切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华介入放射学电子杂志 ›› 2025, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (03) : 246 -249. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-5782.2025.03.009

非血管介入

局部注射硬化剂治疗化脓性肉芽肿的疗效分析
夏杰军1, 杨开颖2, 陈昆山1, 谭小云1, 刘珍银1, 谢世锋1, 李海波1,()   
  1. 1 510623 广东 广州,广州医科大学附属广州市妇女儿童医疗中心介入血管瘤科
    2 510623 广东 广州,广州医科大学附属广州市妇女儿童医疗中心小儿外科
  • 收稿日期:2025-01-24 出版日期:2025-08-25
  • 通信作者: 李海波

Efficacy analysis of local sclerotherapy for the treatment of pyogenic granuloma

Jiejun Xia1, Kaiying Yang2, Kunshan Chen1, Xiaoyun Tan1, Zhenyin Liu1, Shifeng Xie1, Haibo Li1,()   

  1. 1 Department of Interventional Therapy and Vascular Anomalies, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510623, China
    2 Department of Pediatric Surgery, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510623, China
  • Received:2025-01-24 Published:2025-08-25
  • Corresponding author: Haibo Li
  • Supported by:
    The China Postdoctoral Science Foundation(2023M730793); the Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation(2023A1515012751); the Guangzhou Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation(2024A04J3857); the Research Foundation of Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center for Clinical Doctor(2023BS014); the Research Foundation for the Undergraduate Science and Technology Innovation Program of the School of Pediatrics, Guangzhou Medical University(2024ekky002)
引用本文:

夏杰军, 杨开颖, 陈昆山, 谭小云, 刘珍银, 谢世锋, 李海波. 局部注射硬化剂治疗化脓性肉芽肿的疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2025, 13(03): 246-249.

Jiejun Xia, Kaiying Yang, Kunshan Chen, Xiaoyun Tan, Zhenyin Liu, Shifeng Xie, Haibo Li. Efficacy analysis of local sclerotherapy for the treatment of pyogenic granuloma[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Interventional Radiology(Electronic Edition), 2025, 13(03): 246-249.

目的

评估局部硬化剂注射治疗化脓性肉芽肿的安全性和疗效。

方法

回顾性分析2022年2月至2024年12月,广州医科大学附属广州市妇女儿童医疗中心介入血管瘤科收治的化脓性肉芽肿患者的临床资料,根据肿物外观并参考其基底部尺寸,分为宽蒂型与窄蒂型,其中宽蒂型采用丝线结扎联合硬化剂注射,窄蒂型仅使用硬化剂注射,分析患者的治疗结果、并发症发生率、治疗次数以及复发情况,评估治疗的临床效果。

结果

在15例患者中,共有9例窄蒂型接受了硬化剂注射,6例宽蒂型接受了丝线结扎联合硬化剂(1%聚多卡醇或聚桂醇)注射的联合治疗,所有病变在治疗后的8周内完全消退,1例患者接受了2次局部注射,其余患者仅接受一次注射。所有患者治疗过程耐受性良好,未见过敏反应和皮肤坏死等不良反应。随访时间2~24个月,未见肿物复发,愈合后无色素沉着或疤痕形成。

结论

局部硬化注射是治疗化脓性肉芽肿的高效且安全的治疗方法,对于宽蒂型病例,结合结扎方法可提高疗效。

Objective

This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of local sclerosant injection in the treatment of pyogenic granuloma.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was performed on patients with pyogenic granuloma admitted to the Interventional Vascular Anomalies Department of our hospital from February 2022 to December 2024. Based on the appearance of the lesion and its basal dimensions, patients were classified into broad-stalk and narrow-stalk types. The broad-stalk type was treated with a combination of ligation using silk thread and injection of a sclerosant, whereas the narrow-stalk type received only the sclerosant injection. Treatment outcomes, incidence of complications, number of treatment sessions, and recurrence rates were analyzed to assess the clinical effectiveness of the treatment.

Results

Among the 15 patients included, 9 with the narrow-stalk type underwent sclerosant injection, and 6 with the broad-stalk type received the combined treatment of silk thread ligation and injection of a sclerosant (either 1% polidocanol or Lauromacrogol). Complete resolution of the lesions was achieved within 8 weeks following treatment. Only 1 patient required 2 sessions of local injection, while the remaining patients were successfully treated with a single session. All patients tolerated the treatment well, and no adverse reactions such as allergic responses or skin necrosis were observed. During a follow-up period ranging from 2 to 24 months, no recurrences were noted, and no post-healing pigment deposition or scar formation was observed.

Conclusion

Local sclerosant injection is a highly effective and safe treatment modality for pyogenic granuloma. For broad-stalk lesions, the addition of ligation may further enhance therapeutic outcomes.

图1 病例1,手指PG 1A:手指PG,4.5号注射器自基底部注射硬化剂;1B:一次治疗后,1个月后复查,肿物完全消失。PG:化脓性肉芽肿。
图2 病例2,头皮PG 2A:头皮PG,丝线结扎肿物蒂部,后注射硬化剂;2B:一次治疗后,1个月后复查,肿物完全消失。PG:化脓性肉芽肿。
图3 病例3,手指尖部PG,易出血 3A:手指PG易出血,第一次1%硬化剂注射后1 min;3B:第一次注射后7 d,表面部分肿物变黑结痂;3C:第一次注射后1个月,肿物仅缩小少许,进行再次治疗,丝线结扎肿物底部,注射硬化剂;3D:第二次治疗后7 d,肿物完全变黑;3E:第二次治疗后1个月,肿物完全消失。PG:化脓性肉芽肿。
[1]
Kaleeny JD, Janis JE. Pyogenic granuloma diagnosis and management: a practical review[J]. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open, 2024, 12(9): e6160.
[2]
郭晓楠, 董长宪, 朱晓爽, 等. 手指肉芽肿性血管瘤的尿素注射治疗效果观察[J]. 中华手外科杂志, 2015, 31(3): 222-223.
[3]
姜鑫, 樊俊威. 化脓性肉芽肿803例临床及组织病理分析[J]. 临床皮肤科杂志, 2023, 52(10): 596-599.
[4]
魏芬, 陈宏翔, 张颂. 化脓性肉芽肿的临床诊疗进展[J]. 中国皮肤性病学杂志, 2022(007): 036.
[5]
Mishra N, Mehra M, Gahalaut P. Pressure Therapy for Pyogenic Granuloma[J]. Journal of Cutaneous & Aesthetic Surgery, 2023, 16(1).
[6]
张毅. 丝线结扎法治疗寻常疣皮赘化脓性肉芽肿[J]. 贵州医药, 1989(1): 62.
[7]
Deshpande AJ, Dubey VC. 3% Polidocanol sclerotherapy for pyogenic granuloma: efficacy and safety analysis[J]. J Cutan Aesthet Surg, 2022, 15(3): 284-287.
[8]
中华医学会整形外科分会血管瘤脉管畸形学组, 林晓曦. 血管瘤与脉管畸形诊疗指南(2024版)[J]. 组织工程与重建外科杂志, 2024, 20(1): 1-50.
[9]
Cheng J, Yuan H, Fu R, et al. Comparison of the efficacy and adverse effects of long pulsed 1064 nm Nd: YAG laser and sclerotherapy in the treatment of pyogenic granuloma in children: a retrospective study[J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2025, 15(1).
[10]
Komakech D, Ssenkumba B. Pyogenic Granuloma[J]. The New England journal of medicine, 2022, 387(21): 1979.
[11]
Au S, Fancher W, Scribner J. Treatment of pediatric pyogenic granuloma in a functionally and cosmetically sensitive area with the 1064 nm ND: Yag laser[J]. Dermatology Online Journal, 2016, 22(4).
[12]
钟文耀, 田文, 李淳, 等. 手部肉芽肿性血管瘤的分型及治疗策略[J]. 中华手外科杂志, 2017, 33(2): 128-131.
[13]
中华口腔医学会口腔颌面外科专业委员会脉管性疾病学组. 聚桂醇硬化剂治疗口腔颌面部血管瘤和脉管畸形专家共识[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2018, 16(3): 275-278.
[14]
Li J, Wu C, Song D, et al. Polidocanol sclerotherapy for the treatment of pyogenic granuloma in children[J]. Dermatol Surg, 2021, 47(6): 802-804.
[15]
Cheng J, Yuan H, Fu R, et al. Comparison of the efficacy and adverse effects of long pulsed 1064 nm Nd: YAG laser and sclerotherapy in the treatment of pyogenic granuloma in children: a retrospective study[J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2025, 15(1).
[1] 吕祝英, 黄品同, 雷志锴, 楼军, 孔凡雷, 陈龙. 超声引导经皮穿刺聚桂醇硬化治疗症状性子宫肌瘤的临床应用[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2021, 18(10): 991-997.
[2] 丁彦军, 李泞珊, 乔伟, 李佩倞, 益磋, 高文宏, 米成嵘, 刘政. 无水乙醇和聚桂醇增强聚焦超声消融兔肝脏实验研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2020, 17(01): 64-69.
[3] 邵小丽, 林燕, 张玲玲, 韩亚琴. 超声引导下子宫肌瘤注射聚桂醇硬化术联合术后米非司酮治疗临床疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(03): 353-360.
[4] 周世勇, 艾飞, 杨芳, 陆进, 罗绍泽. 聚桂醇治疗腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术后Ⅳ型血清肿及残壁囊肿的疗效[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(02): 174-175.
[5] 宁波, 柴宁莉, 李惠凯, 冯秀雪, 杜晨, 李笑, 张晓彬, 赵鑫, 令狐恩强. 基于新评价体系的胰腺囊性肿瘤消融有效性分析[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 14(05): 293-297.
[6] 黄宏春, 张海波, 孟敏, 陈芳洁, 王秀敏, 郭长青. 透明帽辅助内镜下泡沫硬化剂治疗内痔的初步研究[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2020, 09(06): 621-624.
[7] 中国血管瘤血管畸形联盟, 中国医师协会介入医师分会妇儿介入学组. 聚桂醇注射液治疗儿童静脉畸形中国专家共识[J/OL]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2022, 10(04): 349-354.
[8] 王佳讯, 陈毓菁, 梁展鹏, 伍卓强, 邬家明, 林毅迪. 超声引导下聚多卡醇泡沫硬化治疗肾囊肿的临床应用价值[J/OL]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2022, 10(03): 278-282.
[9] 冯惠岗, 张健谊, 梁奇伟, 陈汉威, 唐郁宽, 黄益. 聚多卡醇与鱼肝油酸钠泡沫硬化治疗下肢静脉曲张的疗效差异[J/OL]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2021, 09(03): 270-274.
[10] 中国医师协会介入医师分会妇儿介入专委会. 硬化注射治疗血管瘤专家共识[J/OL]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2021, 09(03): 247-251.
[11] 左松, 董长宪, 肖莉, 王彦林, 郭晓楠, 任腾飞. 聚多卡醇泡沫硬化治疗儿童Puig'sⅠ型和Ⅱ型肛周静脉畸形临床研究[J/OL]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2021, 09(01): 41-44.
[12] 黄晓霞, 梁奇伟, 冯惠岗, 庄炜钊, 林桂仪, 王浩, 邢会杰, 陈汉威, 黄益, 李龙. DSA引导下注射聚多卡醇和鱼肝油酸钠硬化剂对比格犬隐静脉的影响[J/OL]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2019, 07(02): 151-154.
[13] 令狐恩强. 超声内镜引导下聚桂醇消融术[J/OL]. 中华胃肠内镜电子杂志, 2023, 10(02): 144-144.
[14] 高飞, 李惠凯, 冯秀雪, 杜晨, 韩珂, 柴宁莉, 令狐恩强. 3%聚桂醇消融动物囊性肿瘤模型的有效性和安全性研究[J/OL]. 中华胃肠内镜电子杂志, 2023, 10(01): 31-36.
[15] 臧凤莉, 孙建国, 徐克达. 软式内镜下透明帽辅助硬化术治疗内痔出血的临床观察[J/OL]. 中华胃肠内镜电子杂志, 2020, 07(03): 121-125.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?