切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华介入放射学电子杂志 ›› 2013, Vol. 01 ›› Issue (01) : 13 -17. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-5782.2013.01.005

肿瘤介入

经左锁骨下动脉药盒系统灌注吉西他滨治疗晚期胰腺癌
帖君1, 李延宏1, 殷占新1, 何创业1, 白苇1, 郭文刚1, 牛静1, 吴菲菲1, 张淑娜1, 韩国宏1,()   
  1. 1.710032 西安,第四军医大学西京消化病医院消化介入中心
  • 收稿日期:2013-06-20 出版日期:2013-08-01
  • 通信作者: 韩国宏

Left subclavian artery port-catheter delivery of gemcitabine for advanced pancreatic cancer

Jun TIE1, Yan-hong LI1, Zhan-xin YIN1, Chuang-ye HE1, Wei BAI1, Wen-gang GUO1, Jing NIU1, Fei-fei WU1, Shu-na ZHANG1, Guo-hong HAN1,()   

  1. 1.Xijing Hospital of Digestive Diseases,the Fourth Military Medical University,Xi'an 710032,China
  • Received:2013-06-20 Published:2013-08-01
  • Corresponding author: Guo-hong HAN
引用本文:

帖君, 李延宏, 殷占新, 何创业, 白苇, 郭文刚, 牛静, 吴菲菲, 张淑娜, 韩国宏. 经左锁骨下动脉药盒系统灌注吉西他滨治疗晚期胰腺癌[J]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2013, 01(01): 13-17.

Jun TIE, Yan-hong LI, Zhan-xin YIN, Chuang-ye HE, Wei BAI, Wen-gang GUO, Jing NIU, Fei-fei WU, Shu-na ZHANG, Guo-hong HAN. Left subclavian artery port-catheter delivery of gemcitabine for advanced pancreatic cancer[J]. Chinese Journal of Interventional Radiology(Electronic Edition), 2013, 01(01): 13-17.

目的

研究经左锁骨下动脉药盒灌注吉西他滨治疗晚期胰腺癌的有效性和安全性。

方法

回顾性分析80例经左锁骨下动脉药盒介入治疗的晚期胰腺癌患者临床资料,分别评价其临床受益反应、肿瘤客观疗效、OS,以及药物的毒副反应和手术并发症。用Spss17.0软件对相关的影响因素进行单因素及多因素分析。

结果

经介入治疗患者临床受益反应率为56%(45/80),主要表现为疼痛的减轻及止痛药物用量的减少。80例患者可评价62例,其中部分缓解(PR)9例(11.25%),稳定(SD)27例(33.75%),进展(PD)16例(20.00%),治疗客观反应率为11.25%,疾病控制率为45%。中位生存期160 d(95%CI:98.76~221.24),1年生存率23.3%。单因素分析结果表明,梗阻性黄疸、ECOG评分、化疗次数、转移、糖尿病与晚期胰腺癌患者的生存明显相关(P<0.05)。Cox比例风险回归模型多因素分析结果表明,梗阻性黄疸、ECOG评分、化疗次数及转移是影响晚期胰腺癌患者预后的独立因素。药物毒副反应主要表现为轻度骨髓抑制及恶心、呕吐,出现骨髓抑制的中位时间为10 d。手术并发症主要为药盒导管的堵塞[2.5%(2/80)]。

结论

左锁骨下动脉药盒介入化疗能明显增加患者的临床受益反应,提高患者生活质量,减少全身毒副反应,是治疗晚期胰腺癌安全、有效的方法。

Objective

This study sought to retrospectively analyze the efficacy and safety of a port-catheter drug delivery system(PCS)implanted via left subclavian artery for gemcitabine administration during the treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer.

Methods

Eighty patients with advanced pancreatic cancer who met our inclusion criteria were enrolled in the study and received gemcitabine through a PCS.We retrospectively analyzed the clinical benefit response(CBR),tumor objective response rate(ORR),overall survival(OS),drug toxicity,and surgical complications.

Results

The CBR rate was 56%(45/80)and mainly manifested as pain relief and reduced analgesic drug use.Among the 80 patients enrolled,62 patients could be evaluated,yielding the following results:9 cases had a partial response(11.25%),27 cases had stable disease(33.75%)and 16 cases developed progressive disease(20.00%).The ORR was 11.25%and the disease control rate was 45%.The median survival time was 160 days,and the 1-year survival rate was 23.3%.Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models for predictors of OS showed that obstructive jaundice,ECOG score,number of chemotherapy treatments,and metastasis were independent factors that affected the prognosis of patients with advanced pancreatic cancer.Drug toxicity manifested mainly as mild bone marrow suppression,nausea,and vomiting.The most common interventional complication was port-catheter blockage(2.5%(2/80).

Conclusions

Interventional chemotherapy via a PCS can significantly increase the CBR of patients,improve quality of life,and reduce systemic toxicity.Thus,this approach can be considered a safe and effective treatment for advanced pancreatic cancer.

表1 80例晚期胰腺癌患者临床基线资料
表2 80例晚期胰腺癌患者介入治疗后的客观反应
表3 80例晚期胰腺癌患者与生存相关的单因素分析
表4 80例晚期胰腺癌患者与生存相关的多因素分析
表5 80例晚期胰腺癌患者介入治疗后的不良事件发生率
1
Siegel R,Naishadham D,Jemal A.Cancer statistics,2012.CA Cancer J Clin,2012,62:10-29.
2
Siegel R,DeSantis C,Virgo K,et al.Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics,2012.CA Cancer J Clin,2012,62:220-241.
3
Cao Y,Wu L,Tan A,et al.Meta-analysis of randomized trials:evaluation of benefit of gemcitabine-based molecular targeted therapy for inoperable pancreatic cancer.Pancreas,2010,39:253-255.
4
Reni M,Sartori N,Mambrini A,et al.An Italian study on treatment trends and outcomes of patients with stage Ⅲ pancreatic adenocarcinoma in the gemcitabine era:is it time to change?Anticancer Drugs,2010,21:459-464.
5
Uwagawa T,Misawa T,Sakamoto T,et al.A phase I study of fulldose gemcitabine and regional arterial infusion of nafamostat mesilate for advanced pancreatic cancer.Ann Oncol,2009,20:239-243.
6
Sasada T,Denno R,Tanaka T,et al.Intra-arterial infusion chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin in advanced pancreatic cancer:a feasibility study.Am J Clin Oncol,2008,31:71-78.
7
Nakchbandi W,Müller H,Singer MV,et al.Prospective study on warfarin and regional chemotherapy in patients with pancreatic carcinoma.J Gastrointestin Liver Dis,2008,17:285-290.
8
Ishikawa T,Kamimura H,Tsuchiya A,et al.Clinical efficacy of intraarterial pharmacokinetic chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil,CDDP,gemcitabine,and angiotensin-Ⅱ in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer.Hepatogastroenterolog,2007,54:2378-2382.
9
Milandri C,Calzolari F,Passardi A,et al.Intra-arterial chemotherapy of advanced pancreatic cancer:a single center experience.Hepatogastroenterology,2007,54:2373-2377.
10
Tanaka T,Sakaguchi H,Anai H,et al.Arterial infusion of 5-fluorouracil combined with concurrent radiotherapy for unresectable pancreatic cancer:results from a pilot study.AJR Am J Roentgenol,2007,189:421-428.
11
Barletta E,Fiore F,Daniele B,et al.Second-line intra-arterial chemotherapy in advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma.Front Biosci,2006,11:782-787.
12
Han GH,Yin ZX,Meng XJ,et al.Prospective randomized clinical trial of two drug delivery pathway in the treatment of inoperable advanced pancreatic carcinoma.Chin J Dig Dis,2006,7:45-48.
13
Mambrini A,Sanguinetti F,Pacetti P,et al.Intra-arterial infusion of 5-fluorouracil,leucovorin,epirubicin and carboplatin(FLEC regimen)in unresectable pancreatic cancer:results of a ten-year experience.In Vivo,2006,20:751-755.
14
Nakchbandi W,Müller H,Singer MV,et al.Effects of low-dose warfarin and regional chemotherapy on survival in patients with pancreatic carcinoma.Scand J Gastroenterol,2006,41:1095-1104.
15
Aigner KR,Gailhofer S.Celiac axis infusion and microembolization for advanced stage Ⅲ/Ⅳ pancreatic cancer--a phase Ⅱ study on 265 cases.Anticancer Res,2005,25:4407-4412.
16
Kuemmerle A,Decosterd LA,Buclin T,et al.A phase I pharmacokinetic study of hypoxic abdominal stop-flow perfusion with gemcitabine in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer and refractory malignant ascites.Cancer Chemother Pharmacol,2009,63:331-341.
17
Pohlen U,Rieger H,Kunick-Pohlen S,et al.Phase Ⅱ study of regional chemotherapy using the hypoxic abdominal perfusion technique in advanced abdominal carcinoma.5-FU pharmacokinetics,complications and outcome.Anticancer Res,2007,27:667-674.
18
Guadagni S,Clementi M,Valenti M,et al.Hypoxic abdominal stopflow perfusion in the treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer:a phase Ⅱ evaluation/trial.Eur J Surg Oncol,2007,33:72-78.
19
Meyer F,Gebauer T,Grote R,et al.Results of regional chemotherapy uing the aortic stop-flow technique in advanced pancreatic carcinoma.Surg Today,2006,36:155-161.
20
Miyanishi K,Ishiwatari H,Hayashi T,et al.A Phase I trial of arterial infusion chemotherapy with gemcitabine and 5-fluorouracil for unresectable advanced pancreatic cancer after vascular supply distribution via superselective embolization.Jpn J Clin Oncol,2008,38:268-274.
21
Ikeda O,Tamura Y,Nakasone Y,et al.Comparison of intrahepatic and pancreatic perfusion on fusion images using a combined SPECT/CT system and assessment of efficacy of combined continuous arterial infusion and systemic chemotherapy in advanced pancreatic carcinoma.Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol,2007,30:912-921.
22
Takamori H,Kanemitsu K,Tsuji T,et al.5-fluorouracil intra-arterial infusion combined with systemic gemcitabine for unresectable pancreatic cancer.Pancreas,2005,30:223-226.
23
Mitsutsuji M,Suzuki Y,Iwanaga Y,et al.An experimental study on the pharmacokinetics of 5-fluorouracil regional chemotherapy for pancreatic cancer.Ann Surg Oncol,2003,10:546-550.
[1] 尚培中, 张润萍, 张伟, 贾国洪, 李晓武, 苗建军, 刘冰. 梗阻性黄疸临床防治新技术单中心应用研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 104-107.
[2] 宋小飞, 巫嘉文, 孙阳. 输尿管开口周围膀胱黏膜预离断联合早期膀胱灌注化疗在上尿路尿路上皮癌根治术中的应用[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 479-484.
[3] 刘康, 洪礼虎, 刘根, 彭力, 李祥攀. 复方红豆杉胶囊联合GP化疗对晚期NSCLC疗效分析[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(02): 284-287.
[4] 张瑜, 姜梦妮. 基于DWI信号值构建局部进展期胰腺癌放化疗生存获益预测模型[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 657-664.
[5] 魏妙艳, 徐近. 合并远处转移胰腺癌系统性治疗的梳理和展望[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 644-650.
[6] 孟煜凡, 李永政, 樊知遥, 展翰翔. 瘤内微生物在胰腺癌发病和演进中的作用机制及研究进展[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(04): 577-582.
[7] 王天福, 王刚. 自身免疫性胰腺炎诊治现状[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(04): 492-497.
[8] 黄金灿, 王迪, 崔松平, 陈晴, 吕少诚, 贺强, 郎韧. 预后营养指数对交界可切除胰腺癌患者术后预后的预测价值[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(01): 51-56.
[9] 马虹宇, 陈元武, 张明明, 岳向勇, 檀碧波. 平胃散加味联合毫火针对直肠癌患者化学治疗致胃肠道反应的疗效[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(04): 297-300.
[10] 葛雪梅. SOX与mFOLFOX6化疗方案对晚期胃癌的疗效与安全性[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(01): 67-71.
[11] 谢鸿, 李娜, 李尚日, 谢涛. 肠道菌群特征对结肠癌化学治疗疗效的影响[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(01): 53-56.
[12] 钟广俊, 刘春华, 朱万森, 徐晓雷, 王兆军. MRI联合不同扫描序列在胃癌术前分期诊断及化疗效果和预后的评估[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 378-382.
[13] 盛静, 梅勇, 夏佩, 王晓林. 乌苯美司联合伊立替康二线治疗晚期胃癌的临床研究[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(05): 317-321.
[14] 楚海强, 杨远游, 任刚. 胰腺癌放射治疗联合其他治疗方法的研究进展[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 392-396.
[15] 吴子龙, 吴冰, 袁开盛, 胡瑞翔, 杨华, 王存川. 肥胖与胰腺疾病研究进展[J]. 中华肥胖与代谢病电子杂志, 2024, 10(03): 213-219.
阅读次数
全文


摘要