切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华介入放射学电子杂志 ›› 2025, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (04) : 314 -321. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-5782.2025.04.007

肿瘤介入

肝动脉灌注化疗联合门静脉腔内照射支架治疗肝癌合并门静脉癌栓Ⅲ型的疗效及安全性
阿斯哈尔·哈斯木, 张海潇, 任伟新, 顾俊鹏()   
  1. 830054 新疆,新疆医科大学第一附属医院
  • 收稿日期:2025-03-07 出版日期:2025-11-25
  • 通信作者: 顾俊鹏
  • 基金资助:
    新疆维吾尔自治区科学技术厅,新疆维吾尔自治区科技支疆项目计划(指令性)项目(2021E02074)

Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy Combined with Portal Vein Endovascular Brachytherapy Stent in the Treatment of Primary Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Type Ⅲ Portal Vein Tumor Thrombus

Haixiao Zhang, Weixin Ren, Junpeng Gu()   

  1. Department of Interventional radiology, The First affirmated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urmqi, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, 830054, China
  • Received:2025-03-07 Published:2025-11-25
  • Corresponding author: Junpeng Gu
引用本文:

阿斯哈尔·哈斯木, 张海潇, 任伟新, 顾俊鹏. 肝动脉灌注化疗联合门静脉腔内照射支架治疗肝癌合并门静脉癌栓Ⅲ型的疗效及安全性[J/OL]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2025, 13(04): 314-321.

Haixiao Zhang, Weixin Ren, Junpeng Gu. Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy Combined with Portal Vein Endovascular Brachytherapy Stent in the Treatment of Primary Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Type Ⅲ Portal Vein Tumor Thrombus[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Interventional Radiology(Electronic Edition), 2025, 13(04): 314-321.

目的

探讨肝动脉灌注化疗(hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy, HAIC)联合门静脉腔内照射支架在原发性肝癌合并门静脉癌栓(portal vein tumor thrombus, PVTT)Ⅲ型患者中的临床疗效及安全性。

方法

回顾性分析2021年1月至2024年12月在新疆医科大学第一附属医院接受治疗的30例肝细胞癌(hepatocellular carcinoma, HCC)合并PVTT Ⅲ型患者,按照治疗方案分为观察组(HAIC联合门静脉腔内照射支架,15例)和对照组(单纯HAIC,15例)。比较2组疗效、肝功能变化、不良反应、生存期等指标。

结果

观察组疾病控制率(disease control rate, DCR)为86.7%(13/15),显著高于对照组66.7%(10/15),差异有统计学意义(P=0.031)。中位无进展生存(progression-free survival, PFS)时间:观察组17.6个月(95% CI:14.8~20.4)vs.对照组5.6个月(95% CI:4.7~6.5),log-rank P<0.001;中位总生存(overall survival, OS)时间:观察组18.1个月(95% CI:15.2~21.0)vs.对照组5.9个月(95% CI:5.1~6.9),log-rank P<0.001。因素Cox回归显示,治疗方案为OS独立预后因素(HR 0.28,95% CI:0.10~0.75,P=0.011)。术后总胆红素水平以中位数:观察组23.87±9.03 μmol/L,显著低于对照组45.94±24.46 μmol/L(P=0.015);术后ALBI 2级比例93.3% vs. 46.7%(P=0.014)。不良事件多为Ⅰ–Ⅱ级,观察组与对照组总体发生率无差异(26.7% vs. 20.0%,P=0.648)。

结论

HAIC联合门静脉腔内照射支架显著提高PVTT Ⅲ型肝癌患者病灶控制率与生存期,改善肝功能且安全性良好。

Objective

To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) combined with portal vein endovascular brachytherapy stent implantation in patients with primary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) complicated by type Ⅲ portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT).

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 30 patients with type Ⅲ PVTT treated at the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University between January 2021 and December 2024. Patients were assigned to an observation group (HAIC + portal vein endovascular brachytherapy stent, n=15) or a control group (HAIC alone, n=15). Treatment efficacy, liver function parameters, adverse events, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were compared.

Results

The disease control rate (DCR) was higher in the observation group than in the control group (86.7% [13/15] vs. 66.7% [10/15], P=0.031). Median PFS was significantly prolonged in the observation group (17.6 months, 95% CI: 14.8~20.4) compared with the control group (5.6 months, 95% CI: 4.7~6.5; log-rank P<0.001). Median OS was also longer in the observation group (18.1 months, 95% CI: 15.2~21.0) versus the control group (5.9 months, 95% CI: 5.1~6.9; log-rank P<0.001). Liver function recovery was better in the observation group, with lower post-treatment total bilirubin levels (23.87 ± 9.03 μmol/L vs. 45.94±24.46 μmol/L, P=0.015) and a higher proportion of patients maintaining ALBI grade 2 (93.3% vs. 46.7%, P=0.014). Most adverse events were grade I–II, and the overall incidence was similar between groups (26.7% vs. 20.0%, P=0.648). Cox regression analysis identified treatment group as an independent predictor of OS (HR 0.28, 95% CI: 0.10~0.75, P=0.011).

Conclusion

HAIC combined with portal vein endovascular brachytherapy stent implantation significantly improves disease control, liver function recovery, and survival compared to HAIC alone in PVTT type III HCC patients, with a favorable safety profile.

表1 门静脉腔内照射支架尺寸
表2 门静脉腔内照射支架剂量分布变化
图1 患者,男性,42岁,既往乙肝病史,间断腹痛2月入院。 1A:门静脉造影示门静脉主干及左支癌栓形成(箭头所示);1B:CTA示门静脉主干及左支可见充盈缺损影(箭头所示);1C:门静脉腔内照射支架装碘-125粒子(箭头所示);1D:门静脉腔内照射支架植入至门静脉癌栓位置;1E:术后造影:支架位置良好,造影剂通过顺利;1F:复查CTA示:12个月门静脉腔内照射支架仍通畅(箭头所示)。
表3 2组患者基线资料比较
表4 2组患者术后1年mRECIST评分情况
表5 2组治疗前后肝功能指标变化比较
图2 2组术后PFS生存时间比较
图3 2组术后OS生存时间比较
[1]
Zhang X P, Lin B X, Chen Y, et al. Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Portal Vein Tumor Thrombus: Treatment with Transarterial Chemoembolization Combined with Sorafenib—A Real-World Multicenter Study[J]. J Hepatol, 2020, 73(1): 137-144.
[2]
European Association for the Study of the Liver. EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines: Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma[J]. J Hepatol, 2019, 70(4): 817.
[3]
Shim J H, Jun M J, Han S, et al. Prognostic Nomograms for Prediction of Recurrence and Survival After Curcurative Liver Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma[J]. Ann Surg, 2015, 261(5): 939-946.
[4]
Li Q J, He M K, Chen H W, et al. Hepatic Arterial Infusion of Oxaliplatin, Fluorouracil, and Leucovorin Versus Transarterial Chemoembolization for Large Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Randomized Phase Ⅲ Trial[J]. JAMA Oncol, 2021, 7(5): 735-743.
[5]
Li X, Zhang Y, Chen Q, et al. Iodine-125 Seed Strand Versus Conventional Stent for Portal Vein Thrombosis in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Phase Ⅲ Randomized Controlled Trial.[J] Liver Cancer, 2023, 12(2): 156-168.
[6]
Forner A, Reig M, Bruix J. Hepatocellular Carcinoma[J]. TheLancet, 2018, 391(10127): 1301-1314.
[7]
Chung G E, Lee J H, Kim H Y, et al. Natural History of Untreated Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Portal Vein Tumor Thrombus: A Nationwide Cohort Study.[J] Liver Cancer, 2020, 9(6): 682-690.
[8]
Lyu N, Lin Y, Kong Y, et al. FOLFOX Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy Versus Sorafenib as First-Line Treatment for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Phase Ⅲ Randomized Trial[J]. J CLIN ONCOL, 2022, 40(4_suppl): 407.
[9]
Kudo M, Ueshima K, Ikeda M, et al. Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy-Induced Liver Injury in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Multicenter Retrospective Analysis[J]. Liver Cancer, 2022, 11(3): 240-253.
[10]
Li X, Zhang Y, Wang Z, et al. Dosimetric and Biological Effects of Iodine-125 Seed Strands in Portal Vein Tumor Thrombus: A Preclinical Study[J]. IJROBP, 2022, 112(3): 718-729.
[11]
Zhu K, Chen J, Zhang Y, et al. Hemodynamic Changes in Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Portal Vein Tumor Thrombus: Quantitative Analysis with Four-Dimensional CT[J]. Radiology, 2021, 298(2): 448-457.
[12]
Hamaoka M, Kobayashi T, Kuroda S, et al. Radiation Therapy Combined with Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Portal Vein Tumor Thrombus: A Multicenter Retrospective Study[J]. IJROBP, 2021, 111(3): e135-e146.
[13]
Guo W, He X, Li Z, et al. Iodine-125 Seed Implantation Combined with FOLFOX-HAIC Versus TACE Plus Sorafenib for Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Portal Vein Tumor Thrombus: A Randomized Phase II Trial[J]. EUR J NUCL MED MOL I, 2023, 50(5): 1423-1434.
[14]
He M, Li Q, Zou R, et al. Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Portal Vein Thrombosis: A Multicenter Real-World Study[J]. J HEPATOL, 2021, 75(6): 1372-1381.
[15]
Luo J, Zhang Z, Xu Q, et al. Endovascular Brachytherapy Combined with Stent Placement and Transarterial Chemoembolization for Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Main Portal Vein Tumor Thrombus[J]. Hepatol Int, 2016, 10(1): 185-195.
[16]
Chen Z, Li X, Zhang Y, et al. Histopathological Changes in Normal Liver Parenchyma After Iodine-125 Seed Brachytherapy for Portal Vein Tumor Thrombus: A Prospective Pathological Study[J]. J HEPATOL, 2020, 73(5): 1131-1139.
[17]
Luo J J, Yan Z P, Liu Q X, et al. Endovascular Placement of Iodine-125 Seed Strand and Stent Combined with Chemoembolization for Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Tumor Thrombus in Main Portal Vein[J]. J VASC INTERV RADIOL, 2011, 22(4): 479-489.
[1] 刘宾, 王伟, 任俊, 汪刘华, 王道荣. 腹腔镜改良Devine术在晚期胃癌合并幽门梗阻患者中的临床可行性及术后效果评价[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2025, 19(06): 369-375.
[2] 华赟鹏. 自发性破裂肝细胞癌根治性切除术后腹腔热灌注化疗的疗效及化疗药物方案的比较分析:一项回顾性研究[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2025, 19(05): 344-344.
[3] 邱益霖, 何坤. 肝细胞癌合并门静脉癌栓的治疗进展[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2025, 19(03): 197-202.
[4] 李婷婷, 李宏羽, 吴孟航. 肝动脉灌注化疗在不可切除肝细胞癌中的应用进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(06): 705-708.
[5] 张光亚, 方荣喜, 吴鹏, 肖虎. 腹腔镜下不同入肝血流阻断肝切除治疗原发性肝癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(04): 376-379.
[6] 黎伟忠, 黎嘉历, 张映南, 莫灿荣. 改良Glisson鞘外阻断在腹腔镜解剖性左半肝切除术中的应用研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(04): 453-456.
[7] 朱恒美, 董志涛, 房树恒, 贺丹丹, 张晓丽, 周静, 翟健, 耿利, 杨甲梅. 肝癌肝动脉持续灌注化疗患者卧床时限改变的前瞻性研究[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(06): 925-930.
[8] 赵俊宇, 林航宇, 李会灵, 王显飞, 游川. 肝癌肝切除术后大量腹水预测模型的建立与验证[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(05): 740-747.
[9] 袁洳靖, 孙居仙, 程树群. 肝癌合并门静脉癌栓放射治疗[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(05): 659-666.
[10] 匡嘉文, 陈铁军, 龚远锋, 唐辉, 唐云强. TACE-HAIC联合仑伐替尼和PD-1抑制剂四联治疗Ⅲa期肝癌的疗效[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(04): 554-560.
[11] 吴添庆, 郑梽楷, 贺珉睿, 潘扬勋, 王骏成, 陈锦滨, 周仲国. 华蟾素治疗肝癌肝动脉灌注化疗术后疼痛的疗效和安全性[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(04): 569-575.
[12] 王淼, 贺佳佳, 潘颖威, 王小兰, 姚袆, 刘明宝, 陆兮, 苏丽洁. 远端胆管癌术后生存预后及其影响因素分析[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(04): 582-588.
[13] 甘翌翔, 欧阳俐颖, 潘扬勋, 张耀军, 陈敏山, 徐立. ICGR15和ALBI评分对肝动脉灌注化疗后肝癌肝切除术后肝衰竭和预后的预测价值[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(03): 395-401.
[14] 李姁, 冯中秋. HBV相关原发性肝癌患者经导管动脉化疗栓塞术后严重腹痛预测模型的构建及验证[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2025, 15(05): 480-485.
[15] 卫星彤, 李昊昌, 赵欣. 超声造影在鉴别诊断原发性肝癌类型上的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(05): 392-396.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?