切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华介入放射学电子杂志 ›› 2025, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (03) : 228 -233. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-5782.2025.03.006

影像诊断

缩短碘油输卵管造影延迟片时间的可行性研究
刘明明1, 徐斌1, 金钊2, 雷文峰3, 苗杰1,()   
  1. 1 100006 北京,首都医科大学附属北京妇产医院/北京妇幼保健院放射科
    2 050000 河北 石家庄,河北生殖妇产医院放射介入科
    3 430000 湖北 武汉,武汉大学附属同仁医院(武汉市第三医院)光谷院区介入医学科
  • 收稿日期:2024-10-18 出版日期:2025-08-25
  • 通信作者: 苗杰

Feasibility study on shortening the delay time of hysterosalpingography by lipiodol

Mingming Liu1, Bin Xu1, Zhao Jin2, Wenfeng Lei3, Jie Miao1,()   

  1. 1 Department of Radiology, Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Capital Medical University. Beijing Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Beijing 100006
    2 Department of Interventional Radiology, Hebei Maternity Hospital, Hebei Shijiazhuang 050000
    3 Department of Interventional Medicine, Guang Gu District, Tong Ren Hospital Affiliated to Wuhan University (Wuhan Third Hospital), Hubei Wuhan 430000, China
  • Received:2024-10-18 Published:2025-08-25
  • Corresponding author: Jie Miao
引用本文:

刘明明, 徐斌, 金钊, 雷文峰, 苗杰. 缩短碘油输卵管造影延迟片时间的可行性研究[J/OL]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2025, 13(03): 228-233.

Mingming Liu, Bin Xu, Zhao Jin, Wenfeng Lei, Jie Miao. Feasibility study on shortening the delay time of hysterosalpingography by lipiodol[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Interventional Radiology(Electronic Edition), 2025, 13(03): 228-233.

目的

探索超液化碘油子宫输卵管造影拍摄延迟片时间,缩短拍摄延迟片时间是否可行。

方法

回顾性收集2021年1月至2023年1月,北京妇产医院收治的行输卵管造影检查的不孕症女性患者的临床资料。在超液化碘油输卵管造影后,分别于术后第3、6、24小时拍摄盆腔延迟片,观察输卵管内碘油残留情况,判断输卵管通畅性和功能。采用卡方检验比较在输卵管造影术后3、6、24 h拍摄延迟片,诊断输卵管通畅程度的差异。

结果

卡方检验结果显示,在第3、6、24小时拍摄延迟片诊断结果差异有统计学意义(P=0.002)。组间两两比较,在第3小时和第6小时拍摄延迟片诊断结果差异无统计学意义(P=0.807)。在第3小时或第6小时拍摄延迟片,与第24小时拍摄延迟片比较,诊断结果差异有统计学意义(P=0.001,0.006)。输卵管通畅情况下,在第3、6和24小时拍摄延迟片,诊断结果差异无统计学意义(P=0.787)。但是,在输卵管通畅的情况下,第3、6小时拍摄延迟片,输卵管内有部分碘油残留或伞端周围碘油局部聚集提示蠕动功能差,第24小时拍摄延迟片会遗漏输卵管功能信息(P=0.001,0.001)。在输卵管积水情况下,第3、6小时拍摄延迟片和第24小时拍摄延迟片差异均有统计学意义(P=0.010,0.015),第24小时拍摄延迟片,输卵管积水显影率高。输卵管阻塞情况下,第3小时和第24小时拍摄延迟片差异有统计学意义(P=0.003)。

结论

在输卵管通畅的情况下,在第3小时拍摄延迟片即可满足诊断要求,并可评价输卵管功能。在输卵管积水和输卵管阻塞的情况下,在第24小时拍摄延迟片更具有诊断价值。

Objective

To explore whether it is feasible to shorten the delayed film time of ultra-liquefied lipiodol hysterosalpingography.

Methods

After hysterosalpingography with ultra-liquefied lipiodol, pelvic delay films were taken at 3 hours,6 hours and 24 hours after operation to observe the residual lipiodol in the fallopian tube and judge the patency and function of the fallopian tube. Chi-square test was used to compare the differences in the degree of tubal patency diagnosed by taking delayed films at 3 h, 6 h, and 24 h after hysterosalpingography.

Results

Chi-square test results showed that there was a statistically significant difference in the diagnostic results of delayed films at 3 hours, 6 hours, and 24 hours (P=0.002). There was no significant difference in the diagnostic results of delayed films between the two groups at the 3rd hour and the 6th hour (P=0.807). There were statistically significant differences in the diagnostic results between the delayed films taken at the 3rd or 6th hour and the delayed films taken at the 24th hour (P=0.001, P=0.006). In the case of tubal patency, there was no significant difference in diagnostic results between the delayed films taken at 3 hours, 6 hours and 24 hours (P=0.787). However, in the case of unobstructed fallopian tubes, delayed filming at 3 and 6 hours showed that some lipiodol residues in the fallopian tubes or local accumulation of lipiodol around the umbrella end indicated poor peristalsis, and delayed films at 24 hours miss fallopian tube function information (P=0.001, P=0.001). In the case of hydrosalpinx, the difference between the delayed film taken at the 3rd hour and the 6th hour and the delayed film taken at the 24th hour was statistically significant (P=0.010, P=0.015). In the case of fallopian tube obstruction, there was a statistically significant difference in the delay film between the 3rd hour and the 24th hour (P=0.003).

Conclusion

In the case of fallopian tube patency, the delayed film taken at the third hour can meet the diagnostic requirements and evaluate the fallopian tube function. In the case of hydrosalpinx and fallopian tube obstruction, it is more valuable to take a delayed film at 24 hours.

图1 超液化碘油子宫输卵管造影 1A:定位片;1B:充盈期图像显示子宫腔和输卵管;1C:3 h延迟片;1D:6 h延迟片;1E:24 h延迟片。
图2 输卵管通畅不同延迟时间影像表现 2A:充盈期,双侧输卵管(箭头)碘油顺利溢出进入盆腔,形态自然;2B~2D:延迟3、6、24 h片,盆腔碘油涂抹均匀,双侧输卵管内未见碘油残留。
图3 24 h延迟片除外输卵管阻塞假阳性 3A:充盈期,左侧输卵管显影至远端,未见碘油进入盆腔(粗箭头),右侧输卵管见碘油溢出进入盆腔(细箭头);3B:延迟3 h片,左侧输卵管远端碘油滞留未见溢出进入盆腔(粗箭头),右侧输卵管远端少许碘油残留,盆腔可见碘油弥散;3C:延迟 6 h片,左侧输卵管远端碘油滞留未见溢出盆腔(粗箭头),右侧输卵管内未见碘油残留,全部弥散进入盆腔;3D:延迟24 h片,双侧输卵管内碘油无残留,碘油盆腔涂抹广泛。通过24 h延迟片除外左侧输卵管阻塞,诊断:双侧输卵管通畅。
图4 左侧输卵管积水,右侧输卵管通畅 4A:充盈期,双侧输卵管远端管腔增粗(右侧输卵管细箭头,左侧输卵管粗箭头);4B~4C:延迟3、6 h片,双侧输卵管内见碘油滞留,远端管腔增粗,盆腔见碘油不均匀弥散;4D:延迟24 h片,左侧输卵管碘油滞留,远端管腔增粗(粗箭头),右侧输卵管内碘油溢出进入盆腔,盆腔见碘油广泛涂抹。24 h延迟片确认左侧输卵管积水,右侧输卵管通畅。
图5 双输卵管阻塞不同延迟时间影像表现一致 5A:充盈期,左侧输卵管未见显影,右侧输卵管显影至壶腹部(粗箭头),宫旁见少许碘油逆入间质(细箭头),盆腔未见碘油溢出;5B~5D:延迟3、6、24小时片,左侧输卵管未见显影,右侧输卵管远端碘油滞留(粗箭头,盆腔未见碘油弥散。诊断:左侧输卵管近端阻塞,右侧输卵管壶腹部阻塞。
表1 子宫输卵管造影结果 [例(%)]
表2 不同时间拍摄延迟片输卵管显影情况分析结果(P值)
图6 输卵管通畅,蠕动功能减弱 6A:充盈期,双侧输卵管通畅;6B:3 h延迟片,双侧输卵管内碘油滞留;6C:6 h延迟片显示,双侧输卵管内碘油滞留;6D:24 h延迟片显示,左侧输卵管蠕动功能减弱,管腔内少量碘水滞留(箭头),右侧输卵管内未见碘油残留。
表3 输卵管通畅情况下蠕动功能显影结果 [例(%)]
[1]
Phillips K, Olanrewaju RA, Omole F. Infertility: evaluation and management[J]. Am Fam Physician, 2023, 107(6): 623-630.
[2]
Brugh VM 3rd, Nudell DM, Lipshultz LI. What the urologist should know about the female infertility evaluation[J]. Urol Clin North Am, 2002, 29(4): 983-992.
[3]
Liang G, Zhu Q, He X, et al. Effects of oil-soluble versus water-soluble contrast media at hysterosalpingography on pregnancy outcomes in women with a low risk of tubal disease: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial[J]. BMJ Open, 2020, 10(10): e039166.
[4]
Zhang J, Zhang X, Bian J, et al. Comparation of magnetic resonance hysterosalpingography and hysterosalpingosonography for the assessment of fallopian tubal occlusion of female infertility: a protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Medicine (Baltimore), 2022, 101(3): e28532.
[5]
Carson SA, Kallen AN. Diagnosis and management of Infertility: a review[J]. JAMA, 2021, 326(1): 65-76.
[6]
Baramki TA. Hysterosalpingography[J]. Fertil Steril, 2005, 83(6): 1595-1606.
[7]
Tsui S, Sofy AA. A meta-analysis of fertility and adverse outcomes in oil-and water-based contrast for hysterosalpingography[J]. Turk J Obstet Gynecol, 2023, 20(1): 64-73.
[8]
Peart JM, Sim RG, Hofman PL. Therapeutic effects of hysterosalpingography contrast media in infertile women: what do we know about the H2O in the H2Oil trial and why does it matter?[J]. Hum Reprod, 2021, 36(3): 529-535.
[9]
中国妇幼保健协会放射介入专业委员会. 输卵管造影技术规范中国专家共识(2022年版)[J]. 中国实用妇科与产科杂志, 2022, 38(2): 165-169.
[10]
Lu J, Qi D, Liu Y, Fan Y. A prospective self-controlled study on shortening the time before taking delayed radiographs with iodized oil hysterosalpingography[J]. Ginekol Pol, 2020, 91(11): 655-660.
[11]
李莹莹, 鲁景元, 徐文健. 缩短碘油子宫输卵管造影延迟片拍摄时间可行性研究[J]. 中国实用妇科与产科杂志, 2021, 37(10): 1049-1053.
[12]
韦洁如, 覃文华, 程广明, 等. 超液化碘油在子宫输卵管造影中的应用价值[J]. 广西医科大学学报, 2022, 39(9): 1436-1441.
[13]
郑国, 金钊, 冯莉, 等. 子宫输卵管造影术中输卵管通畅度的再认识[J]. 河北医科大学学报, 2017, 38(8): 921-924.
[14]
Fang F, Bai Y, Zhang Y, et al. Oil-based versus water-based contrast for hysterosalpingography in infertile women: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials[J]. Fertil Steril, 2018, 110(1): 153-160. e3.
[15]
Burks HR, Hansen KR. Oil or water-based contrast for hysterosalpingography?[J] Fertil Steril, 2020, 114(1): 75-76.
[16]
Johnson NP, Hadden WE, Chamley LW. Fertility enhancement by hysterosalpingography with oil-soluble contrast media: reality not myth[J]. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2005, 185(6): 1654.
[17]
Glanville EJ, Venetis C, Boothroyd CA, et al. The use of oil-soluble contrast media for tubal flushing in infertility: a consensus statement from ACCEPT (Australasian CREI Consensus Expert Panel on Trial evidence)[J]. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol, 2020, 60(5): 667-670.
[18]
Peart JM, Sim R. Lipiodol hysterosalpingogram: a modified HSG technique to minimize risks associated with lipiodol use[J]. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol, 2020, 64(4): 516-521.
[19]
Mathews DM, Peart JM, Sim RG, et al. The SELFI study: iodine excess and thyroid dysfunction in women undergoing oil-soluble contrast hysterosalpingography[J]. J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 2022, 107(12): 3252-3260.
[20]
席嘉元. 子宫输卵管碘油造影术后输卵管内碘油可长期潴留[J]. 介入放射学杂志, 2006, 15(5): 303-304.
[21]
Yücel B, Demirel E, Kelekci S, et al. Hysteroscopic evaluation of tubal peristaltic dysfunction in unexplained infertility[J]. J Obstet Gynaecol, 2018, 38(4): 511-515.
[1] 张俊清, 周秘, 张文军, 谭静, 尹立雪. 射血分数保留肝硬化患者的肝脏硬度与左心室功能超声特征及相关性分析[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2025, 22(08): 768-776.
[2] 高瑞霞, 韩佳豪, 宋丹蕾, 王萍萍, 李嘉. 三种超声技术对超重人群肝脂肪变性诊断性能的评估和比较[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2025, 22(07): 600-607.
[3] 谭品, 谢娟娟, 龙湘党, 敖琨, 张萍, 袁勇华. 自动心肌运动定量技术对支原体肺炎患儿左心室收缩功能的评估及与肺炎支原体DNA载量的关系[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2025, 22(04): 360-367.
[4] 丁河南, 林少强, 张杰龙, 赖世芳, 肖志满. 小剂量丙泊酚在肩关节脱位手法复位中的临床应用[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(04): 494-498.
[5] 汤震平, 曾鹏飞, 柏斗胜. 绕肝悬吊前入路与传统入路右半肝切除术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的临床对比[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(06): 670-673.
[6] 孟竹达, 靳亚杰, 郝冉, 赵二鹏. MMIF与围手术期指标预测甲状腺全切术后甲状旁腺功能减退的价值[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(06): 678-681.
[7] 陈系东, 王绍闯, 赵何伟, 王硕, 袁维栋. 高龄BCLC B期肝癌患者常规TACE术后急性肝功能恶化的危险因素研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(06): 689-692.
[8] 贺雅莉, 黄丽, 杨培娟. 功能保留手术在低位直肠癌治疗中的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(06): 701-704.
[9] 洪菁, 高义, 廖桂兰, 陈晓蔚, 菅志远, 周娟娟, 黄志琼, 韦宇, 邓艳婷. 腹腔镜保留回盲部的右半结肠癌根治术在结肠肝曲和横结肠肿瘤中的应用研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(05): 547-550.
[10] 王小贝, 吕庆福, 倪婷. 免充气腋窝入路与全乳晕入路腔镜下甲状腺癌根治术的临床对比[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(04): 368-371.
[11] 余琪伟, 王省博, 姚林亚, 张曦, 吴余凡, 曾学明, 曾庆琪. 经皮胫神经刺激联合索利那新治疗前列腺癌根治术后膀胱功能障碍的疗效观察[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(05): 586-592.
[12] 彭惊龙, 张潇月, 王红美. 脐带间充质干细胞治疗造血干细胞移植术后卵巢早衰的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华细胞与干细胞杂志(电子版), 2025, 15(04): 245-250.
[13] 卜俊峰, 陈炜. ICG在肝切除术中的应用进展[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(05): 780-784.
[14] 卢兴华, 张珊珊, 王文倩, 许寿星, 应斌, 陈晓婷, 朱玮. 肛塞消炎痛栓在经阴道四维超声子宫输卵管造影中的临床应用[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(04): 302-306.
[15] 李敏, 钟孟飞, 胡孟良, 巴莎莎. 穿支动脉粥样硬化性疾病相关卒中患者静脉溶栓后早期神经功能恶化的危险因素分析[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(04): 304-311.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?