切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华介入放射学电子杂志 ›› 2020, Vol. 08 ›› Issue (04) : 339 -345. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-5782.2020.04.009

所属专题: 文献

基础研究

微波消融与传统开放手术治疗甲状腺微小乳头状癌的安全性及近期疗效Meta分析
李昌金1, 胡薇2,()   
  1. 1. 200433 上海,海军军医大学基础医学院
    2. 200433 上海,海军军医大学附属长海医院甲乳外科
  • 收稿日期:2020-06-16 出版日期:2020-11-25
  • 通信作者: 胡薇
  • 基金资助:
    长海医院教改基金面上项目(CHJG2019018); 长海医院军事医学专项课题(2018JS011)

Meta-analysis of the safety and short-term efficacy of microwave ablation and traditional open surgery in the treatment of papillary thyroid microcarcinomas

Changjin Li1, Wei Hu2,()   

  1. 1. School of Basic Medical Sciences, Navy Medical University, Shanghai 200433
    2. Department of Vacular and Thyroid Surgery, Changhai Hospital, Navy Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China
  • Received:2020-06-16 Published:2020-11-25
  • Corresponding author: Wei Hu
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Hu Wei, Email:
引用本文:

李昌金, 胡薇. 微波消融与传统开放手术治疗甲状腺微小乳头状癌的安全性及近期疗效Meta分析[J/OL]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2020, 08(04): 339-345.

Changjin Li, Wei Hu. Meta-analysis of the safety and short-term efficacy of microwave ablation and traditional open surgery in the treatment of papillary thyroid microcarcinomas[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Interventional Radiology(Electronic Edition), 2020, 08(04): 339-345.

目的

运用Meta分析系统评价微波消融和传统开放手术治疗甲状腺微小乳头状癌的疗效及安全性。

方法

确定检索策略、文献的纳入与筛选原则,分别检索Pubmed(Medline)、Cochrane Library、中国生物医学文献数据库(Sinomed)、中国知网(CNKI)、万方数据库中关于微波消融治疗甲状腺微小乳头状癌的随机对照研究,实验组为微波消融法治疗,对照组为传统开放手术治疗。检索时间跨度为2017年4月至2020年4月。运用RevMan 5.3统计软件进行Meta分析。

结果

纳入研究文献10篇,研究对象1 307人,其中试验组669人,对照组638人。结果显示微波消融组和传统开放手术组的手术情况、术后并发症发生率、甲状腺激素水平和炎症因子水平的差异均具有统计学意义。相比之下,微波消融在以上方面的优势均较明显,肿瘤体积变化也非常明显。

结论

微波消融法在治疗微小甲状腺乳头状癌方面具有手术创伤小、恢复快、美观度高、手术并发症少等特点,但是该10项研究均为近3年研究,随访时间短,其远期效果还有待未来大样本、长期随访的RCT研究来证实。

Objective

The meta-analysis system was used to evaluate the efficacy and safety of microwave ablation and traditional open surgery in the treatment of papillary thyroid microcarcinomas.

Methods

The search strategy, the principle of inclusion and screening of the literature were determined.A literature search of Pubmed (Medline), Cochrane Library, China Biomedical Literature Database (Sinomed), CNKI, and Wanfang Database was performed for microwave ablation treatment of papillary thyroid microcarcinomas in randomized controlled studies. The experimental group was treated with microwave ablation and the control group was treated with traditional open surgery. The search time span is from April 2017 to April 2020. Meta analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.3 statistical software.

Results

A total of 10 RCTs were included, with 1 307 subjects, including 669 in the experimental group and 638 in the control group. The results showed that the differences between the microwave ablation group and the traditional open surgery group were statistically significant in terms of operative conditions, postoperative complication rates, thyroid hormone levels, and inflammatory factor levels. In contrast, the advantages of microwave ablation in the above aspects are more obvious, and the tumor volume changes are also very obvious.

Conclusions

Microwave ablation has the characteristics of minimally invasiveness, fast recovery, high aesthetics, and few surgical complications in the treatment of papillary thyroid microcarcinomas. However, the 10 RCTs are all studies in the past 3 years with short follow-up time, and the long-term effect remains to be confirmed by future large-sample, long-termfollow-up RCT studies.

表1 纳入研究的基线情况
图1 文献筛选流程
图2 MWA与TOS手术情况(手术时间、术中出血量、术后自主活动时间)的比较森林图
图3 MWA与TOS术后并发症发生率的比较森林图
图4 MWA与TOS术后3 d FT3、FT4、TSH水平变化的比较森林图
图5 MWA与TOS术后3 d CRP、TNF-α、IL-6水平变化的比较森林图
图6 MWA术后肿瘤的体积变化
图7 MWA与TOS比较术后并发症发生率的漏斗图
[1]
Lloyd R V, Buehler D, Khanafshar E. Papillary thyroid carcinoma variants[J]. Head & Neck Pathology, 2011, 5(1): 51-56.
[2]
Gharib H, Goellner JR. Fine-needle aspiration biopsy of the thyroid: an appraisal[J]. Ann Intern Med, 1993, 118(4): 282-289.
[3]
Elliott MS, Gao K, Gupta R, et al. Management of incidental and non-incidental and non-incidental papillary thyroid microcarcinoma[J]. J Laryngol Otol, 2013, 127(1): 17-23.
[4]
葛明华,徐栋,滕皋军. 甲状腺良性结节, 微小癌及颈部转移性淋巴结热消融治疗专家共识(2018版)[J]. 中国肿瘤, 2018, 27(10): 768-772.
[5]
Li J, Liu Y, Liu J, et al. Ultrasound-guided percutaneous microwave ablation versus surgery for papillary thyroid microcarcinoma[J]. International Journal of Hyperthermia, 2018, 34(5): 653-659.
[6]
Li J, Liu Y, Liu J, et al. A comparative study of short-term efficacy and safety for thyroid micropapillary carcinoma patients after microwave ablation or surgery[J]. Taylor & Francis, 2019, 36(1): 640-646.
[7]
Xu B, Zhou NM, Cao WT, et al. Comparative study on operative trauma between microwave ablation and surgical treatment for papillary thyroid microcarcinoma[J]. World J Clin Cases, 2018, 6(15): 936-943.
[8]
周辉生,李桂英,陈佑江. 超声引导下经皮微波消融治疗微小甲状腺乳头状癌[J]. 现代医学, 2020, 48(03): 373-378.
[9]
姚礼,汪加宽,吴金秀. 超声引导微波消融与手术治疗甲状腺乳头状微小癌的疗效对比[J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2020, 24(04): 40-44.
[10]
王宇. 基于超声引导微波消融治疗甲状腺微小乳头状癌和外科手术切除的分析[J]. 中国医药指南, 2019, 17(31): 116-117.
[11]
陈杭军. 甲状腺微小乳头状癌经微波消融与手术切除的疗效、安全性及经济性比较[D]. 浙江大学, 2018.
[12]
霍齐民,周宁明,曹伟田, 等. 超声下MWA治疗TMC手术学效果及对甲状腺激素影响[J]. 西南国防医药, 2019, 29(02): 146-148.
[13]
马芳花. 甲状腺微小乳头状癌经皮微波消融治疗与外科手术治疗的对比研究[D]. 浙江大学, 2018.
[14]
龚勇,许军. 甲状腺乳头状癌手术方式选择与争议[J]. 中国现代普通外科进展, 2019, 22(02): 126-129.
[15]
Domínguez JM, Nilo F, Martínez MT, et al. Papillary thyroid microcarcinoma: characteristics at presentation, and evaluation of clinical and histological features associated witha worse prognosis in a Latin American cohort[J]. Arch Endocrinol Metab, 2018, 62(1): 6-13.
[16]
Xiang TH, Yan WY, Zhou L. Retrospective analysis of prognostic factors in patients of papillary thyroid microcarcinoma[J]. Oncotarget, 2018, 9(85): 35553-35558.
[17]
Zhou W, Jiang S, Zhan W, et al. Ultrasound-guided percutaneous laser ablation of unifocal T1N0M0 papillary thyroid microcarcinoma: preliminary results[J]. Eur Radiol, 2017, 27(7): 2934-2940.
[18]
Teng DK, Li HQ, Sui GQ,et al. Preliminary report of microwave ablation for the primary papillary thyroid microcarcinoma: a large cohort of 185 patients feasibility study[J]. Endocrine, 2019, 64(1): 109-117.
[19]
Takaki H, Cornelis F, Kako Y,et al. Thermal ablation and immunomodulation:from preclinical experiments to clinical trials[J]. Diagn Interv Imaging, 2017, 98(9): 651-659.
[20]
马奔,王宇,嵇庆海, 等. 原发性甲状腺癌热消融治疗后再手术2例分析[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2016, 36(8): 875-879.
[21]
Dionigi G. Is advocacy for active surveillance over definitive intervention in papillary thyroid microcarcinoma applicable to European patients?[J]. Gland Surg, 2018, 7(2): 242-243.
[1] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[2] 刘世君, 马杰, 师鲁静. 胃癌完整系膜切除术+标准D2根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 27-30.
[3] 赵丽霞, 王春霞, 陈一锋, 胡东平, 张维胜, 王涛, 张洪来. 内脏型肥胖对腹腔镜直肠癌根治术后早期并发症的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 35-39.
[4] 李华志, 曹广, 刘殿刚, 张雅静. 不同入路下行肝切除术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的临床对比[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 52-55.
[5] 常小伟, 蔡瑜, 赵志勇, 张伟. 高强度聚焦超声消融术联合肝动脉化疗栓塞术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的效果及安全性分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 56-59.
[6] 徐逸男. 不同术式治疗梗阻性左半结直肠癌的疗效观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 72-75.
[7] 王伟伟, 费建平, 王璋瑜. 不同手术空间建立方法的经口腔前庭入路腔镜甲状腺术对比研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 84-87.
[8] 王露, 周丽君. 全腹腔镜下远端胃大部切除不同吻合方式对胃癌患者胃功能恢复、并发症发生率的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 92-95.
[9] 许杰, 李亚俊, 冯义文. SOX新辅助化疗后腹腔镜胃癌D2根治术与常规根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 647-650.
[10] 康婵娟, 张海涛, 翟静洁. 胰管支架置入术治疗急性胆源性胰腺炎的效果及对患者肝功能、炎症因子水平的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 667-670.
[11] 顾雯, 凌守鑫, 唐海利, 甘雪梅. 两种不同手术入路在甲状腺乳头状癌患者开放性根治性术中的应用比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 687-690.
[12] 付成旺, 杨大刚, 王榕, 李福堂. 营养与炎症指标在可切除胰腺癌中的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 704-708.
[13] 刘柏隆, 周祥福. 女性尿失禁吊带手术并发症处理的经验分享[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 127-127.
[14] 马振威, 宋润夫, 王兵. ERCP胆道内支架与骑跨十二指肠乳头支架置入治疗不可切除肝门部胆管癌疗效的Meta分析[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 807-812.
[15] 韦巧玲, 黄妍, 赵昌, 宋庆峰, 陈祖毅, 黄莹, 蒙嫦, 黄靖. 肝癌微波消融术后中重度疼痛风险预测列线图模型构建及验证[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(08): 715-721.
阅读次数
全文


摘要