切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华介入放射学电子杂志 ›› 2021, Vol. 09 ›› Issue (04) : 429 -433. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-5782.2021.04.015

影像诊断

自动乳腺全容积成像冠状面边缘特征对于诊断女性乳腺实性肿瘤的价值
李明1, 昝星有1, 李娜1, 杜亚丽2, 陆欣贤1, 朱巧英1, 周锋盛1,()   
  1. 1. 214023 江苏无锡,南京医科大学附属无锡人民医院超声医学科
    2. 南京医科大学附属无锡人民医院妇科
  • 收稿日期:2021-02-05 出版日期:2021-11-25
  • 通信作者: 周锋盛
  • 基金资助:
    无锡市卫计委科技成果和适宜技术推广项目(T201828); 无锡市卫生健康委科研青年项目(Q201902)

The diagnosis value of coronal edge features in ABVS for solid breast tumors

Ming Li1, Xingyou Zan1, Na Li1, Yali Du2, Xinxian Lu1, Qiaoying Zhu1, Fengsheng Zhou1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Ultrasound Medicine, Wuxi People's Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Jiangsu Wuxi 214000, China
    2. Department of Gynaecology, Wuxi People's Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Jiangsu Wuxi 214000, China
  • Received:2021-02-05 Published:2021-11-25
  • Corresponding author: Fengsheng Zhou
引用本文:

李明, 昝星有, 李娜, 杜亚丽, 陆欣贤, 朱巧英, 周锋盛. 自动乳腺全容积成像冠状面边缘特征对于诊断女性乳腺实性肿瘤的价值[J/OL]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2021, 09(04): 429-433.

Ming Li, Xingyou Zan, Na Li, Yali Du, Xinxian Lu, Qiaoying Zhu, Fengsheng Zhou. The diagnosis value of coronal edge features in ABVS for solid breast tumors[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Interventional Radiology(Electronic Edition), 2021, 09(04): 429-433.

目的

研究自动乳房全容积成像(ABVS)冠状面的边缘特征对于诊断女性乳腺实性肿瘤的价值。

方法

回顾性分析206例女性乳腺肿块患者(230个结节)的术前手持式超声(HHUS)和ABVS资料,HHUS主要观察肿块的边缘、形态、生长方位、内部回声、有无钙化、后方回声特征及肿块的相关特征、彩色血流及多普勒频谱特征。采用SPSS 20.0软件统计分析,计量资料采用(±s)表示,敏感性和特异性的比较采用配对卡方检验。一致性检验采用Kappa检验。

结果

HHUS的边缘恶性特征、HHUS的所有特征、ABVS冠状面的边缘恶性特征以及ABVS的边缘恶性特征联合HHUS的所有特征诊断乳腺实性肿瘤的敏感性分别为62.40%、71.40%、72.93%、88.72%;特异性分别为80.41%、76.29%、77.32%、75.26%。ABVS冠状面的边缘恶性特征诊断乳腺实性肿瘤的敏感性高于HHUS的边缘恶性特征,两者差异有统计学意义(P < 0.001),一致性检验Kappa = 0.762;ABVS冠状面的边缘恶性特征结合HHUS的所有特征诊断乳腺实性肿瘤的敏感性高于单纯HHUS,两者的差异有统计学意义(P = 0.001),一致性检验Kappa = 0.778。

结论

ABVS冠状面可以提供更多的乳腺肿瘤边缘特征,联合HHUS有助于提高诊断女性乳腺恶性肿瘤的敏感性。

Objective

To investigate the value of margin features in the coronal plane of automated breast volume scanner (ABVS) for the diagnosis of solid breast tumors in women.

Methods

The preoperative data on handheld ultrasound (HHUS) and ABVS of 206 female breast mass patients with 230 nodes were retrospectively analyzed. HHUS focused on the margins, morphology, growth orientation, calcification, internal echogenic features, posterior echogenic features, color blood flow and Doppler spectrum features of the mass. SPSS 20.0 software was used for statistical analysis, ±s used for the mean of quantitative data, paired chi-square test was used for comparison of sensitivity and specificity. Kappa test was used for consistency testing.

Results

The sensitivities of the malignant marginal features of HHUS, all features of HHUS, the malignant marginal features of ABVS coronal plane, and the malignant marginal features of ABVS combined with all features of HHUS for the diagnosis of solid breast tumors were 62.40%, 71.40%, 72.93%, and 88.72%, respectively, the specificities were 80.41%, 76.29%, 77.32%, and 75.26%, respectively. The sensitivity of the malignant marginal features of the ABVS coronal plane was higher than that of the HHUS, the difference had statistics significance (P < 0.001), the Kappa was 0.762 in the consistency test. The sensitivity of the malignant marginal features of the ABVS coronal plane combined with all features of the HHUS was higher than that of the HHUS alone in the diagnosis of solid breast tumors, the difference had statistics significance (P = 0.001), the Kappa was 0.778 in the consistency test.

Conclusions

ABVS coronal plane can provide more marginal features of breast tumors. The sensitivity of diagnosing malignant tumors of female breast will be improved when combined with HHUS.

表1 230个女性乳腺肿瘤的组织病理结果
表2 恶性特征诊断结果
图1 患者女,74岁,左乳实性乳头状癌1A:HHUS边缘特征包括仅可见边缘光滑,形态规则,边缘特征诊断为良性;1B:ABVS冠状面边缘可见成角、毛刺,边缘特征诊断为恶性。
图2 患者女,45岁,左乳导管原位癌2A:HHUS边缘清晰,仅见成角,内部回声均匀,HHUS诊断为良性;2B~2D:ABVS冠状面3个以上连续切面边缘可见成角、毛刺,部分切面模糊,两者联合诊断为恶性。
[1]
Kaplan SS. Automated whole breast ultrasound[J]. Radiol Clin North Am, 2014, 52(3): 539-546.
[2]
Chen L, Chen Y, Diao XH, et al. Comparative study of automated breast 3-D ultrasound and handheld B-mode ultrasound for differentiation of benign and malignant breast masses[J]. Ultrasound Med Biol, 2013, 39(10): 1735-1742.
[3]
何其佳,赵玉珍,阳练, 等. 乳腺超声自动容积成像技术与普通超声对乳腺肿物的诊断价值比较[J]. 中华超声影像学杂志, 2016, 25(7): 597-602.
[4]
Mendelson EB, Böhm-Vélez M, Berg WA, et al. (2013) ACR BI-RADS ultrasound. ACR BI-RADS atlas, breast imaging reporting and data system, 5th Edition[S]. American College of Radiology, 2013:128-130.
[5]
Schmachtenberh C, Fischer T, Hamm B, et al. Diagnostic performace of automated breast volume scanning (ABVS) compared to handheld ultrasonography with breast MRI as the gold standard[J]. Acad Radiol, 2017, 24(8): 954-961.
[6]
卢瑞刚,于泽兴,梁晓宁,等. ABVS在常规超声乳腺不典型癌中的应用价值[J]. 中国超声医学杂志, 2016, 32(7): 590-593.
[7]
Choi EJ, Choi H, Park EH, et al. Evaluation of an automated breast volume scanner according to the fifth edition of BI-RADS for breast ultrasound compared with hand-held ultrasound[J]. Eur J Radiol, 2018, 99(12): 138-145.
[8]
Elverici E, Barça AN, Aktaş H, et al. Nonpalpable BI-RADS 4 breast lesions: sonographic findings and pathology correlation[J]. Diagn Interv Radiol, 2015, 21(3): 189-194.
[9]
Zheng FY, Yan LX, Huang BJ, et al. Comparison of retraction phenomenon and BI-RADS-US descriptors in differentiating benign and malignant breast masses using an automated breast volume scanner[J]. Eur J Radiol, 2015, 84(11): 2123-2129.
[10]
詹维伟,周建桥. 乳腺超声影像报告与数据系统解读[M].北京: 北京人民卫生出版社, 2015: 35-95.
[11]
严丽霞,黄备建,刘利民, 等. 乳腺病灶声像图冠状面征象的应用价值[J]. 中国超声医学杂志, 2014, 30(11): 980-983.
[12]
王惠,靳凤梅,孙媛媛, 等. 常规超声及ABVS对乳腺结节病理结果对照研究[J]. 中国超声医学杂志, 2017, 33(10): 888-892.
[13]
邵玉红,张惠,王彬, 等. 常规超声联合全自动乳腺容积扫描技术对乳腺肿块BI-RADS分类[J]. 中国医学影像技术, 2015, 31(2): 258-262.
[14]
刘迎春,陈林,陈悦,等. 乳腺超声容积成像的历史与研究现状[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2018, 15(4): 246-250.
[15]
Zhang X, Chen J, Zhou Y, et al. Diagnostic value of an automated breast volume scanner compared with a hand-held ultrasound:a meta-analysis[J]. Gland Surg, 2019, 8(6): 698-711.
[16]
Xiao YM, Zhou QC, Chen ZH. Automated breast volumescanning versus conventional ultrasound in breast cancer screening[J]. Acad Radiol, 2015, 22(3): 387-399.
[17]
包凌云,谭艳娟,朱罗茜, 等. 自动乳腺全容积成像在乳腺导管原位癌诊断中的应用价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2015, 11(1): 61-67.
[1] 李洋, 蔡金玉, 党晓智, 常婉英, 巨艳, 高毅, 宋宏萍. 基于深度学习的乳腺超声应变弹性图像生成模型的应用研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(06): 563-570.
[2] 河北省抗癌协会乳腺癌专业委员会护理协作组. 乳腺癌中心静脉通路护理管理专家共识[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 321-329.
[3] 刘晨鹭, 刘洁, 张帆, 严彩英, 陈倩, 陈双庆. 增强MRI 影像组学特征生境分析在预测乳腺癌HER-2 表达状态中的应用[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 339-345.
[4] 张晓宇, 殷雨来, 张银旭. 阿帕替尼联合新辅助化疗对三阴性乳腺癌的疗效及预后分析[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 346-352.
[5] 邱琳, 刘锦辉, 组木热提·吐尔洪, 马悦心, 冷晓玲. 超声影像组学对致密型乳腺背景中非肿块型乳腺癌的诊断价值[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 353-360.
[6] 程燕妮, 樊菁, 肖瑶, 舒瑞, 明昊, 党晓智, 宋宏萍. 乳腺组织定位标记夹的应用与进展[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 361-365.
[7] 涂盛楠, 胡芬, 张娟, 蔡海峰, 杨俊泉. 天然植物提取物在乳腺癌治疗中的应用[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 366-370.
[8] 朱文婷, 顾鹏, 孙星. 非酒精性脂肪性肝病对乳腺癌发生发展及治疗的影响[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 371-375.
[9] 周荷妹, 金杰, 叶建东, 夏之一, 王进进, 丁宁. 罕见成人肋骨郎格汉斯细胞组织细胞增生症被误诊为乳腺癌术后骨转移一例[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 380-383.
[10] 葛睿, 陈飞, 李杰, 李娟娟, 陈涵. 多基因检测在早期乳腺癌辅助治疗中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 257-263.
[11] 高杰红, 黎平平, 齐婧, 代引海. ETFA和CD34在乳腺癌中的表达及与临床病理参数和预后的关系研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 64-67.
[12] 韩萌萌, 冯雪园, 马宁. 乳腺癌改良根治术后桡神经损伤1例[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 117-118.
[13] 张志兆, 王睿, 郜苹苹, 王成方, 王成, 齐晓伟. DNMT3B与乳腺癌预后的关系及其生物学机制[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 624-629.
[14] 王玲艳, 高春晖, 冯雪园, 崔鑫淼, 刘欢, 赵文明, 张金库. 循环肿瘤细胞在乳腺癌新辅助及术后辅助治疗中的应用[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 630-633.
[15] 赵林娟, 吕婕, 王文胜, 马德茂, 侯涛. 超声引导下染色剂标记切缘的梭柱型和圆柱型保乳区段切除术的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 634-637.
阅读次数
全文


摘要