切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华介入放射学电子杂志 ›› 2020, Vol. 08 ›› Issue (02) : 166 -169. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-5782.2020.02.013

所属专题: 专题评论 文献

影像诊断

320排动态容积CT动脉造影评价冠状动脉支架内再狭窄的价值
刘雪莲1, 郝宝顺2,(), 刘定辉2, 陈秀珍3, 周彬2, 余舒杰2   
  1. 1. 510630 广东广州,中山大学附属第三医院介入手术室
    2. 510630 广东广州,中山大学附属第三医院心内科
    3. 510630 广东广州,中山大学附属第三医院放射科
  • 收稿日期:2020-02-13 出版日期:2020-05-25
  • 通信作者: 郝宝顺

Diagnostic accuracy of 320-slice dynamic volume CT in assessment of coronary artery in-stent restenosis

Xuelian Liu1, Baoshun Hao2,(), Dinghui Liu2, Xiuzhen Chen3, Bin Zhou2, Shujie Yu2   

  1. 1. Interventional Operation Room, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Guangzhou 510630, China
    2. Department of Cardiology, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Guangzhou 510630, China
    3. Department of Radiology, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Guangzhou 510630, China
  • Received:2020-02-13 Published:2020-05-25
  • Corresponding author: Baoshun Hao
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Hao Baoshun, Email:
引用本文:

刘雪莲, 郝宝顺, 刘定辉, 陈秀珍, 周彬, 余舒杰. 320排动态容积CT动脉造影评价冠状动脉支架内再狭窄的价值[J]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2020, 08(02): 166-169.

Xuelian Liu, Baoshun Hao, Dinghui Liu, Xiuzhen Chen, Bin Zhou, Shujie Yu. Diagnostic accuracy of 320-slice dynamic volume CT in assessment of coronary artery in-stent restenosis[J]. Chinese Journal of Interventional Radiology(Electronic Edition), 2020, 08(02): 166-169.

目的

评价320排动态容积CT(320-slice dynamic volume CT,320-DVCT)动脉造影诊断冠状动脉支架内部再狭窄的准确性。

方法

208例怀疑发生支架内再狭窄的冠状动脉支架植入患者,进行320-DVCT动脉造影检查,之后2~7 d内行冠状动脉造影检查。

结果

320-DVCT动脉造影可获得较好的图像质量,可用于诊断冠状动脉支架内再狭窄。对于直径≥3.0 mm的支架,其图像优级率和成功率明显高于直径<3.0 mm的支架。320-DVCT诊断冠状动脉支架内再狭窄的敏感性91.30%,特异性95.21%,阳性预测值86.3%,阴性预测值97.07%,准确率94.24%;诊断左前降支支架内再狭窄的敏感性89.29%,特异性96.77%,阳性预测值89.29%,阴性预测值96.77%,准确率95.04%;诊断左回旋支支架内再狭窄的敏感性88.89%,特异性92.73%,阳性预测值80.00%,阴性预测值96.23%,准确率91.78%;诊断右冠状动脉支架内再狭窄的敏感性88.00%,特异性94.92%,阳性预测值88.00%,阴性预测值94.92%,准确率92.86%。

结论

320-DVCT动脉造影是目前较新的一种安全无创、有效诊断冠状动脉支架内再狭窄的检查方法。

Objective

To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of coronary artery in-stent restenosis with 320 dynamic volume computed tomography in comparison of selective coronary angiography.

Methods

Two hundred and eight patients with suspected coronary artery in-stent restenosis underwent 320-DVCT coronary angiography, and selective coronary angiography was performed within 2 to 7 days subsequently.

Results

The images acquired from 320-DVCT were excellent and sufficient enough to be used to evaluate coronary in -stent restenosis. For the stents with diameter of more than 3.0 mm, the image of optimization rate and success rate are significantly higher than those with a diameter of <3.0 mm. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value, rate of accuracy of 320-DVCT for detecting in-stent restenosis were 91.30%, 95.21%, 86.3%, 97.07% and 94.24%, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value, rate of accuracy of in-stent restenosis in the left anterior descending stent were 89.29%, 96.77%, 89.29%, 96.77% and 95.04%, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value, rate of accuracy of in-stent restenosis in the left circumflex stent were 88.89%, 92.73% , 80.00%, 96.23% and 91.78%, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value, rate of accuracy rate of in-stent restenosis in the right coronary artery stent were 88.00%, 94.92%, 88.00%, 94.92% and 92.86%, respectively.

Conclusions

320-DVCT angiography is a safe, noninvasive and effective method for the diagnosis of coronary in-stent restenosis at present.

表1 320-DVCT动脉造影图像质量评价
表2 208例患者320-DVCT和CAG检查显示冠脉支架内狭窄统计学分析
表3 208例患者320-DVCT和CAG检查显示不同冠状动脉支架内狭窄统计学分析
[1]
郝宝顺,刘勇,周彬,等.320排动态容积CT冠状动脉成像诊断冠状动脉狭窄的价值[J].中国动脉硬化杂志,2013,21(1): 74-78.
[2]
Dai T, Wang JR, Hu PF, et al. Diagnostic performance of computed tomography angiography in the detection of coronary artery in-stent restenosis: evidence from an updated meta-analysis[J]. European Radiology, 2018, 28(4): 1373-1382.
[3]
Yoshimura M, Nao T, Miura T. New quantitative method to diagnose coronary in-stent restenosis by 64-multislice computed tomography[J]. Journal of Cardiology, 2015, 65(1): 57-62.
[4]
Jensen L, Vikman S, Antonsen L, et al. Intravascular ultrasound assessment of minimum lumen area and intimal hyperplasia in in-stent restenosis after drug-eluting or bare-metal stent implantation[J]. Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine, 2017, 18(8): 577-582.
[5]
Paramasivam G, Devasia T, Jayaram A, et al. In-stent restenosis of drug-eluting stents in patients with diabetes mellitus: Clinical presentation, angiographic features, and outcomes[J]. Anatolian Journal of Cardiology, 2020, 23(1):28-34.
[6]
Singh AD, Singal AK, Mian A, et al. Recurrent drug eluting stent in-stent restenosis: A state-of-art review of pathophysiology, diagnosis and management[J]. In Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine. 2019, 1(1): 102-104.
[7]
Lettau M, Kotte E, Bendszus M, et al. Carotid artery stents on CTA: in vitro comparison of different stent designs and sizes using 16-, 64- and 320-row CT scanners[J]. Journal of Neuroradiology, 2014, 41(4): 259-268.
[8]
Khan A, Khosa F, Nasir K, et al. Comparison of radiation dose and image quality: 320-MDCT versus 64-MDCT coronary angiography[J]. Am J Roentgenol, 2011, 197(1): 163-168.
[9]
王健,陈晓敏,王胜煌,等.320层CT冠状动脉成像诊断支架内再狭窄的价值[J].中华心血管病杂志,2012, 40(6): 487-491.
[10]
De Graaf FR, Schuijf JD, van Velzen JE, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of 320-row multidetector computed tomography coronary angiography to noninvasively assess in-stent restenosis[J]. Investigative Radiology, 2010, 45(6): 331-340.
[11]
张玉平,李屏,梁金峰,等.320排动态容积CT冠状动脉成像与冠脉造影对冠心病诊断的对比研究[J].第三军医大学学报,2012, 34(6): 570-572.
[12]
Tatsugami F, Higaki T, Sakane H, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of n-stent restenosis using model-based iterative reconstruction at coronary CT angiography: initial experience[J]. The British Journal of Radiology, 2018, 91(11): 228-232.
[1] 张婉微, 秦芸芸, 蔡绮哲, 林明明, 田润雨, 金姗, 吕秀章. 心肌收缩早期延长对非ST段抬高型急性冠脉综合征患者冠状动脉严重狭窄的预测价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(10): 1016-1022.
[2] 刘婷婷, 丁明岩, 冀威, 郭丽娟, 李颖, 赵含章, 朱芳. 非冠状动脉梗阻性缺血性心脏病女性患者心率储备与微循环功能障碍的相关性研究[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2022, 19(10): 1077-1082.
[3] 齐旭浩, 卢凯. 冠状动脉慢性完全闭塞患者血清微小RNA-126变化的临床意义[J]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2022, 15(06): 486-489.
[4] 秦玲玲, 游兆媛, 丁舒, 王晓莉, 朱萌. 基于遗忘曲线规律的随访对冠状动脉粥样硬化性心脏病介入治疗患者自我管理行为的影响[J]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2022, 15(06): 481-485.
[5] 叶晓芳, 杨京华, 武元星, 朱光发. COPD患者冠状动脉旁路移植术后肺部感染的预后影响及危险因素分析[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(02): 175-179.
[6] 谢恩睿, 段一璇, 刘畅, 邓捷. 利用随机森林联合人工神经网络基于外周血细胞易感基因建立冠心病诊断模型[J]. 中华细胞与干细胞杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(01): 19-26.
[7] 南文慧, 周丽花, 李珊珊, 荣嵘. 冠状动脉旁路移植术后行hs-TnI预测主要心血管不良事件发生的临界值及相关性分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 237-242.
[8] 李丹, 刘璞娟, 卞亚辉, 张会军, 王莉. 动机性访谈结合阶段性健康教育对冠状动脉旁路移植术后健康行为的影响[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(11): 1151-1156.
[9] 郑毅华, 陈晓丹, 伍慧妍, 詹铀超. 缺血性修饰白蛋白、心型脂肪酸结合蛋白、可溶性生长刺激表达基因2蛋白与GRACE评分联合检测对急性冠状动脉综合征的早期诊断价值[J]. 中华临床实验室管理电子杂志, 2023, 11(01): 10-15.
[10] 颜凡辉, 赵明俐, 李颖, 郭方明, 詹景冬, 赵英杰, 王阳, 张艳芬, 赵笑梅. 急性冠脉综合征患者冠脉血管病变程度与血清TNF-α、VEGF水平相关性研究[J]. 中华诊断学电子杂志, 2023, 11(03): 158-164.
[11] 熊鑫, 邓勇志. 基于血管内超声的机器学习在冠状动脉病变中的研究进展[J]. 中华诊断学电子杂志, 2023, 11(03): 153-157.
[12] 张娟, 纪青, 胡国宏, 谭成, 王双双, 易秀英. CD11b基因rs4597342位点多态性与川崎病的相关性研究[J]. 中华诊断学电子杂志, 2023, 11(02): 92-96.
[13] 陈猛, 孟润祺, 曹勇, 张金国. 冠状动脉支架内再狭窄的影像诊断与治疗研究进展[J]. 中华诊断学电子杂志, 2023, 11(01): 12-16.
[14] 神童, 申程, 甘立军. 囊泡在冠状动脉钙化过程中的作用[J]. 中华诊断学电子杂志, 2023, 11(01): 1-4.
[15] 孙相利, 许真真. 经皮冠状动脉旋磨术在冠状动脉重度钙化病变介入治疗中的应用[J]. 中华老年病研究电子杂志, 2023, 10(02): 33-36.
阅读次数
全文


摘要