Home    中文  
 
  • Search
  • lucene Search
  • Citation
  • Fig/Tab
  • Adv Search
Just Accepted  |  Current Issue  |  Archive  |  Featured Articles  |  Most Read  |  Most Download  |  Most Cited

Chinese Journal of Interventional Radiology(Electronic Edition) ›› 2019, Vol. 07 ›› Issue (01): 26-30. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-5782.2019.01.005

Special Issue:

• Monographi Study·Vascular Intervention • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Clinical value of percutaneous endovascular stent exclusion under DSA in treatment of Stanford type B aortic dissection

Weizhao Zhuang1, Mengju Yu1, Wenzhu Zhang1, Chen Huang1, Yukuan Tang1, Huigang Feng1, Weiqi Li1, Weifeng Zhong1   

  1. 1. Department of Minimally Invasive Intervention, Guangzhou Panyu Central Hospital, Guangzhou 511400, China
  • Received:2018-12-20 Online:2019-02-01 Published:2019-02-01

Abstract:

Objective:

To investigate the clinical value of the stent lumen isolation belt membrane technique (endovascular graft exclusion, EVGE) in the treatment of Stanford type B aortic dissection (AD) with the digital subtraction angiography (DSA) .

Methods:

From January 2015 to December 2015, 30 Stanford type B AD patients were involved in this study. Fifteen patients were treated with EVGE by DSA and blood vessel suture instrument as observation group, then other 15 patients treated with EVGE through the exposed femoral artery, respectively, were set to control group, the clinical data of two groups of patients were retrospectively recorded, such as surgery and postoperative recovery time and local vascular complications, and the vascular diameter, quality of life score and stent displacement were compared between the two groups after 3 months follow-up.

Results:

The surgical success rates of two groups had no statistically significant difference (93.3% vs. 100.0%, χ2=1.03, P>0.05) . In observation group, intraoperative blood loss was lower than that in the control group[ (43.57±14.30) ml vs. (69.82±25.18) ml, t=3.51, P<0.05]. The postoperative drainage time and hospitalization time of the observation group were shorter than those of the control group [ (2.63±1.07) d vs. (3.87±1.25) d, t=2.91, P<0.05; (5.47±1.85) d vs. (7.65±2.24) d, t=2.90, P<0.05) , and the total incidence of local vascular complications was lower than that of the control group (6.67% vs. 40.0%, χ2=4.90, P<0.05) . Followed up for 3 months, the quality of life score in observation group was higher than that of the control group (t=1.84, P<0.05) , while the difference of blood vessel diameter between groups had no statistical significance (P>0.05) , and stent shifting did not happen.

Conclusions:

The belt membrane bracket EVGE could effectively guarantee the success rate of surgery and prognosis of patients, reduce intraoperative bleeding and postoperative local vascular complications, and accelerate the postoperative recovery for the Stanford type B aortic dissection patients.

Key words: Stanford B type, Aortic dissection, Intraventricular isolation, Digital subtraction angiography

京ICP 备07035254号-20
Copyright © Chinese Journal of Interventional Radiology(Electronic Edition), All Rights Reserved.
Tel: 0756-2528259 E-mail: zhjrfsx@163.com
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd