切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华介入放射学电子杂志 ›› 2020, Vol. 08 ›› Issue (01) : 38 -43. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-5782.2020.01.009

所属专题: 文献

肿瘤介入

超声引导125I粒子腹腔神经节植入术治疗进展期胰腺癌疼痛的疗效分析
辛玉晶1, 陈毅1, 王亚楠1, 杨伊1, 周翔1,()   
  1. 1. 100021 北京,国家癌症中心/国家肿瘤临床医学研究中心/中国医学科学院北京协和医学院肿瘤医院介入治疗科
  • 收稿日期:2019-12-04 出版日期:2020-02-25
  • 通信作者: 周翔

Clinical analysis of ultrasound-guided celiac ganglion irradiation with 125I seeds for pain control in local advanced pancreatic carcinoma

Yujing Xin1, Yi Chen1, Yanan Wang1, Yi Yang1, Xiang Zhou1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Interventional Therapy, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China
  • Received:2019-12-04 Published:2020-02-25
  • Corresponding author: Xiang Zhou
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Zhou Xiang, Email:
引用本文:

辛玉晶, 陈毅, 王亚楠, 杨伊, 周翔. 超声引导125I粒子腹腔神经节植入术治疗进展期胰腺癌疼痛的疗效分析[J]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2020, 08(01): 38-43.

Yujing Xin, Yi Chen, Yanan Wang, Yi Yang, Xiang Zhou. Clinical analysis of ultrasound-guided celiac ganglion irradiation with 125I seeds for pain control in local advanced pancreatic carcinoma[J]. Chinese Journal of Interventional Radiology(Electronic Edition), 2020, 08(01): 38-43.

目的

评价经腹超声引导下125I粒子腹腔神经节植入治疗不可切除及复发胰腺癌顽固性癌痛的疗效以及其安全性。

方法

对15例不能切除的胰腺癌患者及10例术后局部复发胰腺癌患者行经腹超声引导下125I粒子腹腔神经节植入术,术后每周随访1次,观察腹痛评分、镇痛药物的使用情况、患者生活质量评分并记录手术相关的并发症。

结果

所有患者均一次性手术成功,平均每例患者植入4枚粒子(2~8枚)。术后2周,患者的疼痛评分由平均7.56分降至3.36分(P<0.05),所需要麻醉药物的剂量由术前87.60 mg迅速减少到50.00 mg(P<0.05),随访过程中在其生存期内一直维持在较低水平,无1例出现进展;患者术后1个月、3个月的生活质量较术前明显好转;术后并发症分析胃潴留1例,腹泻2例,站立性晕厥1例,辅助治疗后消失。

结论

经腹超声引导下125I粒子腹腔神经节植入术,对缓解不可切除及复发胰腺癌顽固性癌痛安全有效。

Objective

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of direct celiac ganglion irradiation with 125I seeds for pain management of unresectable and local recurrent pancreatic cancer.

Methods

This study enrolled 25 consecutive patients within 15 unresectable pancreatic head cancer patients and 10 local recurrent patients, who had moderate to severe pain resulting from biopsy- proven advanced pancreatic cancer. All patients underwent US-guided direct celiac ganglion irradiation with 125I seeds. Follow-up was conducted at least once weekly until death. Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score, mean analgesic consumption, quality of life (QoL) and procedure-related complications were evaluated during follow-up.

Results

All patients successfully underwent implantation at one attempt. The mean number of seeds implanted in the celiac ganglion per patient was 4 (range 2-8). Two weeks later, the VAS score and mean analgesic consumption were significantly less than preoperative value. The overall quality of life of patients in one and three months after operation was significantly improved compared with that before treatment. No procedure-related deaths or major complications occurred. Only one suffers from gastric retention, Two suffer from diarrhea, and one suffers from standing syncope, All of them recovered by adjunctive therapy.

Conclusions

US-guided direct celiac ganglion irradiation with 125I seeds is safe and effective for alleviating refractory cancer pain due to unresectable and local recurrent pancreatic cancer.

表1 入选病人特征
图1 56岁,男性,进展期胰头癌
图2 125I置入后VAR评分柱状图,显示治疗2周后疼痛程度明显减低,且持续可达5个月
图3 125I置入后吗啡用量,治疗2周后用药量明显减低,且持续可达5个月
表2 粒子植入术前、术后VAS评分及硫酸吗啡控释片使用量的比较和疼痛缓解情况
图4 125I置入后QoL评分
[1]
Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2019. CA:a cancer journal for clinicians, 2019, 69(1):7-34. DOI: 10.3322/caac.21551.
[2]
Walter FM, Mills K, Mendonca SC, et al. Symptoms and patient factors associated with diagnostic intervals for pancreatic cancer (SYMPTOM pancreatic study): a prospective cohort study. The lancet Gastroenterology & hepatology, 2016, 1(4): 298-306. DOI: 10.1016/S2468-1253(16)30079-6
[3]
Janjan N. Improving cancer pain control with NCCN guideline-based analgesic administration: a patient-centered outcome. Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network: JNCCN, 2014, 12(9): 1243-1249. DOI:10.6004/jnccn.2014.0122
[4]
Mills K, Birt L, Emery JD, et al. Understanding symptom appraisal and help-seeking in people with symptoms suggestive of pancreatic cancer: a qualitative study. BMJ open, 2017,7(9):e015682. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015682.
[5]
Hao S, Xu WJ, Di Y, et al. How to improve the efficacy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided celiac plexus neurolysis in pain management in patients with pancreatic cancer: analysis ina single center. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2014, 24(1): 31-35. DOI:10.1097/SLE.0000000000000032
[6]
Dobosz L, Kaczor M, Stefaniak TJ. Pain in pancreatic cancer: review of medical and surgical remedies. ANZ journal of surgery. 2016, 86(10): 756-761. DOI: 10.1111/ans.13609
[7]
Koulouris AI, Banim P, Hart AR. Pain in Patients with Pancreatic Cancer: Prevalence, Mechanisms, Management and Future Developments. Digestive diseases and sciences. 2017, 62(4):861-870. DOI: 10.1007/s10620-017-4488-z.
[8]
Choe JW, Hyun JJ. [Relief of Cancer Pain in Patients with Pancreatic Cancer]. The Korean journal of gastroenterology= Taehan Sohwagi Hakhoe chi. 2019, 74(2): 81-86. DOI: 10.4166/kjg.2019.74.2.81.
[9]
Han Q, Deng M, Lv Y, et al. Survival of patients with advanced pancreatic cancer after iodine125 seeds implantation brachytherapy: A meta-analysis. Medicine, 2017, 96(5): e5719. DOI: 10.4103/1673-5374.135326.
[10]
Erdek MA, King LM, Ellsworth SG. Pain management and palliative care in pancreatic cancer. Current problems in cancer. 2013, 37(5): 266-272. DOI: 10.1016/j.currproblcancer.2013.10.003
[11]
Rombouts SJ, Vogel JA, van Santvoort HC, et al. Systematic review of innovative ablative therapies for the treatment of locally advanced pancreatic cancer. The British journal of surgery. 2015, 102(3): 182-193. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.9716.
[12]
Oh TK, Do SH, Yoon YS, et al. Association Between Opioid Use and Survival Time in Patients With Unresectable Pancreatic Cancer: 10 Years of Clinical Experience. Pancreas. 2018, 47(7): 837-842. DOI: 10.1097/MPA.0000000000001094
[13]
Lu Z, Dong TH, Si PR, et al. Continuous Low-dose-rate Irradiation of Iodine-125 Seeds Inhibiting Perineural Invasion in Pancreatic Cancer. Chinese medical journal, 2016, 129(20): 2460-2468. DOI: 10.4103/0366-6999.191777.
[14]
Jiao L, Zhang T, Wang H, et al. Implanting iodine-125 seeds into rat dorsal root ganglion for neuropathic pain: neuronal microdamage without impacting hind limb motion. Neural regeneration research, 2014, 9(12): 1204-1209. DOI: 10.4103/1673-5374.135326.
[15]
Ozcan S, Akin S, Yildiz Altun A, et al. [Effective pain therapy can improve the survival of patients with pancreatic cancer]. Agri : Agri (Algoloji) Dernegi'nin Yayin organidir = The journal of the Turkish Society of Algology. 2019, 31(3):145-149. DOI: 10.14744/agri.2019.61224.
[16]
Wang KX, Jin ZD, Du YQ, et al. EUS-guided celiac ganglion irradiation with iodine-125 seeds for pain control in pancreatic carcinoma: a prospective pilot study. Gastrointestinal endoscopy, 2012, 76(5): 945-952. DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2012.05.032
[17]
Lv WF, Lu D, Xiao JK, et al. The side effects and complications of percutaneous iodine-125 seeds implantation under CT-guide for patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. Medicine, 2017, 96(52): e9535. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000009535.
[18]
Wang ZM,Liu Y, Liu FJ, et al. Clinical efficacy of CT-guided iodine-125 seed implantation therapy in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. European radiology, 2010, 20(7): 1786-1791. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-009-1703-0.
[19]
Yasuda I, Wang HP. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided celiac plexus block and neurolysis. Digestive endoscopy: official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society. 2017, 29(4):455-462.
[20]
Jones WB, Jordan P, Pudi M. Pain management of pancreatic head adenocarcinomas that are unresectable: celiac plexus neurolysis and splanchnicectomy. Journal of gastrointestinal oncology, 2015, 6(4): 445-451. DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2078-6891.2015.052.
[21]
Rosland JH, Geitung JT. CT guided neurolytic blockade of the coeliac plexus in patients with advanced and intractably painful pancreatic cancer. Scandinavian journal of pain, 2018, 18(2): 247-251. DOI: 10.1515/sjpain-2017-0185.
[1] 张婉微, 秦芸芸, 蔡绮哲, 林明明, 田润雨, 金姗, 吕秀章. 心肌收缩早期延长对非ST段抬高型急性冠脉综合征患者冠状动脉严重狭窄的预测价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(10): 1016-1022.
[2] 任书堂, 刘晓程, 张亚东, 孙佳英, 陈萍, 周建华, 龙进, 黄云洲. 左心室辅助装置支持下单纯收缩期主动脉瓣反流的超声心动图特征[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(10): 1023-1028.
[3] 何金梅, 尹立雪, 谭静, 张文军, 王锐, 任梅, 廖明娇. 超声心肌做功技术对2型糖尿病患者潜在左心室心肌收缩功能损伤的评价[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(10): 1029-1035.
[4] 薛艳玲, 马小静, 谢姝瑞, 何俊, 夏娟, 何亚峰. 左心声学造影在急性心肌梗死合并室间隔穿孔中的应用价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(10): 1036-1039.
[5] 吕琦, 惠品晶, 丁亚芳, 颜燕红. 颈动脉斑块易损性的超声造影评估及与缺血性卒中的相关性研究[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(10): 1040-1045.
[6] 魏淑婕, 惠品晶, 丁亚芳, 张白, 颜燕红, 周鹏, 黄亚波. 单侧颈内动脉闭塞患者行颞浅动脉-大脑中动脉搭桥术的脑血流动力学评估[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(10): 1046-1055.
[7] 武玺宁, 欧阳云淑, 张一休, 孟华, 徐钟慧, 张培培, 吕珂. 胎儿心脏超声检查在抗SSA/Ro-SSB/La抗体阳性妊娠管理中的应用[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(10): 1056-1060.
[8] 杨水华, 何桂丹, 覃桂灿, 梁蒙凤, 罗艳合, 李雪芹, 唐娟松. 胎儿孤立性完全型肺静脉异位引流的超声心动图特征及高分辨率血流联合时间-空间相关成像的应用[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(10): 1061-1067.
[9] 张璇, 马宇童, 苗玉倩, 张云, 吴士文, 党晓楚, 陈颖颖, 钟兆明, 王雪娟, 胡淼, 孙岩峰, 马秀珠, 吕发勤, 寇海燕. 超声对Duchenne肌营养不良儿童膈肌功能的评价[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(10): 1068-1073.
[10] 张宝富, 俞劲, 叶菁菁, 俞建根, 马晓辉, 刘喜旺. 先天性原发隔异位型肺静脉异位引流的超声心动图诊断[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(10): 1074-1080.
[11] 冯冰, 邹秋果, 梁振波, 卢艳明, 曾奕, 吴淑苗. 老年非特殊型浸润性乳腺癌超声征象与分子生物学指标的临床研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 48-51.
[12] 吴畏, 吴永哲, 李宗倍, 崔宏力, 李华志, 许臣. 轻质大网孔补片腹腔镜下疝修补术治疗老年腹股沟疝的疗效及炎症因子的影响[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 70-73.
[13] 尚培中, 张润萍, 张伟, 贾国洪, 李晓武, 苗建军, 刘冰. 梗阻性黄疸临床防治新技术单中心应用研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 104-107.
[14] 赵文毅, 邹冰子, 蔡冠晖, 刘永志, 温红. 超声应变力弹性成像联合MRI-DWI靶向引导穿刺在前列腺病变诊断中的应用[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 988-994.
[15] 薛念余, 张盛敏, 吴凌恒, 沙蕾, 童揽月, 沈崔琴, 李朝军, 杜联芳. 研究血清胆红素对2型糖尿病患者心脏结构发生改变前心肌功能的影响[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 1004-1009.
阅读次数
全文


摘要