切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华介入放射学电子杂志 ›› 2017, Vol. 05 ›› Issue (03) : 128 -134. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-5782.2017.03.002

所属专题: 专题评论 文献

专题研究·妇产科介入

子宫动脉栓塞与甲氨蝶呤治疗不同MRI分型的剖宫产术后疤痕妊娠的疗效评价
李奎1, 颜国辉1, 邹煜1,()   
  1. 1. 310006 杭州,浙江大学医学院附属妇产科医院放射科
  • 收稿日期:2017-06-03 出版日期:2017-08-01
  • 通信作者: 邹煜
  • 基金资助:
    浙江省教育厅科研基金项目(Y201534762)

Uterine artery chemoembolization and systemic methotrexate in treating cesarean scar pregnancy of different MRI types

Kui Li1, Guohui Yan1, Yu Zou1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Radiology, Women’s Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310006, China
  • Received:2017-06-03 Published:2017-08-01
  • Corresponding author: Yu Zou
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Zou Yu, Email:
引用本文:

李奎, 颜国辉, 邹煜. 子宫动脉栓塞与甲氨蝶呤治疗不同MRI分型的剖宫产术后疤痕妊娠的疗效评价[J/OL]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2017, 05(03): 128-134.

Kui Li, Guohui Yan, Yu Zou. Uterine artery chemoembolization and systemic methotrexate in treating cesarean scar pregnancy of different MRI types[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Interventional Radiology(Electronic Edition), 2017, 05(03): 128-134.

目的:

探讨剖宫产后疤痕妊娠(CSP)的MRI影像学表现及分型对其治疗的指导意义,评价甲氨蝶呤(MTX)联合刮宫及子宫动脉化疗栓塞术(UACE)联合刮宫治疗不同类型CSP的适应证、有效性及安全性。

方法:

回顾性分析于我院治疗且影像资料完整的CSP患者187例,其中CSP 1型57例,CSP 2型130例,根据MRI分型及治疗方式的不同将患者分为4组:A1组(CSP 1型患者行MTX联合刮宫术者)45例,B1组(CSP 1型患者行UACE联合刮宫术)12例;A2组(CSP 2型患者行MTX联合刮宫术者)40例,B2组(CSP 2型患者行UACE联合刮宫术)90例。对患者术后临床数据及随访结果进行统计分析。

结果:

A1、B1两组的刮宫术中出血量、术后第1天血β-hCG下降超过50%者的比例、肝功能异常率、子宫切除率、治疗成功率的差异均无统计学意义。但A1组患者的住院时间明显长于B1组,差异有统计学意义。A2组的刮宫术中出血量、住院时间、肝功能异常率、子宫切除率高于B2组,术后第1天血β-hCG下降超过50%者的比例、治疗成功率低于B2组,差异均有统计学意义。

结论:

MRI能够明确CSP诊断,并准确分型,对于治疗方式的选择有重要指导意义。UACE联合刮宫治疗CSP的效果优于MTX联合刮宫术,尤其是对于CSP 2型患者更能降低子宫切除率,保留生育功能,可作为CSP 2型患者的首选治疗方式。

Objective:

To study various types of MRI imagings of cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP), and to evaluate their significance in clinical application. Also, the indications, efficacy and safety of methotrexate (MTX) combined with uterine curettage and uterine artery chemoembolization (UACE) combined with curettage in the treatment of different types of CSP were as well studied.

Methods:

Clinical data of 187 patients with CSP treated in our hospital were retrospectively analyzed. They were divided into four groups according to different MRI types and treatments: Group A1 (CSPI patients treated by MTX combined with curettage), 45 patients; group B1( CSPI patients treated by UACE combined with curettage ), 12 patients; group A2 (CSPII patients treated by MTX combined with curettage), 40 patients; and group B2 (CSPII patients treated by UACE combined curettage), 90 patients. Their relative clinical data and follow-up results were statistically analyzed.

Results:

The blood loss during curettage showed no difference in both group A1 and group B1, while the number of patients with β-hCG decreased by more than 50% in the first day after curettage, and abnormal liver function rate, hysterectomy rate and treatment success rate all showed no significant difference. However, hospital stay in group A1 was much longer than in group B1, with significant difference. Group A2 and group B2 were seen a significant difference in blood loss during curettage, hospital stay, abnormal liver function rate, hysterectomy rate, decreased β-hCG decreased in the first day after curettage and treatment success rate.

Conclusion:

MRI can not only diagnose CSP, but also can confirm its different types, thus, it has an important clinical significance for the treatment of CSP. UACE combined with curettage had better effect than MTX combined with curettage in the treatment of CSP patients, especially for CSPII patients, and it should be the first choice for the patients with CSPII.

表1 两组患者的一般资料比较 (±s)、中位数或例(%)
图1 疤痕妊娠患者UACE术前及术后子宫动脉造影
图2 2种类型CSP患者的MRI图像表现
表2 A、B组患者治疗后的资料比较 (±s)、中位数或例(%)
表3 CSP 1型患者经两种方法治疗后的资料比较 (±s)、中位数或例(%)
表4 CSP 2型患者经两种方法治疗后的资料比较 (±s)、中位数或例(%)
1
Jurkovic D, Hillaby K, Woelfer B, et al. First trimester diagnosis and management of pregnancies implanted into the lower uterine segment cesarean section scar[J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol ,2003,21(3):220-227.
2
曹满瑞,何健龙,刘炳光,等.剖宫产疤痕妊娠的子宫动脉栓塞并清宫治疗[J].临床放射学杂志,2009,28(4):553-555.
3
Rotas MA, Haberman S, Levgur M. Cesarean scar ectopic pregnancies: etiology, diagnosis, and management[J]. Obstet Gynecol,2006,107(6):1373-1381.
4
Fylstra DL. Ectopic pregnancy within a cesarean scar: a review[J]. Obstet Gynecol Surv,2002,57(8):537-543.
5
Yang XY, Yu H, Li KM, et al. Uterine artery embolisation combined with local methotrexate for treatment of caesarean scar pregnancy[J]. BJOG, 2010,117(8):990-996. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02578.x.
6
Hois EL, Hibbeln JF, Alonzo MJ, et al. Ectopic pregnancy in a cesarean section scar treated with intramuscular methotrexate and bilateral uterine artery embolization[J]. J Clin Ultrasound,2008,36(2):123-127.
7
朱志韬,孙志先,祖茂衡,等.子宫动脉栓塞术预防疤痕妊娠清宫大出血的临床价值[J].中华介入放射学电子杂志,2017,5(1):13-16.doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-5782.2017.01.004.
8
车锦连,谢锦兰,严达,等. MRI在子宫疤痕妊娠诊断中的应用价值[J]. 海南医学, 2016, 27(5):748-750.doi:10.3969/j.issn.1003-6350.2016.05.021.
9
Godin PA, Bassil S, Donnez J. An ectopic pregnancy developing in a previous caesarian section scar[J]. Fertil Steril, 1997, 67(2):398-400.
10
Vial Y, Petignat P, Hohlfeld P. Pregnancy in a cesarean scar[J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2000, 16(6):592-593.
11
Wu X, Zhang X, Zhu J, et al. Caesarean scar pregnancy: comparative efficacy and safety of treatment by uterine artery chemoembolization and systemic methotrexate injection[J]. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 2011, 161(1):75-79.
12
中华医学会计划生育学分会. 剖宫产瘢痕妊娠诊断与治疗共识[J]. 中华医学杂志, 2012, 92(25):1731-1733.
13
种轶文,张坤,周延,等. MRI检查在剖宫产术后子宫瘢痕妊娠诊治中的应用价值[J]. 中华妇产科杂志, 2014, 49(12):914-918.
14
崔璨,程悦,沈文, 等.女性盆腔器官脱垂病人肛提肌的MRI评价[J].国际医学放射学杂志,2015,38(2):148-151.doi:10.3874/j.issn.1674-1897.2015.02.Z0210.
15
Huang Q, Zhang M, Zhai R. Comparison of gadolinium‐enhanced magnetic resonance imaging with ultrasound in evaluation of cesarean scar pregnancy[J]. J Obstet Gynaecol Res, 2014, 40(7):1890-1893.
16
Li C, Li C, Feng D, et al. Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization versus systemic methotrexate for the management of cesarean scar pregnancy[J].Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 2011, 113(3):178-182.
17
Arslan M, Pata O, Dilek T U, et al. Treatment of viable cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy with suction curettage[J]. Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 2005, 89(2):163-166.
18
Litwicka K, Greco E. Caesarean scar pregnancy: a review of management options[J]. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol, 2011, 23(6): 415-421.
19
Ryu RK, Siddiqi A, Omary RA, et al. Sonography of delayed effects of uterine artery embolization on ovarian arterial perfusion and function.[J]. AJR Am J Roentgenol,2003, 181(1):89-92.
[1] 项文静, 徐燕, 茹彤, 郑明明, 顾燕, 戴晨燕, 朱湘玉, 严陈晨. 神经学超声检查在产前诊断胼胝体异常中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(05): 470-476.
[2] 谢峰, 伍玉晗, 赵胜, 杨小红, 王玉波, 石珍, 范建华, 章敏. 产前超声和MRI诊断胎儿硬脑膜窦畸形的联合应用[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(03): 275-280.
[3] 刘晨鹭, 刘洁, 张帆, 严彩英, 陈倩, 陈双庆. 增强MRI 影像组学特征生境分析在预测乳腺癌HER-2 表达状态中的应用[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 339-345.
[4] 庄若语, 杭明辉, 李文华, 张霆, 侯炜. 膝骨关节炎半定量磁共振评分研究进展[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 545-552.
[5] 吴少敏, 张世豪, 刘炳光, 李婵, 尹嘉敏, 郑昌业, 黄素然. 胎儿巨大蛛网膜囊肿并文献复习[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(04): 390-397.
[6] 王莉, 曹蕾, 王亚丹, 张伟. Krabbe病1例临床分析并文献复习[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(03): 339-345.
[7] 陈海香, 王元银, 蒋盼. 冠突过长患者的临床表现及磁共振影像学分析[J/OL]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 169-174.
[8] 谢丽春, 欧庆芬, 张秋萍, 叶升. 简化和标准肝脏MRI方案在结直肠癌肝转移患者随访中的临床应用[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 434-437.
[9] 刘明辉, 葛方明. MRI 对腹股沟疝修补术后患者早期并发症的评估价值研究[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 579-583.
[10] 臧书芹, 陈巧玲, 江思源, 朱晓明, 沈浮, 王颢, 张卫, 邵成伟. 基于直肠高分辨MRI的直肠侧系膜分析及其临床价值的研究[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(04): 312-320.
[11] 吴浩凡, 刘元豪, 张锋敏, 张现中, 朱金浩, 黄嘉莹, 刘忠臣, 丁良福, 庄成乐. 基于术前MRI的盆底解剖参数对超低位直肠癌精准功能保肛手术时间的影响[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(03): 209-216.
[12] 张立俊, 孙存杰, 胡春峰, 孟冲, 张辉. MSCT、DCE-MRI 评估术前胃癌TNM 分期的准确性研究[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 519-523.
[13] 姜超, 夏旭东, 王功夏, 何向宇, 王海彬, 李媛. 磁共振DWI及其ADC对乳腺导管原位癌伴微浸润腋窝淋巴结转移的诊断价值[J/OL]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2024, 12(03): 234-243.
[14] 欧阳川, 朱巧珍, 欧阳林. 腰椎间盘退变的生物代谢特征及评价技术研究进展[J/OL]. 中华诊断学电子杂志, 2024, 12(03): 206-211.
[15] 金安松, 邹玉松, 刘玖涛, 薛凤麟, 庞爱兰. 孤立性颅内浆细胞瘤一例及相关文献复习[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 495-500.
阅读次数
全文


摘要