Home    中文  
 
  • Search
  • lucene Search
  • Citation
  • Fig/Tab
  • Adv Search
Just Accepted  |  Current Issue  |  Archive  |  Featured Articles  |  Most Read  |  Most Download  |  Most Cited

Chinese Journal of Interventional Radiology(Electronic Edition) ›› 2022, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (01): 56-60. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-5782.2022.01.010

• Imaging Diagnose • Previous Articles     Next Articles

The effect of size on CT findings of renal oncocytoma and chromophobe renal cell carcinoma

Guojie Wang1, Peixin Qin1,(), Xiangmeng Chen2, Kunwei Li1, Wansheng Long2   

  1. 1. Department of Radiology, the Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Zhuhai 519000
    2. Department of Radiology, Jiangmen Central Hospital, Guangdong Jiangmen 529000, China
  • Received:2021-05-29 Online:2022-02-25 Published:2022-03-23
  • Contact: Peixin Qin

Abstract:

Objective

To explore common CT differential diagnosis findings between renal oncocytoma (RO) and chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (ChRCC) for different size lesions.

Methods

Double-blind methods were used to retrospectively analyze the CT images of 16 cases of RO and 21 cases of ChRCC. The CT features of different tumors were analyzed and compared. The cases were then divided into two groups according to size, ≤3 cm in diameter were classified as group one, and > 3 cm in diameter were classified as group two, the characteristics were compared between the two groups.

Results

(1) There was no statistically significant differences between RO and ChRCC in lesions diameter (P = 0.118); (2) Statistically significant differences between RO and ChRCC were shown in segmental enhancement inversion, spoke-wheel-like enhancement and degree of enhancement in the cortical phase (P = 0.024, 0.027, 0.001), but not shown in central scar and calcification (P = 0.520, 0.071); (3) There were statistically significant differences between group one and group two in central-scar, segmental enhancement inversion, calcification and degree of enhancement in the cortical phase (P = 0.000, 0.011, 0.015, 0.002).

Conclusions

Comprehensive analysis of lesion size and CT features is helpful for diagnosing and distinguishing RO and ChRCC accurately.

Key words: Oncocytoma, Choromophobe renal cell carcinoma, CT, Central scar, Segmental enhancement inversion

京ICP 备07035254号-20
Copyright © Chinese Journal of Interventional Radiology(Electronic Edition), All Rights Reserved.
Tel: 0756-2528259 E-mail: zhjrfsx@163.com
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd