切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华介入放射学电子杂志 ›› 2023, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (01) : 35 -41. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-5782.2023.01.007

神经介入

对比分析抽吸取栓与支架取栓治疗前循环大血管急性栓塞性闭塞的临床疗效
陈立洲1, 李文会1, 朱军1, 徐晓露2, 曹月洲3, 贾振宇3, 刘圣3,(), 施海彬3   
  1. 1. 224001 江苏盐城,盐城市第三人民医院介入放射科
    2. 224001 江苏盐城,盐城市第三人民医院神经内科
    3. 210029 江苏南京,南京医科大学第一附属医院介入放射科
  • 收稿日期:2022-09-22 出版日期:2023-02-25
  • 通信作者: 刘圣

Comparison of outcomes of aspiration thrombectomy and stent retriever thrombectomy in patients with acute embolic stroke due to large vessel occlusion

Lizhou Chen1, Wenhui Li1, Jun Zhu1, Xiaolu Xu2, Yuezhou Cao3, Zhenyu Jia3, Sheng Liu3,(), Haibin Shi3   

  1. 1. Department of Interventional Radiology, Yancheng Third People 's Hospital, Jiangsu Yancheng 224001
    2. Department of Neurology, Yancheng Third People 's Hospital, Jiangsu Yancheng 224001
    3. Department of Interventional Radiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Jiangsu Nanjing 210029, China
  • Received:2022-09-22 Published:2023-02-25
  • Corresponding author: Sheng Liu
引用本文:

陈立洲, 李文会, 朱军, 徐晓露, 曹月洲, 贾振宇, 刘圣, 施海彬. 对比分析抽吸取栓与支架取栓治疗前循环大血管急性栓塞性闭塞的临床疗效[J/OL]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2023, 11(01): 35-41.

Lizhou Chen, Wenhui Li, Jun Zhu, Xiaolu Xu, Yuezhou Cao, Zhenyu Jia, Sheng Liu, Haibin Shi. Comparison of outcomes of aspiration thrombectomy and stent retriever thrombectomy in patients with acute embolic stroke due to large vessel occlusion[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Interventional Radiology(Electronic Edition), 2023, 11(01): 35-41.

目的

对比分析导管抽吸取栓与支架取栓治疗前循环大血管急性栓塞性闭塞患者的临床疗效。

方法

回顾性分析2021年1月至2022年1月于南京医科大学第一附属医院接受血管内治疗的前循环大血管急性栓塞性闭塞患者的临床资料。主要观察指标是90 d改良Rankin量表(modified Rankin scale,mRS)评分。采用独立样本t检验、Mann-Whitney U检验和卡方检验比较两组患者的临床资料。单因素和多因素逻辑回归分析评价临床预后的影响因素。

结果

研究期间内共纳入120例患者,其中46例(38.3%)患者接受导管抽吸取栓,74例(61.7%)患者采用支架取栓。较支架取栓相比,抽吸取栓手术时间更短(36 min vs 46 min;Z = 928.5,P < 0.001),成功再通率(93.5% vs 75.7%;c2 = 6.227,P = 0.014)、完全再通率(60.9% vs 40.5%;c2 = 4.694,P = 0.039)。和90 d良好预后(mRS 0~2)比例更高(50.0% vs 31.1%;c2 = 4.295,P = 0.038)。两组之间不良事件发生率(症状性脑出血和90 d死亡率)无明显差异。多因素逻辑回归分析显示抽吸取栓术和良好临床预后显著正相关(OR = 0.12,95%CI:0.03~0.49;P = 0.003)。

结论

对于前循环大血管急性栓塞性闭塞患者,本单中心研究结果显示导管抽吸取栓优于支架取栓,但确切的结果还需更严格临床研究的验证。

Objective

To compare the angiographic and clinical outcomes between aspiration thrombectomy and stent retriever thrombectomy in patients with acute embolic stroke due to emergent large vessel occlusion (ELVO) in the anterior circulation.

Methods

Data from consecutive acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients who treated by endovascular thrombectomy using aspiration thrombectomy or stent retriever thrombectomy in our hospital between January 2021 and January 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. The primary outcome was the 90-day modified Rankin scale (mRS) score. Procedure metrics and clinical outcomes were compared between these two groups. The risk factors associated with clinical outcome were determined by using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses.

Results

A total of 120 patients were included for further evaluation. Among them, primary aspiration thrombectomy was performed in 46 (38.3%) patients, and primary stent retriever thrombectomy was used in 74 (61.7%) patients. Median procedure time(36 vs 46 minutes; Z = 928.5, P < 0.001) were significantly shorter in patients treated with aspiration thrombectomy. Successful recanalization rates (93.5% vs 75.7%; c2 = 6.227, P = 0.014), full recanalization rates (60.9% vs 40.5%; c2 = 4.694, P = 0.039) and good clinical outcome (mRS 0~2) (50.0% vs 31.1%; c2 =4.295, P = 0.038) were achieved in aspiration group significantly higher than those in stent retriever group. Adverse event rates, including symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage and 90-day mortality were comparable between the two groups. Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that aspiration thrombectomy was independently associated with good functional outcome (adjusted common odds ratio: 0.12, 95% confidence interval: 0.03~0.49, P = 0.003).

Conclusions

Among the specific patients with LVO due to acute embolic stroke, the use of aspiration thrombectomy approach compared with stent retriever thrombectomy resulted in a greater likelihood of favorable neurological outcomes. A large multicenter randomized clinical trial is warranted.

图1 患者女,65岁,醒后卒中,基线NIHSS 18分1A:术前CTP显示核心梗死体积18 mL,缺血半暗带体积148 mL,提示存在"不匹配";1B:造影示左侧大脑中动脉M1段闭塞(黑色箭头);1C:术中抽吸导管到达血栓近端(白色箭头);1D:术后造影证实闭塞血管成功再通。
表1 抽吸取栓与支架取栓两组患者基线资料对比[例(%)]
表2 两组患者手术资料及临床预后对比[例(%)]
表3 不良预后的单因素及多因素逻辑回归分析
[1]
中华医学会神经病学分会, 中华医学会神经病学分会脑血管病学组. 中国急性缺血性脑卒中诊治指南2018[J]. 中华神经科杂志, 2018, 51(9): 666-682.
[2]
《中国脑卒中防治报告》编写组. 《中国脑卒中防治报告2019》概要[J]. 中国脑血管病杂志, 2020, 17(5): 272-281.
[3]
Goyal M, Menon BK, Zwam WHV, et al. Endovascular thrombectomy after large-vessel ischaemic stroke: a meta-analysis of individual patient data from five randomised trials[J]. Lancet, 2016, 387(10029): 1723-1731.
[4]
中华医学会神经病学分会, 中华医学会神经病学分会脑血管病学组, 中华医学会神经病学分会神经血管介入协作组. 中国急性缺血性脑卒中早期血管内介入诊疗指南2018[J]. 中华神经科杂志, 2018, 51(9): 683-691.
[5]
Romano DG, Frauenfelder G, Casseri T, et al. Efficacy of ADAPT with large-bore reperfusion catheter in anterior circulation acute ischemic stroke: a multicentric Italian experience[J]. Radiol Med, 2020, 125(1): 57-65.
[6]
Stapleton CJ, Leslie-Mazwi TM, Torok CM, et al. A direct aspiration first-pass technique vs stentriever thrombectomy in emergent large vessel intracranial occlusions[J]. J Neurosurg, 2018, 128(2): 567-574.
[7]
Phan K, Dmytriw AA, Teng L, et al. A direct aspiration first pass technique vs standard endovascular therapy for acute stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Neurosurgery. 2018, 83(1): 19-28.
[8]
Lapergue B, Blanc R, Gory B, et al. Effect of endovascular contact aspiration vs stent retriever on revascularization in patients with acute ischemic stroke and large vessel occlusion: the ASTER randomized clinical trial[J]. JAMA, 2017, 318(5): 443-452.
[9]
Turk AS, Adnan S, Fifi JT, et al. Aspiration thrombectomy versus stent retriever thrombectomy as first-line approach for large vessel occlusion (COMPASS): a multicentre, randomised, open label, blinded outcome, non-inferiority trial[J]. Lancet, 2019, 393(10175): 998-1008.
[10]
霍晓川, 高峰. 急性缺血性卒中血管内治疗中国指南2018[J].中国卒中杂志, 2018, (7): 706-729.
[11]
Alawieh A, Vargas J, Fargen KM, et al. Impact of procedure time on outcomes of thrombectomy for stroke[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2019, 73(8): 879-890.
[12]
Lecouffe NE, Kappelhof M, Treurniet KM, et al. 2B, 2C, or 3: What should be the angiographic target for endovascular treatment in ischemic stroke?[J]. Stroke, 2020, 51(6): 1790-1796.
[13]
Kummer RV, Broderick JP, Campbell BC, et al. The heidelberg bleeding classification: classification of bleeding events after ischemic stroke and reperfusion therapy[J]. Stroke, 2015, 46(10): 2981-2986.
[14]
Liu XF, Xu GL, Liu YX, et al. Acute basilar artery occlusion: endovascular interventions versus standard medical treatment (BEST) trial-design and protocol for a randomized, controlled, multicenter study[J]. Int J Stroke, 2017, 12(7): 779-785.
[15]
马浩源, 赵岩, 胡明, 等. SOFIA远端通路导管直接血栓抽吸和支架取栓治疗早期急性缺血性脑卒中疗效比较[J]. 中国神经精神疾病杂志, 2020, 46(4): 216-220.
[16]
Zhang YC, Zhang Y, Hu CT, et al. A direct aspiration first-pass technique (ADAPT) versus stent retriever for acute ischemic stroke (AIS): a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. J Neurol, 2020268(12): 4594-4606.
[17]
Martini M, Mocco J, Turk A, et al. 'Real-world' comparison of first-line direct aspiration and stent retriever mechanical thrombectomy for the treatment of acute ischemic stroke in the anterior circulation: a multicenter international retrospective study[J]. J Neurointerv Surg, 2019, 11(10): 957-963.
[18]
Sgreccia A, Zoé Duchmann, Desilles JP, et al. Association between acute ischemic stroke etiology and macroscopic aspect of retrieved clots: is a clot’s color a warning light for underlying pathologies?[J]. J Neurointerv Surg, 2019, 11(12): 1197-1200.
[19]
Sporns PB, Hanning U, Schwindt W, et al. Ischemic stroke: what does the histological composition tell us about the origin of the thrombus?[J]. Stroke, 2017, 48(8): 2206-2210.
[20]
黄光. 心源性卒中的病因和风险[J]. 中国卒中杂志, 2019, 14(5): 410-413.
[21]
Yeo LLL, Bhogal P, Gopinathan A, et al. Why does mechanical thrombectomy in large vessel occlusion sometimes fail: a review of the literature[J]. Clin Neuroradiol, 2019, 29(3): 401-414.
[22]
Marnat G, Barreau X, Detraz L, et al. First-line sofia aspiration thrombectomy approach within the endovascular treatment of ischemic stroke multicentric registry: efficacy, safety, and predictive factors of success[J]. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 2019, 40(6): 1006-1012.
[1] 江西省神经外科质量控制中心. 江西省心源性脑卒中多学科协作防治专家共识[J/OL]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(05): 264-277.
[2] 张洪, 杨琪, 罗静, 唐茜, 邓鸿, 巩文艳, 王丽坤, 刘静, 艾双春. 多靶点神经调控技术对卒中后上肢运动功能障碍患者的脑网络功能连接研究[J/OL]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(05): 278-284.
[3] 许方军, 曹晓光, 王修敏, 王婷, 陈冬冬, 余程冬, 张鹤言. 基于闭环理论的动作观察疗法联合躯干控制训练对脑卒中后下肢运动的影响[J/OL]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(05): 292-299.
[4] 张雅文, 尹昱, 陈江龙, 杨玉慧, 吕红香, 张琦, 吕佩源. Theta爆发式经颅磁刺激治疗失语症的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(05): 306-311.
[5] 陈冬冬, 余程冬, 曹晓光. 上肢外骨骼机器人在脑卒中康复中的应用与研究进展[J/OL]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(05): 312-317.
[6] 耿晓坤. 缺血性卒中后无效再灌注的时间窗、组织窗与神经保护[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 636-636.
[7] 李璇, 邓岚, 郭微, 邓永梅, 刘杰昕. 标准化皮肤管理流程在防治脑卒中患者失禁相关性皮炎中的应用[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 479-482.
[8] 郑屹, 刘莹, 张煜坤, 李广平, 陈康寅, 刘彤. 既往及新发心房颤动对急性心肌梗死患者远期卒中风险的影响[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 406-417.
[9] 刘志超, 胡风云, 温春丽. 山西省脑卒中危险因素与地域的相关性分析[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 424-433.
[10] 王丽娜, 吕书霞, 李亚男. 脑卒中偏瘫患者健康焦虑元认知与疾病接受度、恐惧疾病进展的相关性[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 434-440.
[11] 穆巴拉克·伊力哈, 徐霁华, 鲁明. 急性轻型卒中微量脑出血误诊病例的临床特点及影像学表现分析[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 441-445.
[12] 金安松, 邹玉松, 刘玖涛, 薛凤麟, 庞爱兰. 孤立性颅内浆细胞瘤一例及相关文献复习[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 495-500.
[13] 周洪千, 张煜坤, 顾天舒, 胡苏涛, 姜超, 张雪, 张昊, 陶华岳, 刘行, 刘彤, 陈康寅. 既往出血性脑卒中患者行经皮冠脉介入治疗后不良事件的危险因素分析[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 323-329.
[14] 邓越, 白鹏, 洪秋阳, 王桂玲. 颈部七线调衡疗法探析并病例汇报一例[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 345-349.
[15] 贾伟华, 刘芙蓉, 杨宝玲, 张鸥, 赵秉清. 以岗位综合胜任力为导向融合思政教育的多模式教学在卒中实习教学中的应用[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 365-369.
阅读次数
全文


摘要