切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华介入放射学电子杂志 ›› 2023, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (03) : 247 -250. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-5782.2023.03.009

神经介入

CPR技术在颅内血流导向装置植入术中的应用
陈中国, 万宇婷, 陈卓萍, 陈晓君, 袁亚君()   
  1. 519000 广东珠海,中山大学附属第五医院介入医学中心;广东省分子影像技术工程研究中心
    519000 广东珠海,中山大学附属第五医院介入医学中心
  • 收稿日期:2022-10-02 出版日期:2023-08-25
  • 通信作者: 袁亚君

Application of CPR technique in intracranial blood flow diverter device implantation

Zhongguo Chen, Yuting Wan, Zhuoping Chen, Xiaojun Chen, Yajun Yuan()   

  1. Center for Interventional Medicine, the Fifth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Zhuhai 519000, China; Guangdong Provincial Engineering Research Center of Molecular Imaging, the Fifth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Zhuhai 519000, China
    Center for Interventional Medicine, the Fifth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Zhuhai 519000, China
  • Received:2022-10-02 Published:2023-08-25
  • Corresponding author: Yajun Yuan
引用本文:

陈中国, 万宇婷, 陈卓萍, 陈晓君, 袁亚君. CPR技术在颅内血流导向装置植入术中的应用[J/OL]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2023, 11(03): 247-250.

Zhongguo Chen, Yuting Wan, Zhuoping Chen, Xiaojun Chen, Yajun Yuan. Application of CPR technique in intracranial blood flow diverter device implantation[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Interventional Radiology(Electronic Edition), 2023, 11(03): 247-250.

目的

探索曲面重建技术(curved plannar reconstruction,CPR)在颅内血流导向装置植入术中的应用价值。

方法

选取我院神经介入科采用血流导向装置治疗颅内动脉瘤的20例患者,术中使用锥体束CT(cone beam computed tomography,CBCT)稀释造影,分别使用最大密度投影技术(maximal intensity projection,MIP)和CPR两种算法重建图像评估血流导向装置贴壁情况。由3位神经介入科医师采用VAS(visual analogue scale)盲法评分,比较两种技术重建图像的质量。

结果

血流导向装置植入术中CBCT扫描后采用CPR技术处理VAS评分为(4.49 ± 0.35),采用MIP技术处理VAS评分为(2.03 ± 0.43),P值为0.000 1,差异有统计学意义。

结论

在血流导向装置植入术中CBCT稀释造影,CPR重建图像质量优于MIP,更有利于观察血流导向装置贴壁情况。

Objective

To explore the application value of Curved Plannar Reconstruction (CPR) in cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) of cerebral aneurysm after blood flow diverter device implantation.

Methods

Twenty patients after interventional blood flow diverter device implantation were selected and scanned by CBCT dilution angiography during operation.The maximum intensity projection (MIP) and curved CPR were used to reconstruct images to evaluate the adherence of the blood flow diverter device. Three neurologists from the interventional department used VAS (Visual Analogue Scale) blind scoring method to compare the quality of the reconstructed images of the two techniques.

Results

During the implantation of blood flow diverter device, after CBCT scanning, the VAS score of CPR was 4.49 ± 0.35, and that of MIP was 2.03 ± 0.43, P = 0.000 1, which indicate the difference was statistically significant.

Conclusions

After CBCT dilution angiography during blood flow diverter device implantation, the image quality of CPR reconstruction is better than that of MIP, which is more suitable for observing the adherence of blood flow diverter device.

图1 分别通过CPR和MIP重建后的图像评估血流导向装置贴壁情况1A:患者Ⅰ颅内动脉瘤血流导向装置植入术后CPR重建图像可以清晰显示支架贴壁不良和血管间隙(红色箭头);1B:患者Ⅱ颅内血流导向装置植入术后CPR重建图像可以清晰显示支架贴壁不良和血管间隙(红色箭头);1C:患者Ⅰ MIP重建后支架贴壁情况显示较模糊(红色箭头);1D:患者Ⅱ MIP重建后支架贴壁情况显示较模糊(红色箭头)。
图2 VAS评分t检验视图
表1 不同重建算法显示血流导向装置VAS评分比较
[1]
Nieuwkamp DJ, Setz LE, Algra A, et al. Changes in case fatality of aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage over time,according to age, sex, and region: a meta-analysis[J]. Lancet Neurol, 2009, 8(7): 635-642.
[2]
Etminan N, Rinkel G J. Unruptured intracranial aneurysms: development, rupture and preventive management[J]. Nat Rev Neurol, 2017, 13(2): 126.
[3]
中国医师协会神经介入专业委员会, 中国颅内动脉瘤计划研究组. 中国颅内未破裂动脉瘤诊疗指南2021[J]. 中国脑血管病杂志, 2021, 18(9): 634-664.
[4]
Molyneux AJ, Birks J, Clarke A, et al. The durability of endovascular coiling versus neurosurgical clipping of ruptured cerebral aneurysms: 18 year follow-up of the UK cohort of the international subarachnoid aneurysm trial[J]. Lancet, 2015, 385(9969): 691-697.
[5]
Wiebers DO, Whisnant JP, Huston JR, et al. Unruptured intracranial aneurysms: natural history, clinical outcome, and risks of surgical and endovascular treatment[J]. Lancet, 2003, 362(9378): 103-110.
[6]
Byrne JV, Beltechi R, Yarnold JA, et al. Early experience in the treatment of intra-cranial aneurysms by endovascular flow diversion: a multicentre prospective study[J]. PLoS One, 2010, 5(9): e12492.
[7]
Setlur NS, Vakharia K, Waqas M, et al. Single-center experience of using high definition (Hi-Def) imaging during neurointervention treatment of intracranial aneurysms using flow diverters[J]. J Neurointerv Surg, 2020, 12(9): 897-901.
[8]
Fiorella D, Lylyk P, Szikora I, et al. Curative cerebrovascular reconstruction with the pipeline embolization device: the emergence of definitive endovascular therapy for intracranial aneurysms[J]. J Neurointerv Surg, 2018, 10(Suppl 1): i9-i18.
[9]
Kallmes DF, Brinjikji W, Cekirge S, et al. Safety and efficacy of the pipeline embolization device for treatment of intracranial aneurysms: a pooled analysis of 3 large studies[J]. J Neurosurg, 2017, 127(4): 775-780.
[10]
Kang H, Zhou Y, Luo B, et al. Pipeline embolization device for intracranial aneurysms in a Large Chinese cohort: complication risk factor analysis[J]. Neurotherapeutics, 2021, 18(2): 1198-1206.
[11]
Luo B, Kang H, Zhang H, et al. Pipeline embolization device for intracranial aneurysms in a large Chinese cohort: factors related to aneurysm occlusion[J]. Ther Adv Neurol Disord, 2020, 13: 1279189396.
[12]
Hanel RA, Kallmes DF, Lopes DK, et al. Prospective study on embolization of intracranial aneurysms with the pipeline device: the premier study 1 year results[J]. J Neurointerv Surg, 2020, 12(1): 62-66.
[13]
Pierot L, Spelle L, Berge J, et al. SAFE study (safety and efficacy Analysis of fred embolic device in aneurysm treatment): 1-year clinical and anatomical results[J]. J Neurointerv Surg, 2019, 11(2): 184-189.
[14]
Dmytriw AA, Phan K, Moore JM, et al. On flow diversion: the changing landscape of intracerebral aneurysm management[J]. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 2019, 40(4): 591-600.
[15]
Aquarius R, de Korte A, Smits D, et al. The importance of wall apposition in flow diverters[J]. Neurosurgery, 2019, 84(3):804-810.
[16]
Liang F, Zhang Y, Yan P, et al. Outcomes and complications after the Use of the pipeline embolization device in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms of the posterior circulation: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. World Neurosurg, 2019, 127: e888-e895.
[17]
Orth RC, Wallace MJ, Kuo MD. C-arm cone-beam CT: general principles and technical considerations for use in interventional radiology[J]. J Vasc Interv Radiol, 2009, 20(7 Suppl): S538-S544.
[18]
吉喆, 耿介文, 翟晓东, 等. 颅内动脉瘤影像学判读专家共识[J]. 中国脑血管病杂志, 2021, 18(7): 492-504.
[1] 冯铭, 孙洪涛. 动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血的颅内压监测与管理[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2024, 10(04): 248-253.
[2] 刘珍, 乔卫东, 王辉, 李钢. Pipeline支架治疗颅脑创伤后颅内大型动脉瘤[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2023, 09(06): 381-384.
[3] 黎鹏程, 黄谦亦, 张逵, 范润金, 尚彬. 手术切除颅内巨大假性动脉瘤一例报道并文献复习[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2023, 09(02): 123-125.
[4] 许明伟, 许民辉. 组合塑形夹闭联合低流量搭桥治疗复杂大脑中动脉多发动脉瘤[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2023, 09(01): 62-64.
[5] 赖凌峰, 黄小飞, 丁聪, 周小兵. 血流导向装置治疗血泡样动脉瘤的临床效果分析[J/OL]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(03): 166-170.
[6] 周章明, 余水, 梁张. 老年破裂前循环动脉瘤患者的急诊显微手术治疗研究[J/OL]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(02): 106-111.
[7] 潘晓帆, 徐勤义, 陆瑨, 王丹, 刘路路, 董万利. 颅内动脉瘤破裂介入术后并发脑疝的风险因素分析[J/OL]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(01): 37-44.
[8] 陈军, 许明伟. 经非责任动脉瘤侧翼点入路开颅一期夹闭双侧大脑中动脉动脉瘤[J/OL]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(01): 61-64.
[9] 李田利, 张照龙, 孙成建, 刘国平, 谢宜兴, 赵晓龙, 邵黎明, 郑璇, 王长鑫, 徐锐. 基于血流动力学、血脂及外周血炎症标志物的眼段动脉瘤破裂风险相关研究[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(02): 78-83.
[10] 陈爱霞, 吴培, 吴桥伟, 李俞辰, 胡旭晨, 姚金彪, 陈平伯, 史怀璋, 王跃华. 单纯血流导向装置治疗椎-基底动脉动脉瘤的安全性及疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2023, 11(03): 241-246.
[11] 矫健, 李汶翰, 罗瀚, 袁亚君, 王文毫, 刘汉伟, 于本帅. Pipeline血流导向装置与传统支架辅助栓塞治疗颈内动脉未破裂中小型动脉瘤的疗效比较分析[J/OL]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2023, 11(03): 223-229.
[12] 许英, 彭采凤, 曾梁楠, 李倩茜, 杨昌美. 未破裂颅内动脉瘤介入治疗患者自我管理干预方案的构建[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 164-170.
[13] 段丽娟, 蒋艳, 樊朝凤, 曹华. 颅内动脉瘤介入治疗术后不留置导尿管的效果及安全性[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 104-109.
[14] 李建, 张立, 高嵘, 倪海波, 宋照明, 陈周青, 王中. 创伤性脑血管损伤的识别和治疗[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 596-603.
[15] 连万成, 姚京, 吴泽涛, 何毅, 伍健明, 张猛. 血流导向装置治疗颅内未破裂动脉瘤的疗效与影响因素分析[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(01): 31-36.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?