切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华介入放射学电子杂志 ›› 2021, Vol. 09 ›› Issue (01) : 65 -69. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-5782.2021.01.011

所属专题: 文献

影像诊断

CT结合C臂透视引导经皮椎体成形术治疗疼痛性颈椎转移癌
史慧娟1, 廖骞1, 陈珑1,(), 倪才方1, 马圆1, 陈正文1   
  1. 1. 215006 江苏苏州,苏州大学附属第一医院介入科
  • 收稿日期:2020-09-15 出版日期:2021-02-25
  • 通信作者: 陈珑
  • 基金资助:
    苏州市民生科技项目(SYS2018029); 江苏省卫生厅高层次人才"六个一工程"项目(LGY2018079); 江苏省青年医学人才项目(QNRC2016712)

Percutaneous vertebroplasty guided by CT and C-arm fluoroscopy in treatment of painful cervical metastasis

Huijuan Shi1, Qian Liao1, Long Chen1,(), Caifang Ni1, Yuan Ma1, Zhengwen Chen1   

  1. 1. Department of Interventional Radiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Jiangsu Suzhou 215006, China
  • Received:2020-09-15 Published:2021-02-25
  • Corresponding author: Long Chen
引用本文:

史慧娟, 廖骞, 陈珑, 倪才方, 马圆, 陈正文. CT结合C臂透视引导经皮椎体成形术治疗疼痛性颈椎转移癌[J/OL]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2021, 09(01): 65-69.

Huijuan Shi, Qian Liao, Long Chen, Caifang Ni, Yuan Ma, Zhengwen Chen. Percutaneous vertebroplasty guided by CT and C-arm fluoroscopy in treatment of painful cervical metastasis[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Interventional Radiology(Electronic Edition), 2021, 09(01): 65-69.

目的

评估利用CT结合C臂透视引导行经皮椎体成形术治疗疼痛性颈椎椎体转移癌的临床可行性、安全性及疗效。

方法

采用CT结合C臂透视引导经皮椎体成形术,治疗10例疼痛性颈椎转移癌患者的11个病变椎体,其中C3和C6各3个,C5和C7各2个,C4椎体1个。在CT引导下以18 G穿刺针穿刺进入靶椎体内,然后将患者移至DSA机诊疗床上,在透视监控下注射聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯骨水泥于病变椎体内,记录术中骨水泥用量及PVP相关并发症。记录患者术前、术后1周、术后1个月及3个月疼痛评分,采用重复测量的方差分析检验治疗前后各时间点的患者疼痛评分有无差异。

结果

所有患者病变椎体穿刺和骨水泥注射都取得了成功。每个椎体的骨水泥平均注射量为1.7±0.3 mL(1.2~2.2 mL),所有患者的疼痛都得到了明显缓解。患者术前、术后1周、术后1个月及3个月疼痛评分分别为8.3±0.7,3.0±0.7,2.7±0.5,3.0±0.6,差异有统计学意义(F = 215.705,P < 0.05)。除3个椎体发生无症状的骨水泥渗漏外,无一例发生严重并发症。

结论

CT结合C臂透视引导行经皮椎体成形术治疗疼痛性颈椎转移癌安全、有效、可行。

Objective

To investigate the clinical safety, efficacy and feasibility of percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) guided by CT and C-arm fluoroscopy for the treatment of painful cervical metastasis.

Methods

PVP was performed under CT and C-arm guidance in 10 patients with painful cervical metastases. A total of 11 diseased vertebral bodies were detected, which distributed in the C3 (n = 3), C4 (n = 1), C5 (n = 2), C6 (n = 3) and C7 (n = 2). Under CT guidance, an 18G needle was punctured into the target vertebral body, and then the patient was moved to a C-arm digitalized angiographic system. Polymethylmethacrylate bone cement was injected into the vertebral body under constant lateral fluoroscopy with the C-arm fluoroscopy system. Under C-arm fluoroscopy monitoring,vertebral bodies were injected polymethyl methacrylate bone cement.The amount of bone cement used during PVP and any complications related with PVP were recorded. The score of visual analogue scale point (VAS) before PVP, 1 week, 1 and 3 months after PVP was recorded respectively. The difference of VAS score between the different time points was analyzed using repeated measures of ANOVA.

Results

The technical success of both needle puncturing and bone cement injection was achieved in all patients. The mean amount of bone cement injected in each diseased vertebra was 1.7 ± 0.3 mL(1.2~2.2 mL). Marked pain relief was quickly obtained in all 10 patients. The VAS score before PVP, 1 week, 1 month and 3 months after PVP was 8.3 ± 0.7, 3.0 ± 0.7, 2.7 ± 0.5, 3.0 ± 0.6, respectively ,and the VAS score after PVP decreased significantly compared to the pre-treatment (F = 215.705, P < 0.05). No major complications occurred in this series, except for asymptomatic bone cement leaking around vertebra which appeared in 3 vertebral bodies.

Conclusions

Percutaneous vertebroplasty guided by CT and C-arm is a safe and effective technique for the treatment of painful cervical vertebral body metastasis.

图1 宫颈癌第三颈椎转移患者术前影像检查
图2 患者CT定位颈椎穿刺
图3 患者X线透视下注射骨水泥及骨水泥沉积图
[1]
Baerlocher MO, Saad WE, Dariushnia S, et al. Quality improvement guidelines for percutaneous vertebroplasty[J]. Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, 2014, 25(2): 165-170.
[2]
Filippiadis DK, Marcia S, Masala S, et al. Percutaneous vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty: current status, new developments and old controversies[J]. CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology, 2017, 40(12): 1815-1823.
[3]
N'Dri Oka D, Tokpa A, Derou L. Surgical vertebral body cementoplasty as spinal cancer metastasis management[J]. British Journal of Neurosurgery, 2015, 29(3): 374-379.
[4]
Wang KW, Wang HK, Lu K, et al. Fluoroscopically guided C2 percutaneous vertebroplasty: a surgical technique note on an anterior ascending approach[J]. Pain Physician, 2016, 19(4): E625-E629.
[5]
Yang J, Chu L, Xiao F, et al. Anterior retropharyngeal approach to C1 for percutaneous vertebroplasty under C-arm fluoroscopy[J]. The Spine Journal, 2015, 15(3): 539-545.
[6]
Shimokawa N, Abe J, Satoh H, et al. Image-guided Spine Stabilization for traumatic or osteoporotic spine injury: radiological accuracy and neurological outcome[J]. Neurologia medico-chirurgica, 2016, 56(8): 493-500.
[7]
Bao L, Jia P, Li J, et al. Percutaneous vertebroplasty relieves pain in cervical spine metastases[J]. Pain Research and Management, 2017, 2017: 1-5.
[8]
Wang KW, Wang HK, Lu K, et al. Fluoroscopically guided C2 percutaneous vertebroplasty: a surgical technique note on an anterior ascending approach[J]. Pain Physician, 2016, 19(4): E625-E629.
[9]
Chen L, Su I, Ni C, et al. Percutaneous vertebroplasty performed with an 18-Gauge needle for treatment of metastatic severe compression fracture of the cervical vertebral body[J]. Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, 2014, 25(9): 1413-1417.
[10]
Amoretti N, Diego P, Amélie P, et al. Percutaneous vertebroplasty in tumoral spinal fractures with posterior vertebral wall involvement: feasibility and safety[J]. European Journal of Radiology, 2018, 104: 38-42.
[11]
Gu Y, Tian Q, Li Y, et al. Percutaneous vertebroplasty and interventional tumor removal for malignant vertebral compression fractures and/or spinal metastatic tumor with epidural involvement: a prospective pilot study[J]. 2017, 10: 211-218.
[12]
Barakat AS, Owais T, Alhashash M, et al. Presentation and management of symptomatic central bone cement embolization[J]. Eur Spine J, 2018, 27(10): 2584-2592.
[13]
王福安,黄文诺,吕朋华, 等. C臂锥体束CT成像技术在经皮椎体成形术中的临床应用[J]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2017, 5(2): 98-101.
[1] 王典, 刘双赫, 曾峥. 肩关节镜术后肌肉功能改变对颈椎形态及矢状面参数影响的自身前后对照队列研究[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(05): 371-378.
[2] 韩戟, 杨力, 陈玉. 腹部形态CT参数与完全腹腔镜全胃切除术术中失血量的关系研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 88-91.
[3] 张腾花, 尚培中, 王晓梅, 李晓武, 王金, 苗建军, 刘冰. 外伤性脾破裂三阶梯分层治疗策略[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 510-512.
[4] 谢汶歆, 马乐, 刘晔, 曹晓明, 张万春. 前列腺特异性膜抗原PET/CT在肾癌诊疗中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 514-519.
[5] 江杰, 沈城, 潘永昇, 陈新风, 刘振民, 朱华, 郑兵. 尿酸结石的危险因素分析及双能量CT特征研究[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 361-365.
[6] 钱春蕊, 周燕, 张晶, 蔡笃财, 门慧, 王松海, 黎莉, 邢龙. 高分辨率CT 与多层螺旋CT 在肺结节及早期肺癌中的应用[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 827-830.
[7] 郑大雯, 王健东. 胆囊癌辅助诊断研究进展[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 769-773.
[8] 池彬, 魏梁锋, 王守森. CT扫描结合三维可视化技术在腰椎管狭窄症后路显微通道手术前定位的应用[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2024, 10(04): 220-225.
[9] 李刚, 潘晓帆, 田雪, 刘路路. CT灌注成像参数及血栓弹力图对急性前循环脑梗死早期神经功能恶化的预测价值分析[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2024, 10(04): 226-232.
[10] 王芳, 刘达, 左智炜, 盛金平, 陈庭进, 蒋锐. 定量CT与双能X线骨密度仪对骨质疏松诊断效能比较的Meta分析[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(06): 363-371.
[11] 甘曦, 廖鑫. 胃癌旁肿瘤沉积与CT影像学特征、血清指标及病理特征的关联性分析[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(05): 422-425.
[12] 丛黎, 马林, 陈旭, 李文文, 张亮亮, 周华亭. 改良CT严重指数联合炎症指标在重症急性胰腺炎患者胰腺感染预测及预后评估中的研究[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(05): 432-436.
[13] 刘伟, 高续, 谢玉海, 蒋哲, 刘士成. 基于增强CT影像组学模型在预测急性胰腺炎复发中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(04): 348-354.
[14] 李金星, 陈志宏, 孙铭均, 孙岩岩, 党树伟, 李广恩, 彭书奇, 付大伟, 李宏伟, 李国东. 基于多层螺旋CT 的腹腔干解剖变异与新分型研究[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(08): 756-763.
[15] 杨松林, 黄仕豪, 王丽珠, 李禧萌, 邹飞翔, 李坤炜, 梁明柱, 陈炳辉. 良性肺结节生长变化的影像学评价[J/OL]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2024, 12(04): 344-350.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?