切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华介入放射学电子杂志 ›› 2025, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (03) : 206 -211. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-5782.2025.03.002

神经介入

血流导向装置治疗未破裂基底动脉大型动脉瘤的安全性及疗效分析
曹婷婷1, 刘嘉博1, 都一鸣2, 吴桥伟2, 马丽娜1,()   
  1. 1 150000 哈尔滨,哈尔滨医科大学附属第一医院门诊中心手术室
    2 150000 哈尔滨,哈尔滨医科大学附属第一医院神经外科
  • 收稿日期:2024-11-21 出版日期:2025-08-25
  • 通信作者: 马丽娜

Analysis of the safety and efficacy of flow diverter implantation in the treatment of unruptured large basilar artery aneurysms

Tingting Cao1, Jiabo Liu1, Yiming Du2, Qiaowei Wu2, Lina Ma1,()   

  1. 1 Outpatient Central Operating Room, The First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin 150000, China
    2 Department of Neurosurgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin 150000, China
  • Received:2024-11-21 Published:2025-08-25
  • Corresponding author: Lina Ma
引用本文:

曹婷婷, 刘嘉博, 都一鸣, 吴桥伟, 马丽娜. 血流导向装置治疗未破裂基底动脉大型动脉瘤的安全性及疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2025, 13(03): 206-211.

Tingting Cao, Jiabo Liu, Yiming Du, Qiaowei Wu, Lina Ma. Analysis of the safety and efficacy of flow diverter implantation in the treatment of unruptured large basilar artery aneurysms[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Interventional Radiology(Electronic Edition), 2025, 13(03): 206-211.

目的

探讨采用单纯血流导向装置(flow diverter,FD)置入治疗未破裂基底动脉主干大型动脉瘤(large basilar trunk aneurysms,LBTAs)的安全性及疗效。

方法

回顾性纳入哈尔滨医科大学附属第一医院自2015年1月至2023年8月采用单纯FD置入治疗未破裂基底动脉主干大型动脉瘤(最大径≥10 mm)的患者。评估术后患者的并发症发生情况及随访影像学结果。采用改良Rankin量表评分(modified Rankin scale,mRS)评估患者的临床预后情况;采用O'Kelly-Marotta(OKM)分级评估影像学随访中的动脉瘤闭塞情况。

结果

共纳入14例(14个动脉瘤)接受FD治疗的未破裂LBTAs患者,手术成功率为100%。平均动脉瘤最大径为(18.0±8.9) mm。所有患者均采用单纯FD置入治疗,均未结合弹簧圈栓塞。共使用20枚支架治疗14个动脉瘤,其中2例患者采用3枚支架重叠置入,2例患者采用2枚支架重叠置入。术后共5例(35.7%)患者出现神经系统并发症,其中4例(28.6%)并发症于围手术期首次出现,1例(7.1%)于随访期间出现首次出现。共3例患者死亡,死亡率为21.4%。5例并发症患者首次出现均为缺血性并发症,其中2例(14.3%)患者合并出血性并发症。所有患者末次临床平均随访时间为(25.5±12.3)个月。患者出院及末次随访良好预后(mRS评分>2分)率分别为85.7%(12/14)和71.4%(10/14)。9例患者获得影像学随访,中位随访时间为6(6,8)个月,其中5例(55.5%)患者随访时动脉瘤完全闭塞(OKM分级D级)。

结论

单纯采用FD置入治疗未破裂LBTAs手术成功率高,安全及有效性可。然而,临床医师仍应警惕术后致死或致残性缺血性并发症的发生。

Objective

To investigate the safety and efficacy of treatment with standalone flow diverter (FD) placement for unruptured large basilar trunk aneurysms (LBTAs).

Methods

Patients with unruptured LBTAs (maximum diameter ≥ 10 mm) who underwent standalone FD placement in the First Hospital of Harbin Medical University from January 2015 to August 2023 were retrospectively included. The occurrence of postoperative complications and follow-up imaging results were evaluated. The modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score was used to assess the clinical outcomes of patients; the O'Kelly-Marotta (OKM) grading was used to evaluate the aneurysm occlusion status during imaging follow-up.

Results

A total of 14 patients (14 aneurysms) with unruptured LBTAs who received FD treatment were included, with a surgical success rate of 100%. The average maximum diameter of the aneurysms was 18.0±8.9 mm. All patients were treated with standalone FD placement without coil embolization. A total of 20 stents were used to treat 14 aneurysms, among which 3 stents were overlappingly placed in 2 patients and 2 stents were overlappingly placed in another 2 patients. Postoperatively, neurological complications occurred in 5 patients (35.7%), of which 4 (28.6%) first appeared during the perioperative period and 1 (7.1%) first appeared during the follow-up period. A total of 3 patients died, with a mortality rate of 21.4%. The first appearance of complications in all 5 patients with complications was ischemic complications, and 2 (14.3%) patients had combined hemorrhagic complications. The average last clinical follow-up time for all patients was 25.5±12.3 months. The rates of favorable outcome (mRS score > 2) at discharge and the last follow-up were 85.7% (12/14) and 71.4% (10/14), respectively. Imaging follow-up was obtained in 9 patients, with a median follow-up time of 6 (6, 8) months, and among them, 5 patients (55.5%) had complete aneurysm occlusion (OKM grade D) during follow-up.

Conclusion

The treatment of unruptured LBTAs with standalone FD placement has a high surgical success rate and acceptable safety and efficacy. However, clinicians should still be vigilant against the occurrence of fatal or disabling ischemic complications after surgery.

图1 患者,男性,56岁,因后循环缺血性症状入院 图1A:术前DSA显示基底动脉主干动脉瘤;图1B,C:术中采用Tubridge血流导向装置治疗,术后DSA显示支架内血流通畅,远端血管通畅,并可见动脉瘤内造影剂滞留;图1D:患者四肢肌力下降,头部CT提示无脑内出血,随后急诊行DSA显示载瘤血管通畅,动脉瘤完全闭塞;图1E,F:给予内科保守治疗后,患者肢体无力症状加重,行头部CT检查发现患者出现脑内出血。DSA为数字减影血管造影。
表1 术后并发症患者详细资料
[1]
Saliou G, Sacho RH, Power S, et al. Natural history and management of basilar trunk artery aneurysms[J]. Stroke, 2015, 46(4): 948-953.
[2]
Wu Q, Ai C, Bi Y, et al. Complications after endovascular treatment of large basilar trunk aneurysms[J]. Interv Neuroradiol, 2023, 16: 15910199231193904.
[3]
Sonobe M, Yamazaki T, Yonekura M, et al. Small unruptured intracranial aneurysm verification study: SUAVe study, Japan[J]. Stroke, 2010, 41(9): 1969-1977.
[4]
Wiebers DO. Unruptured intracranial aneurysms: natural history, clinical outcome, and risks of surgical and endovascular treatment[J]. Lancet, 2003, 362(9378): 103-110.
[5]
Nakatomi H, Kiyofuji S, Ono H, et al. Giant fusiform and dolichoectatic aneurysms of the basilar trunk and vertebrobasilar junction-clinicopathological and surgical outcome[J]. Neurosurgery, 2020, 88(1): 82-95.
[6]
贺迎坤, 姜卫剑, 李天晓, 等. 颅内椎基底动脉干大动脉瘤血管内介入与保守治疗的对照研究[J]. 中华放射学杂志, 2020, 54(5): 485-490.
[7]
Sim SY, Chung J, Choi JH, et al. Basilar artery trunk aneurysm: clinical and angiographic outcomes of endovascular treatment[J]. J Neurointerv Surg, 2022, 14(3): 262-267.
[8]
Tjahjadi M, Niemela M, Kivelev J, et al. Presigmoid approach to vertebrobasilar artery aneurysms: a series of 31 patients and review of the literature[J]. World Neurosurg, 2016, 92: 313-322.
[9]
Yang J, Wu Q, Ji Z, et al. Endovascular treatment for ruptured intracranial posterior circulation aneurysms: complications and clinical outcomes[J]. World Neurosurg, 2024, 193: 1089-1098.
[10]
Wu Q, Li C, Xu S, et al. Flow diversion vs. stent-assisted coiling in the treatment of intradural large vertebrobasilar artery aneurysms[J]. Front Neurol, 2022, 13: 917002.
[11]
罗斌, 王超, 刘健, 等. Pipeline血流导向装置治疗后循环颅内动脉瘤的效果观察: 多中心回顾性研究[J]. 中国脑血管病杂志, 2023, 20(6): 374-381, 391.
[12]
吴桥伟, 徐善才, 王春雷, 等. 多支架重叠辅助弹簧圈栓塞与单纯应用血流导向装置治疗颅内未破裂椎-基底动脉干动脉瘤的对比研究[J]. 中华神经外科杂志, 2023, 39(5): 440-445.
[13]
Alwakeal A, Shlobin NA, Golnari P, et al. Flow diversion of posterior circulation aneurysms: systematic review of disaggregated individual patient data[J]. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 2021, 42(10): 1827-1833.
[14]
Luo B, Kang H, Zhang H, et al. Pipeline embolization device for intracranial aneurysms in a large Chinese cohort: factors related to aneurysm occlusion[J]. Ther Adv Neurol Disord, 2020, 13: 1756286420967828.
[15]
吴桥伟, 李立, 邵秋季, 等. 血流导向装置治疗颅内大型未破裂动脉瘤的临床疗效分析[J]. 中华神经外科杂志, 2020, 36(3): 269-273.
[16]
Wu Q, Shao Q, Li L, et al. Prophylactic administration of tirofiban for preventing thromboembolic events in flow diversion treatment of intracranial aneurysms[J]. J Neurointerv Surg, 2021, 13(9): 835-840.
[17]
Fujii S, Fujita K, Yamaoka H, et al. Refractory in-stent stenosis after flow diverter stenting associated with delayed cobalt allergic reaction[J]. J Neurointerv Surg, 2022, 14(4): e4.
[18]
Rouchaud A, Brinjikji W, Lanzino G, et al. Delayed hemorrhagic complications after flow diversion for intracranial aneurysms: a literature overview[J]. Neuroradiology, 2016, 58(2): 171-177.
[19]
Cebral JR, Mut F, Raschi M, et al. Aneurysm rupture following treatment with flow-diverting stents: computational hemodynamics analysis of treatment[J]. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 2011, 32(1): 27-33.
[20]
Kulcsar Z, Houdart E, Bonafe A, et al. Intra-aneurysmal thrombosis as a possible cause of delayed aneurysm rupture after flow-diversion treatment[J]. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 2011, 32(1): 20-25.
[1] 姚金含, 王伟娜, 张玉泉. 妊娠相关深静脉血栓形成患者的预后研究现状[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(04): 367-373.
[2] 童嘉胤, 朱健伟. 基底动脉旁穿支破裂动脉瘤的介入治疗[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2025, 11(03): 201-203.
[3] 冯铭, 孙洪涛. 动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血的颅内压监测与管理[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2024, 10(04): 248-253.
[4] 李晓东, 李昂, 马龙, 刘亮, 魏云, 王汉宇. 基底动脉顶端动脉瘤显微手术治疗[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2024, 10(04): 254-256.
[5] 赖凌峰, 黄小飞, 丁聪, 周小兵. 血流导向装置治疗血泡样动脉瘤的临床效果分析[J/OL]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(03): 166-170.
[6] 陈雪梅, 潘晓虎, 杨明刚, 刘邦勇, 曹月洲, 贾振宇, 赵林波, 刘圣. 不同基底动脉弯曲度对急性基底动脉闭塞患者取栓治疗的影响[J/OL]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(02): 93-99.
[7] 杨墨, 曹月洲, 吕朋华, 丁鸭锁, 刘振生, 贾振宇, 赵林波, 徐川, 施海彬, 刘圣. 溶栓时间窗内动脉粥样硬化性基底动脉闭塞桥接治疗与直接取栓的多中心对照研究[J/OL]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2025, 13(02): 104-109.
[8] 范金铭, 翁子瑄, 马武钦, 周斌. 经桡动脉入路在神经介入的发展与应用[J/OL]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2024, 12(03): 261-266.
[9] 于棋, 李兰君, 韩红星, 王贤军, 王蒙恩. 晚窗血管内治疗不同病因类型急性大血管闭塞性缺血性卒中的临床疗效[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(04): 296-303.
[10] 张笑闻, 钟海龙, 佟鑫, 范梦妍, 万佳鑫, 林日金, 李菁, 管生. 瘤内扰流装置相关临床应用的研究现状[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(03): 250-254.
[11] 黄虎, 宋春杰, 刘志伟, 陈兴, 朱发勇, 韩远远. 脑小血管病总负荷对急性前循环大血管闭塞梗死增长率及临床转归的影响[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(02): 141-148.
[12] 李小勇, 郭海志, 赵洋. QSM 联合SWI 预测急性缺血性脑卒中患者EVT 后神经功能的价值[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 549-555.
[13] 程娅雯, 韩香凝, 朱宁, 何彩莲, 张润宁, 于嘉, 韩建峰, 刘福德. 双路途指导下血管内治疗症状性非急性颈内动脉颅内段闭塞的疗效观察[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 330-337.
[14] 陈鲲鹏, 陆军, 祁鹏, 王俊杰, 胡深, 杨希孟, 邓颖, 裴傲, 王大明. 应用脑膜中动脉栓塞术治疗慢性硬脑膜下血肿的临床观察[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 236-242.
[15] 段丽娟, 蒋艳, 樊朝凤, 曹华. 颅内动脉瘤介入治疗术后不留置导尿管的效果及安全性[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 104-109.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?