Abstract:
Objective: To investigate the clinical efficacy of uterine artery embolization in the treatment of endogenous cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) and exogenous CSP.
Methods: Thirty cases of endophytic CSP cicatricial pregnancy from January 2017 to January 2018 were selected as the observation group, and 30 cases diagnosed as exogenous CSP from January 2016 to January 2017 without systematic classification were randomly selected as control group, and the two groups were treated with pure uterine operation after interventional therapy. The difference of data between the two groups was compared, such as the amount of bleeding, degree of postoperative pain, time of hospitalization, normal time for recovery of serum HCG, and recovery time of menstruation.
Results: In the observation group, the amount of bleeding, time of hospitalization, degree of pain after the operation, recovery time of serum HCG and recovery time of menstruation were all lower than those in the control group, and the difference of data between the two groups was statistically significant (P<0.05) .
Conclusions: Interventional embolization of uterine artery is better than exogenous CSP in the treatment of endogenetic CSP. It should actively advocate a more systematic classification of CSP by color Doppler ultrasound, so as to provide better therapy for clinical treatment.
Key words:
Uterine artery embolization,
Endogenetic type,
Uterine scar pregnancy,
Clinical efficacy
Xiaoyu Wang, Yongxu Mu, Lei Zhang. Clinical analysis on uterine artery embolization in treatment of endogenic uterine scar pregnancy[J]. Chinese Journal of Interventional Radiology(Electronic Edition), 2018, 06(03): 209-212.