切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华介入放射学电子杂志 ›› 2023, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (03) : 230 -235. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-5782.2023.03.006

血管介入

腔内修复急性Stanford B型主动脉夹层后支架远端主动脉重塑的因素分析
钱建伟, 周春高, 田伟, 祖庆泉, 严海涛, 施海彬, 刘圣()   
  1. 210029 江苏南京,南京医科大学第一附属医院介入放射科
  • 收稿日期:2023-02-20 出版日期:2023-08-25
  • 通信作者: 刘圣

Analysis of factors influencing distal aortic remodeling after endovascular repair of acute Stanford B aortic dissection

Jianwei Qian, Chungao Zhou, Wei Tian, Qingquan Zu, Haitao Yan, Haibin Shi, Sheng Liu()   

  1. Department of Interventional Radiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Jiangsu Nanjing 210029, China
  • Received:2023-02-20 Published:2023-08-25
  • Corresponding author: Sheng Liu
引用本文:

钱建伟, 周春高, 田伟, 祖庆泉, 严海涛, 施海彬, 刘圣. 腔内修复急性Stanford B型主动脉夹层后支架远端主动脉重塑的因素分析[J]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2023, 11(03): 230-235.

Jianwei Qian, Chungao Zhou, Wei Tian, Qingquan Zu, Haitao Yan, Haibin Shi, Sheng Liu. Analysis of factors influencing distal aortic remodeling after endovascular repair of acute Stanford B aortic dissection[J]. Chinese Journal of Interventional Radiology(Electronic Edition), 2023, 11(03): 230-235.

目的

探究急性Stanford B型主动脉夹层患者行胸主动脉腔内修复术(thoracic endovascular aortic repair,TEVAR)后支架远端主动脉重塑不良的影响因素。

方法

回顾性收集2015年1月至2020年12月于我科接受TEVAR治疗的急性Stanford B型主动脉夹层患者的临床资料,观察支架远端多平面真假腔变化情况并分析支架远端主动脉重塑不良的影响因素。

结果

共82例患者入组,其中58例(70.7%)患有高血压,57例(69.5%)夹层延伸至髂动脉,随访期间15例(18.3%)患者支架远端出现假腔扩大。假腔扩大组支架主体远端与主动脉角度、腹腔干上方破口数、术后剩余破口数及末次随访时Ⅰ型内漏人数均大于假腔未扩大组,假腔扩大组假腔内血栓长度则小于假腔未扩大组,以上差异具有统计学意义(均P < 0.05)。多因素分析显示支架主体远端与主动脉角度过大(OR = 1.282,95%CI:1.104~1.486,P = 0.001)、术后仍存在较多破口(OR = 3.282,95%CI:1.035~10.401,P = 0.043)是TEVAR术后主动脉重塑不良的危险因素。

结论

支架主体远端与主动脉角度过大、术后剩余破口较多是TEVAR术后支架远端主动脉重塑不良的危险因素。

Objective

To investigate the influencing factors of poor remodeling of distal aorta after thoracic endovascular repair (TEVAR) in patients with acute Stanford B aortic dissection.

Methods

The clinical data of patients with acute Stanford B aortic dissection who received TEVAR treatment in our department from January 2015 to December 2020 were retrospectively collected, the changes of multiplanar true and false lumens at the distal end of the stent-graft were observed, and the influencing factors of poor aortic remodeling at the distal end of the stent-graft were analyzed.

Results

A total of 82 patients were included, 58 (70.7%) of them had hypertension, 57 (69.5%) of them had dissection extending to the iliac artery. During the follow-up period, 15 (18.3%) patients had false lumen expansion at the distal end of the stent-graft. The angle between the distal end of the stent-graft and the aorta, the number of tears above the celiac trunk, the number of remaining tears after procedure and the number of type I endoleaks at the last follow-up in the false lumen expansion group were greater than those in the non-expansion group. The length of thrombus in the false lumen expansion group was smaller than that in the non-expansion group. The above differences were statistically significant (all P < 0.05). Multivariate analysis showed that an excessive angle between the distal end of the stent-graft and the aorta (OR = 1.282, 95%CI: 1.104~1.486, P = 0.001), and a large number of remaining tears (OR = 3.282, 95%CI: 1.035~10.401, P < 0.043) were risk factors for poor aortic remodeling after TEVAR.

Conclusions

The large angle between the distal end of the stent-graft and the aorta, and the large number of residual tears are risk factors for poor remodeling of the distal aorta after TEVAR.

图1 真假腔直径和总直径测量方法(淡蓝色部分表示假腔)1A:绿色线条平均值表示真腔直径;1B:黄色线条平均值表示假腔直径;1C:红色线条平均值表示总直径。
图2 术前与术后12个月主动脉重构情况(*:P < 0.05)
表1 主动脉术前及术后随访情况
图3 患者术后及随访图片3A:术后支架与主动脉角度过大;3B:术后左肾动脉水平真假腔形态,真腔(黄色箭头)较大,假腔较小;3C:术后1年左肾动脉水平真假腔形态,真腔(黄色箭头)减小,假腔增大。
表2 影响胸主动脉腔内修复术后支架远端假腔扩大的因素
表3 患者术后发生假腔扩大的多因素分析
[1]
Nienaber CA, Clough RE. Management of acute aortic dissection[J]. Lancet, 2015, 385(9970): 800-811.
[2]
Enezate TH, Omran J, Al-Dadah AS, et al. Thoracic endovascular repair versus medical management for acute uncomplicated type B aortic dissection[J]. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions, 2018, 91(6): 1138-1143.
[3]
Iannuzzi JC, Stapleton SM, Bababekov YJ, et al. Favorable impact of thoracic endovascular aortic repair on survival of patients with acute uncomplicated type B aortic dissection[J]. Journal of Vascular Surgery, 2018, 68(6): 1649-1655.
[4]
Erbel R, Aboyans V, Boileau C, et al. 2014 ESC guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of aortic diseases[J]. European Heart Journal, 2014, 72(12): 1169-252.
[5]
Fattori R, Montgomery D, Lovato L, et al. Survival after endovascular therapy in patients with type B aortic dissection: a report from the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection (IRAD)[J]. JACC Cardiovasc Interv, 2013, 6(8): 876-882.
[6]
Tsai TT, Evangelista A, Nienaber CA, et al. Partial thrombosis of the false lumen in patients with acute type B aortic dissection[J]. N Engl J Med, 2007, 357(4): 349-359.
[7]
葛静, 刘建平, 张永恒, 等. 急性期Stanford B型主动脉夹层患者腔内修复术后主动脉重塑[J]. 介入放射学杂志, 2021, 30(11): 1113-1118.
[8]
Tolenaar JL, Kern JA, Jonker FH, et al. Predictors of false lumen thrombosis in type B aortic dissection treated with TEVAR[J]. Annals of cardiothoracic surgery, 2014, 3(3): 255-263.
[9]
Sigman MM, Palmer OP, Ham SW, et al. Aortic morphologic findings after thoracic endovascular aortic repair for type B aortic dissection[J]. JAMA Surgery, 2014, 149(9): 977-983.
[10]
燕亚州, 胡何节, 方征东, 等. Stanford B型主动脉夹层患者胸主动脉腔内修复术后腹主动脉重塑的影响因素[J]. 血管与腔内血管外科杂志, 2022, 8(5): 517-523.
[11]
Shimono T, Kato N, Yasuda F, et al. Transluminal stent-graft placements for the treatments of acute onset and chronic aortic dissections[J]. Circulation, 2002, 106(12_suppl_1): l241-1247.
[12]
计博斓, 田民, 刘训强. 急性期Stanford B型主动脉夹层腔内治疗研究进展[J]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2019, 7(3): 227-230.
[13]
王喜明, 张艳霞, 余海彬, 等. 85例Stanford B型主动脉夹层腔内修复治疗体会[J]. 介入放射学杂志, 2017, 26(7): 651-654.
[14]
Chen IM, Chen PL, Huang CY, et al. Factors affecting optimal aortic remodeling after thoracic endovascular aortic repair of Type B (Ⅲb) aortic dissection[J]. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol, 2017, 40(5): 671-681.
[15]
Lee S, Kang WC, Ko Y, et al. Aortic remodeling and clinical outcomes in type B aortic dissection according to the timing of thoracic endovascular aortic repair[J]. Annals of Vascular Surgery, 2020, 67: 322-331.
[16]
Chen I, Huang C, Weng S, et al. Implantation sequence modification averts distal stent graft-induced new entry after endovascular repair of Stanford type B aortic dissection[J]. Journal of Vascular Surgery, 2016, 64(2): 281-288.
[17]
饶从亮, 胡何节, 王晓天, 等. 亚急性期Stanford B型主动脉夹层腔内隔绝术后主动脉重塑的特点及影响因素[J]. 中国普通外科杂志, 2017, 26(12): 1547-1554.
[18]
Ge Y, Lv X, Ge X, et al. The number of preoperative abdominal false lumen-perfused small branches is related to abdominal aortic remodeling after thoracic endovascular aortic repair for type B aortic dissection[J]. Ann Vasc Surg, 2021, 71: 56-64.
[1] 应康, 杨璨莹, 刘凤珍, 陈丽丽, 刘燕娜. 左心室心肌应变对无症状重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者的预后评估价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(06): 581-587.
[2] 杨倩, 李翠芳, 张婉秋. 原发性肝癌自发性破裂出血急诊TACE术后的近远期预后及影响因素分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 33-36.
[3] 栗艳松, 冯会敏, 刘明超, 刘泽鹏, 姜秋霞. STIP1在三阴性乳腺癌组织中的表达及临床意义研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 52-56.
[4] 马伟强, 马斌林, 吴中语, 张莹. microRNA在三阴性乳腺癌进展中发挥的作用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 111-114.
[5] 潘冰, 吕少诚, 赵昕, 李立新, 郎韧, 贺强. 淋巴结清扫数目对远端胆管癌胰十二指肠切除手术疗效的影响[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 608-612.
[6] 张其坤, 商福超, 李琪, 栗光明, 王孟龙. 联合脾切除对肝癌合并门静脉高压症患者根治性切除术后的生存获益分析[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 613-618.
[7] 张文华, 陶焠, 胡添松. 不同部位外生型肝癌临床病理特点及其对术后肝内复发和预后影响[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 651-655.
[8] 张维志, 刘连新. 基于生物信息学分析IPO7在肝癌中的表达及意义[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 694-701.
[9] 卢艳军, 马健, 白鹏宇, 郭凌宏, 刘海义, 江波, 白文启, 张毅勋. 纳米碳在腹腔镜直肠癌根治术中253组淋巴结清扫的临床效果[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 473-477.
[10] 钟广俊, 刘春华, 朱万森, 徐晓雷, 王兆军. MRI联合不同扫描序列在胃癌术前分期诊断及化疗效果和预后的评估[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 378-382.
[11] 胡宝茹, 尚乃舰, 高迪. 中晚期肝细胞癌的DCE-MRI及DWI表现与免疫治疗预后的相关性分析[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 399-403.
[12] 陆萍, 邹健. 凝血和纤维蛋白溶解标志物的动态变化对急性胰腺炎患者预后的评估价值[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 427-432.
[13] 李永胜, 孙家和, 郭书伟, 卢义康, 刘洪洲. 高龄结直肠癌患者根治术后短期并发症及其影响因素[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 962-967.
[14] 王军, 刘鲲鹏, 姚兰, 张华, 魏越, 索利斌, 陈骏, 苗成利, 罗成华. 腹膜后肿瘤切除术中大量输血患者的麻醉管理特点与分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(08): 844-849.
[15] 索利斌, 刘鲲鹏, 姚兰, 张华, 魏越, 王军, 陈骏, 苗成利, 罗成华. 原发性腹膜后副神经节瘤切除术麻醉管理的特点和分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(07): 771-776.
阅读次数
全文


摘要