A review of the hysterosalpingography in the diagnosis of hydrosalpinx

doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-5782.2023.04.008

Abstract

Abstract:

Hydrosalpinx is one of the risk factors for infertility. Hysterosalpingography (HSG) is a candidate for use as a diagnostic tool in hydrosalpinx. It is important to know the HSG manifestations of hydrosalpinx for the radiologists. HSG provides insight into the diagnosis of this entity. This paper summarizes the typical and atypical appearances based on HSG for hydrosalpinx and the relevant studies.

Key words: Hysterosalpingography, Hydrosalpinx, Infertility

Yu Zhang, Jie Miao. A review of the hysterosalpingography in the diagnosis of hydrosalpinx[J]. Chinese Journal of Interventional Radiology(Electronic Edition), 2023, 11(04): 336-340.

/ / Recommend

Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

URL: https://zhjrfsxdzzz.cma-cmc.com.cn/EN/10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-5782.2023.04.008

https://zhjrfsxdzzz.cma-cmc.com.cn/EN/Y2023/V11/I04/336

Figures/Tables 5

References 29

[1]	Obrzut B, Obrzut M. Is there still a place for reconstructive surgery in distal tubal disease?[J]. J Clin Med, 2022, 11(12): 3278.
[2]	Ng KYB, Cheong Y. Hydrosalpinx-salpingostomy, salpingectomy or tubal occlusion[J]. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol, 2019, 59: 41-47.
[3]	Palagiano A, Cozzolino M, Ubaldi FM, et al. Effects of hydrosalpinx on endometrial implantation failures: evaluating salpingectomy in women undergoing in vitro fertilization[J]. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet, 2021, 43(4): 304-310.
[4]	Palagiano A, Cozzolino M, Ubaldi FM, et al. Effects of hydrosalpinx on endometrial implantation failures: evaluating salpingectomy in women undergoing in vitro fertilization[J]. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet, 2021,43(4): 304-310.
[5]	Revzin MV, Moshiri M, Katz DS, et al. Imaging evaluation of fallopian tubes and related disease: a primer for radiologists[J]. Radiographics, 2020, 40(5): 1473-1501.
[6]	Bontis JN, Theodoridis TD. Laparoscopic management of hydrosalpinx[J]. Ann N Y Acad Sci, 2006, 1092: 199-210.
[7]	Igbodike EP, Badejoko OO, Fasubaa OB, et al. Correlation between hysterosalpingography diagnosis and final hysterolaparoscopy with dye-test diagnosis in women with utero-tubal infertility: a cross-sectional study of the implication for which test should be the first-line investigation[J]. SAGE Open Med, 2022, 10: 20503121221104434.
[8]	Zhang J, Lan W, Wang Y, et al. Ethiodized poppyseed oil-based contrast medium is superior to water-based contrast medium during hysterosalpingography regarding image quality improvement and fertility enhancement: a multicentric, randomized and controlled trial[J]. EClinicalMedicine, 2022, 46: 101363.
[9]	Tan J, Deng M, Xia M, et al. Comparison of hysterosalpingography with laparoscopy in the diagnosis of tubal factor of female infertility[J]. Front Med (Lausanne), 2021, 8: 720401.
[10]	Grigovich M, Kacharia VS, Bharwani N, et al. Evaluating fallopian tube patency: what the radiologist needs to know[J]. Radiographics, 2021, 41(6): 1876-1896.
[11]	Makwe CC, Ugwu AO, Sunmonu OH, et al. Hysterosalpingography findings of female partners of infertile couple attending fertility clinic at Lagos University Teaching Hospital[J]. Pan Afr Med J, 2021, 40: 223.
[12]	Strandell A, Lindhard A. Why does hydrosalpinx reduce fertility? The importance of hydrosalpinx fluid[J]. Hum Reprod, 2002, 17(5): 1141-1145.
[13]	van Rijswijk J, Pham CT, Dreyer K, et al. Oil-based or water-based contrast for hysterosalpingography in infertile women: a cost-effectiveness analysis of a randomized controlled trial[J]. Fertil Steril, 2018, 110(4): 754-760.
[14]	Wang R, van Welie N, van Rijswijk J, et al. Effectiveness on fertility outcome of tubal flushing with different contrast media: systematic review and network meta-analysis[J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2019, 54(2): 172-181.
[15]	Lu J, Qi D, Xu W. Fertility-enhancing effect of oil-based contrast agents during hysterosalpingography and the variation of this effect within a 3-year follow-up period in infertile patients[J]. Front Med (Lausanne), 2022, 9: 948945.
[16]	Zhang J, Lan W, Wang Y, et al. Ethiodized poppyseed oil-based contrast medium is superior to water-based contrast medium during hysterosalpingography regarding image quality improvement and fertility enhancement: a multicentric, randomized and controlled trial[J]. EClinicalMedicine, 2022, 46: 101363.
[17]	Tan Y, Zheng S, Lei W, et al. Ethiodized poppyseed oil versus ioversol for image quality and adverse events in hysterosalpingography: a prospective cohort study[J]. BMC Med Imaging, 2019, 19(1): 50.
[18]	Igbodike EP, Badejoko OO, Fasubaa OB, et al. Correlation between hysterosalpingography diagnosis and final hysterolaparoscopy with dye-test diagnosis in women with utero-tubal infertility: a cross-sectional study of the implication for which test should be the first-line investigation[J]. SAGE Open Med, 2022, 10: 20503121221104434.
[19]	Antonisamy N, Reddy NS, Chinta P, et al. Role of hysterosalpingography in diagnosing tubal blockage-a prospective diagnostic study[J].J Hum Reprod Sci, 2021, 14(4): 386-391.
[20]	Onwuchekwa CR, Oriji VK. Hysterosalpingographic (HSG) pattern of infertility in women of reproductive age[J]. J Hum Reprod Sci, 2017, 10(3): 178-184.
[21]	Streda R, Mardesic T, Kult D, et al. The diagnostic value of hysterosalpingography in the diagnosis of tubal disease[J]. Ceska Gynekol, 2009, 74(1): 18-21.
[22]	Simpson WL Jr, Beitia LG, Mester J. Hysterosalpingography: a reemerging study[J]. Radiographics, 2006, 26(2): 419-431.
[23]	Li YZ, Qiu J, Ma B, et al. The role of diagnostic magnetic resonance hysterosalpingography in the evaluation of fallopian tubal occlusion of female infertility: a meta-analysis[J]. Clin Imaging, 2021, 72: 11-18.
[24]	Ma L, Wu G, Wang Y, et al. Fallopian tubal patency diagnosed by magnetic resonance hysterosalpingography[J]. J Reprod Med, 2012, 57(9-10): 435-440.
[25]	De Felice C, Rech F, Marini A, et al. Magnetic resonance hysterosalpingography in the evaluation of tubal patency in infertile women: an observational study[J]. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol, 2012, 39(1): 83-88.
[26]	梁娜, 吴青青. 三维子宫输卵管超声造影临床应用及进展[J]. 中国医学影像学杂志,2010, 18(4): 306-309.
[27]	Arya S, Kupesic Plavsic S. Preimplantation 3D ultrasound: current uses and challenges[J]. J Perinat Med, 2017, 45(6): 745-758.
[28]	Devine K, Dolitsky S, Ludwin I, et al. Modern assessment of the uterine cavity and fallopian tubes in the era of high-efficacy assisted reproductive technology[J]. Fertil Steril, 2022, 118(1): 19-28.
[29]	李宏波, 张玫玫, 强也, 等. 两种球囊导管在三维子宫输卵管超声造影中的应用研究[J]. 东南大学学报(医学版), 2019, 38(3): 494-497.

Please choose a citation manager

Content to export