切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"
高级检索
中华介入放射学电子杂志

中华介入放射学电子杂志 ›› 2020, Vol. 08 ›› Issue (01) : 28 -32. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-5782.2020.01.007

所属专题： 文献；

神经介入

Pipeline Flex血流导向装置治疗颅内复杂动脉瘤的安全性及短期疗效
吴桥伟1, 李立1, 邵秋季1, 李天晓1,†(), 贺迎坤1,†(), 常凯涛1, 白卫星1   
  1. 1. 450003　河南郑州，郑州大学人民医院介入中心脑血管病科、河南省人民医院、河南大学人民医院、河南省神经介入研发与应用工程研究中心
  • 收稿日期:2020-01-23 出版日期:2020-02-25
  • 通信作者: 李天晓, 贺迎坤
  • 基金资助:
    "十三五"国家重点研发计划项目(2016YFC1300702); 国家自然科学基金项目(81601583)

Safety and efficacy analysis of Pipeline Flex embolization device for treatment of complex intracranial aneurysms

Qiaowei Wu1, Li Li1, Qiuji Shao1, Tianxiao Li1,†(), Yingkun He1,†(), Kaitao Chang1, Weixin Bai1   

  1. 1. Department of Cerebrovascular Disease, Zhengzhou University People's Hospital, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Henan Provincial Neurointerventional Engineering Research Center, Henan Zhengzhou 450003, China
全文 ( ) 下载PDF ( ) 导出引用
引用本文：

吴桥伟, 李立, 邵秋季, 李天晓, 贺迎坤, 常凯涛, 白卫星. Pipeline Flex血流导向装置治疗颅内复杂动脉瘤的安全性及短期疗效[J]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2020, 08(01): 28-32.

Qiaowei Wu, Li Li, Qiuji Shao, Tianxiao Li, Yingkun He, Kaitao Chang, Weixin Bai. Safety and efficacy analysis of Pipeline Flex embolization device for treatment of complex intracranial aneurysms[J]. Chinese Journal of Interventional Radiology(Electronic Edition), 2020, 08(01): 28-32.

目的

评价第2代Pipeline血流导向装置（PED Flex）治疗颅内复杂动脉瘤的安全性及短期疗效。

方法

回顾性分析郑州大学人民医院2018年1月至2019年8月应用PED Flex治疗颅内复杂动脉瘤患者的临床及影像学资料，分析围手术期神经系统并发症情况，采用改良Rankin量表（mRS）评分评价患者临床预后；影像学随访采用O'Kelly-Marotta（OKM）分级评估动脉瘤闭塞情况。

结果

131例患者共应用144枚PED Flex治疗159个动脉瘤，手术成功率为100%。其中107个动脉瘤采用单纯支架置入，52个动脉瘤结合弹簧圈填塞。术后神经系统并发症发生率为3.1%（4/131），其中缺血性并发症发生率为2.3%（3/131），出血性并发症发生率为0.8%（1/131），无死亡病例，出院mRS 0分101例，1分25例，2分4例，4分1例，致残率为0.8%（1/131）。61例患者共80个动脉瘤获影像学随访，末次中位随访时间6.0（3～9）个月，动脉瘤完全闭塞（OKM分级D级）57个，完全闭塞率为71.3%（57/80）；支架内狭窄4（6.6%，4/61）例，均无神经系统症状。87例患者获临床随访，中位随访时间为9.0（2～21）个月，mRS 0分78例，1分5例，2分3例，4分1例。

结论

PED Flex治疗颅内复杂动脉瘤手术成功率高，安全性较好；术后6个月随访完全闭塞率高，疗效良好。

关键词: 血流导向装置, 颅内动脉瘤, 随访研究, 并发症
Objective

To evaluate the safety and short-term efficacy of Pipeline Flex embolization device (PED Flex) for treatment of complex intracranial aneurysms.

Methods

The clinical data of131 patients with complex intracranial aneurysms who were treated with PED Flex in Zhengzhou university People's Hospital from June 2018 to August 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. Periprocedural complications were analyzed. Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) was used to evaluate clinical outcomes and the O’Kelly-Marotta (OKM)grading scale was used to evaluate imaging outcomes.

Results

A total of 131 patients with159 complex aneurysms were treated with 144 PED Flex, and the procedure success rate was 100%. Adjunctive coiling was used in 52 aneurysms and 107 cases used the stent only. Postprocedural neurological complication rate was 3.1% (4/131). Among them, the thromboembolic and hemorrhagic complication was 2.3%(3/131) and 0.8%(1/131), respectively. There were no deaths occurred. The mRS were 0 in 101 patients, 1 in 25, 2 in 4,4 in 1 and the disability rate was 0.8%(1/131) at discharge. A total of 61 patients with 80 aneurysms obtained the imaging follow-up with a median of 6.0(3-9) months. Fifty-seven aneurysms were completely occluded (grade D of OKM grading scale) with a complete occlusion rate of 71.3%(57/80). The in-stent stenosis was observed in 4 (6.6%, 4/61) patients, but no patients were symptomatic. Eighty-seven patients obtained the clinical follow-up with a median of 9.0 (2-21) months, and the mRS were 0 in 78 patients, 1 in 5, 2 in 3 and 4 in 1.

Conclusions

The treatment of complex intracranial aneurysms with PED Flex is safe with a high procedure success rate, and it is efficient with a high complete occlusion rate during the 6-months follow-up.

Key words: Flow diverter, Intracranial aneurysm, Follow-up, Complication.
图1 巨大动脉瘤患者（女，65岁，因频繁恶心、呕吐入院）的术前后DSA图像
[1]
Rho MH, Park HJ, Chung EC, et al. Various techniques of stent-assisted coil embolization of wide-necked or fusiform artherosclerotic and dissecting unruptured vertebrobasilar artery aneurysms for reducing recanalization: mid-term results[J]. Acta neurochirurgica, 2013, 155(11): 2009-2017. DOI: 10.1007/s00701-013-1866-y.
[2]
Becske T, Kallmes DF, Saatci I, et al. Pipeline for uncoilable or failed aneurysms: results from a multicenter clinical trial[J]. Radiology, 2013, 267(3): 858-868. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.13120099.
[3]
李航，贺迎坤，白卫星，等．Pipeline血流导向装置治疗复杂颅内动脉瘤的安全性及中期疗效[J]．中华神经外科杂志，2018, 34(5): 442-6. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1001-2346.2018.05.003.
[4]
Kallmes DF, Ding YH, Dai D,et al. A new endoluminal, flow-disrupting device for treatment of saccular aneurysms[J]. Stroke, 2007, 38(8): 2346-2352. DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.106.479576.
[5]
Duckworth EA, Nickele C, Hoit D, et al. The first North American use of the Pipeline Flex flow diverter[J]. Journal of neurointerventional surgery, 2016, 8(2): e8. DOI: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2014-011548.rep.
[6]
Martínez-Galdámez M, Gil A, Caniego JL, et al. Preliminary experience with the Pipeline Flex Embolization Device: technical note[J]. Journal of neurointerventional surgery, 2015, 7(10): 748-751. DOI: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2014-011385.
[7]
O'kelly CJ, Krings T, Fiorella D. A novel grading scale for the angiographic assessment of intracranial aneurysms treated using flow diverting stents[J]. Interventional neuroradiology, 2010, 16(2): 133-137. DOI: 10.1177/159101991001600204.
[8]
Radaelli AG, Augsburger L, Cebral JR, et al. Reproducibility of haemodynamical simulations in a subject-specific stented aneurysm model--a report on the Virtual Intracranial Stenting Challenge 2007[J]. Journal of biomechanics, 2008, 41(10): 2069-2081. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2008.04.035.
[9]
Szikora I, Berentei Z, Kulcsar Z, et al. Treatment of intracranial aneurysms by functional reconstruction of the parent artery: the Budapest experience with the pipeline embolization device[J]. AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2010, 31(6): 1139-1147. DOI:10.3174/ajnr.A2023.
[10]
Wong GK, Kwan MC, Ng RY, et al. Flow diverters for treatment of intracranial aneurysms: current status and ongoing clinical trials[J]. Journal of clinical neuroscience, 2011, 18(6): 737-740. DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2010.10.011.
[11]
Jabbour P, Chalouhi N, Tjoumakaris S, et al. The Pipeline Embolization Device: learning curve and predictors of complications and aneurysm obliteration[J]. Neurosurgery, 2013, 73(1): 113-20; discussion 120. DOI: 10.1227/01.neu.0000429844.06955.39.
[12]
Pereira VM, Kelly M, Vega P, et al. New Pipeline Flex device: initial experience and technical nuances[J]. Journal of neurointerventional surgery, 2015, 7(12): 920-925. DOI: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2014-011347.
[13]
Colby GP, Bender MT, Lin LM, et al. Declining complication rates with flow diversion of anterior circulation aneurysms after introduction of the Pipeline Flex: analysis of a single-institution series of 568 cases[J]. Journal of neurosurgery, 2018, 129(6): 1475-1481. DOI: 10.3171/2017.7.JNS171289.
[14]
Brasiliense LBC, Aguilar-Salinas P, Lopes DK, et al. Multicenter Study of Pipeline Flex for Intracranial Aneurysms[J]. Neurosurgery, 2019, 84(6): E402-E409. DOI: 10.1093/neuros/nyy422.
[15]
Ge H,Yang H,Ren H,et al.Association of thrombelastographic parameters with complications in patients with intracranial aneurysm after stent placement[J]. World neurosurgery, 2019, 127: e30-e38. DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.02.007.
[16]
Adeeb N, Griessenauer CJ, Foreman PM, et al. Use of Platelet Function Testing Before Pipeline Embolization Device Placement: A Multicenter Cohort Study[J]. Stroke, 2017, 48(5): 1322-1330. DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.015308.
[17]
Zi-Liang W, Xiao-Dong L, Tian-Xiao L, et al. Intravenous administration of tirofiban versus loading dose of oral clopidogrel for preventing thromboembolism in stent-assisted coiling of intracranial aneurysms[J]. International journal of stroke, 2017, 12(5): 553-559. DOI: 10.1177/1747493016677989.
[18]
Kallmes D F, Brinjikji W, Cekirge S, et al. Safety and efficacy of the Pipeline embolization device for treatment of intracranial aneurysms: a pooled analysis of 3 large studies[J]. J Neurosurg, 2017, 127(4): 775-80. DOI: 10.3171/2016.8.JNS16467.
[19]
Marosfoi M, Langan ET, Strittmatter L, et al. In situ tissue engineering: endothelial growth patterns as a function of flow diverter design[J]. Journal of neurointerventional surgery, 2017, 9(10): 994-998. DOI:10.1136/neurintsurg-2016-012669.
[1] 金鑫, 谢卯, 刘芸, 杨操, 杨述华, 许伟华. 个性化股骨导向器辅助初次全髋关节置换的随机对照研究[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 780-787.
[2] 易晨, 张亚东, 董茜, 唐海阔, 刘志国. 应用骨盖技术拔除下颌低位骨性埋伏阻生第三磨牙的疗效观察[J]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 424-429.
[3] 杜滨和, 徐楠, 杨云川, 崔培元. 5项改良衰弱指数预测胰十二指肠切除术近期预后的价值探讨[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 444-448.
[4] 李建美, 邓静娟, 杨倩. 两种术式联合治疗肝癌合并肝硬化门静脉高压的安全性及随访评价[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 41-44.
[5] 逄世江, 黄艳艳, 朱冠烈. 改良π形吻合在腹腔镜全胃切除消化道重建中的安全性和有效性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 66-69.
[6] 杨体飞, 杨传虎, 陆振如. 改良无充气经腋窝入路全腔镜下甲状腺手术对喉返神经功能的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 74-77.
[7] 陈大敏, 曹晓刚, 曹能琦. 肥胖对胃癌患者手术治疗效果的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 651-653.
[8] 曹智, 朱希望, 王尉, 张辉, 杨成林, 张小明. 经皮肾镜碎石取石术中不同肾盂内压力与围术期并发症相关性研究[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 616-620.
[9] 叶晋生, 路夷平, 梁燕凯, 于淼, 冀祯, 贺志坚, 张洪海, 王洁. 腹腔镜下应用生物补片修补直肠术后盆底缺损的疗效[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 688-691.
[10] 袁伟, 张修稳, 潘宏波, 章军, 王虎, 黄敏. 平片式与填充式腹股沟疝修补术的疗效比较[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 697-701.
[11] 夏松, 姚嗣会, 汪勇刚. 经腹腹膜前与疝环充填式疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝的对照研究[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 702-705.
[12] 代格格, 杨丽, 胡媛媛, 周文婷. 手术室综合干预在老年腹股沟疝患者中的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 759-763.
[13] 潘冰, 吕少诚, 赵昕, 李立新, 郎韧, 贺强. 淋巴结清扫数目对远端胆管癌胰十二指肠切除手术疗效的影响[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 608-612.
[14] 崔佳琪, 吴迪, 陈海艳, 周惠敏, 顾元龙, 周光文, 杨军. TACE术后并发肝脓肿的临床诊治分析[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 688-693.
[15] 王小娜, 谭微, 李悦, 姜文艳. 预测性护理对结直肠癌根治术患者围手术期生活质量、情绪及并发症的影响[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 525-529.
阅读次数
全文


摘要

版权所有 中华医学会 中华医学电子音像出版社有限责任公司  京ICP备14006079号-1  网络出版服务许可证：(署)网出证(京)字第075号