切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华介入放射学电子杂志 ›› 2018, Vol. 06 ›› Issue (02) : 104 -108. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-5782.2018.02.003

所属专题: 文献

专题研究·肿瘤介入

不同治疗方案对晚期肝细胞性肝癌预后的影响及因素分析
王磊1, 咸玉涛2, 杨正强2,(), 施海彬2   
  1. 1. 225001 江苏省苏北人民医院,扬州大学临床医学院
    2. 210029 南京医科大学第一附属医院介入科
  • 收稿日期:2018-01-16 出版日期:2018-05-01
  • 通信作者: 杨正强

Effect and factor analysis of different treatment strategies on prognosis of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma patients

Lei Wang1, Yutao Xian2, Zhengqiang Yang2,(), Haibin Shi2   

  1. 1. Department of Vascular Surgery, The Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital, Clinical Medical School of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225001, China
    2. Department of Interventional Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210029, China
  • Received:2018-01-16 Published:2018-05-01
  • Corresponding author: Zhengqiang Yang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Yang Zhengqiang, Email:
引用本文:

王磊, 咸玉涛, 杨正强, 施海彬. 不同治疗方案对晚期肝细胞性肝癌预后的影响及因素分析[J]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2018, 06(02): 104-108.

Lei Wang, Yutao Xian, Zhengqiang Yang, Haibin Shi. Effect and factor analysis of different treatment strategies on prognosis of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma patients[J]. Chinese Journal of Interventional Radiology(Electronic Edition), 2018, 06(02): 104-108.

目的:

研究单纯和联合治疗方案对晚期肝细胞肝癌(HCC)预后的影响,分析影响预后的主要因素。

方法:

回顾性分析2014年我院收治的133例晚期HCC患者,统计24项预后相关数据,采用Cox单因素和多因素回归模型分析预后影响因素。统计患者接受的所有治疗方式,并分为3种治疗方案:(1)保守治疗58例;(2)单纯肝动脉化疗栓塞术(TACE)治疗58例;(3)联合治疗17例:TACE联合索拉菲尼或者TACE联合立体定向放疗(SBRT)。Kaplan-Meier法绘制生存曲线,并使用Log-rank检验比较患者生存期差异。

结果:

133例患者总体中位生存期为7.6个月,其中6个月、1年、2年的生存率分别为57%、30%、12%。多因素分析证明Child-Pugh分级、门静脉癌栓类型、肝外转移类型以及甲胎蛋白水平为影响预后的独立因素。治疗方案上,TACE联合索拉菲尼与TACE联合SBRT之间无明显差异,但均明显优于单纯TACE治疗,且单纯TACE治疗明显优于保守治疗。

结论:

Child-Pugh分级、门静脉癌栓类型、肝外转移类型和甲胎蛋白水平是影响晚期HCC预后的独立因素。TACE联合索拉菲尼或TACE联合SBRT的预后均优于单纯TACE治疗,单纯TACE治疗优于保守治疗。

Objective:

To analyze different treatment strategies and prognostic factors for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with an advanced stage.

Methods:

A total of 133 consecutive HCC patients with an advanced stage were evaluated retrospectively. Twenty-four prognostic factors were counted and then evaluated using univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis. All treatment modalities of every patient during the follow-up period were collected carefully, and were separated into three strategies: (1) conservative therapy; (2) transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) monotherapy; (3) combined therapy, including TACE combined with sorafenib therapy and TACE combined with radiation therapy. The Kaplan-Meier method, with differences in survival estimated using the Log-rank test, was used to compare different prognoses.

Results:

The median survival time of all 133 advanced HCC patients was 7.6 months, and the survival rates at 6 months, 1 year and 2 years were 57%, 30% and 12%, respectively. Multivariate analysis identified that Child-Pugh class, type of portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT) , type of extrahepatic metastasis (EHM) and level of α-fetoprotein (AFP) were independent predictors of survival. For the treatment strategy, a combined therapy for both intrahepatic and extrahepatic tumors was superior to TACE monotherapy for advanced HCC patients. And TACE monotherapy was better than conservative treatment obviously.

Conclusions:

Child-Pugh class, type of PVTT, type of EHM and AFP level are demonstrated to be independent predictors of survival in HCC patients with an advanced stage. For advanced HCC patients in our study, a combined therapy is better than TACE monotherapy, and TACE monotherapy is better than conservative treatment.

表1 133例晚期肝细胞性肝癌患者的基线特征
表2 影响晚期肝细胞性肝癌预后的单因素与多因素Cox回归分析结果
指标 单因素HR(95%CI) P 多因素HR(95%CI) P
年龄(≥55岁) 0.88(0.59~1.32) 0.549 ? ?
性别(男) 0.93(0.57~1.51) 0.765 ? ?
肝病病史(乙肝/丙肝) 1.25(0.81~1.93) 0.307 ? ?
体能评分(2分) 1.25(0.58~2.69) 0.578 ? ?
腹水(中等/大量) 2.43(1.17~5.06) 0.017 1.30(0.58~2.93) 0.522
Child-Pugh分级(B级) 1.84(1.22~2.79) 0.004 1.78(1.17~2.69) 0.007
肝硬化(有) 1.30(0.86~1.97) 0.220 ? ?
肿瘤位置(多叶) 1.29(0.86~1.93) 0.226 ? ?
肿瘤数目(多个) 1.10(0.73~1.66) 0.661 ? ?
肿瘤大小(≥10 cm) 1.40(0.90~2.18) 0.137 ? ?
门静脉癌栓类型(Ⅲ型) 1.60(1.06~2.41) 0.024 1.59(1.04~2.43) 0.031
肝外转移(远处转移) 1.58(1.05~2.37) 0.027 1.68(1.06~2.66) 0.027
谷丙转氨酶(≥50 U/L) 1.25(0.78~1.99) 0.362 ? ?
谷草转氨酶(≥50 U/L) 1.57(1.03~2.41) 0.037 1.11(0.68~1.80) 0.675
白蛋白(≤40 g/L) 0.67(0.43~1.05) 0.080 0.81(0.49~1.33) 0.409
总胆红素(≥19 μmol/L) 1.92(1.28~2.70) 0.002 1.50(0.96~2.34) 0.076
白细胞计数(≥6×109/L) 0.78(0.52~1.17) 0.230 ? ?
中性粒细胞计数(≥4×109/L) 1.13(0.75~1.70) 0.562 ? ?
淋巴细胞计数(≤1×109/L) 0.62(0.41~0.94) 0.024 0.76(0.48~1.19) 0.230
粒细胞/淋巴细胞(≥4) 1.37(0.89~2.11) 0.155 ? ?
血小板计数(≤125×109/L) 0.72(0.48~1.07) 0.105 ? ?
凝血酶原时间(≥14 s) 1.52(0.98~2.35) 0.063 0.88(0.48~1.62) 0.674
甲胎蛋白(≥200 μg/L) 1.25(1.02~1.53) 0.034 1.26(1.01~1.59) 0.040
图1 不同治疗方式对晚期肝细胞性肝癌患者生存曲线的影响
图2 不同Child-Pugh分级晚期肝细胞性肝癌患者的生存曲线
[1]
Torre LA, Bray F, Siegel RL, et al. Global cancer statistics, 2012[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2015, 65(2):87-108.
[2]
Forner A, Llovet JM, Bruix J. Hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. Lancet, 2012, 379(9822):1245-1255.
[3]
Park JW, Chen M, Colombo M, et al. Global patterns of hepatocellular carcinoma management from diagnosis to death:the BRIDGE Study[J]. Liver Int, 2015, 35(9):2155-2166.
[4]
Llovet JM, Ricci S, Mazzaferro V, et al. Sorafenib in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. N Engl J Med, 2008, 359(4):378-390.
[5]
李兰起,鲍尧堂.肝癌介入治疗的进展[J].实用放射学杂志,2001,17(3):219-221.
[6]
安锋,韩国宏,郭永斌,等.经肝动脉化疗栓塞治疗中晚期肝癌疗效及预后影响因素分析[J].胃肠病学和肝病学杂志,2006,15(4):401-404.
[7]
Liu L, Zhang C, Zhao Y, et al. Transarterial chemoembolization for the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombosis:prognostic factors in a single-center study of 188 patients[J]. Biomed Res Int, 2014, 2014:194278.
[8]
张波,李晓敏,李巧芳,等.三维适形放疗联合肝动脉化疗栓塞术治疗中晚期肝癌的临床研究[J].胃肠病学和肝病学杂志,2014,23(7):816-818.
[9]
Nakazawa T, Hidaka H, Shibuya A, et al. Overall survival in response to sorafenib versus radiotherapy in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma with major portal vein tumor thrombosis:propensity score analysis[J]. BMC Gastroenterol, 2014, 14:84.
[10]
中国抗癌协会肝癌专业委员会.原发性肝癌的临床诊断与分期标准[J].中华肝脏病学杂志,2001,9(6):324.
[11]
Edge SB, Compton CC. The American Joint Committee on Cancer:the 7th edition of the AJCC cancer staging manual and the future of TNM[J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2010, 17(6):1471-1474.
[12]
Cheng AL, Kang YK, Chen Z, et al. Efficacy and safety of sorafenib in patients in the Asia-Pacific region with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma:a phase III randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial[J]. Lancet Oncol, 2009, 10(1):25-34.
[13]
Cabrera R, Pannu DS, Caridi J, et al. The combination of sorafenib with transarterial chemoembolisation for hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. Aliment Pharmacol Ther, 2011, 34(2):205-213.
[1] 刘明, 徐明, 黄光亮, 周路遥, 林满霞, 吕明德, 谢晓燕. 超声造影定量分析评估原发性肝细胞肝癌患者行经导管肝动脉化疗栓塞术前后血流灌注的改变[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2020, 17(03): 262-267.
[2] 中国性病艾滋病防治协会学术委员会外科学组, 中华医学会热带病与寄生虫学分会外科学组, 国家传染病医学中心(北京). 中国人类免疫缺陷病毒感染者围手术期抗病毒治疗专家共识(第二版)[J]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(05): 289-294.
[3] 俞祺健, 杨喆, 郑树森. 预防肝癌肝移植术后肿瘤复发的研究现状及进展[J]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 171-179.
[4] 王瑞涛. 液态活检对肝癌肝移植术后复发预测的研究进展[J]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(03): 189-192.
[5] 季家祥, 关鸽, 孙延东, 王新, 刘欢, 臧运金, 郭源. 肝细胞肝癌肝移植受者术后生存及肿瘤复发临床分析[J]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(03): 143-148.
[6] 陈亮, 马克强, 林波, 陈浩, 曹天生, 王健, 张文伟, 张升敏, 邹来宾, 巫泓生, 林梁, 汤婷婷, 何青青, 范国勇, 张健. 不同术式治疗腹股沟疝的临床疗效及预后分析[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(01): 54-57.
[7] 雷丽均, 赵才林, 徐静. 急性肺栓塞的研究进展[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2022, 15(01): 127-128.
[8] 陈亚峰, 李江斌, 钟文钧, 董瑞, 臧莉, 阴继凯, 杜锡林, 鲁建国. 腹腔镜微波消融治疗≤3 cm肝细胞肝癌的临床疗效分析[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 14(05): 271-276.
[9] 翟志超, 王延召, 雷福明. 结直肠癌脑转移的临床进展[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2021, 10(02): 117-121.
[10] 郑国良, 郑志超, 赵岩. 胃肠道外间质瘤预后因素分析[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2019, 08(03): 236-240.
[11] 陈宇晖, 田君, 王守森. 颅脑火器伤预后影响因素的研究进展[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2021, 07(04): 220-223.
[12] 张文豪, 马强, 高健, 续斌, 赵信迪, 牟利民, 艾尔西丁·阿不来提, 沈志敏. 髌股韧带重建治疗髌骨外脱位影响因素的研究进展[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2021, 07(06): 379-384.
[13] 刘战涛, 宋艳秋. 三阴性乳腺癌的临床病理特征及预后因素分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(05): 337-343.
[14] 邹斯彬, 罗抒阳, 赵承豪, 黄明声. 肝细胞癌TACE术后肿瘤内T细胞表型与CD73的表达及其与预后的相关性[J]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2022, 10(02): 137-144.
[15] 赵飞龙, 王斌, 祖庆泉, 赵林波, 贾振宇, 施海彬, 刘圣. 血管内栓塞治疗后交通动脉动脉瘤性动眼神经麻痹临床效果及预后因素分析[J]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2020, 08(02): 151-154.
阅读次数
全文


摘要