切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华介入放射学电子杂志 ›› 2023, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (03) : 236 -240. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-5782.2023.03.007

血管介入

主动脉夹层累及腹腔分支二期腔内治疗的中期研究
杨伟洪, 向先俊, 郭宗锦, 王亮, 周汝明, 魏民新(), 王赞鑫   
  1. 518053 广东深圳,香港大学深圳医院介入科
    518053 广东深圳,香港大学深圳医院心脏大血管外科
  • 收稿日期:2022-12-28 出版日期:2023-08-25
  • 通信作者: 魏民新

A mid-term study on the secondary endovascular treatment of aortic dissection involving visceral branches of abdominal aorta

Weihong Yang, Xianjun Xiang, Zongjin Guo, Liang Wang, Ruming Zhou, Mingxin Wei(), Zanxin Wang   

  1. Department of Interventional Radiology, the University of Hong Kong Shenzhen Hospital, Guangdong Shenzhen 518053, China
    Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, the University of Hong Kong Shenzhen Hospital, Guangdong Shenzhen 518053, China
  • Received:2022-12-28 Published:2023-08-25
  • Corresponding author: Mingxin Wei
引用本文:

杨伟洪, 向先俊, 郭宗锦, 王亮, 周汝明, 魏民新, 王赞鑫. 主动脉夹层累及腹腔分支二期腔内治疗的中期研究[J]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2023, 11(03): 236-240.

Weihong Yang, Xianjun Xiang, Zongjin Guo, Liang Wang, Ruming Zhou, Mingxin Wei, Zanxin Wang. A mid-term study on the secondary endovascular treatment of aortic dissection involving visceral branches of abdominal aorta[J]. Chinese Journal of Interventional Radiology(Electronic Edition), 2023, 11(03): 236-240.

目的

评价主动脉夹层(aortic dissectio,AD)胸主动脉一期手术后,夹层累及腹腔动脉分支的二期腔内治疗方法和中期疗效。

方法

选择2020年11月至2021年8月,因主动脉夹层行一期手术后,存在夹层累及腹腔分支,导致假腔逐步增大和脏器缺血的患者行二期腔内治疗,研究共回顾性收集18例患者资料,年龄29~60岁,平均(40.05 ± 3.45)岁。一期二期手术间隔14天~8个月;二期腔内治疗手段包括胸、腹主动脉以及腹腔分支覆膜支架隔绝成形术,假腔弹簧圈栓塞等。术中DSA观察疗效;术后6个月到15个月随访对比CT表现,随访截止时间2022年10月。

结果

所有患者均顺利完成腔内治疗,18例患者共植入胸、腹主动脉覆膜支架19枚,支架直径20~28 mm,长度80 mm;植入腹腔动脉分支覆膜支架20枚,其中右肾动脉10枚,左肾动脉7枚,腹腔干2枚,肠系膜上动脉1枚;假腔弹簧圈栓塞5例。随访评估18例患者真假腔重构和脏器供血情况:优良40%;好转50%;改善10%。腹腔动脉分支覆膜支架通畅率100%。

结论

主动脉夹层一期手术后夹层累及腹腔动脉分支的二期腔内处理安全有效,部分患者可获得优良疗效,有效促使真假腔重构朝有利方向发展。

Objective

To evaluate the secondary endoluminal treatment and medium-term efficacy of dissection involving the branch of the abdominal aorta after aortic repair.

Methods

From November 2020 to August 2021, patients with dissection involving abdominal visceral branches resulting in the prosthetic cavity gradually enlarging and organ ischemia after primary endovascular repair were selected for secondary endovascular treatment, and a total of 18 patients were retrospectively collected, with an average age of 40.05 ±3.45 years old between 29 and 60 years old. The interval between the primary and second stages of operation ranges from 14 days to 8 months. The second stage of intraluminal treatment includes: chest, abdominal aorta, and abdominal branch covering stent implantation, pseudo-cavity coil embolism, etc. Imaging data were collected from 6 to 15 months after operation, and the DSA was reviewed immediately during operation, and the CT performance of patients was followed up from 6 to 15 months after operation.

Results

All patients successfully completed endoluminal treatment. A total of 19 thoracic and abdominal aortic mulching stents were implanted in 18 patients, with a diameter of 20~28 mm and a length of 80 mm, and 20 covered stents were implanted in the branch of the abdominal artery, including 10 covered stents of right renal artery,7 of left renal artery, 2 of peritoneal trunks, 1 of upper mesenteric artery, and 5 cases of pseudo-cavity coil embolism. Follow-up evaluation of true and false cavity reconstruction and organ blood supply in 18 cases, including excellent (40%), better (50%), improvement (10%). The patency rate of the covered stent of the abdominal visceral branches was 100%.

Conclusions

The secondary endovascular treatment of aortic dissection involving the branch of the abdominal artery after primary endovascular repair is safe and effective, and some patients can achieve clinical cure, which effectively promotes the development of true and false cavity reconstruction in a favorable direction.

表1 18例患者二期治疗指征分类(部分病例重复多个指征)
表2 18例患者二期腔内治疗方式分类
图1 病例1,男,42岁,A型全弓置换术后6个月,夹层累及左肾分支,行二期腔内治疗前后影像资料1A:术前DSA图像显示腹主动脉假腔破口主要来自左肾动脉开口,左肾覆膜支架VB(6×25 mm)置入;1B:术后左肾动脉破口基本覆盖,假腔不显示;1C:术前CT;1D:二期手术后15个月复查CT假腔基本血栓化,双肾灌注对称,疗效评估为优良。
图2 病例2,男,45岁,A型夹层累及右肾分支二期治疗前后影像资料2A:术前CT显示右肾动脉夹层远端破口,胸腹主动脉真腔受压变扁,右肾灌注轻度减低,二期腔内治疗行右肾动脉VB(7×25 mm),胸主动脉延长覆膜支架(南京微创覆膜2624160);2B:二期术后6个月复查CT显示双肾灌注对称,胸腹主动脉真腔增大,右肾动脉破口基本覆盖,假腔绝大部分血栓化,疗效评估为优良。
图3 病例3,男,36岁,B型夹层累及右肾分支,二期腔内治疗前后影像对比资料3A:主动脉夹层腔内治疗前,术后8个月CT显示右肾动脉夹层破口,腹主动脉段真腔受压变扁;3B:二期腔内治疗行右肾VB(7×25 mm),腹主动脉段覆膜支架(美敦力2480);假腔辅助弹簧圈栓塞(美国波士顿科学,2枚Interlock-35 20 mm×40 cm);3C:术前CT轴位;3D:术后12个月CT示腹主动脉段真腔增大,假腔大部分血栓化,双肾灌注对称,右肾动脉支架通畅,疗效评估为好转。
[1]
Lombardi JV, Hughes GC, Appoo JJ, et al. Society for Vascular Surgery (SVS) and Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) reporting standards for type B aortic dissections[J]. J Vasc Surg, 2020, 71: 723.
[2]
周小彪, 林明辉, 宋曼, 等. 胸主动脉腔内修复术治疗B型主动脉夹层的早中期结果[J]. 中华血管外科杂志, 2020, 5(3): 175-180.
[3]
赵锐, 吴进林, 丘俊涛, 等. 主动脉夹层多中心注册数据库概况[J]. 中华外科杂志, 2020, 8(1): 73-76.
[4]
徐乐吟, 来志超, 邵江, 等. Stanford B型主动脉夹层远端破口的腔内治疗策略[J]. 中华外科杂志, 2021, 59(8): 711-715.
[5]
王睿涵, 司逸, 符伟国. 浅析Stanford B型主动脉夹层胸主动脉腔内修复术后支架远端并发症[J]. 中华血管外科杂志, 2021, 6(3): 209-214.
[6]
李逸明, 张磊, 周建, 等. 主动脉夹层腔内微创治疗术后假腔血栓化研究进展[J]. 中华外科杂志, 2019, 6(1): 219-225.
[7]
Kamman AV, Brunkwall J, Verhoeven EL, et al. Predictors of aortic growth in uncomplicated type B aortic dissection from the acute dissection stent grafting or best medical treatment (ADSORB) database[J]. J Vasc Surg, 2017, 65(4): 964-971. e3.
[8]
Rong D, Ge Y, Liu J, et al. Combined proximal descending aortic endografting plus distal bare metal stenting (PETTICOAT technique) versus conventional proximal descending aortic stent graft repair for complicated type B aortic dissections[J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2019, 2019(10): CD013149.
[9]
Leshnower BG, Keeling WB, Duwayri YM, et al. The "thoracic endovascular aortic repair-first" strategy for acute type A dissection with mesenteric malperfusion: initial results compared with conventional algorithms[J]. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2019, 158: 1516.
[10]
Yang B, Rosati CM, Norton EL, et al. Endovascular fenestration/stenting first followed by delayed open aortic repair for acute type A aortic dissection with malperfusion syndrome[J]. Circulation, 2018, 138: 2091.
[11]
Berger L, Palcau L, Gouicem D, et al. Persistent type B aortic dissection treatment by renal artery reentry stent grafting as an alternative to open surgery[J]. Ann Vasc Surg, 2013, 27: 498. e5-498. e8.
[1] 戴云, 徐超丽, 林秀玉, 孙晖, 李娟, 宋秋怡, 王晓春, 杨斌. 超声造影评价移植肾动脉狭窄支架治疗短期疗效的临床价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(03): 301-306.
[2] 李艳, 王洋, 任俊红. 超声造影评估伴副肾动脉患者肾脏血流灌注的初步研究[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2022, 19(08): 742-747.
[3] 叶桂连, 吴秋敏, 陈英超, 胡思娣, 邓伟霞. 肩关节操联合呼吸训练促进主动脉夹层开胸术患者康复[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(06): 790-793.
[4] 陈川, 杨太珠, 何泽凤. 肾脏彩色多普勒超声结果对儿童重症医学科急性肾损伤患儿的辅助诊断价值[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(02): 219-226.
[5] 朱良振, 于永刚, 陈杲, 廖松柏. 儿童高级别闭合性肾损伤肾动脉栓塞与手术探查的疗效比较[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 461-465,475.
[6] 汤朝晖, 骆秋霞, 陈洋, 张建生. 双层探测器光谱CT的不同单能级图像对肾动脉成像质量的影响[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(05): 408-412.
[7] 李一星, 王诗良, 郭锋, 郇林春, 张浩, 于建军. 覆膜支架治疗外伤性椎动脉夹层动脉瘤一例报道[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2022, 08(04): 252-254.
[8] 李欣赛, 彭凯, 黄萱, 王正业, 褚雪倩, 陈思思, 蒋绪燕, 李素华. 不同分型急性主动脉夹层导致围术期AKI临床预测模型的构建与比较[J]. 中华重症医学电子杂志, 2023, 09(02): 149-161.
[9] 周洋, 曹学, 赵飞, 郑波, 查惠娟, 蒋娜, 罗俊, 熊伟. 血清miR-22、HSPB1水平与急性Stanford A型主动脉夹层患者预后的关系[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 243-248.
[10] 许睿, 刘长红, 王蔚云, 高莹莹, 刘鸿. Roy适应模式用于Stanford B型主动脉夹层患者围术期的价值[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(08): 738-743.
[11] 吴佳霖, 罗骏阳, 钟胜, 王有枝, 姜在波. 肝内小直径覆膜支架联合抽栓、溶栓治疗门静脉血栓二例[J]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2023, 11(04): 377-379.
[12] 钱建伟, 周春高, 田伟, 祖庆泉, 严海涛, 施海彬, 刘圣. 腔内修复急性Stanford B型主动脉夹层后支架远端主动脉重塑的因素分析[J]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2023, 11(03): 230-235.
[13] 王彦旭, 何益港, 秦永林. 计算流体力学研究B型主动脉夹层中4D Flow MRI的应用进展[J]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2023, 11(02): 159-163.
[14] 王美德, 田伟, 周春高, 刘圣. 血管腔内治疗肾动脉瘤的临床疗效研究[J]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2022, 10(04): 371-375.
[15] 李安, 张秀萍, 白波, 赵阳, 薛国芳, 李东芳. 主动脉夹层术后并发神经系统并发症二例及文献复习[J]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 373-378.
阅读次数
全文


摘要