Home    中文  
 
  • Search
  • lucene Search
  • Citation
  • Fig/Tab
  • Adv Search
Just Accepted  |  Current Issue  |  Archive  |  Featured Articles  |  Most Read  |  Most Download  |  Most Cited

Chinese Journal of Interventional Radiology(Electronic Edition) ›› 2023, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (03): 223-229. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-5782.2023.03.005

• Vascular Intervention • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Comparative analysis of the efficacy of Pipeline flow diverter and traditional stent-assisted coiling in the treatment of small and medium sized unruptured internal carotid artery aneurysms

Jian Jiao, Wenhan Li, Han Luo, Yajun Yuan, Wenhao Wang, Hanwei Liu, Benshuai Yu()   

  1. Department of Neurological Intervention, Interventional Medical Centre, the Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Zhuhai 519000
    Department of Imaging Diagnostic, Yuebei People's Hospital, Guangdong Shaoguan 512026, China
  • Received:2022-12-07 Online:2023-08-25 Published:2023-09-18
  • Contact: Benshuai Yu

Abstract:

Objective

To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of Pipeline Flow Diverter (PED) in the treatment of unruptured small and medium-sized aneurysms of internal carotid artery.

Methods

From January 2018 to February 2022, the clinical data of 53 patients with unruptured internal carotid artery aneurysms treated by PED and stent-assisted coil embolization (SAC) in the neurointerventional therapy in the Department of Neurological Intervention in our hospital were collected. Retrospective analysis and comparison between groups were evaluated. O Kelly Marotta (OKM) scale and Raymond scale were used to evaluate the degree of aneurysm embolization immediately after operation and follow-up. The modified Rankin Scale (mRS) was used to evaluate the neurological function of the patients during perioperative period and follow-up. Digital subtraction angiography (DSA) or CT angiography (CTA) were used to evaluate the degree of aneurysm embolization and stent patency during the follow-up.

Results

A total of 53 patients met the inclusion criteria, including 31 patients treated by PED and 22 patients treated by SAC. There is no significant statistical differences in gender, age and other baseline data between the two groups. The DSA of 34 aneurysms immediately after the operation of PED group showed that the cantrast agent was well filled in the aneurysms. The OKM grades were grade A in 9 (26.4%) cases, grade B in 7 (20.6%), grade C in 14 (41.2%), and grade D in 4 (11.8%).24 aneurysms immediately after the operation of SAC group showed that the Raymond grades were grade I in 16 (66.7%) cases, grade Ⅱ in 7 (29.1%), grade Ⅲ in 1 (4.2%). However there was a significant statistical difference in operation time between the PED group and SAC group (P = 0.003 < 0.05). There are 9 cases of perioperative complications, 4 cases in PED group and 5 cases in SAC group. There is no statistically significant difference between the two groups (P = 0.49). The mean follow-up time of PED group was (6.4 ± 1.8) months (range: 5~12 months) and SAC group was (10.4 ± 9.0) months (range: 2~30 months). The postoperative degree of aneurysm occlusion was observed, 28 cases (84.8%) in PED group and 17 cases (77.3%) in SAC group were completely occluded. But there are 4 postoperative recurrence cases in the SAC group and 0 in the PED group. In postoperative follow-up, all patients have a good prognosis, with mRS≤2, and no adverse events caused by bleeding or ischemia occurred.

Conclusions

The use of PED neuro-interventional therapy of small and medium-sized aneurysms of internal carotid artery shows less operation time and no less rate of complete aneurysm occlusion and safety than SAC therapy. It has obvious advantage in avoiding postoperative recurrence, but long-term efficacy still needs further follow-up observation.

Key words: Pipeline flow diverter, Internal carotid artery, Small and medium-sized aneurysms

京ICP 备07035254号-20
Copyright © Chinese Journal of Interventional Radiology(Electronic Edition), All Rights Reserved.
Tel: 0756-2528259 E-mail: zhjrfsx@163.com
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd