切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华介入放射学电子杂志 ›› 2018, Vol. 06 ›› Issue (04) : 319 -323. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-5782.2018.04.009

所属专题: 经典病例 文献

血管介入

新型蝶式股动脉穿刺压迫装置在618例经股动脉行介入治疗患者中的应用效果
王颖1, 王兵1,(), 崔文军1, 安乾1, 司江涛1, 吴斐1, 李阳1   
  1. 1. 450052 郑州大学第五附属医院血管外科
  • 收稿日期:2018-05-03 出版日期:2018-11-01
  • 通信作者: 王兵

Clinical effect analysis on a new type of butterfly femoral artery puncture compression device in 618 cases

Ying Wang1, Bing Wang1,(), Wenjun Cui1, Qian An1, Jiangtao Si1, Fei Wu1, Yang Li1   

  1. 1. Department of Vascular Surgery, the Fifth Affiliate Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450052, China
  • Received:2018-05-03 Published:2018-11-01
  • Corresponding author: Bing Wang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Wang Bing, Email:
引用本文:

王颖, 王兵, 崔文军, 安乾, 司江涛, 吴斐, 李阳. 新型蝶式股动脉穿刺压迫装置在618例经股动脉行介入治疗患者中的应用效果[J/OL]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2018, 06(04): 319-323.

Ying Wang, Bing Wang, Wenjun Cui, Qian An, Jiangtao Si, Fei Wu, Yang Li. Clinical effect analysis on a new type of butterfly femoral artery puncture compression device in 618 cases[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Interventional Radiology(Electronic Edition), 2018, 06(04): 319-323.

目的:

观察新型蝶式股动脉穿刺压迫装置在经股动脉行介入治疗患者中的应用效果。

方法:

选取2015年1月至2017年6月我科经股动脉穿刺行介入治疗的患者618例,平均年龄(60.9±8.2)岁,男406例,女212例。术中使用5F、6F、8F、10F动脉鞘管的患者分别为206、342、56、14例,术后均使用新型蝶式股动脉穿刺压迫装置进行穿刺口的压迫,分析患者的肢体制动时间及并发症发生情况。

结果:

5F/6F动脉鞘管拔除后平均制动时间(12.0±4.6)h,8F/10F动脉鞘管拔除后平均制动时间(22.1±8.4)h。618例患者中有效613例,有效率99.2%,5例术后出现穿刺口血肿,经彩超检查3例确诊为假性动脉瘤,其中1例予以凝血酶注射,1例行手术治疗,1例延长压迫时间(48 h),均痊愈,无严重皮肤过敏及破溃患者。

结论:

新型蝶式股动脉压迫装置用于经股动脉行介入治疗后止血,具有操作简便、并发症发生率低、可在直视下有效止血、节时省力,且可同时行双侧股动脉压迫止血等优点,是较为理想的止血方法,值得在临床推广应用。

Objective:

To observe the effect of the new butterfly femoral artery puncture compression device in the treatment of patients with femoral artery punctured.

Methods:

From January 2015 to June 2017, 618 patients who underwent interventional treatment of femoral artery puncture were selected. The mean age of the patients was (60.9±8.2) years old, 406 males and 212 females. The number of patients who used 5F, 6F, 8F and 10F arterial sheath was 206, 342, 56 and 14 cases, respectively. This new butterfly femoral artery puncture compression device was applied to every case after operation. Then the time of limb braking and complications were analyzed.

Results:

After the 5F/6F arterial sheath was pulled out, the average braking time was (12.0±4.6) h, and after the 8F/10F arterial sheath was pulled out, the average braking time was (22.1±8.4) h. The effective rate was 99.2% (613/618) , and 5 hematoma cases of 618 patients were punctured postoperatively, of which 3 cases diagnosed by Doppler Ultrasound were false aneurysms, 1 case of thrombin injection, 1 case undergoing surgical treatment, and 1 case prolonging the time of compression (48 h) , then all recovered. No serious skin allergy and burst happened.

Conclusions:

The new butterfly femoral artery compression device could be used for hemostasis after the femoral artery intervention, with the features of easy operation, low complication rate, also effective under visualization, especially, and the advantages of bilateral femoral artery compression at the same time. It is a more ideal hemostatic device and worth popularizing in clinical application.

图1 新型蝶式股动脉压迫装置模型图
图2 单侧股动脉穿刺压迫带固定方法(2A为前方、2B为后方)
图3 双侧股动脉穿刺压迫带固定方法(3A为前方、3B为后方)
[1]
齐丹青,姚济荣,杜汉萍, 等.预见性护理降低股动脉穿刺点局部血肿发生率的研究[J].介入放射学杂志, 2014, 23(6):539-541.
[2]
Andersen K,Bregendahl M,Kaestel H, et al. Haematoma after coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention via the femoral artery frequency and risk factors[J]. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs, 2005, 4(2):123-127.
[3]
Koreny M,Riedmuller E,Nikfardjam M, et al. Arteral puncture closing devices compared with standard manual compression after cardiac catheterization: systemic review and meta-analysis[J]. JAMA, 2004, 291(3):350-357.
[4]
Dauerman HL,Applegate RJ,Cohen DJ. Vascular closure devices: the second decade[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2007, 50(17):1617-1626.
[5]
Wagner SC,Gonsalves CF,Eschelman DJ, et al. Complications of a percutaneous suture-mediated closure device versus manual compression for arteriotomy closure: a case-controlled study[J]. J Vasc Interv Radiol, 2003, 14:735-741.
[6]
Siani A,Accrocca F,Gabrielli R, et al. Management of acute lower limb ischemia associated with the Angio-Seal arterial puncture closing device[J]. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg, 2011, 12(3):400-403.
[7]
李红霞,左秀兰,刘延军, 等.介入诊疗术后股动脉穿刺点并发症的诱因及预防[J].医学影像学杂志, 2012, 22(10):1739-1741.
[8]
Hoffer EK. Assessing the benefit of vascular closure devices after femoral artery puncture[J]. JAMA, 2015, 313(8):855.
[1] 罗辉, 方晔. 品管圈在提高甲状腺结节细针穿刺检出率中的应用[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(10): 972-977.
[2] 孙佳丽, 金琳, 沈崔琴, 陈晴晴, 林艳萍, 李朝军, 徐栋. 机器人辅助超声引导下经皮穿刺的体外实验研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 884-889.
[3] 陆婷, 范晴敏, 王洁, 万晓静, 许春芳, 董凤林. 超声引导下经皮穿刺置管引流对重症急性胰腺炎的疗效及应用时机的选择[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(05): 511-516.
[4] 杨新园, 王淑君, 何成, 宋喜鹤, 刘丽芸. 预防与处理危重烧伤患者经外周静脉穿刺置入中心静脉导管堵塞的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(05): 443-446.
[5] 党军强, 杨雁灵, 汪庆强, 尚琳, 朱磊, 项红军. 主动经皮穿刺引流治疗重症急性胰腺炎并发急性坏死物积聚的疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 671-674.
[6] 杨小栎, 李万富, 马柱, 马兰, 郑义, 付晓丽, 王晶. 钳式针一步法在小儿腹腔镜疝囊高位结扎术中的应用效果[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 535-538.
[7] 石兵, 张智, 陈金海, 唐文. 基于电磁跟踪和手术导航系统的实时超声引导下两种经皮肾盏穿刺方法的应用[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 572-578.
[8] 石海波, 赵旭东, 王聪, 曲巍. 气肿性肾盂肾炎、气肿性膀胱炎并脓毒性休克一例报道并文献复习[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 644-647.
[9] 杨勇军, 曾一鸣, 贺显雅, 卢强, 李远伟. ASA分级≥Ⅲ级患者局麻经会阴前列腺多模态影像融合穿刺的安全性和有效性[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 441-447.
[10] 吴伟宙, 王琼仁, 詹雄宇, 郑明星, 李亚县. 广东省医学会泌尿外科疑难病例多学科会诊(第16期)——左肾肉瘤样癌[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 525-529.
[11] 罗磊, 熊建平, 郑宏伟, 王嗣嵩, 柴祥, 吴青, 潘海鹏. 静脉留置针穿刺引流治疗颅骨修补术后硬膜外积液一例报道[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2024, 10(05): 315-317.
[12] 李新宇, 梁建锋. 3D打印导板辅助颅内血肿穿刺引流手术[J/OL]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 382-384.
[13] 吴荣奎, 吴静, 冯俊浩, 钟嘉懿. 临床护理路径在经股动脉入路介入患者的应用[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(08): 729-733.
[14] 邓屹, 叶苏意, 崔伟, 乐艳青, 陈兢兢, 陈俞溪, 陈泳衡, 许荣德, 李静. 影像引导下经皮肺穿刺活检的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2024, 12(04): 296-302.
[15] 周洪千, 张煜坤, 顾天舒, 胡苏涛, 姜超, 张雪, 张昊, 陶华岳, 刘行, 刘彤, 陈康寅. 既往出血性脑卒中患者行经皮冠脉介入治疗后不良事件的危险因素分析[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 323-329.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?