切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华介入放射学电子杂志 ›› 2022, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (03) : 333 -338. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-5782.2022.03.021

介入护理

肝癌TACE术中应用利多卡因的效果观察
吴蓝1, 冯建宇1,()   
  1. 1. 510515 广东广州,南方医科大学南方医院血管与介入科
  • 收稿日期:2021-10-14 出版日期:2022-08-25
  • 通信作者: 冯建宇

Effect of lidocaine intransarterial chemoembolization for liver cancer

Lan Wu1, Jianyu Feng1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Vascular and Interventional, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangdong Guangzhou 510515, China
  • Received:2021-10-14 Published:2022-08-25
  • Corresponding author: Jianyu Feng
引用本文:

吴蓝, 冯建宇. 肝癌TACE术中应用利多卡因的效果观察[J]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2022, 10(03): 333-338.

Lan Wu, Jianyu Feng. Effect of lidocaine intransarterial chemoembolization for liver cancer[J]. Chinese Journal of Interventional Radiology(Electronic Edition), 2022, 10(03): 333-338.

目的

观察肝癌TACE术注入栓塞剂前应用利多卡因联合规范围手术期护理,对包括老年人群在内的肝癌患者的镇痛效果及对睡眠和生活质量的影响。

方法

将100例拟行TACE术肝癌患者,按入院先后顺序分为两组各50例。两组均给予规范围手术期护理,观察组在TACE术中注入栓塞剂前一次性注入盐酸利多卡因注射液100 mg,对照组在注入栓塞剂前不注入利多卡因。两组均采用疼痛评分(视觉模拟评分法)、癌症患者生活质量量表、Spiegel量表评估两组术前、术后24 h疼痛、生活质量、睡眠情况。

结果

两组术前生活质量评分、Spiegel量表评分比较及疼痛评分均无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。术后24 h生活质量评分,观察组(35.08 ± 9.50)与对照组(38.72 ± 10.9)比较无统计学意义(P > 0.05),观察组优于对照组;术后24 h Spiegel量表评分,观察组(11.56 ± 2.31)与对照组(9.02 ± 2.69)比较均有统计学意义(P < 0.001),观察组优于对照组;术后24 h疼痛视觉模拟评分,观察组(2.38 ± 1.47)与对照组(4.08 ± 1.59)比较有统计学意义(P < 0.001),观察组优于对照组。

结论

TACE术中注入栓塞剂前应用利多卡因联合规范围手术期护理,可以减轻肝癌患者包括老年人群在内的术后疼痛,改善其睡眠质量。

Objective

To observe the analgesic effects of lidocaine injected before embolic agent injection in transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with usual perioperative care on liver cancer patients, including the elderly, and its effect on sleep and quality of life.

Methods

A total of 100 patients with liver cancer undergoing TACE were enrolled into observation group or control group (in a 1: 1 ratio) according to the order of admission. Usual perioperative care was implemented in both of two groups. The patients in observation group were injected with 100 mg lidocaine hydrochloride injection before embolic agent injection during TACE, while the patients in the control group were not injected with lidocaine hydrochloride injection before embolic agent injection. The pain score (visual analogue scale), quality of life scale of cancer patients and Spiegel scale were used to evaluate the pain, quality of life and sleep of the two groups before operation and 24 h after operation.

Results

There were no significant differences in preoperative quality of life score, Spiegel scale score and pain score between the two groups (P > 0.05). At 24 h after operation, there was no significant difference in quality of life between the two groups (35.08 ± 9.50 vs 38.72 ± 10.9, P > 0.05). At24 h after operation, the Spiegel scale score of the observation group (11.56 ± 2.31) was better than than that of the control group (9.02 ± 2.69), with statistically significant differences (P < 0.001). At 24 h after operation, The pain score (visual analogue scale) was lower in the observation group (2.38 ± 1.47) than that in the control group (4.08 ± 1.59), statistically significant differences (P < 0.001).

Conclusions

Injecting lidocaine before injecting embolization during TACE combined with usual perioperative care can reduce the postoperative pain and improve the quality of sleep of patients with liver cancer including the elderly.

图1 研究流程图
表1 观察组与对照组基线情况
表2 两组癌症患者生活质量测定量表评分
表3 两组Spiegel量表评分
表4 两组疼痛视觉模拟评分
表5 两组术后补救镇痛药物使用情况
[1]
安澜, 曾红梅, 冉显会, 等. 肝细胞癌和肝内胆管细胞癌流行病学研究进展[J]. 中国肿瘤, 2020(11): 879-884.
[2]
格桑旺姆, 常中飞, 杜雅璐, 等. 2001—2017年我院原发性肝癌流行病学特征分析[J]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2019, 7(3): 206-210.
[3]
安天志, 高嵩, 靳勇, 等. 中国肝细胞癌经动脉化疗栓塞治疗(TACE)临床实践指南[J]. 介入放射学杂志, 2018(12): 1117-1126.
[4]
闫东. 2018《CSCO原发性肝癌诊疗指南》解读——肝动脉介入治疗部分[J]. 肝癌电子杂志, 2018(3): 4-7.
[5]
Lv N, Kong Y, Mu L, et al. Effect of perioperative parecoxib sodium on postoperative pain control for transcatheter arterial chemoembolization for inoperable hepatocellular carcinoma:a prospective randomized trial[J]. Eur Radiol, 2016, 26(10):3492-3499.
[6]
王天成, 马聪, 肖煜东, 等. 利多卡因-表阿霉素-超液化碘油混合乳剂在肝癌TACE相关疼痛管理中的应用[J]. 介入放射学杂志, 2020(4): 366-371.
[7]
Feng YL, Ling CQ, Zhai XF, et al. A new way: alleviating postembolization syndrome following transcatheter arterial chemoembolization[J]. J Altern Complement Med, 2009, 15(2): 175-181.
[8]
Xu L, Wang S, Zhuang L, et al. Jian Pi Li Qi decoction alleviated postembolization syndrome following transcatheter arterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial[J]. Integr Cancer Ther, 2016, 15(3): 349-357.
[9]
Yang H, Seon J, Sung PS, et al. Dexamethasone prophylaxis to alleviate postembolization syndrome after transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma: a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study[J]. J Vasc Interv Radiol, 2017, 28(11): 1503-1511.
[10]
Guo JG, Zhao LP, Rao YF, et al. Novel multimodal analgesia regimen improves post-TACE pain in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Diseases International, 2018, 17(6): 510-516.
[11]
Lee SH, Hahn ST, Park SH. Intraarterial lidocaine administration for relief of pain resulting from transarterial chemoembolization of hepatocellular carcinoma: its effectiveness and optimal timing of administration[J]. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol, 2001, 24(6): 368-371.
[12]
中华人民共和国国家卫生健康委员会医政医管局. 原发性肝癌诊疗规范(2019年版)[J]. 传染病信息, 2020(6): 481-500.
[13]
李麟荪, 徐阳, 林汉英. 介入护理学[G]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2015.
[14]
段甜, 孙晓芙, 韩月霞. 针对性护理对肝癌介入治疗患者胃肠道反应及疼痛的影响[J]. 临床医学工程, 2021, 28: 219-220.
[15]
宋丽娜, 黄华, 袁萍. 多模式镇痛护理对肝动脉化疗栓塞术治疗肝癌患者负性情绪及疼痛的影响[J]. 当代护士(下旬刊), 2021, 28: 118-120.
[16]
郑飞辉. 肝癌化疗栓塞术后疼痛的护理措施进展[J]. 医药前沿, 2021, 11: 190-191.
[17]
首运凤, 李元涛. 利多卡因的临床作用及机制[J]. 中国临床新医学, 2021(5): 522-527.
[18]
温雪敏, 宫云云, 范钦, 等. 利多卡因在围术期的研究进展及机制[J]. 麻醉安全与质控, 2021(2): 114-118.
[1] 刘嘉嘉, 王承华, 陈绪娇, 刘瑗玲, 王善钰, 屈海花, 张莉. 经阴道子宫-输卵管实时三维超声造影中患者疼痛发生情况及其影响因素分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(09): 959-965.
[2] 金姗, 丁雪晏, 蔡绮哲, 李一丹, 赵智玲, 郭兮恒, 吕秀章. 左心室压力-应变环对阻塞型睡眠呼吸暂停综合征患者心肌功能的评价[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(06): 575-580.
[3] 夏传龙, 迟健, 丛强, 连杰, 崔峻, 陈彦玲. 富血小板血浆联合关节镜治疗半月板损伤的临床疗效[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 877-881.
[4] 董红华, 郭艮春, 江磊, 吴雪飞, 马飞翔, 李海凤. 骨科康复一体化模式在踝关节骨折快速康复中的应用[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 802-807.
[5] 代莉, 邓恢伟, 郭华静, 黄芙蓉. 术中持续输注艾司氯胺酮对腹腔镜结直肠癌手术患者术后睡眠质量的影响[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 408-412.
[6] 杨倩, 李翠芳, 张婉秋. 原发性肝癌自发性破裂出血急诊TACE术后的近远期预后及影响因素分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 33-36.
[7] 吴畏, 吴永哲, 李宗倍, 崔宏力, 李华志, 许臣. 轻质大网孔补片腹腔镜下疝修补术治疗老年腹股沟疝的疗效及炎症因子的影响[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 70-73.
[8] 陆闻青, 陈昕怡, 任雪飞. 遗传代谢病儿童肝移植受者术后生活质量调查研究[J]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 287-292.
[9] 王敏, 蒋家斌, 李茂新. 预警宣教联合个性化疼痛管理对腹股沟疝手术患者的影响[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 764-767.
[10] 王可, 范彬, 李多富, 刘奎. 两种疝囊残端处理方法在经腹腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术中的疗效比较[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 692-696.
[11] 夏松, 姚嗣会, 汪勇刚. 经腹腹膜前与疝环充填式疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝的对照研究[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 702-705.
[12] 李梅, 孔珊珊. Robocare护理模式联合高频胸壁振荡在腹腔镜腹壁切口疝修补术的应用[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 619-624.
[13] 韩冰, 顾劲扬. 深度学习神经网络在肝癌诊疗中的研究及应用前景[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(05): 480-485.
[14] 孙晗, 武侠. 成人肠易激综合征患者肠道菌群特征与不同分型患者生活质量和精神症状的相关性[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 461-465.
[15] 王小娜, 谭微, 李悦, 姜文艳. 预测性护理对结直肠癌根治术患者围手术期生活质量、情绪及并发症的影响[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 525-529.
阅读次数
全文


摘要