To explore the squeeze method of PTCD tube to maintain smooth drainage of the tube and promote postoperative recovery.

A total of 120 patients with PTCD tube placed after cholangiography were selected, and the patients were divided into three groups A, B, and C according to the randomized controlled single-blind principle, with 40 cases in each group. Group A adopts the rapid squeeze method; Group B adopts the winding finger method; Group C adopts the progressive V-shape method.

The pain rate and bleeding rate of the three squeezing methods were compared, and the differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05). Among them, the pain rate and bleeding rate of the finger-wound method were the highest; the comparison of the single squeeze times of the three methods showed that the difference was significant. Statistical significance (F = 36.069, P < 0.001); comparison of the patency rates of the three methods before and after extrusion, the difference in patency rates of group C before and after extrusion was statistically significant (χ² = 6.725, P < 0.05), suggesting the progressive V method The squeeze has the best effect.

The progressive V-shaped method has a moderate number of single squeezing, the drainage tube has the best patency effect, and there are fewer pain and bleeding complications after squeezing. It does not affect the comfort of the patient and does not increase the burden on the operator. It is more suitable for PTCD tube squeezing. The preferred method of compression.