切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华介入放射学电子杂志 ›› 2023, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (02) : 106 -112. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-5782.2023.02.002

非血管介入

非顺应性腹主动脉球囊阻断术在凶险性前置胎盘伴胎盘植入剖宫产中的应用
向雷1, 杨琪1, 谢辉1, 刘海涛1, 夏风1,(), 兰为顺1, 杨文忠1   
  1. 1. 430070 湖北武汉,湖北省妇幼保健院医学影像科
  • 收稿日期:2022-08-30 出版日期:2023-05-25
  • 通信作者: 夏风

Application of non-compliant balloon occlusion of abdominal aorta during cesarean section of pernicious placenta previa with placental implantation

Lei Xiang1, Qi Yang1, Hui Xie1, Haitao Liu1, Feng Xia1,(), Weishun Lan1, Wenzhong Yang1   

  1. 1. Department of Medical Imaging, Hubei Maternal and Children's Hospital, Hubei Wuhan 430070, China
  • Received:2022-08-30 Published:2023-05-25
  • Corresponding author: Feng Xia
引用本文:

向雷, 杨琪, 谢辉, 刘海涛, 夏风, 兰为顺, 杨文忠. 非顺应性腹主动脉球囊阻断术在凶险性前置胎盘伴胎盘植入剖宫产中的应用[J]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2023, 11(02): 106-112.

Lei Xiang, Qi Yang, Hui Xie, Haitao Liu, Feng Xia, Weishun Lan, Wenzhong Yang. Application of non-compliant balloon occlusion of abdominal aorta during cesarean section of pernicious placenta previa with placental implantation[J]. Chinese Journal of Interventional Radiology(Electronic Edition), 2023, 11(02): 106-112.

目的

探讨在辅助凶险性前置胎盘伴胎盘植入剖宫产的过程中,非顺应性腹主动脉球囊阻断术的临床应用价值。

方法

回顾性分析2020年6月至2022年9月在湖北省妇幼保健院收治的114例凶险性前置胎盘伴胎盘植入产妇的临床治疗,其中54例(A组)进行了非顺应性腹主动脉球囊阻断术,60例(B组)未行腹主动脉球囊阻断术。通过对比两组产妇的术中出血量、手术时长、术中收缩压波动幅度、手术前后收缩压及舒张压变化、术后住院天数、新生儿1 min及5 min Apgar评分等指标来评估非顺应性腹主动脉球囊阻断术在剖宫产术治疗凶险性前置胎盘的安全性及有效性。

结果

A组与B组两组产妇的年龄、孕次、剖宫产次、孕周均无统计学差异;胎盘植入类型分布有明显差异(Z =-2.980,P = 0.003);产妇手术时长、子宫切除率、住院天数均无明显差异。A组中,胎盘粘连型(t = -2.250,P = 0.032)、植入型(t = -2.230,P = 0.030)、穿透型(t = -2.304,P = 0.031)术中出血量均少于B组产妇;胎儿X线曝光时长为4~33 s,平均(12.20 ± 6.74)s,X线曝光剂量为1.99~12.16 mGy,平均(4.65 ± 2.61)mGy。两组新生儿娩出后1 min(P = 0.420)及5 min(P = 0.474)的Apgar评分无统计学差异。A组产妇术中收缩压波动(t = 3.064,P = 0.003)及舒张压波动(t = 3.126,P = 0.002)幅度明显大于B组产妇。两组产妇术后并发症发生率(下肢静脉血栓、动脉血栓、产褥期感染、主动脉损伤、术后心功能不全、产后出血)无明显差异(χ2 = 0.057,P = 0.852)。

结论

对于凶险性前置胎盘伴胎盘植入的产妇,在进行剖宫产的过程中,使用非顺应性腹主动脉球囊短时间内阻断腹主动脉血流能够安全、有效地减少术中出血量,且尚未发现对新生儿有明显损伤。

Objective

To explore the clinical application value of non-compliant balloon occlusion of abdominal aorta during cesarean section of pernicious placenta previa with placental implantation.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was made on the clinical treatment data of 114 women with pernicious placenta previa and placental implantation admitted to Hubei Maternal and Children's Hospital from June 2020 to September 2022. Among them, 54 cases (group A) underwent non-compliant abdominal aortic balloon occlusion, and 60 cases (group B) did not. The safety and effectiveness of non-compliant abdominal aortic balloon occlusion in the treatment of pernicious placenta previa during cesarean section was evaluated by comparing the intraoperative hemorrhage, the operation duration, the fluctuation of intraoperative systolic blood pressure, the changes of systolic and diastolic blood pressure before and after operation, the hospitalization days after cesarean section, and 1st and 5th minute Apgar score of newborns.

Results

There were no statistical differences in age, gestational times, cesarean section times and gestational weeks between group A and group B, and there was a significant difference in the type of placental implantation between the two groups(Z = -2.980, P = 0.003). There were no significant differences in operation duration, hysterectomy rate and hospital stay. Compared with the two groups of parturient with placental implantation, the amount of intraoperative hemorrhage of placenta accrete (t = -2.250, P = 0.032), placenta increta (t = -2.230, P = 0.030) and placenta percreta (t = -2.304, P = 0.031) in group A was less than that of group B. The fetal X-ray exposure duration in group A was 4~33 seconds, with an average of (12.20 ± 6.74) seconds. The X-ray exposure dose was 1.99~12.16 mGy, with an average of (4.65 ± 2.61) mGy. There was no significant difference in Apgar scores between the two groups at 1 minute (P = 0.420) and 5 minutes (P = 0.474) after delivery. The fluctuation of systolic blood pressure (t = 3.064, P = 0.003) and diastolic blood pressure (t = 3.126, P = 0.002) in group A were significantly greater than those in group B. There were no significant differences between the two groups in the incidence of postoperative complications (lower limb venous thrombosis, arterial thrombosis, puerperal infection, aortic injury, postoperative cardiac insufficiency, and postpartum hemorrhage) (χ2 = 0.057, P = 0.852).

Conclusions

For the pregnant women with pernicious placenta previa and placental implantation, during cesarean section, filling the non-compliant abdominal aortic balloon to block abdominal aortic blood flow temporarily can safely and effectively reduce the intraoperative hemorrhage, and no obvious damage to the newborns has been found.

图1 产妇30岁,既往孕5产1,本次孕36周,凶险性前置胎盘伴穿透型胎盘植入;术前常规行胎盘MR检查,剖宫产术前经右侧股动脉行腹主动脉球囊置入术1A:矢状位见胎盘后壁底蜕膜低信号连续性中断,见胎盘信号向外凸出(白箭);1B:轴位见胎盘后壁底蜕膜低信号连续性中断,胎盘信号向外凸出(白箭);1C:矢状位见胎盘左前下壁底蜕膜低信号不连续,子宫下壁与膀胱后壁之间界限不清,膀胱壁内见结节状突起(白箭);1D:腹主动脉球囊放置于右肾动脉开口水平以下,腹主动脉分叉以上,球囊充盈后可阻断腹主动脉血流。
表1 两组产妇基本资料对比
表2 两组产妇观察指标对比
表3 两组产妇血压情况对比
表4 两组产妇术后并发症对比[例(%)]
[1]
Liu J, Liu C, Zuo X, et al. Pernicious placenta previa/placenta percreta complicating active systemic lupus erythematosus resulting in postoperative artery thrombosis[J]. J Int Med Res, 2019, 47(12): 6365-6373.
[2]
Sumigama S, Itakura A, Ota T, et al. Placenta previa increta/percreta in Japan: a retrospective study of ultrasound findings, management and clinical course[J]. J Obstet Gynaecol Res, 2007, 33(5): 606-611.
[3]
Mu Y, Li M, Zhu J, et al. Apgar score and neonatal mortality in China: an observational study from a national surveillance system[J]. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, 2021, 21(1): 47-59.
[4]
蔡争, 宋建涛, 甄文瑞, 等. 不同性质球囊腹主动脉阻断术在凶险性前置胎盘应用中的对比研究[J]. 介入放射学杂志, 2022, 31(6): 605-608.
[5]
Li N, Yang T, Liu C, et al. Feasibility of infrarenal abdominal aorta balloon occlusion in pernicious placenta previa coexisting with placenta accrete[J]. Biomed Res Int, 2018, 2018: 4596189.
[6]
Ayati S, Leila L, Pezeshkirad M, et al. Accuracy of color Doppler ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosis of placenta accreta: a survey of 82 cases[J]. Int J Reprod Biomed, 2017, 15(4): 225-230.
[7]
Hull AD, Moore TR. Multiple repeat cesareans and the threat of placenta accreta: incidence, diagnosis, management[J]. Clin Perinatol, 2011, 38(2): 285-296.
[8]
Liu C, Yang DD, Qu HB, et al. Efficacy and safety of prophylactic abdominal aortic balloon occlusion versus internal iliac arterial balloon occlusion for placenta accreta spectrum disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Clin Imaging, 2021, 78: 250-255.
[9]
Peng Q, Zhang W. Rupture of multiple pseudoaneurysms as a rare complication of common iliac artery balloon occlusion in a patient with placenta accreta: a case report and review of literature[J]. Medicine (Baltimore), 2018, 97(12): e9896.
[10]
王艳丽, 蒋天, 段旭华, 等. 腹主动脉球囊封堵联合剖宫产术治疗凶险性前置胎盘的安全性随访研究[J]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2021, 9(1): 36-40.
[11]
Peng ZH, Xiong Z, Zhao BS, et al. Prophylactic abdominal aortic balloon occlusion: An effective method of controlling hemorrhage in patients with placenta previa or accreta[J]. Exp Ther Med, 2019, 17(2): 1492-1496.
[12]
Wang YL, Su FM, Zhang HY, et al. Aortic balloon occlusion for controlling intraoperative hemorrhage in patients with placenta previa increta/percreta[J]. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med, 2017, 30(21): 2564-2568.
[13]
Cui S, Zhi Y, Cheng G, et al. Retrospective analysis of placenta previa with abnormal placentation with and without prophylactic use of abdominal aorta balloon occlusion[J]. Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 2017, 137(3): 265-270.
[14]
Luo F, Wu Z, Mei J, et al. Thrombosis after aortic balloon occlusion during cesarean delivery for abnormally invasive placenta[J]. Int J Obstet Anesth, 2018, 33: 32-39.
[15]
张剑, 张文淼, 黄士勇, 等. 腹主动脉与髂内动脉球囊阻断在凶险性前置胎盘剖宫产术中应用对比研究[J]. 介入放射学杂志, 2018, 27(9): 827-831.
[1] 赵军凤, 钱林学, 谭小蕖, 刘玉江. 超声引导下平阳霉素治疗胎盘植入的疗效分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2021, 18(09): 858-861.
[2] 李勤, 张静秋, 李春梅, 吕燕芬. 胎盘植入的危险因素与超声预警指标的回顾性研究[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2018, 15(05): 355-358.
[3] 刘勤, 汪龙霞, 王艳秋, 王岳, 何萍, 徐虹, 闫志风. 产前胎盘植入超声图像特征及漏诊原因分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2017, 14(11): 851-856.
[4] 刘建, 李娅, 李俊鹏, 李易. 产前MRI在胎盘植入性疾病诊断中的应用价值[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2020, 16(02): 196-201.
[5] 王霞, 赵福敏, 李雅倩, 宁刚, 王晓东. 《腹部放射学会和欧洲泌尿生殖放射学会关于胎盘植入性疾病MRI检查的联合共识声明》要点解读[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2020, 16(02): 161-170.
[6] 黄桂琼, 王晓东, 余海燕, 周淑. 宫颈内口成形术在完全性前置胎盘伴胎盘植入患者剖宫产术分娩中的应用[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2019, 15(01): 19-24.
[7] 陈颖, 曾万江. 病理组织学诊断在胎盘植入性疾病中的作用和意义[J]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2023, 12(03): 143-146.
[8] 柴国路, 许培, 陈兢思, 杜丽丽, 陈永雪, 毕石磊, 陈敦金. 胎盘植入性疾病的危险因素及妊娠结局分析[J]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2020, 09(01): 49-53.
[9] 郑九生, 辛思明, 刘凌芝, 廖宗高. 凶险性前置胎盘伴宫颈植入的诊断与治疗[J]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2019, 08(04): 241-246.
[10] 周玉兰, 张晶晶, 刘丽. 髂内动脉球囊阻断应用于凶险性前置胎盘剖宫产术的围手术期护理[J]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2022, 10(03): 339-342.
[11] 杨挺岸, 李秋阳, 刘雪莲, 高倩, 傅娴, 贺海朋. 凶险性前置胎盘合并胎盘植入"一站式"杂交手术配合[J]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2022, 10(03): 320-324.
[12] 王艳丽, 蒋天, 段旭华, 赵毅, 徐苗, 焦德超, 韩新巍, 陈志敏, 刘传, 赵先兰, 王晓娟, 储勤军. 腹主动脉球囊封堵联合剖宫产术治疗凶险性前置胎盘的安全性随访研究[J]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2021, 09(01): 36-40.
[13] 罗荣光, 关晏星. 介入技术在凶险性前置胎盘剖宫产术的应用[J]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2020, 08(03): 269-275.
[14] 周文杰, 吕朋华, 卢丹, 孙陵, 王书祥, 黄文诺, 耿素萍, 蔡明玉. "一站式"双介入技术在凶险型前置胎盘并胎盘植入剖宫产中的应用[J]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2018, 06(01): 22-26.
[15] 蒋天, 王艳丽, 韩新巍, 张文哲, 段旭华, 吴正阳, 李腾飞, 李宗明. 腹主动脉球囊封堵序贯子宫动脉栓塞术在凶险性前置胎盘并胎盘植入剖宫产中的应用[J]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2017, 05(03): 149-152.
阅读次数
全文


摘要