切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华介入放射学电子杂志 ›› 2018, Vol. 06 ›› Issue (04) : 319 -323. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-5782.2018.04.009

所属专题: 经典病例 文献

血管介入

新型蝶式股动脉穿刺压迫装置在618例经股动脉行介入治疗患者中的应用效果
王颖1, 王兵1,(), 崔文军1, 安乾1, 司江涛1, 吴斐1, 李阳1   
  1. 1. 450052 郑州大学第五附属医院血管外科
  • 收稿日期:2018-05-03 出版日期:2018-11-01
  • 通信作者: 王兵

Clinical effect analysis on a new type of butterfly femoral artery puncture compression device in 618 cases

Ying Wang1, Bing Wang1,(), Wenjun Cui1, Qian An1, Jiangtao Si1, Fei Wu1, Yang Li1   

  1. 1. Department of Vascular Surgery, the Fifth Affiliate Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450052, China
  • Received:2018-05-03 Published:2018-11-01
  • Corresponding author: Bing Wang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Wang Bing, Email:
引用本文:

王颖, 王兵, 崔文军, 安乾, 司江涛, 吴斐, 李阳. 新型蝶式股动脉穿刺压迫装置在618例经股动脉行介入治疗患者中的应用效果[J]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2018, 06(04): 319-323.

Ying Wang, Bing Wang, Wenjun Cui, Qian An, Jiangtao Si, Fei Wu, Yang Li. Clinical effect analysis on a new type of butterfly femoral artery puncture compression device in 618 cases[J]. Chinese Journal of Interventional Radiology(Electronic Edition), 2018, 06(04): 319-323.

目的:

观察新型蝶式股动脉穿刺压迫装置在经股动脉行介入治疗患者中的应用效果。

方法:

选取2015年1月至2017年6月我科经股动脉穿刺行介入治疗的患者618例,平均年龄(60.9±8.2)岁,男406例,女212例。术中使用5F、6F、8F、10F动脉鞘管的患者分别为206、342、56、14例,术后均使用新型蝶式股动脉穿刺压迫装置进行穿刺口的压迫,分析患者的肢体制动时间及并发症发生情况。

结果:

5F/6F动脉鞘管拔除后平均制动时间(12.0±4.6)h,8F/10F动脉鞘管拔除后平均制动时间(22.1±8.4)h。618例患者中有效613例,有效率99.2%,5例术后出现穿刺口血肿,经彩超检查3例确诊为假性动脉瘤,其中1例予以凝血酶注射,1例行手术治疗,1例延长压迫时间(48 h),均痊愈,无严重皮肤过敏及破溃患者。

结论:

新型蝶式股动脉压迫装置用于经股动脉行介入治疗后止血,具有操作简便、并发症发生率低、可在直视下有效止血、节时省力,且可同时行双侧股动脉压迫止血等优点,是较为理想的止血方法,值得在临床推广应用。

Objective:

To observe the effect of the new butterfly femoral artery puncture compression device in the treatment of patients with femoral artery punctured.

Methods:

From January 2015 to June 2017, 618 patients who underwent interventional treatment of femoral artery puncture were selected. The mean age of the patients was (60.9±8.2) years old, 406 males and 212 females. The number of patients who used 5F, 6F, 8F and 10F arterial sheath was 206, 342, 56 and 14 cases, respectively. This new butterfly femoral artery puncture compression device was applied to every case after operation. Then the time of limb braking and complications were analyzed.

Results:

After the 5F/6F arterial sheath was pulled out, the average braking time was (12.0±4.6) h, and after the 8F/10F arterial sheath was pulled out, the average braking time was (22.1±8.4) h. The effective rate was 99.2% (613/618) , and 5 hematoma cases of 618 patients were punctured postoperatively, of which 3 cases diagnosed by Doppler Ultrasound were false aneurysms, 1 case of thrombin injection, 1 case undergoing surgical treatment, and 1 case prolonging the time of compression (48 h) , then all recovered. No serious skin allergy and burst happened.

Conclusions:

The new butterfly femoral artery compression device could be used for hemostasis after the femoral artery intervention, with the features of easy operation, low complication rate, also effective under visualization, especially, and the advantages of bilateral femoral artery compression at the same time. It is a more ideal hemostatic device and worth popularizing in clinical application.

图1 新型蝶式股动脉压迫装置模型图
图2 单侧股动脉穿刺压迫带固定方法(2A为前方、2B为后方)
图3 双侧股动脉穿刺压迫带固定方法(3A为前方、3B为后方)
[1]
齐丹青,姚济荣,杜汉萍, 等.预见性护理降低股动脉穿刺点局部血肿发生率的研究[J].介入放射学杂志, 2014, 23(6):539-541.
[2]
Andersen K,Bregendahl M,Kaestel H, et al. Haematoma after coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention via the femoral artery frequency and risk factors[J]. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs, 2005, 4(2):123-127.
[3]
Koreny M,Riedmuller E,Nikfardjam M, et al. Arteral puncture closing devices compared with standard manual compression after cardiac catheterization: systemic review and meta-analysis[J]. JAMA, 2004, 291(3):350-357.
[4]
Dauerman HL,Applegate RJ,Cohen DJ. Vascular closure devices: the second decade[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2007, 50(17):1617-1626.
[5]
Wagner SC,Gonsalves CF,Eschelman DJ, et al. Complications of a percutaneous suture-mediated closure device versus manual compression for arteriotomy closure: a case-controlled study[J]. J Vasc Interv Radiol, 2003, 14:735-741.
[6]
Siani A,Accrocca F,Gabrielli R, et al. Management of acute lower limb ischemia associated with the Angio-Seal arterial puncture closing device[J]. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg, 2011, 12(3):400-403.
[7]
李红霞,左秀兰,刘延军, 等.介入诊疗术后股动脉穿刺点并发症的诱因及预防[J].医学影像学杂志, 2012, 22(10):1739-1741.
[8]
Hoffer EK. Assessing the benefit of vascular closure devices after femoral artery puncture[J]. JAMA, 2015, 313(8):855.
[1] 方晔, 谢晓红, 罗辉. 品管圈在提高前列腺癌穿刺检出率中的应用[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(07): 722-727.
[2] 禄韶英. 股动脉假性动脉瘤的微创治疗[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(05): 377-380.
[3] 李俊, 彭健韵, 邱婉冰, 窦倩怡, 潘福顺, 梁瑾瑜. 甲状腺结节恶性风险分层(指南):ACR TI-RADS与C-TIRADS诊断效能及不同医师使用指南一致性的多中心回顾性比较研究[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 401-407.
[4] 鲁鑫, 许佳怡, 刘洋, 杨琴, 鞠雯雯, 徐缨龙. 早期LC术与PTCD续贯LC术治疗急性胆囊炎对患者肝功能及预后的影响比较[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 648-650.
[5] 徐成, 王璐璐, 王少华. 洗脱液甲状腺球蛋白在甲状腺乳头状癌转移淋巴结中的应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 701-704.
[6] 梁健, 何京伟, 关文峰, 梁其炎, 冯能卓, 黄亦欣, 覃文超. 多参数MRI与超声认知融合引导下前列腺靶向穿刺的前瞻性研究[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 558-562.
[7] 陈秀山, 张婷婷, 杨栓盈, 高娜. 低剂量CT扫描在肺部同轴穿刺活检中的临床应用[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(04): 587-588.
[8] 魏小勇. 原发性肝癌转化治疗焦点问题探讨[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 602-607.
[9] 金浪, 石洁, 黄正, 贾永伟, 张建坡, 魏礼成, 金昊雷. 3D打印数字技术辅助改良交叉PVP对重度骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折脊柱-骨盆矢状面平衡状态的影响[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2023, 09(05): 263-268.
[10] 运陌, 李茂芳, 王浩, 刘东远. 微创穿刺引流联合吡拉西坦、乌拉地尔治疗基底节区高血压性脑出血的临床研究[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(05): 278-285.
[11] 刘政委, 仪立志, 尹夕龙, 孔文龙, 纠智松, 张文源. 锥颅血肿外引流与神经内镜手术治疗老年基底节区高血压性脑出血的疗效分析[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(05): 299-303.
[12] 孙欣欣, 刘军, 陈超伍, 孙超. 超声内镜引导细针穿刺抽吸术在胰腺占位性病变中的应用[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 418-421.
[13] 赵文毅, 邹冰子, 蔡冠晖, 刘永志, 温红. 超声应变力弹性成像联合MRI-DWI靶向引导穿刺在前列腺病变诊断中的应用[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 988-994.
[14] 张曦才, 曹先德. 经皮肾镜取石术治疗无积水肾结石中皮肾通道建立的应用研究进展[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(08): 911-915.
[15] 李世凯, 梁佳, 何艳艳, 于毅, 李天晓, 常金龙, 贺迎坤. 兔颈动脉粥样硬化性狭窄模型在介入治疗的应用进展[J]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2023, 11(04): 357-362.
阅读次数
全文


摘要