切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华介入放射学电子杂志 ›› 2023, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (03) : 230 -235. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-5782.2023.03.006

血管介入

腔内修复急性Stanford B型主动脉夹层后支架远端主动脉重塑的因素分析
钱建伟, 周春高, 田伟, 祖庆泉, 严海涛, 施海彬, 刘圣()   
  1. 210029 江苏南京,南京医科大学第一附属医院介入放射科
  • 收稿日期:2023-02-20 出版日期:2023-08-25
  • 通信作者: 刘圣

Analysis of factors influencing distal aortic remodeling after endovascular repair of acute Stanford B aortic dissection

Jianwei Qian, Chungao Zhou, Wei Tian, Qingquan Zu, Haitao Yan, Haibin Shi, Sheng Liu()   

  1. Department of Interventional Radiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Jiangsu Nanjing 210029, China
  • Received:2023-02-20 Published:2023-08-25
  • Corresponding author: Sheng Liu
引用本文:

钱建伟, 周春高, 田伟, 祖庆泉, 严海涛, 施海彬, 刘圣. 腔内修复急性Stanford B型主动脉夹层后支架远端主动脉重塑的因素分析[J/OL]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2023, 11(03): 230-235.

Jianwei Qian, Chungao Zhou, Wei Tian, Qingquan Zu, Haitao Yan, Haibin Shi, Sheng Liu. Analysis of factors influencing distal aortic remodeling after endovascular repair of acute Stanford B aortic dissection[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Interventional Radiology(Electronic Edition), 2023, 11(03): 230-235.

目的

探究急性Stanford B型主动脉夹层患者行胸主动脉腔内修复术(thoracic endovascular aortic repair,TEVAR)后支架远端主动脉重塑不良的影响因素。

方法

回顾性收集2015年1月至2020年12月于我科接受TEVAR治疗的急性Stanford B型主动脉夹层患者的临床资料,观察支架远端多平面真假腔变化情况并分析支架远端主动脉重塑不良的影响因素。

结果

共82例患者入组,其中58例(70.7%)患有高血压,57例(69.5%)夹层延伸至髂动脉,随访期间15例(18.3%)患者支架远端出现假腔扩大。假腔扩大组支架主体远端与主动脉角度、腹腔干上方破口数、术后剩余破口数及末次随访时Ⅰ型内漏人数均大于假腔未扩大组,假腔扩大组假腔内血栓长度则小于假腔未扩大组,以上差异具有统计学意义(均P < 0.05)。多因素分析显示支架主体远端与主动脉角度过大(OR = 1.282,95%CI:1.104~1.486,P = 0.001)、术后仍存在较多破口(OR = 3.282,95%CI:1.035~10.401,P = 0.043)是TEVAR术后主动脉重塑不良的危险因素。

结论

支架主体远端与主动脉角度过大、术后剩余破口较多是TEVAR术后支架远端主动脉重塑不良的危险因素。

Objective

To investigate the influencing factors of poor remodeling of distal aorta after thoracic endovascular repair (TEVAR) in patients with acute Stanford B aortic dissection.

Methods

The clinical data of patients with acute Stanford B aortic dissection who received TEVAR treatment in our department from January 2015 to December 2020 were retrospectively collected, the changes of multiplanar true and false lumens at the distal end of the stent-graft were observed, and the influencing factors of poor aortic remodeling at the distal end of the stent-graft were analyzed.

Results

A total of 82 patients were included, 58 (70.7%) of them had hypertension, 57 (69.5%) of them had dissection extending to the iliac artery. During the follow-up period, 15 (18.3%) patients had false lumen expansion at the distal end of the stent-graft. The angle between the distal end of the stent-graft and the aorta, the number of tears above the celiac trunk, the number of remaining tears after procedure and the number of type I endoleaks at the last follow-up in the false lumen expansion group were greater than those in the non-expansion group. The length of thrombus in the false lumen expansion group was smaller than that in the non-expansion group. The above differences were statistically significant (all P < 0.05). Multivariate analysis showed that an excessive angle between the distal end of the stent-graft and the aorta (OR = 1.282, 95%CI: 1.104~1.486, P = 0.001), and a large number of remaining tears (OR = 3.282, 95%CI: 1.035~10.401, P < 0.043) were risk factors for poor aortic remodeling after TEVAR.

Conclusions

The large angle between the distal end of the stent-graft and the aorta, and the large number of residual tears are risk factors for poor remodeling of the distal aorta after TEVAR.

图1 真假腔直径和总直径测量方法(淡蓝色部分表示假腔)1A:绿色线条平均值表示真腔直径;1B:黄色线条平均值表示假腔直径;1C:红色线条平均值表示总直径。
图2 术前与术后12个月主动脉重构情况(*:P < 0.05)
表1 主动脉术前及术后随访情况
图3 患者术后及随访图片3A:术后支架与主动脉角度过大;3B:术后左肾动脉水平真假腔形态,真腔(黄色箭头)较大,假腔较小;3C:术后1年左肾动脉水平真假腔形态,真腔(黄色箭头)减小,假腔增大。
表2 影响胸主动脉腔内修复术后支架远端假腔扩大的因素
表3 患者术后发生假腔扩大的多因素分析
[1]
Nienaber CA, Clough RE. Management of acute aortic dissection[J]. Lancet, 2015, 385(9970): 800-811.
[2]
Enezate TH, Omran J, Al-Dadah AS, et al. Thoracic endovascular repair versus medical management for acute uncomplicated type B aortic dissection[J]. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions, 2018, 91(6): 1138-1143.
[3]
Iannuzzi JC, Stapleton SM, Bababekov YJ, et al. Favorable impact of thoracic endovascular aortic repair on survival of patients with acute uncomplicated type B aortic dissection[J]. Journal of Vascular Surgery, 2018, 68(6): 1649-1655.
[4]
Erbel R, Aboyans V, Boileau C, et al. 2014 ESC guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of aortic diseases[J]. European Heart Journal, 2014, 72(12): 1169-252.
[5]
Fattori R, Montgomery D, Lovato L, et al. Survival after endovascular therapy in patients with type B aortic dissection: a report from the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection (IRAD)[J]. JACC Cardiovasc Interv, 2013, 6(8): 876-882.
[6]
Tsai TT, Evangelista A, Nienaber CA, et al. Partial thrombosis of the false lumen in patients with acute type B aortic dissection[J]. N Engl J Med, 2007, 357(4): 349-359.
[7]
葛静, 刘建平, 张永恒, 等. 急性期Stanford B型主动脉夹层患者腔内修复术后主动脉重塑[J]. 介入放射学杂志, 2021, 30(11): 1113-1118.
[8]
Tolenaar JL, Kern JA, Jonker FH, et al. Predictors of false lumen thrombosis in type B aortic dissection treated with TEVAR[J]. Annals of cardiothoracic surgery, 2014, 3(3): 255-263.
[9]
Sigman MM, Palmer OP, Ham SW, et al. Aortic morphologic findings after thoracic endovascular aortic repair for type B aortic dissection[J]. JAMA Surgery, 2014, 149(9): 977-983.
[10]
燕亚州, 胡何节, 方征东, 等. Stanford B型主动脉夹层患者胸主动脉腔内修复术后腹主动脉重塑的影响因素[J]. 血管与腔内血管外科杂志, 2022, 8(5): 517-523.
[11]
Shimono T, Kato N, Yasuda F, et al. Transluminal stent-graft placements for the treatments of acute onset and chronic aortic dissections[J]. Circulation, 2002, 106(12_suppl_1): l241-1247.
[12]
计博斓, 田民, 刘训强. 急性期Stanford B型主动脉夹层腔内治疗研究进展[J]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2019, 7(3): 227-230.
[13]
王喜明, 张艳霞, 余海彬, 等. 85例Stanford B型主动脉夹层腔内修复治疗体会[J]. 介入放射学杂志, 2017, 26(7): 651-654.
[14]
Chen IM, Chen PL, Huang CY, et al. Factors affecting optimal aortic remodeling after thoracic endovascular aortic repair of Type B (Ⅲb) aortic dissection[J]. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol, 2017, 40(5): 671-681.
[15]
Lee S, Kang WC, Ko Y, et al. Aortic remodeling and clinical outcomes in type B aortic dissection according to the timing of thoracic endovascular aortic repair[J]. Annals of Vascular Surgery, 2020, 67: 322-331.
[16]
Chen I, Huang C, Weng S, et al. Implantation sequence modification averts distal stent graft-induced new entry after endovascular repair of Stanford type B aortic dissection[J]. Journal of Vascular Surgery, 2016, 64(2): 281-288.
[17]
饶从亮, 胡何节, 王晓天, 等. 亚急性期Stanford B型主动脉夹层腔内隔绝术后主动脉重塑的特点及影响因素[J]. 中国普通外科杂志, 2017, 26(12): 1547-1554.
[18]
Ge Y, Lv X, Ge X, et al. The number of preoperative abdominal false lumen-perfused small branches is related to abdominal aortic remodeling after thoracic endovascular aortic repair for type B aortic dissection[J]. Ann Vasc Surg, 2021, 71: 56-64.
[1] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[2] 高杰红, 黎平平, 齐婧, 代引海. ETFA和CD34在乳腺癌中的表达及与临床病理参数和预后的关系研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 64-67.
[3] 李代勤, 刘佩杰. 动态增强磁共振评估中晚期低位直肠癌同步放化疗后疗效及预后的价值[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 100-103.
[4] 梁孟杰, 朱欢欢, 王行舟, 江航, 艾世超, 孙锋, 宋鹏, 王萌, 刘颂, 夏雪峰, 杜峻峰, 傅双, 陆晓峰, 沈晓菲, 管文贤. 联合免疫治疗的胃癌转化治疗患者预后及术后并发症分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 619-623.
[5] 张志兆, 王睿, 郜苹苹, 王成方, 王成, 齐晓伟. DNMT3B与乳腺癌预后的关系及其生物学机制[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 624-629.
[6] 屈翔宇, 张懿刚, 李浩令, 邱天, 谈燚. USP24及其共表达肿瘤代谢基因在肝细胞癌中的诊断和预后预测作用[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 659-662.
[7] 李伟, 宋子健, 赖衍成, 周睿, 吴涵, 邓龙昕, 陈锐. 人工智能应用于前列腺癌患者预后预测的研究现状及展望[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 541-546.
[8] 陈樽, 王平, 金华, 周美玲, 李青青, 黄永刚. 肌肉减少症预测结直肠癌术后切口疝发生的应用研究[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 639-644.
[9] 关小玲, 周文营, 陈洪平. PTAAR在乙肝相关慢加急性肝衰竭患者短期预后中的预测价值[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 841-845.
[10] 张润锦, 阳盼, 林燕斯, 刘尊龙, 刘建平, 金小岩. EB病毒相关胆管癌伴多发转移一例及国内文献复习[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 865-869.
[11] 陈晓鹏, 王佳妮, 练庆海, 杨九妹. 肝细胞癌VOPP1表达及其与预后的关系[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 876-882.
[12] 韩加刚, 王振军. 梗阻性左半结肠癌的治疗策略[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 450-458.
[13] 董佳, 王坤, 张莉. 预后营养指数结合免疫球蛋白、血糖及甲胎蛋白对HBV 相关慢加急性肝衰竭患者治疗后预后不良的预测价值[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 555-559.
[14] 王景明, 王磊, 许小多, 邢文强, 张兆岩, 黄伟敏. 腰椎椎旁肌的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(09): 846-852.
[15] 郭曌蓉, 王歆光, 刘毅强, 何英剑, 王立泽, 杨飏, 汪星, 曹威, 谷重山, 范铁, 李金锋, 范照青. 不同亚型乳腺叶状肿瘤的临床病理特征及预后危险因素分析[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 524-532.
阅读次数
全文


摘要