切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"
高级检索
中华介入放射学电子杂志

中华介入放射学电子杂志 ›› 2022, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (04) : 404 -407. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-5782.2022.04.011

神经介入

颅内动脉瘤破裂合并脑室出血的危险因素分析
李敬峰1, 赵林波1, 倪恒1, 贾振宇1, 曹月洲1, 施海彬1, 刘圣1,†()   
  1. 1. 210029　江苏南京，南京医科大学第一附属医院介入放射科
  • 收稿日期:2022-05-07 出版日期:2022-11-25
  • 通信作者: 刘圣

Risk factors affecting development of intraventricular hemorrhage in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage

Jingfeng Li1, Linbo Zhao1, Heng Ni1, Zhenyu Jia1, Yuezhou Cao1, haibian Shi1, Sheng Liu1,†()   

  1. 1. Department of Interventional Radiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Jiangsu Nanjing 210029, China
  • Received:2022-05-07 Published:2022-11-25
  • Corresponding author: Sheng Liu
全文 ( ) 下载PDF ( ) 导出引用
引用本文：

李敬峰, 赵林波, 倪恒, 贾振宇, 曹月洲, 施海彬, 刘圣. 颅内动脉瘤破裂合并脑室出血的危险因素分析[J/OL]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2022, 10(04): 404-407.

Jingfeng Li, Linbo Zhao, Heng Ni, Zhenyu Jia, Yuezhou Cao, haibian Shi, Sheng Liu. Risk factors affecting development of intraventricular hemorrhage in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Interventional Radiology(Electronic Edition), 2022, 10(04): 404-407.

目的

探讨颅内动脉瘤破裂合并脑室出血的危险因素。

方法

回顾性收集2017年1月至2020年8月于我中心收治的动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血患者的临床和影像学资料，采用单因素和多因素Logistic回归方法分析颅内动脉瘤破裂合并脑室出血的危险因素。

结果

共纳入596例患者，其中合并脑室出血198例（33.2%）。单因素分析提示年龄、糖尿病史、动脉瘤最大径以及动脉瘤位于后循环与动脉瘤破裂合并脑室出血相关（P < 0.05）。多因素Logistic回归分析表明高龄（OR = 1.017，95%CI：1.001~1.033，P = 0.037）、有糖尿病史（OR = 2.545，95%CI：1.244~5.208，P = 0.011）、动脉瘤较大（OR = 1.101，95%CI：1.031~1.177，P = 0.004）和动脉瘤位于后循环（OR = 1.863，95%CI：1.104~3.144，P = 0.02）是动脉瘤破裂合并脑室出血发生的独立危险因素。

结论

患者高龄、伴有糖尿病史、动脉瘤较大及动脉瘤位于后循环与颅内动脉瘤破裂并发脑室出血相关。

关键词: 颅内动脉瘤, 蛛网膜下腔出血, 脑室出血, 危险因素
Objective

To identify independent risk factors for intraventricular hemorrhage development caused by ruptured aneurysm.

Methods

From January 2017 to August 2020, the clinical and imaging data of patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage were analyzed retrospectively. Univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression analysis were performed to identify the risk factors for intraventricular hemorrhage from ruptured aneurysm.

Results

A total of 596 patients who met the criteria were enrolled in this study, and intraventricular hemorrhage was present in 198 patients (33.2%).Univariate analysis showed that age, history of diabetes mellitus, aneurysm size, and aneurysm located at posterior circulation were related to intraventricular hemorrhage. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that increasing age (OR = 1.017, 95%CI: 1.001-1.033, P = 0.037), history of diabetes mellitus (OR = 2.545, 95%CI: 1.244-5.208, P = 0.011), increasing aneurysm size (OR = 1.101, 95%CI: 1.031-1.177, P = 0.004) and location in the posterior circulation (OR = 1.863, 95%CI: 1.104-3.144, P = 0.02) were independent risk factors for intraventricular hemorrhage development due to ruptured aneurysm.

Conclusions

Higher age, history of diabetes mellitus, increasing aneurysm size and location in the posterior circulation are associated with the occurrence of aneurysmal intraventricular hemorrhage.

Key words: Aneurysm, Subarachnoid Hemorrhage, Intraventricular hemorrhage, Risk factors.
表1 脑室出血形成的危险因素的单因素分析结果
因素 脑室出血(n = 198) 非脑室出血(n = 398) P值
性别[男(%)] 131 (0.66) 70 (0.18) 0.870
年龄(±s，岁) 60.33 ± 12.38 57.60 ± 11.03 0.009
高血压[例(%)] 128 (0.65) 225 (0.57) 0.058
高血脂[例(%)] 3 (0.02) 7 (0.02) 1.000
糖尿病[例(%)] 20 (0.10) 15 (0.04) 0.002
心脏病[例(%)] 15 (0.08) 26 (0.07) 0.636
吸烟史[例(%)] 22 (0.11) 38 (0.10) 0.550
血小板(×109/L) 194.00(145.75，258.00) 189.00(148.00，243.25) 0.482
凝血酶原时间(s) 12.3 (11.6，13.2) 12.2 (11.6，13.0) 0.389
活化部分凝血活酶时间(s) 29.3 (26.6，32.0) 28.55 (26.10，31.80) 0.121
纤维蛋白原(g/L) 2.66 (2.18，3.34) 2.73 (2.31，3.34) 0.302
凝血酶时间(s) 17.4 (16.00,19.32) 17.6 (16.4,19.00) 0.669
动脉瘤最大径(mm) 4.8 (3.6，6.9) 4.4 (3.3，6.1) 0.026
动脉瘤位置      
  颈内动脉-后交通[例(%)] 68 (0.34) 158 (0.40) 0.182
  大脑前动脉-前交通[例(%)] 69 (0.35) 125 (0.31) 0.434
  大脑中动脉[例(%)] 30 (0.15) 78 (0.20) 0.172
  后循环[例(%)] 31 (0.17) 37 (0.09) 0.011
表2 脑室出血形成的危险因素的Logistic多因素分析结果
因素 P值 OR 95%CI
年龄 0.037 1.017 1.001~1.033
高血压 0.261 1.235 0.855~1.786
糖尿病 0.011 2.545 1.244~5.208
动脉瘤最大径 0.004 1.101 1.031~1.177
后循环 0.020 1.863 1.104~3.144
图1 后循环破裂动脉瘤合并脑室出血典型病例1A：入院头颅CT平扫示蛛网膜下腔出血合并第四脑室出血；1B：术前CTA显示左侧小脑后下动脉远端动脉瘤(箭头指向示)，靠近第四脑室；1C：术中左侧椎动脉造影证实为左侧小脑后下动脉远端假性动脉瘤（三角形指向示）。
[1]
Morgan TC, Dawson J, Spengler D, et al. The modified graeb score: an enhanced tool for intraventricular hemorrhage measurement and prediction of functional outcome[J]. Stroke, 2013, 44(3): 635-641.
[2]
Mohr G, Ferguson G, Khan M, et al. Intraventricular hemorrhage from ruptured aneurysm : retrospective analysis of 91 cases[J]. J Neurosurg, 1983, 58(4): 482-487.
[3]
Kramer AH, Mikolaenko I, Deis N, et al. Intraventricular hemorrhage volume predicts poor outcomes but not delayed ischemic neurological deficits among patients with ruptured cerebral aneurysms[J]. Neurosurgery, 2010, 67(4): 1044-52.
[4]
Jabbarli R, Reinhard M, Roelz R, et al. The predictors and clinical impact of intraventricular hemorrhage in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage[J]. Int J Stroke, 2016, 11(1): 68-76.
[5]
Darkwah Oppong M, Gembruch O, Herten A, et al. Intraventricular hemorrhage caused by subarachnoid hemorrhage: does the severity matter?[J]. World Neurosurgery, 2018, 111: e693-e702.
[6]
Zanaty M, Nakagawa D, Starke RM, et al. Intraventricular extension of an aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage is an independent predictor of a worse functional outcome[J]. Clin Neurol Neurosurg, 2018, 170: 67-72.
[7]
Trifan G, Arshi B, Testai FD. Intraventricular hemorrhage severity as a predictor of outcome in intracerebral hemorrhage[J]. Frontiers in Neurology, 2019, 10: 217.
[8]
张国锋, 梁锐, 刘慧, 等. Graeb评分预测伴脑室出血的高分级动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血患者转归[J]. 国际脑血管病杂志, 2021, 29(7): 507-513.
[9]
Rosen DS, Macdonald RL, Huo D, et al. Intraventricular hemorrhage from ruptured aneurysm: clinical characteristics, complications, and outcomes in a large, prospective, multicenter study population[J]. J Neurosurg, 2007, 107(2): 261-265.
[10]
Tun NN, Arunagirinathan G, Munshi SK, et al. Diabetes mellitus and stroke: a clinical update[J]. World J Diabetes, 2017, 8(6): 235-248.
[11]
Huang D, Refaat M, Mohammedi K, et al. Macrovascular complications in patients with diabetes and prediabetes[J]. Biomed Res Int, 2017, 2017: 7839101.
[12]
杨博文, 白卫星, 李天晓, 等. 椎-基底动脉夹层动脉瘤的临床与影像学特点分析[J]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2016, 4(1): 4-8.
[13]
高峰, 王哲培, 陈腊. 开颅第四脑室血肿清除加侧脑室外引流术治疗全脑室积血30例疗效分析[J]. 浙江创伤外科, 2015, 20(2): 351-352.
[1] 明昊, 肖迎聪, 巨艳, 宋宏萍. 乳腺癌风险预测模型的研究现状[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 287-291.
[2] 庄燕, 戴林峰, 张海东, 陈秋华, 聂清芳. 脓毒症患者早期生存影响因素及Cox 风险预测模型构建[J/OL]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 372-378.
[3] 黄鸿初, 黄美容, 温丽红. 血液系统恶性肿瘤患者化疗后粒细胞缺乏感染的危险因素和风险预测模型[J/OL]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 285-292.
[4] 罗文斌, 韩玮. 胰腺癌患者首次化疗后中重度骨髓抑制的相关危险因素分析及预测模型构建[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 357-362.
[5] 贺斌, 马晋峰. 胃癌脾门淋巴结转移危险因素[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 694-699.
[6] 林凯, 潘勇, 赵高平, 杨春. 造口还纳术后切口疝的危险因素分析与预防策略[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 634-638.
[7] 杨闯, 马雪. 腹壁疝术后感染的危险因素分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 693-696.
[8] 周艳, 李盈, 周小兵, 程发辉, 何恒正. 不同类型补片联合Nissen 胃底折叠术修补食管裂孔疝的疗效及复发潜在危险因素[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 528-533.
[9] 张伟伟, 陈启, 翁和语, 黄亮. 随机森林模型预测T1 期结直肠癌淋巴结转移的初步研究[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 389-393.
[10] 司楠, 孙洪涛. 创伤性脑损伤后肾功能障碍危险因素的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(05): 300-305.
[11] 李晓东, 王汉宇, 马龙, 刘亮, 魏云, 李昂. 小脑后下动脉瘤的显微手术治疗[J/OL]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(05): 318-320.
[12] 颜世锐, 熊辉. 感染性心内膜炎合并急性肾损伤患者的危险因素探索及死亡风险预测[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(07): 618-624.
[13] 李文哲, 王毅, 崔建, 郑启航, 王靖彦, 于湘友. 新疆维吾尔自治区重症患者急性肾功能异常的危险因素分析[J/OL]. 中华卫生应急电子杂志, 2024, 10(05): 269-276.
[14] 刘志超, 胡风云, 温春丽. 山西省脑卒中危险因素与地域的相关性分析[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 424-433.
[15] 曹亚丽, 高雨萌, 张英谦, 李博, 杜军保, 金红芳. 儿童坐位不耐受的临床进展[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 510-515.
阅读次数
全文


摘要

版权所有 中华医学会 中华医学电子音像出版社有限责任公司  京ICP备14006079号-1  网络出版服务许可证：(署)网出证(京)字第075号