切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华介入放射学电子杂志 ›› 2019, Vol. 07 ›› Issue (03) : 211 -218. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-5782.2019.03.008

所属专题: 经典病例 文献

神经介入

942例颅内动脉瘤患者血管内治疗围术期出血并发症分析及防治
蒋业清1, 黄磊1, 葛亮1, 鲁刚1, 狄若愚1, 万海林1, 张磊2, 万军2, 张晓龙1,()   
  1. 1. 200040 上海,复旦大学附属华山医院放射科
    2. 200040 上海,复旦大学附属华山医院静安区分院介入科
  • 收稿日期:2019-06-01 出版日期:2019-08-01
  • 通信作者: 张晓龙
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金面上项目(81771242、81371308)

Analysis of perioperative hemorrhagic complications on 942 cases of intracranial aneurysms undergoing endovascular treatment

Yeqing Jiang1, Lei Huang1, Liang Ge1, Gang Lu1, Ruoyu Di1, Hailin Wan1, Lei Zhang2, Jun Wan2, Xiaolong Zhang1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Radiology, Huashan Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University, Shanghai 200040, China
    2. Department of Intervention, Jing'an District Centre Hospital of Shanghai, Huashan Hospital Fudan University Jing'an Branch, Shanghai 200040, China
  • Received:2019-06-01 Published:2019-08-01
  • Corresponding author: Xiaolong Zhang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Zhang Xiaolong, Email:
引用本文:

蒋业清, 黄磊, 葛亮, 鲁刚, 狄若愚, 万海林, 张磊, 万军, 张晓龙. 942例颅内动脉瘤患者血管内治疗围术期出血并发症分析及防治[J]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2019, 07(03): 211-218.

Yeqing Jiang, Lei Huang, Liang Ge, Gang Lu, Ruoyu Di, Hailin Wan, Lei Zhang, Jun Wan, Xiaolong Zhang. Analysis of perioperative hemorrhagic complications on 942 cases of intracranial aneurysms undergoing endovascular treatment[J]. Chinese Journal of Interventional Radiology(Electronic Edition), 2019, 07(03): 211-218.

目的:

分析942例颅内动脉瘤患者行血管内治疗的围术期出血并发症发生情况,并探讨其处理措施。

方法:

收集2011年1月至2019年4月复旦大学附属华山医院收治的942例颅内动脉瘤患者(1 055个动脉瘤),分析围术期出血并发症发生原因,探讨围术期用药方案,总结防治措施。

结果:

本组942例患者发生出血性并发症共12例(1.27%),其中术中出血9例、术后出血3例。9例术中出血无一例致死致残,其中因弹簧圈损伤瘤腔致动脉瘤破裂6例,微导管损伤瘤腔致动脉瘤破裂2例,微导丝损伤远端小分支导致出血1例。9例患者均预后良好,出院前mRS评分较入院时未增加。术后出血3例均死亡,其中2例蛛网膜下腔出血可能与瘤腔栓塞不全或术后肝素化有关,1例基底节区血肿可能与术后血压一过性增高有关。

结论:

术前不常规应用抗血小板聚集药物及肝素化可降低术中出血导致的致死率,及时识别并处理后多数患者预后良好。术后出血发生率低,但预后差,病死率高。术前充分评估危险因素,术中致密填塞瘤腔,术后慎用抗凝治疗,可改善出血患者的预后。

Objective:

To analyze preoperative hemorrhagic complications and management on endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms in 942 cases.

Methods:

From January 2011 to April 2019, 942 patients with intracranial aneurysms (1 055 aneurysms) in our center were collected to investigate the clinical perioperative hemorrhagic complications and their management.

Results:

Among the 942 patients 12 (1.27%) experienced preoperative hemorrhagic complications, consisting of intraoperative hemorrhage in 9 aneurysms (9/942, 0.96%) and postoperative hemorrhagic complications in 3 patients (3/942, 0.32%) . Nine intraoperative hemorrhages with no mortality and disability, of which 6 cases due to coil injury in the aneurysm wall, 2 cases due to microcatheter injury in the aneurysm wall, 1 case due to micro-guide wire injury in distal small arterial branch. Nine patients had a good prognosis, and the mRS score before discharge was not increased compared with admission. 3 patients with postoperative hemorrhagic complications were fatal, of which two cases were related to incomplete embolization or postoperative general heparinization, and one case might due to the acute fluctuation of blood pressure.

Conclusions:

No preoperative heparinization and dual antiplatelet medicine can reduce the fatal intraoperative hemorrhage. Intraoperative rupture complications can achieve favorable prognosis via timely screening and reasonable treatment. Although the low incidence rate of postoperative hemorrhagic complications, the outcome will be fatal. Preoperative prevention measures, densely embolization and prudent anticoagulation usage can improve the prognosis.

图1 典型病例1(女性,60岁,蛛网膜下腔出血4.5 h)左侧后交通动脉瘤支架辅助栓塞术前术后表现
图2 典型病例2(女性,71岁,左侧大脑中动脉动脉瘤)微导管损伤瘤腔出血术中及术后表现
图3 典型病例3(女性,79岁)左侧丘脑脑梗后发现左侧大脑中动脉分叉部巨大夹层梭形动脉瘤支架辅助栓塞及复发再次治疗前后
图4 病例(女性,63岁,破裂前交通动脉瘤)行支架辅助栓塞治疗前后
图5 病例2(女性,51岁,未破裂左侧颈眼动脉瘤)行双微导管栓塞治疗前后
图6 病例3(男性,38岁,右侧大脑中动脉M1段巨大夹层动脉瘤)行球囊闭塞试验后闭塞载瘤动脉栓塞治疗前后
[1]
Algra AM, Lindgren A, Vergouwen MDI,et al. Procedural clinical complications,case-fatality risks,and risk factors in endovascular and neurosurgical treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms: A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. JAMA Neurol,2019,76(3):282.
[2]
Nieuwkamp DJ, Setz LE, Algra A,et al. Changes in case fatality of aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage over time,according to age,sex,and region: a meta-analysis[J]. Lancet Neurol,2009,8(7): 635-642.
[3]
Molyneux AJ, Kerr RS, Yu LM,et al. International subarachnoid aneurysm trial(ISAT)of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised comparison of effects on survival,dependency,seizures,rebleeding,subgroups,and aneurysm occlusion[J]. Lancet,2005,366(9488): 809-817.
[4]
Cloft HJ, Kallmes DF. Cerebral aneurysm perforations complicating therapy with Guglielmi detachable coils: A meta-analysis[J]. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol,2002,23(10): 1706-1709.
[5]
Sluzewski M, van Rooij WJ. Early rebleeding after coiling of ruptured cerebral aneurysms: incidence,morbidity,and risk factors[J]. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol,2005,26(7): 1739-1743.
[6]
蒋业清,黄磊,鲁刚,等.未破裂床突旁动脉瘤血管内栓塞术后复发的相关危险因素分析[J].中华神经外科杂志,2018,34(10):982-987.
[7]
Wang JL, Li XN, Zhang YH,et al. Evaluation function of transcranial two-dimensional and color Doppler ultrasonography (TCCS)for patients with different degrees of cerebral vasospasm before and after the nimodipine treatment[J]. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci,2017,21(11): 2757-2763.
[8]
Dornbos D 3rd, Katz JS, Youssef P,et al. Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors in prevention and rescue treatment of thromboembolic complications during endovascular embolization of intracranial aneurysms[J]. Neurosurgery,2018,82(3): 268-277.
[9]
Ihn YK, Shin SH, Baik SK,et al. Complications of endovascular treatment for intracranial aneurysms: Management and prevention[J]. Interv Neuroradiol,2018,24(3): 237-245.
[10]
Yang HC, Li YX, Jiang YH. Insufficient platelet inhibition and thromboembolic complications in patients with intracranial aneurysms after stent placement[J]. J Neurosurg,2016,125(2): 247-253.
[11]
Mascitelli JR, Moyle H, Oermann EK,et al. An update to the raymond-Roy occlusion classification of intracranial aneurysms treated with coil embolization[J]. J Neurointerv Surg,2015,7(7): 496-502.
[12]
Stapleton CJ, Torok CM, Rabinov JD,et al. Validation of the modified raymond-Roy classification for intracranial aneurysms treated with coil embolization[J]. J Neurointerv Surg,2016,8(9): 927-933.
[13]
Mendenhall SK, Sahlein DH, Wilson CD,et al. The natural history of coiled cerebral aneurysms stratified by modified raymond-Roy occlusion classification[J]. World Neurosurg,2019: S1878-S8750(19)31162-3.
[14]
Elijovich L, Higashida RT, Lawton MT,et al. Predictors and outcomes of intraprocedural rupture in patients treated for ruptured intracranial aneurysms: the CARAT study[J]. Stroke,2008,39(5):1501-1506.
[15]
Kawabata S, Imamura H, Adachi H,et al. Risk factors for and outcomes of intraprocedural rupture during endovascular treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms[J]. J Neurointerv Surg,2018,10(4): 362-366.
[16]
Brisman JL, Niimi Y, Song JK,et al. Aneurysmal rupture during coiling: low incidence and good outcomes at a single large volume center[J]. Neurosurgery,2008,62(6 Suppl 3): 1538-1551.
[17]
Pierot L, Spelle L, Vitry F,et al. Immediate clinical outcome of patients harboring unruptured intracranial aneurysms treated by endovascular approach: Results of the ATENA study[J]. Stroke,2008,39(9): 2497-2504.
[18]
Li KL, Guo YB, Zhao Y,et al. Acute rerupture after coil embolization of ruptured intracranial saccular aneurysms: A literature review[J]. Interv Neuroradiol,2018,24(2): 117-124.
[19]
Jartti P, Isokangas JM, Karttunen A,et al. Early rebleeding after coiling of ruptured intracranial aneurysms[J]. Acta Radiol,2010,51(9): 1043-1049.
[20]
潘奇,刘建民,许奕,等.颅内破裂动脉瘤栓塞术后早期破裂再出血危险因素分析[J].介入放射学杂志,2010,19(2): 95-100.
[1] 黎鹏程, 黄谦亦, 张逵, 范润金, 尚彬. 手术切除颅内巨大假性动脉瘤一例报道并文献复习[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2023, 09(02): 123-125.
[2] 许明伟, 许民辉. 组合塑形夹闭联合低流量搭桥治疗复杂大脑中动脉多发动脉瘤[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2023, 09(01): 62-64.
[3] 潘鹏宇, 孔睿, 李侑埕, 李佳朔, 杨新宇, 张文旭, 朱泽超, 田学实, 闻亮, 朱廷准, 梁国标. 无创脑电磁扰动在蛛网膜下腔出血术后脱水治疗中的应用研究[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2022, 08(06): 351-355.
[4] 李田利, 张照龙, 孙成建, 刘国平, 谢宜兴, 赵晓龙, 邵黎明, 郑璇, 王长鑫, 徐锐. 基于血流动力学、血脂及外周血炎症标志物的眼段动脉瘤破裂风险相关研究[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(02): 78-83.
[5] 陈中国, 万宇婷, 陈卓萍, 陈晓君, 袁亚君. CPR技术在颅内血流导向装置植入术中的应用[J]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2023, 11(03): 247-250.
[6] 徐志嘉, 贾振宇, 赵林波, 刘圣, 施海彬, 曹月洲. 高敏肌钙蛋白T动态变化在晚时间窗内进行血管内治疗的急性缺血性脑卒中患者中的预测价值[J]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2023, 11(01): 42-47.
[7] 赖和泰, 刘羽, 程光森, 刘永康, 李忠亮, 陆骊工. 39例Surpass Streamline治疗未破裂动脉瘤患者诊疗分析:单中心临床经验[J]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2023, 11(01): 19-24.
[8] 王俊杰, 尹晓亮, 刘二腾, 陆军, 祁鹏, 胡深, 杨希孟, 陈鲲鹏, 张东, 王大明. 机器学习对预测颈内动脉非急性闭塞患者血管内再通术成功的潜在价值[J]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 464-470.
[9] 孙洪扬, 刘基, 龚字翔, 王广英, 宁召腾, 赵璇, 朱其义, 王贤军. 急性前循环大血管闭塞性轻型卒中血管内治疗的临床预后及手术时机选择[J]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 445-451.
[10] 袁兴运, 陈万红, 鱼丽萍, 姚力. 以Wallenberg综合征起病的椎动脉颅外段闭塞介入治疗探讨[J]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 394-399.
[11] 杜小林, 陈鄂, 康俊龙, 肖庆, 丰伟, 田新华. 椎-基底动脉夹层动脉瘤介入治疗的疗效分析[J]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 350-358.
[12] 黎丹丹, 程峙娟, 刘旭, 陈未平, 殷敏, 郭华, 涂江龙. 急性后循环进展性缺血性卒中患者血管内治疗的效果[J]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(02): 112-123.
[13] 张文胜, 幸伟芳, 谢颖, 何锦照. 急性前循环大血管闭塞血管内治疗头颅CT高密度影的研究进展[J]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(02): 159-162.
[14] 连万成, 姚京, 吴泽涛, 何毅, 伍健明, 张猛. 血流导向装置治疗颅内未破裂动脉瘤的疗效与影响因素分析[J]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(01): 31-36.
[15] 付永鹏, 拉巴索朗, 马强, 陈群超, 郑裕峰, 吴蕻, 郑圆杰, 胡婧, 于洮, 张东. 人工智能辅助CT血管成像脑血管重建在基层医院颅内动脉瘤诊断中的应用[J]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(01): 26-30.
阅读次数
全文


摘要