切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华介入放射学电子杂志 ›› 2022, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (01) : 61 -64. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-5782.2022.01.011

影像诊断

超声TI-RADS分类与细针穿刺活检在诊断甲状腺恶性结节中的临床应用
王佳讯1, 陈毓菁1,(), 梁展鹏1, 伍卓强1, 邬家明1, 林毅迪1   
  1. 1. 511400 广东广州,番禺区中心医院超声科
  • 收稿日期:2021-04-07 出版日期:2022-02-25
  • 通信作者: 陈毓菁

The clinical application of ultrasound TI-RADS classification and fine needle aspiration biopsy in the diagnosis of malignant thyroid nodules

Jiaxun Wang1, Yujing Chen1,(), Zhanpeng Liang1, Zhuoqiang Wu1, Jiaming Wu1, Yidi Lin1   

  1. 1. Department of Ultrasonography, Panyu Central Hospital, Guangdong Guangzhou 511400, China
  • Received:2021-04-07 Published:2022-02-25
  • Corresponding author: Yujing Chen
引用本文:

王佳讯, 陈毓菁, 梁展鹏, 伍卓强, 邬家明, 林毅迪. 超声TI-RADS分类与细针穿刺活检在诊断甲状腺恶性结节中的临床应用[J/OL]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2022, 10(01): 61-64.

Jiaxun Wang, Yujing Chen, Zhanpeng Liang, Zhuoqiang Wu, Jiaming Wu, Yidi Lin. The clinical application of ultrasound TI-RADS classification and fine needle aspiration biopsy in the diagnosis of malignant thyroid nodules[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Interventional Radiology(Electronic Edition), 2022, 10(01): 61-64.

目的

探讨甲状腺影像报告和数据系统分类(TI-RADS)与细针穿刺活检(FNA)在诊断甲状腺恶性结节中的临床应用价值。

方法

回顾性分析我院于2020年1月至2020年12月期间常规甲状腺超声检查中TI-RADS分类≥3类的585例患者的588个甲状腺结节,所有患者均接受甲状腺细针穿刺细胞学活检,其中266个甲状腺结节手术切除,以大体病理为金标准,评价超声TI-RADS分类与细针穿刺活检诊断甲状腺恶性结节的效能。

结果

588个甲状腺结节细胞学病理诊断恶性243例、良性193例、性质不确定152例,超声TI-RADS 3、4、5类甲状腺恶性结节的阳性率分别为3.01%(4/133)、38.87%(110/283)、75.00%(129/172);266个结节手术切除,大体病理诊断恶性211例、良性55例,细针穿刺活检诊断甲状腺恶性结节的敏感性、特异性、准确性分别为98.46%、93.02%、97.48%,阳性预测值为98.46%,阴性预测值为93.02%,阳性似然比为14.11,阴性似然比为0.017;穿刺感硬及有砂粒感诊断为甲状腺恶性结节的准确性明显高于穿刺感软及无砂粒感,差异有统计学意义(χ2 = 70.206,65.083;P = 0.000,0.000);超声TI-RADS分类及细针穿刺活检诊断甲状腺恶性结节的ROC曲线下面积分别为0.881及0.954。

结论

超声TI-RADS分类结合细针穿刺活检对甲状腺恶性结节有较高的诊断价值,可更准确、更安全地判断甲状腺结节的良恶性,值得临床推广。

Objective

To explore the clinical application value of ultrasound TI-RADS classification and fine needle aspiration biopsy in the diagnosis of malignant thyroid nodules.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of 588 thyroid nodules in 585 patients with TI-RADS classification≥3 in routine thyroid ultrasound examinations in our hospital from January 2020 to December 2020. All patients underwent thyroid fine-needle aspiration cytology biopsy. Among them, 266 thyroid nodules were surgically removed. Using gross pathology as the gold standard, to evaluate the efficacy of ultrasound TI-RADS classification and fine-needle aspiration biopsy in diagnosing malignant thyroid nodules.

Results

Among 588 thyroid nodules in 585 patients, 243 cases were malignant, 193 cases were benign, and 152 cases were uncertain. The positive rates of ultrasound TI-RADS 3, 4, and 5 thyroid malignant nodules were 3.01% (4/133), 38.87% (110/283), 75.00% (129/172), respectively. 266 nodules were surgically removed, gross pathological results were available 211 malignant and 55 benign. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of fine-needle aspiration biopsy in the diagnosis of malignant thyroid nodules were 98.46%, 93.02%, and 97.48%, respectively. The positive predictive value was 98.46%, the negative predictive value was 93.02%, the positive likelihood ratio was 14.11 and the negative likelihood ratio was 0.017. The accuracy of diagnosing thyroid malignant nodules with hard puncture feeling and grit sensation was significantly higher than that with soft puncture feeling and no grit sensation, and the difference was statistically significant (χ2 = 70.206, 65.083; P = 0.000, 0.000).The areas under the ROC curve of ultrasonic TI-RADS classification and fine-needle aspiration biopsy for the diagnosis of malignant thyroid nodules were 0.881 and 0.954, respectively.

Conclusions

UltrasoundTI-RADS classification combined with fine-needle aspiration biopsy has higher diagnostic value for malignant thyroid nodules, which can distinguish benign and malignant thyroid nodules more accurately and safely, and is worthy of clinical promotion.

表1 TI-RADS分类与细针穿刺细胞学病理对照情况
表2 不同穿刺手感诊断甲状腺恶性结节价值比较
图1 TI-RADS分类及细针穿刺细胞学诊断甲状腺恶性结节的ROC曲线
[1]
赵艳娜, 周伟, 傅一萍, 等. 超声甲状腺影像报告与数据系统及超声积分法对甲状腺结节的诊断价值[J]. 中国超声医学杂志, 2018, 34(5): 392-395.
[2]
王欣, 卓锋. 甲状腺影像报告和数据系统在甲状腺结节诊断中的应用价值[J]. 实用医技杂志, 2020, 27(8): 1009-1011.
[3]
Haddad RI, Nasr C, Bischoff L, et al. NCCN guidelines insights: thyroid carcinoma, version 2. 2018[J]. JNCCN, 2018, 16(12): 1429-1440.
[4]
Haugen BR, Alexander EK, Bible KC, et al. 2015 American Thyroid Association management guidelines for adult patients with thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer: the American Thyroid Association guidelines task force on thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer[J]. Thyroid, 2016, 26(1): 1-133.
[5]
Tessler FN, Middleton WD, Grant EG, et al. ACR thyroid imaging, reporting and data system (TI-RADS): white paper of the ACR TI-RADS Committee[J]. Journal of the American College of Radiology, 2017, 14(5): 587-595.
[6]
岳文炬, 哈思宁, 张景, 等. 甲状腺结节超声特点与甲状腺细胞病理学Bethesda报告系统相关性研究[J]. 天津医科大学学报, 2020, 26(6): 542-544, 548.
[7]
Megwalu UC. Risk of malignancy in thyroid nodules 4 cm or larger[J]. Endocrinology and Metabolism, 2017, 32(1): 77-82.
[8]
刘辉, 桑梓桐, 叶新华. 超声联合细针抽吸细胞学检查对甲状腺结节的诊断价值[J]. 临床超声医学杂志, 2017, 19(11):755-758.
[9]
Gupta N, Gupta P, Rajwanshi A. Trucut/core biopsy versus FNAC: who wins the match? Thyroid lesions and salivary gland lesions: an overview[J]. Journal of Cytology, 2018, 35(3): 173-175.
[10]
骆洁丽, 陈建设, 孙杨, 等. 甲状腺细针穿刺手感联合细胞学检查对甲状腺结节良恶性的研究[J]. 中华超声影像学杂志, 2016, 25(11): 966-969.
[11]
赵俊丽, 赵俊峰, 刘瑞霞, 等. 超声TI-RADS分级法和弹性成像技术对甲状腺结节定性诊断的效能比较[J]. 临床超声医学杂志, 2018, 20(4): 267-270.
[1] 罗辉, 方晔. 品管圈在提高甲状腺结节细针穿刺检出率中的应用[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(10): 972-977.
[2] 刘畅, 蒋洁, 胥雪冬, 崔立刚, 王淑敏, 陈文. 北京市海淀区医疗机构甲状腺超声检查及TIRADS分类基线调查[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(07): 693-697.
[3] 杨敬武, 周美君, 陈雨凡, 李素淑, 何燕妮, 崔楠, 刘红梅. 人工智能超声结合品管圈活动对低年资超声医师甲状腺结节风险评估能力的作用[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(05): 522-526.
[4] 伯小皖, 郭乐杭, 余松远, 李明宙, 孙丽萍. 甲状腺结节人工智能自动分割和分类系统的建立和验证[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(03): 304-309.
[5] 刘健, 谢尚宏, 席雪华, 张波. BRAF V600E基因及ACR TI-RADS分类对Bethesda Ⅲ类甲状腺结节风险评估价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(01): 57-62.
[6] 张茜, 陈佳慧, 高雪萌, 赵傲雪, 黄瑛. 基于高帧频超声造影的影像组学特征鉴别诊断甲状腺结节良恶性的价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(09): 895-903.
[7] 丁雷, 罗文, 杨晓, 庞丽娜, 张佩蒂, 刘海静, 袁佳妮, 刘瑾. 高帧频超声造影在评价C-TIRADS 4-5类甲状腺结节成像特征中的应用[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(09): 887-894.
[8] 李卫民, 陈军民, 黄艳丽, 范晓芳, 韩文, 贾磊, 张俊超, 瞿辰. 基于中国甲状腺超声报告与数据系统分析超声在不同大小甲状腺结节中的诊断价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(07): 743-748.
[9] 付泽辉, 王思齐, 卢叶君, 张剑, 贺烨, 陈卉. 超声对易误诊的等回声、高回声甲状腺结节良恶性的鉴别[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(05): 517-523.
[10] 郭云云, 解翔, 彭梅, 姜凡, 毕玉, 何年安, 胡蕾, 杨杨, 王涛, 石玉洁, 陈冬冬. ACR-TIRADS与C-TIRADS分类分别联合二维剪切波弹性成像对甲状腺结节分类的诊断效能——多中心回顾性研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(05): 511-516.
[11] 王娜, 刘晓真, 叶木奇, 刘少中, 谢轶峰, 戴玉娟, 陈叶. 超微血流成像联合甲状腺成像报告和数据系统对桥本甲状腺炎背景下甲状腺良恶性结节检测效果的价值研究[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 287-290.
[12] 李俊, 彭健韵, 邱婉冰, 窦倩怡, 潘福顺, 梁瑾瑜. 甲状腺结节恶性风险分层(指南):ACR TI-RADS与C-TIRADS诊断效能及不同医师使用指南一致性的多中心回顾性比较研究[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 401-407.
[13] 王本泉, 崔凡, 邱钧, 项本宏. 不同甲状腺手术方式对改善胰岛素抵抗的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 208-211.
[14] 马云霞, 于金勇, 魏淑凤, 韩臣子. 耳穴疗法对肝气郁结型甲状腺结节合并焦虑抑郁的临床疗效观察[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 348-354.
[15] 王理萍, 陈晓波. 甲状腺结节超声恶性危险分层中国指南在老年患者甲状腺结节良恶性诊断中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华老年病研究电子杂志, 2024, 11(01): 35-39.
阅读次数
全文


摘要