切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华介入放射学电子杂志 ›› 2025, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (02) : 104 -109. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-5782.2025.02.002

神经介入

溶栓时间窗内动脉粥样硬化性基底动脉闭塞桥接治疗与直接取栓的多中心对照研究
杨墨1, 曹月洲1, 吕朋华2, 丁鸭锁3, 刘振生4, 贾振宇1, 赵林波1, 徐川2, 施海彬1, 刘圣1,()   
  1. 1. 210029 江苏南京,南京医科大学第一附属医院介入放射科
    2. 225001 江苏扬州,苏北人民医院介入放射科
    3. 225300 江苏泰州,泰州市人民医院神经外科
    4. 225001 江苏扬州,扬州大学附属医院介入放射科
  • 收稿日期:2024-07-09 出版日期:2025-05-25
  • 通信作者: 刘圣
  • 基金资助:
    江苏省科技厅社会发展面上项目(BE2022809)江苏省人民医院临床能力提升工程(JSPH-MA-2022-4)

Multicenter efficacy comparative study of bridging therapy versus direct thrombectomy for atherosclerotic basilar artery occlusion within the thrombolysis time window

Mo Yang1, Yuezhou Cao1, Penghua Lv2, Yasuo Ding3, Zhensheng Liu4, Zhenyu Jia1, Linbo Zhao1, Chuan Xu2, Haibin Shi1, Sheng Liu1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Interventional Radiology,the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University,Jiangsu Nanjing 210029
    2. Department of Interventional Radiology,Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital,Jiangsu Yangzhou 225001
    3. Department of Neurosurgery,Taizhou People's Hospital,Jiangsu Taizhou 225300
    4. Department of Interventional Radiology,The Affiliated Hospital of Yangzhou University,Jiangsu Yangzhou 225001,China
  • Received:2024-07-09 Published:2025-05-25
  • Corresponding author: Sheng Liu
引用本文:

杨墨, 曹月洲, 吕朋华, 丁鸭锁, 刘振生, 贾振宇, 赵林波, 徐川, 施海彬, 刘圣. 溶栓时间窗内动脉粥样硬化性基底动脉闭塞桥接治疗与直接取栓的多中心对照研究[J/OL]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2025, 13(02): 104-109.

Mo Yang, Yuezhou Cao, Penghua Lv, Yasuo Ding, Zhensheng Liu, Zhenyu Jia, Linbo Zhao, Chuan Xu, Haibin Shi, Sheng Liu. Multicenter efficacy comparative study of bridging therapy versus direct thrombectomy for atherosclerotic basilar artery occlusion within the thrombolysis time window[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Interventional Radiology(Electronic Edition), 2025, 13(02): 104-109.

目的

对照研究静脉溶栓时间窗内桥接治疗与直接取栓动脉粥样硬化性基底动脉闭塞(basilar artery occlusion, BAO)性急性缺血性脑卒中的安全性及有效性。

方法

回顾性分析2018 年1 月至2023 年10 月在江苏省人民医院(南京医科大学第一附属医院)、苏北人民医院、泰州市人民医院以及扬州大学附属医院四个卒中中心收治的,症状发生后4.5 h 内开始治疗的动脉粥样硬化性BAO患者的临床数据。主要评估指标包括90 d 的良好预后率,以及2 组患者的术前临床特征、取栓次数、成功再通率、症状性颅内出血发生率和死亡率等。利用多因素Logistic 回归分析比较两种治疗方案的疗效。

结果

共纳入63 例BAO 患者,其中25 例接受直接机械取栓(直接取栓治疗组)、38 例接受桥接治疗(桥接治疗组)。在调整后的90 d 良好预后率及功能独立率方面,桥接治疗组表现优于直接取栓治疗组(P=0.026 和P=0.011),且桥接治疗组的取栓次数较少(P=0.032)。2 组在成功再通率、症状性颅内出血的发生率、死亡率等方面的差异无统计学意义(P >0.05)。

结论

对于在4.5 h 内开始治疗的动脉粥样硬化性BAO 患者,桥接治疗相较于直接机械取栓治疗有更好的预后,且桥接治疗的取栓次数较少。

Objective

To investigate the safety and efficacy of direct thrombectomy versus bridging therapy for patients with acute ischemic stroke caused by arteriosclerotic basilar artery occlusion (BAO)within the intravenous thrombolysis time window.

Methods

This study conducted a retrospective analysis of clinical data from patients with arteriosclerotic basilar artery occlusion (BAO), who initiated treatment within 4.5 hours of symptom onset, from January 2018 to October 2023, across four stroke centers.The primary evaluation metrics included the rate of favorable prognosis at 90 days, as well as preoperative clinical characteristics, number of thrombectomy attempts, successful reperfusion rates, incidence of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, and mortality rates among both patient groups.Efficacy of the two treatment modalities was compared using multivariate logistic regression analysis.

Results

A total of 63 BAO patients were included in the study, with 25 undergoing direct mechanical thrombectomy and 38 receiving bridging therapy.There were no statistically significant differences in preoperative baseline data between the two groups.In terms of the adjusted 90-day good prognosis rate and functional independence rate, the bridging therapy group outperformed the direct thrombectomy group (P=0.026 and P=0.011), and also required fewer thrombectomy attempts (P=0.032).No significant differences were observed between the two groups in terms of successful reperfusion rates, incidence of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, and mortality rates(P>0.05).

Conclusion

For arteriosclerotic BAO patients treated within 4.5 hours, bridging therapy provides a better prognosis compared to direct mechanical thrombectomy, with fewer thrombectomy attempts required.

图1 直接取栓治疗组与桥接取栓组患者的入组流程图 注:ICAS:动脉粥样硬化。
图2 直接取栓治疗组与桥接取栓组患者90 d 改良Rankin量表评分比较
表1 直接取栓治疗组与桥接治疗组患者的基线资料比较
表2 直接取栓治疗组与桥接治疗组患者的结果比较
[1]
《中国脑卒中防治报告2021》编写组.《中国脑卒中防治报告2021》概要[J].中国脑血管病杂志, 2023, 20(11): 783-793.
[2]
霍晓川, 高峰.急性缺血性卒中血管内治疗中国指南2023[J].中国卒中杂志, 2023, 18(6): 684-711.
[3]
Majoie CB, CAVALCANTE F, GRALLA J, et al.Value of intravenous thrombolysis in endovascular treatment for largevessel anterior circulation stroke: individual participant data meta-analysis of six randomised trials[J].Lancet (London,England), 2023, 402(10406): 965-974.
[4]
Jovin TG, Li C, Wu L, et al.Trial of Thrombectomy 6 to 24 hours after stroke due to basilar-artery occlusion[J/OL].The New England Journal of Medicine, 2022, 387(15): 1373-1384.
[5]
Tao C, Nogueira RG, ZHU Y, at al.Trial of endovascular treatment of acute basilar-artery occlusion[J].The New England Journal of Medicine, 2022, 387(15): 1361-1372.
[6]
Adams HP, Bendixen BH, Kappelle LJ, et al.Classification of subtype of acute ischemic stroke.Definitions for use in a multicenter clinical trial.TOAST.Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment[J].Stroke, 1993, 24(1): 35-41.
[7]
Nie X, Wang D, Pu Y, et al.Endovascular treatment with or without intravenous alteplase for acute ischaemic stroke due to basilar artery occlusion[J].Stroke and Vascular Neurology, 2022,7(3): 190-199.
[8]
Nappini S, Arba F, Pracucci G, et al.Bridging versus direct endovascular therapy in basilar artery occlusion[J].Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, 2021, 92(9):956-962.
[9]
Siow I, Tan BYQ, Lee KS, et al.Bridging thrombolysis versus direct mechanical thrombectomy in stroke due to basilar artery occlusion[J].Journal of Stroke, 2022, 24(1): 128-137.
[10]
Guo M, Yue C, Yang J, et al.Thrombectomy alone versus intravenous thrombolysis before thrombectomy for acute basilar artery occlusion[J].Journal of Neurointerventional Surgery,2023: jnis-2023-020361.
[11]
Saver JL, Fonarow GC, Smith EE, et al.Time to treatment with intravenous tissue plasminogen activator and outcome from acute ischemic stroke[J].JAMA, 2013, 309(23): 2480-2488.
[12]
Malhotra K, Liebeskind DS.Collaterals in ischemic stroke[J].Brain Hemorrhages, 2020, 1(1): 6-12.
[13]
Desilles JP, Loyau S, Syvannarath V, et al.Alteplase reduces downstream microvascular thrombosis and improves the benefit of large artery recanalization in stroke[J].Stroke, 2015, 46(11):3241-3248.
[14]
Duffy S, Farrell M, Mcardle K, et al.Novel methodology to replicate clot analogs with diverse composition in acute ischemic stroke[J].Journal of Neurointerventional Surgery, 2017, 9(5):486-491.
[15]
Belachew NF, Dobrocky T, Meinel TR, et al.Risks of undersizing stent retriever length relative to thrombus length in patients with acute ischemic stroke[J].AJNR, 2021, 42(12):2181-2187.
[16]
汪琛栋,贾振宇, 曹月洲,等.急性缺血性脑卒中血栓成分与卒中病因及临床预后的关联分析[J].中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2022, 10(4): 408-413.
[1] 管红梅, 吴邹仪, 杨元, 曾云. 经颅直流电刺激右侧小脑外侧对脑卒中后失语症语言功能的影响[J/OL]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2025, 15(01): 50-54.
[2] 张泽延, 段止璇, 吴惠群, 王国栋, 凌华, 杜晓霞. 亚急性期脑卒中患者心肺适能预测模型的构建及验证[J/OL]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2025, 15(01): 15-20.
[3] 葛苹苹, 曹晓光, 陈露萍, 袁海. 脑卒中偏瘫患者支撑期下肢肌肉协同收缩与肢体功能状况的相关性[J/OL]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2025, 15(01): 21-25.
[4] 陈飞, 李宁, 王营, 孙飞阳, 周敬杰. PNF技术联合FES康复踏车对脑卒中患者步行功能的影响[J/OL]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2025, 15(01): 38-43.
[5] 钱云苏, 陈晓, 唐潮, 苏宁. 基于虚拟现实的多模态神经康复技术联合镜像疗法和低频脉冲电刺激对脑卒中偏瘫患者手功能恢复的协同效应[J/OL]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2025, 15(01): 44-49.
[6] 光雪珂, 刘承云, 卢伟琳. 线粒体功能障碍与老年人缺血性脑卒中相关信号通路关系研究进展[J/OL]. 中华老年病研究电子杂志, 2025, 12(01): 41-47.
[7] 邓垚, 谢壁成, 吴边, 兰丹凤. 减重手术对肠道菌群及代谢性炎症综合征影响的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华肥胖与代谢病电子杂志, 2025, 11(01): 70-75.
[8] 程安琪, 邹胤曦, 司倩倩, 范晓媛, 张晓倩, 李明利, 冯逢, 刘彩燕, 徐蔚海. 无症状大脑后动脉粥样硬化性狭窄与认知功能的关系[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(02): 94-99.
[9] 陈娜娜, 韩莹, 胥青芝. 基于文献计量学的脑卒中吞咽障碍康复护理研究进展与临床热点趋势分析[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(02): 100-108.
[10] 庞淇丹, 崔玮, 唐涛, 姜德春, 李深. 检测脑缺血再灌注损伤的探针及技术进展[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(02): 149-154.
[11] 国家卫生健康委加强脑卒中防治工作减少百万新发残疾工程专家委员会, 吉训明. 国家脑卒中防治与百万减残工程工作进展[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 1-5.
[12] 张丽华, 张炜, 薛海丽, 朱向阳. 脑心健康管理师主导的认知行为疗法对脑卒中后焦虑、抑郁的影响[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-24.
[13] 马一茁, 胡叶文. 脑卒中患者营养风险筛查与评估工具的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 54-57.
[14] 游洪, 乔杉, 张宇. 脑卒中患者居家延续护理模式的研究新进展[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 63-67.
[15] 李芳, 郭廷昊, 程峙娟, 涂江龙. 卒中后检测到的心房颤动研究进展[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 68-73.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?