Home    中文  
 
  • Search
  • lucene Search
  • Citation
  • Fig/Tab
  • Adv Search
Just Accepted  |  Current Issue  |  Archive  |  Featured Articles  |  Most Read  |  Most Download  |  Most Cited

Chinese Journal of Interventional Radiology(Electronic Edition) ›› 2023, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (01): 30-34. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-5782.2023.01.006

• Non-vascular Intervention • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Factors influencing uterine artery recanalization after gelatin sponge interventional embolization of cesarean scar pregnancy

Shaofeng Xu1, Zhiqiang Wang2, Hongjie Hu3,()   

  1. 1. Department of Radiology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Zhejiang Hangzhou 310016; Department of Radiology, Ningbo Women and Children's Hospital, Zhejiang Ningbo 315300, China
    2. Department of Radiology, Ningbo Women and Children's Hospital, Zhejiang Ningbo 315300, China
    3. Department of Radiology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Zhejiang Hangzhou 310016
  • Received:2022-05-19 Online:2023-02-25 Published:2023-03-15
  • Contact: Hongjie Hu

Abstract:

Objective

To investigate the factors influencing revascularization after gelatin sponge embolization of cesarean scar pregnancy, in order to improve the surgical procedure and increase the revascularization rate.

Methods

Retrospective analysis of 41 patients who underwent interventional treatment twice at Ningbo Women and Children's Hospital from January 2010 to December 2019. Case-based and surgical data were collected to assess vessel diameters, embolic sites and vessel recanalisation. All vessels (82) were divided into a revascularisation group (48) and an occlusion group (34) according to the recanalisation of the uterine arteries. A t-test was performed for the internal diameter of the uterine artery, a U-test for the interval between two procedures, a chi-square test for the site of embolism and the left and right sides, and a logistic regression analysis for each factor, with P < 0.05 being considered statistically significant.

Results

Comparison of the case-based data between the two interventions showed statistically significant differences (P < 0.05) in age, gestation, time of surgery and post-operative clearance for haemorrhage.The revascularization rate after uterine artery embolization with gelatin sponge was 58.5% (48/82). The recanalisation rate was 36.4% in the descending segment, 44.0% in the transverse segment and 71.7% in the superior branch when embolized to different parts of the uterine artery, with statistically significant differences (χ2 = 7.78, P = 0.023). By univariate logistic regression analysis, uterine artery embolization site from proximal to distal uterine artery increased the revascularization rate (OR = 2.359, 95%CI: 1.226 ~4.54, P = 0.013)with a Hosmer-Lemeshaw test of (χ2 = 0.693, P = 0.424) and a prediction percentage of 65.9%.

Conclusions

The site of uterine artery embolization is a key factor for revascularization after applying gelatin sponge intervention for cesarean scar pregnancy, and the highest rate of revascularization was observed when embolized to the segment of the superior branch of the uterine artery, which may provide implications for the satisfactory degree of embolization in similar procedures.

Key words: Uterine artery embolization, Cesarean scar pregnancy, Vascular recanalization, Embolic site, Superior branch of the uterine artery

京ICP 备07035254号-20
Copyright © Chinese Journal of Interventional Radiology(Electronic Edition), All Rights Reserved.
Tel: 0756-2528259 E-mail: zhjrfsx@163.com
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd