切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华介入放射学电子杂志 ›› 2018, Vol. 06 ›› Issue (03) : 232 -236. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-5782.2018.03.011

所属专题: 文献

血管介入

血管成形联合置管溶栓治疗下肢动脉硬化闭塞症的临床效果研究
武兴杰1,(), 黄树圭1, 邓军2, 李军1, 方萍1, 朱威1   
  1. 1. 510080 广州,广东药科大学附属第一医院影像介入科
    2. 510100 广州,中山大学附属第二医院影像介入科
  • 收稿日期:2017-12-24 出版日期:2018-08-01
  • 通信作者: 武兴杰

Clinical effects of angioplasty combined with catheterized thrombolysis in treatment of arteriosclerosis obliterans of lower extremities

Xingjie Wu1,(), Shugui Huang1, Jun Deng2, Jun Li1, Ping Fang1, Wei Zhu1   

  1. 1. Department of Interventional Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong University of Pharmacy, Guangzhou 510080, China
    2. Department of Interventional Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510100, China
  • Received:2017-12-24 Published:2018-08-01
  • Corresponding author: Xingjie Wu
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Email:
引用本文:

武兴杰, 黄树圭, 邓军, 李军, 方萍, 朱威. 血管成形联合置管溶栓治疗下肢动脉硬化闭塞症的临床效果研究[J/OL]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2018, 06(03): 232-236.

Xingjie Wu, Shugui Huang, Jun Deng, Jun Li, Ping Fang, Wei Zhu. Clinical effects of angioplasty combined with catheterized thrombolysis in treatment of arteriosclerosis obliterans of lower extremities[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Interventional Radiology(Electronic Edition), 2018, 06(03): 232-236.

目的:

比较血管成形联合置管溶栓治疗与常规血管成形术治疗下肢动脉硬化闭塞症的临床效果。

方法:

选择2014年1月至2015年12月我院收治的下肢动脉硬化闭塞症患者33例,18例行常规介入治疗(常规组),15例行介入联合溶栓治疗(溶栓组),观察两组患者的踝肱指数(ABI)、血管开通率、临床疗效与并发症,随访其血管通畅情况。

结果:

常规组的血管开通率、临床有效率均为88.89%(16/18),溶栓组分别为93.33%(14/15)、100%(15/15)。两组的术后足背动脉搏动均增强,ABI值均较术前明显升高,其中溶栓组ABI提高幅度较常规组大,组间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。常规组发生血栓相关并发症2例,溶栓组无相关并发症出现。常规组术后3、6、12、24个月血管通畅率分别为83.33%(15/18)、83.33%(15/18)、72.22%(13/18)及62.50%(10/16),溶栓组分别为100%(15/15)、100%(15/15)、80.00%(12/15)及71.43%(10/14)。溶栓组血管通畅率数值高于常规组。

结论:

经皮血管成形联合置管溶栓治疗下肢动脉硬化闭塞症的临床效果优于常规的血管成形术。

Objective:

To compare the clinical effects of angioplasty combined with catheterized thrombolysis and conventional angioplasty in the treatment of lower extremity arterial occlusive disease.

Methods:

From January 2014 to December 2015, clinical data of 33 patients with lower extremity ASO treated by different ways were analyzed, including 18 cases with routine interventional therapy (routine group) and 15 ones with interventional and thrombolytic therapy (thrombolysis group) . The clinical results in two groups were analyzed and compared.

Results:

Technical success rates were 88.89% in routine group and 93.33% in thrombolysis group. The clinical total effective rate in thrombolysis group was higher than that of routine group (100% vs. 88.89%) . The ABI values in both groups were significantly increased after operation, and the increase rate of ABI in thrombolysis group was larger than that in routine group (P<0.05) . The complications about thrombosis of thrombolysis group were lower than those of routine group. After 3, 6, 12 and 24 months of operation, the primary patency rates were 83.33%, 83.33%, 72.22% and 62.50% respectively in routine group, and 100%, 100%, 80.00% and 71.43% respectively in thrombolysis group. The primary patency in the thrombolysis group was much better than that in the routine group.

Conclusion:

For patients with ASO, the value of interventional treatment combined with thrombolysis is better than that of only routine interventional option.

表1 常规组与溶栓组的一般资料比较
图1 典型病例1(女性,68岁,股浅动脉近端阻塞合并血栓)血管成形联合置管溶栓治疗前后造影图
图2 典型病例2(男性,76岁,两侧髂总动脉闭塞合并血栓)血管成形联合置管溶栓治疗前后造影图
图3 典型病例3(男性,80岁,胫前、胫腓干严重闭塞)血管成形联合置管溶栓治疗前后造影图
表2 两组患者手术前后及组间ABI值比较(±s
表3 两组患者术后并发症及通畅率比较[例(%)]
[1]
郑月宏,廖鹏志.下肢动脉硬化闭塞症治疗现状与展望[J].中华老年多器官疾病杂志,2016,15(3):161-164.
[2]
李成学,王波涛,李建红,等.下肢动脉硬化闭塞症的腔内介入治疗及疗效观察[J].当代医学,2011,17(5):15-17.
[3]
包俊敏.下肢动脉闭塞腔内治疗策略的新思考[J/CD].中国血管外科杂志(电子版),2017,9(2):81-83.
[4]
Indes JE,Pfaff MJ,Farrokhyar F,et al. Clinical outcomes of 5358 patients undergoing direct open bypass or endovascular treatment for aorto-iliac occlusive disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J].J Endovasc Ther,2013,20(4):443-455.
[5]
姚陈,叶彦琛,李勇辉,等.股浅动脉硬化闭塞症腔内治疗效果分析[J/CD].中国血管外科杂志(电子版),2015,7(3):170-174.
[6]
王佩双,胡何节,方征东,等.股腘动脉闭塞腔内成形术与旁路转流术的临床疗效对比分析[J/CD].中国血管外科杂志(电子版),2014,6(1):41-44.
[7]
Kitrou P,Parthipun A,Diamantopoulos A,et al. Targeted true lumen re-entry with the Outback catheter: accuracy,success,and complications in 100 peripheral chronic total occlusions and systematic review of the literature[J]. J Endovasc Ther,2015,22(4):538-545.
[8]
钱结胜,朱康顺,姜在波,等.经桡、股动脉序贯途径腔内治疗下肢动脉硬化闭塞症[J].当代医学,2010,16(29):516-520.
[9]
宋盛晗,王克勤,张望德.溶栓介入治疗主髂动脉闭塞伴血栓形成一例[J/CD].中华介入放射学电子杂志,2016,4(1):48-50.
[10]
Bagan P,Dakhil B,Lacal P,et al. Acute peripheral arterial occlusion: prospective study evaluating intra-arterial thrombolysis with a micro-porous balloon catheter[J]. J Endovasc Ther,2013,20(3):422-426.
[1] 陆婷, 范晴敏, 王洁, 万晓静, 许春芳, 董凤林. 超声引导下经皮穿刺置管引流对重症急性胰腺炎的疗效及应用时机的选择[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(05): 511-516.
[2] 邢颖, 程石. 巨脾外科治疗现状与介入治疗序贯手术策略[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(03): 253-258.
[3] 唐必英, 李钢. 治疗时机对动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血患者预后的影响[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2024, 10(04): 213-219.
[4] 杨金朔, 吴桥伟, 王春雷, 史怀璋. 脑血管内支架成形术后再狭窄的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2024, 10(03): 174-179.
[5] 周帅, 张庆海, 王新, 马晓艳, 孙建霞, 王海波, 张继红. 静脉-动脉体外膜肺氧合辅助下溶栓治疗急性高危肺栓塞一例[J/OL]. 中华重症医学电子杂志, 2024, 10(03): 298-302.
[6] 高振轩, 谢晨, 曹绍东, 甘中伟, 周倍, 罗朝川, 王子齐, 葛煜彤, 张伟光. 高分辨率核磁共振在颅颈大动脉狭窄介入治疗中的临床应用进展[J/OL]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(02): 112-119.
[7] 牟超鹏, 宗斌, 刘奕, 史美英, 徐杜娟, 冯春光. 经远端桡动脉与经常规桡动脉行急诊冠脉介入诊疗后穿刺部位血肿的对比[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 275-282.
[8] 赵峰, 邓默. 纤维蛋白原水平、踝肱指数与外周血管支架治疗下肢动脉硬化闭塞症后再狭窄的关系[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 144-151.
[9] 陈芳, 王建英, 曹建用, 刘丽, 罗晓琴. 基于分析-设计-开发-实施-评价模式的叙事护理培训在产科预防性介入治疗中的应用[J/OL]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2024, 12(04): 392-396.
[10] 李超迪, 刘娟芳, 闫肃, 秦胜东, 张镐哲, 常琼方, 韩新巍, 张建好. 血管性介入治疗在宫颈癌大出血患者中的临床疗效[J/OL]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2024, 12(03): 217-220.
[11] 周宝林, 刘曦, 谌浩, 王金, 马雪琴. 温敏水凝胶在血管内栓塞治疗中的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2024, 12(03): 244-249.
[12] 潘鑫, 黄晓云, 王超, 顾慧, 唐加波, 王鹏, 崔恒熙, 李政. 院前亚低温结合院内溶栓救治急性脑梗死的效果[J/OL]. 中华卫生应急电子杂志, 2024, 10(03): 145-148.
[13] 穆巴拉克·伊力哈, 徐霁华, 鲁明. 急性轻型卒中微量脑出血误诊病例的临床特点及影像学表现分析[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 441-445.
[14] 周洪千, 张煜坤, 顾天舒, 胡苏涛, 姜超, 张雪, 张昊, 陶华岳, 刘行, 刘彤, 陈康寅. 既往出血性脑卒中患者行经皮冠脉介入治疗后不良事件的危险因素分析[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 323-329.
[15] 李芳, 戴西望, 王凯, 郭廷昊, 涂江龙. 非瓣膜性心房颤动相关性卒中的治疗研究进展[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 393-397.
阅读次数
全文


摘要