切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华介入放射学电子杂志 ›› 2022, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (04) : 382 -386. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-5782.2022.04.007

非血管介入

不同类型患者接受腰椎间盘O3注射术后疼痛缓解疗效分析
郝珂楠1, 陈小晶1, 李新民1, 冯建宇1, 何晓峰1,()   
  1. 1. 510515 广东广州,南方医科大学南方医院血管与介入科
  • 收稿日期:2021-07-13 出版日期:2022-11-25
  • 通信作者: 何晓峰
  • 基金资助:
    广东省自然科学基金-面上项目(2022A1515012392)

Effect analysis of pain relief in different types of patients after lumbar disc O3 injection

Kenan Hao1, Xiaojing Chen1, Xinmin Li1, Jianyu Feng1, Xiaofeng He1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangdong Guangzhou 510515, China
  • Received:2021-07-13 Published:2022-11-25
  • Corresponding author: Xiaofeng He
引用本文:

郝珂楠, 陈小晶, 李新民, 冯建宇, 何晓峰. 不同类型患者接受腰椎间盘O3注射术后疼痛缓解疗效分析[J]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2022, 10(04): 382-386.

Kenan Hao, Xiaojing Chen, Xinmin Li, Jianyu Feng, Xiaofeng He. Effect analysis of pain relief in different types of patients after lumbar disc O3 injection[J]. Chinese Journal of Interventional Radiology(Electronic Edition), 2022, 10(04): 382-386.

目的

分析不同年龄组及不同椎间盘突出类型的患者接受腰椎间盘三氧(Ozone,O3)注射术后疗效的差别,为临床治疗的选择提供依据。

方法

随访2009年1月到2019年6月在南方医院就诊的腰椎间盘突出症患者共476人(年龄在14~85岁之间,单一责任椎间盘)。根据MRI影像和DSA下O3注射时的影像表现,我们将腰椎间盘突出症分为四型:Ⅰ型:纤维环破裂髓核突出型;Ⅱ型:纤维环破裂髓核非突出型;Ⅲ型:纤维环非破裂髓核突出型;Ⅳ型:纤维环非破裂髓核非突出型。VAS评分作为评价疗效的标准,我们记录了患者术前、术后1周、1、6和12个月的VAS评分并进行比较。

结果

腰椎间盘O3注射术对患者疼痛缓解有较好的疗效,有椎间盘突出的患者在治疗后可观察到突出减小。在年龄、性别、病程、突出类型等临床特征中,年龄是唯一与术后VAS相关因素,且呈负相关。不同年龄组患者疗效与分型相关,中青年组患者Ⅰ型疗效最好,Ⅳ型疗效最差;老年组患者Ⅱ型疗效最好,Ⅲ型最差。

结论

腰椎间盘O3注射术是一种有效的治疗腰椎间盘突出症的方法,但是不同年龄组间不同类型的患者疗效不同,在临床治疗中应根据患者特点选用不同治疗方案。

Objective

Analyze the difference in curative effect of patients of different age groups and different types of intervertebral disc herniation after receiving ozone (O3) injection of lumbar intervertebral disc, and provide a basis for the choice of clinical treatment.

Methods

A total of 476 patients with lumbar disc herniation (aged between 14-85 years old, single responsibility disc) who were treated at Nanfang Hospital from January 2009 to June 2019 were followed up. According to the MRI images and the imaging manifestations during O3 injection under DSA, we classified lumbar disc herniation into four types: Type Ⅰ: ruptured annulus fibrosus with herniated nucleus pulposus, TypeⅡ: ruptured annulus fibrosus withnon-protruding nucleus pulposus, Type Ⅲ : annulus fibrosus non-ruptured with herniated nucleus pulposus, and type Ⅳ: annulus fibrosus non-ruptured with non-protruding nucleus pulposus.The VAS score was used as a standard for evaluating the efficacy. We recorded the VAS scores of patients before surgery, 1 week, 1 month, 6 months and 12 months after surgery and compared them.

Results

O3 injection of lumbar intervertebral disc has a good effect on pain relief in patients. The reduction of herniation can be observed after treatment in patients with herniated intervertebral disc. Among clinical characteristics such as age, gender, course of disease, and prominent type, age was the only factor that was negatively correlatedwith postoperative VAS. The curative effect of patients in different age groups was related to the classification. The young and middle-aged patients have the best curative effect in type Ⅰ and the worst curative effect in type Ⅳ.The elderly group has the best curative effect in type Ⅱ and the worst effect in type Ⅲ.

Conclusions

Lumbar intervertebral disc O3 injection is an effective method for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation, but different types of patients have different curative effects among different age groups. In clinical treatment, different treatment options should be selected based on the characteristics of patients.

图1 患者穿刺过程1A:用21G的酒精注射针进行椎间盘穿刺;1B:在突出的椎间盘注入O3气体(黑色箭头);1C:将针撤回病变神经根旁;1D:O3气体(黑色箭头)椎旁的注入。
图2 25岁成年男性行腰椎间盘O3注射术前后MRI检查2A、2C:术前患者L5/S1椎间盘突出(黑色箭头);2B、2D:术后患者L5/S1水平萎缩椎间盘突出(白色箭头)明显减小。
图3 腰椎间盘O3注射术术前术后VAS评分比较(****:P≤0.000 1)。
图4 临床特点与术后VAS评分相关性分析及不同年龄组患者术前术后VAS比较4A:临床特点与术后VAS评分相关性分析(*:P≤0.05);4B:不同年龄组患者术前术后VAS比较(-:无统计学差别;*:P≤0.05,**:P≤0.01)。
表1 不同年龄患者基本信息比较
图5 不同类型患者术前术后VAS评分比较(ns:P>0.05,**:P≤0.01,***:P≤0.001,****:P≤0.000 1)
[1]
O'Keeffe M, Maher CG, Rozbroj T, et al. Lessons from The Lancet Low Back Pain Series media strategy[J]. Lancet, 2020, 396(10262): 1560-1561.
[2]
张鹏, 刘丰平, 刘杨, 等. 微创镜下减压治疗退行性腰椎椎管狭窄症的临床研究[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2021, 7(2): 85-92.
[3]
戎毅, 马勇, 郭杨, 等. 中医药治疗腰椎间盘突出症微创术后残留症状的研究进展[J]. 中华中医药杂志, 2021, 36(5):2830-2834.
[4]
Migliorini F, Maffulli N, Eschweiler J, et al. Ozone injection therapy for intervertebral disc herniation[J]. Br Med Bull, 2020, 136(1): 88-106.
[5]
张照庆, 刘瀛, 徐芸, 等. 经皮旋切术结合O3注射对腰椎间盘突出症患者血清前列腺素E1α和脑钠肽的影响[J]. 介入放射学杂志, 2013, 22(5): 396-398.
[6]
Ozcan S, Muz A, Yildiz AA, et al. Intradiscal ozone therapy for lumbar disc herniation[J]. Cell Mol Biol (Noisy-le-grand), 2018, 64(5): 52-55.
[7]
Hashemi M, Poorfarokh M, Mohajerani SA, et al. Injection of intradiscal o2-o3 to reduce pain and disability of patients with low back pain due to prolapsed lumbar disk[J]. Anesth Pain Med, 2014, 4(5): e19206.
[8]
Magalhaes FN, Dotta L, Sasse A, et al. Ozone therapy as a treatment for low back pain secondary to herniated disc: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials[J]. Pain Physician, 2012, 15(2): E115-E129.
[9]
Hao K, Li Y, Feng J, et al. Ozone promotes regeneration by regulating the inflammatory response in zebrafish[J]. Int Immunopharmacol, 2015, 28(1): 369-375.
[10]
彭志康, 刘亚洪, 卢蔚芳, 等. 经皮髓核钳夹术联合O3治疗腰椎间盘突出症的应用研究[J]. 中华神经医学杂志, 2010(9): 955-958.
[1] 中国老年医学学会烧创伤分会. 老年患者皮肤撕裂伤防护专家共识(2022版)[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(02): 98-103.
[2] 张芝, 孙海云. 舒适护理对老年腹股沟疝患者腹腔镜手术后睡眠质量及满意度的影响[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 488-490.
[3] 董艳, 吴向阳, 林巧兰, 李国栋, 杨瑞洲. 基于快速康复外科理念的清单管理在老年双侧腹股沟疝患者围手术期的应用[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 354-358.
[4] 邓美云, 马兰, 胡惠惠. 双环节协同护理模式在老年腹股沟疝患者中的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 346-349.
[5] 邵乐宁, 何腾飞, 钟丰云, 吴浩荣. 嵌顿疝合并新型冠状病毒感染高龄患者的外科诊治体会[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 280-284.
[6] 李云锋, 俞永江. 抗凝治疗的老年腹股沟疝患者围手术期治疗研究进展[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 247-250.
[7] 阎晨, 刘涛, 宣斐. 超声引导联合全麻对老年肺癌肺叶切除术患者NGF-β、MBP及术后转归分析[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2022, 15(02): 192-196.
[8] 于凌佳, 祝斌, 张国强, 谢学虎, 刘宁, 董华钧, 李想, 杨雍. 经皮内镜下腰椎间盘切除术的日间手术(8 h内)诊疗流程的建立、优化及应用效果[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 15(04): 227-232.
[9] 赵俊华, 杨政伟, 刘阳, 郑银福, 刘建. 规范的术后康复训练对PELD术预后的影响[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2023, 09(03): 157-165.
[10] 曾少良, 包权, 赵金义, 于泽霏, 王崇, 邢健. PROSET序列诊断腰椎间盘突出症责任病灶的价值[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2022, 12(02): 88-93.
[11] 李永胜, 孙家和, 郭书伟, 卢义康, 刘洪洲. 高龄结直肠癌患者根治术后短期并发症及其影响因素[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 962-967.
[12] 卓徐鹏, 刘颖, 任菁菁. 感染性疾病与老年人低蛋白血症的相关性研究进展[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(08): 896-899.
[13] 陈名珍, 杨珺楠, 李开来, 赵旭静, 薛安静, 满姗姗, 向平超. 经鼻高流量氧气湿化治疗老年慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重合并呼吸衰竭的可行性研究[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(06): 481-486.
[14] 张志强, 杨建东, 范新宇, 黄吉军, 蔡俊, 冯新民, 闫明. Endo-LOVE技术治疗重度脱垂型腰椎间盘突出症的效果分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(01): 62-65.
[15] 王宇, 韩敏, 郭瑞敏, 秦熠, 牛开亚, 宋娟, 陈鹏, 邹亚, 孙燕妮. 老年脓毒症患者短期预后的早期预测研究[J]. 中华老年病研究电子杂志, 2022, 09(04): 1-5.
阅读次数
全文


摘要