958-967.
|
[2] |
金力, 陈蔚琳, 周应芳, 等. 剖宫产术后子宫瘢痕妊娠诊治专家共识(2016)[J]. 中华妇产科杂志, 2016, 51(8): 568-572.
|
[3] |
Maeda N, Verret V, Moine L, et al. Targeting and recanalization after embolization with calibrated resorbable microspheres versus hand-cut gelatin sponge particles in a porcine kidney model[J].J Vasc Interv Radiol, 2013, 24(9): 1391-1398.
|
[4] |
Ye Y, Ren Y, Zeng H, et al. Characterization of calibrated gelatin sponge particles in a rabbit renal embolization model[J]. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol, 2019, 42(8): 1183-1191.
|
[5] |
陈金亮, 梅海炳. 首次和再次瘢痕妊娠介入治疗临床效果分析 [J]. 介入放射学杂志, 2021, 30(8): 820-823.
|
[6] |
孙光. 通过血管铸造型技术及CT三维重建来探讨子宫血管分布及血管网的意义[D]. 大连: 大连医科大学, 2012.
|
[7] |
李奎, 颜国辉, 邹煜. 子宫动脉栓塞与甲氨蝶呤治疗不同MRI分型的剖宫产术后疤痕妊娠的疗效评价[J]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2017, 5(3): 128-134.
|
[8] |
王瑾, 姬中庆. 不同直径明胶海绵行子宫动脉栓塞术治疗子宫瘢痕妊娠的临床效果[J]. 中国性科学, 2019, 28(4): 51-54.
|
[9] |
刘瑞青, 曹会存, 曹广劭, 等. 子宫动脉栓塞联合刮宫术治疗瘢痕妊娠疗效及其远期影响[J].中国介入影像与治疗学, 2018, 15(10): 597-600.
|
[10] |
马志刚, 杨新丽, 王华. 明胶海绵条与明胶海绵颗粒在栓塞子宫动脉治疗切口妊娠中的疗效对比研究[J].实用放射学杂志, 2017, 33(4): 597-599, 631.
|
[11] |
Zhang G, Li J, Tang J, et al. Role of collateral embolization in addition to uterine artery embolization followed by hysteroscopic curettage for the management of cesarean scar pregnancy[J]. BMC Pregnancy Childb, 2019, 19(1): 502-509.
|
[12] |
Tumenjargal A, Tokue H, Kishi H, et al. Uterine artery embolization combined with cilation and curettage for the treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy: efficacy and future fertility[J]. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol, 2018, 41(8): 1165-1173.
|
[13] |
李彦豪. 关于血管栓塞术的思考[J].介入放射学杂志, 2001, 10(3): 186-189.
|
[14] |
Katsumori T, Kasahara T, Kin Y, et al. Magnetic resonance angiography of uterine artery: changes with embolization using gelatin sponge particles alone for fibroids[J]. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol, 2007, 30(3): 398-404.
|