切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华介入放射学电子杂志 doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-5782.2025.03.000

影像诊断

缩短碘油输卵管造影延迟片时间的可行性研究
刘明明1, 徐斌1, 金钊2, 雷文峰3, 苗杰1,()   
  1. 1. 100006 北京,首都医科大学附属北京妇产医院/北京妇幼保健院放射科
    2. Department of Interventional Radiology,Hebei Maternity Hospital,Hebei Shijiazhuang 050000
    3. 430000 湖北武汉,武汉大学附属同仁医院(武汉市第三医院)光谷院区介入医学科
  • 通信作者: 苗杰

Feasibility study on shortening the delay time of hystero-salpingography by iodipin

Mingming Liu1, Bin Xu1, Zhao Jin2, Wenfeng Lei3, Jie Miao1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Radiology,Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital,Capital Medical University. Beijing Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital,Beijing 100006
    2. Department of Interventional Radiology,Hebei Maternity Hospital,Hebei Shijiazhuang 050000
    3. Department of Interventional Medicine,Guang Gu District,Tong Ren Hospital Affiliated to Wuhan University (Wuhan Third Hospital),Hubei Wuhan 430000,China
  • Corresponding author: Jie Miao
引用本文:

刘明明, 徐斌, 金钊, 雷文峰, 苗杰. 缩短碘油输卵管造影延迟片时间的可行性研究[J/OL]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-5782.2025.03.000.

Mingming Liu, Bin Xu, Zhao Jin, Wenfeng Lei, Jie Miao. Feasibility study on shortening the delay time of hystero-salpingography by iodipin[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Interventional Radiology(Electronic Edition), doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-5782.2025.03.000.

目的

探索超液化碘油子宫输卵管造影拍摄延迟片时间,缩短拍摄延迟片时间是否可行。

方法

回顾性收集2021年1月至2023年1月,北京妇产医院收治的行输卵管造影检查的不孕症女性患者的临床资料。在超液化碘油输卵管造影后,分别于术后第3、6、24小时拍摄盆腔延迟片,观察输卵管内碘油残留情况,判断输卵管通畅性和功能。采用卡方检验比较在输卵管造影术后3、6、24 h拍摄延迟片,诊断输卵管通畅程度的差异。

结果

卡方检验结果显示,在第3、6、24小时拍摄延迟片诊断结果差异有统计学意义(P=0.002)。组间两两比较,在第3小时和第6小时拍摄延迟片诊断结果差异无统计学意义(P=0.807)。在第3小时或第6小时拍摄延迟片,与第24小时拍摄延迟片比较,诊断结果差异有统计学意义(P=0.001,0.006)。输卵管通畅情况下,在第3、6和24小时拍摄延迟片,诊断结果差异无统计学意义(P=0.787)。但是,在输卵管通畅的情况下,第3、6小时拍摄延迟片,输卵管内有部分碘油残留或伞端周围碘油局部聚集提示蠕动功能差,第24小时拍摄延迟片会遗漏输卵管功能信息(P=0.001,0.001)。在输卵管积水情况下,第3、6小时拍摄延迟片和第24小时拍摄延迟片差异均有统计学意义(P=0.010,0.015),第24小时拍摄延迟片,输卵管积水显影率高。输卵管阻塞情况下,第3小时和第24小时拍摄延迟片差异有统计学意义(P=0.003)。

结论

在输卵管通畅的情况下,在第3小时拍摄延迟片即可满足诊断要求,并可评价输卵管功能。在输卵管积水和输卵管阻塞的情况下,在第24小时拍摄延迟片更具有诊断价值。

Objective

To explore whether it is feasible to shorten the shooting delay time of ultraliquefied lipiodol hysterosalpingography.

Methods

After hysterosalpingography with ultra-liquefied lipiodol,pelvic delay films were taken at 3 hours,6 hours and 24 hours after operation to observe the residual lipiodol in the fallopian tube and judge the patency and function of the fallopian tube. Chi-square test was used to compare the differences in the degree of tubal patency diagnosed by taking delayed films at 3 h,6 h,and 24 h after hystero-salpingography.

Results

Chi-square test results showed that there was a statistically significant difference in the diagnostic results of delayed films at 3 hours,6 hours,and 24 hours (P=0.002).There was no significant difference in the diagnostic results of delayed films between the two groups at the 3rd hour and the 6th hour (P=0.807). There were statistically significant differences in the diagnostic results between the delayed films taken at the 3rd or 6th hour and the delayed films taken at the 24th hour (P=0.001,P=0.006). In the case of tubal patency,there was no significant difference in diagnostic results between the delayed films taken at 3 hours,6 hours and 24 hours (P=0.787). However,in the case of unobstructed fallopian tubes,delayed filming at 3 and 6 hours showed that some lipiodol residues in the fallopian tubes or local accumulation of lipiodol around the umbrella end indicated poor peristalsis,and delayed filming at 24 hours missed fallopian tube function information (P=0.001,P=0.001). In the case of hydrosalpinx,the difference between the delayed film taken at the 3rd hour and the 6th hour and the delayed film taken at the 24th hour was statistically significant (P=0.010,P=0.015). In the case of fallopian tube obstruction,there was a statistically significant difference in the delay film between the 3rd hour and the 24th hour (P=0.003).

Conclusion

In the case of fallopian tube patency,the delayed film taken at the third hour can meet the diagnostic requirements and evaluate the fallopian tube function. In the case of hydrosalpinx and fallopian tube obstruction,it is more valuable to take a delayed film at 24 hours.

图1 超液化碘油子宫输卵管造影 1A:定位片;1B:充盈期图像显示子宫腔和输卵管;1C:3 h延迟片;1D:6 h延迟片;1E:24 h延迟片。
图2 输卵管通畅不同延迟时间影像表现 2A:充盈期,双侧输卵管(箭头)碘油顺利溢出进入盆腔,形态自然;2B~2D:延迟3、6、24 h片,盆腔碘油涂抹均匀,双侧输卵管内未见碘油残留。
图3 24 h延迟片 除外输卵管阻塞假阳性 3A:充盈期,左侧输卵管显影至远端,未见碘油进入盆腔(粗箭头),右侧输卵管见碘油溢出进入盆腔(细箭头);3B:延迟3 h片,左侧输卵管远端碘油滞留未见溢出进入盆腔(粗箭头),右侧输卵管远端少许碘油残留,盆腔可见碘油弥散;3C:延迟 6 h片,左侧输卵管远端碘油滞留未见溢出盆腔(粗箭头),右侧输卵管内未见碘油残留,全部弥散进入盆腔;3D:延迟24 h片,双侧输卵管内碘油无残留,碘油盆腔涂抹广泛。通过24 h延迟片除外左侧输卵管阻塞,诊断:双侧输卵管通畅。
图4 左侧输卵管积水,右侧输卵管通畅 4A:充盈期,双侧输卵管远端管腔增粗(右侧输卵管细箭头,左侧输卵管粗箭头);4B~4C:延迟3、6 h片,双侧输卵管内见碘油滞留,远端管腔增粗,盆腔见碘油不均匀弥散;4D:延迟24 h片,左侧输卵管碘油滞留,远端管腔增粗(粗箭头),右侧输卵管内碘油溢出进入盆腔,盆腔见碘油广泛涂抹。24 h延迟片确认左侧输卵管积水,右侧输卵管通畅。
图5 双输卵管阻塞不同延迟时间影像表现一致 5A:充盈期,左侧输卵管未见显影,右侧输卵管显影至壶腹部(粗箭头),宫旁见少许碘油逆入间质(细箭头),盆腔未见碘油溢出;5B~5D:延迟3、6、24小时片,左侧输卵管未见显影,右侧输卵管远端碘油滞留(粗箭头,盆腔未见碘油弥散。诊断:左侧输卵管近端阻塞,右侧输卵管壶腹部阻塞。
表1 子宫输卵管造影结果[例(%)]
表2 不同时间拍摄延迟片输卵管显影情况分析结果(P值)
表3 输卵管通畅情况下蠕动功能显影结果[例(%)]
图6 输卵管通畅,蠕动功能减弱 6A:充盈期,双侧输卵管通畅;6B:3 h延迟片,双侧输卵管内碘油滞留;6C:6 h延迟片显示,双侧输卵管内碘油滞留;6D:24 h延迟片显示,左侧输卵管蠕动功能减弱,管腔内少量碘水滞留(箭头),右侧输卵管内未见碘油残留。
[1]
Phillips K,Olanrewaju RA,Omole F. Infertility: evaluation and management[J]. Am Fam Physician,2023,107(6):623-630.
[2]
Brugh VM 3rd,Nudell DM,Lipshultz LI. What the urologist should know about the female infertility evaluation[J]. Urol Clin North Am,2002,29(4):983-992.
[3]
Liang G,Zhu Q,He X,et al. Effects of oil-soluble versus watersoluble contrast media at hysterosalpingography on pregnancy outcomes in women with a low risk of tubal disease: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial[J]. BMJ Open,2020,10(10):e039166.
[4]
Zhang J,Zhang X,Bian J,et al. Comparation of magnetic resonance hysterosalpingography and hysterosalpingosonography for the assessment of fallopian tubal occlusion of female infertility: a protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Medicine (Baltimore),2022,101(3):e28532.
[5]
Carson SA,Kallen AN. Diagnosis and management of Infertility:a review[J]. JAMA,2021,326(1):65-76.
[6]
Baramki TA. Hysterosalpingography[J]. Fertil Steril,2005,83(6):1595-1606.
[7]
Tsui S,Sofy AA. A meta-analysis of fertility and adverse outcomes in oil- and water-based contrast for hysterosalpingography[J].Turk J Obstet Gynecol,2023,20(1):64-73.
[8]
Peart JM,Sim RG,Hofman PL. Therapeutic effects of hysterosalpingography contrast media in infertile women: what do we know about the H2O in the H2Oil trial and why does it matter? [J]Hum Reprod,2021,36(3):529-535.
[9]
中国妇幼保健协会放射介入专业委员会.输卵管造影技术规范中国专家共识(2022年版)[J]. 中国实用妇科与产科杂志,2022,38(2):165-169.
[10]
Lu J,Qi D,Liu Y,Fan Y. A prospective self-controlled study on shortening the time before taking delayed radiographs with iodized oil hysterosalpingography[J]. Ginekol Pol,2020,91(11):655-660.
[11]
李莹莹,鲁景元,徐文健. 缩短碘油子宫输卵管造影延迟片拍摄时间可行性研究[J].中国实用妇科与产科杂志,2021,37(10):1049-1053.
[12]
韦洁如,覃文华,程广明,等.超液化碘油在子宫输卵管造影中的应用价值[J].广西医科大学学报,2022,39(9):1436-1441.
[13]
郑国,金钊,冯莉,等.子宫输卵管造影术中输卵管通畅度的再认识[J].河北医科大学学报,2017,38(8):921-924.
[14]
Fang F,Bai Y,Zhang Y,et al. Oil-based versus water-based contrast for hysterosalpingography in infertile women: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials[J]. Fertil Steril,2018,110(1):153-160.e3.
[15]
Burks HR,Hansen KR. Oil or water-based contrast for hysterosalpingography? [J] Fertil Steril,2020,114(1):75-76.
[16]
Johnson NP,Hadden WE,Chamley LW. Fertility enhancement by hysterosalpingography with oil-soluble contrast media: reality not myth[J]. AJR Am J Roentgenol,2005,185(6):1654.
[17]
Glanville EJ,Venetis C,Boothroyd CA,et al. The use of oil-soluble contrast media for tubal flushing in infertility:a consensus statement from ACCEPT (Australasian CREI Consensus Expert Panel on Trial evidence) [J]. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol,2020,60(5):667-670.
[18]
Peart JM,Sim R. Lipiodol hysterosalpingogram: a modified HSG technique to minimize risks associated with lipiodol use[J].J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol,2020 ,64(4):516-521.
[19]
Mathews DM,Peart JM,Sim RG,et al. The SELFI study: iodine excess and thyroid dysfunction in women undergoing oil-soluble contrast hysterosalpingography[J]. J Clin Endocrinol Metab,2022,107(12):3252-3260.
[20]
席嘉元.子宫输卵管碘油造影术后输卵管内碘油可长期潴留[J].介入放射学杂志,2006,15(5):303-304.
[21]
Yücel B,Demirel E,Kelekci S,et al. Hysteroscopic evaluation of tubal peristaltic dysfunction in unexplained infertility[J]. J Obstet Gynaecol,2018,38(4):511-515.
[1] 周彦彤, 王成. 不同新型敷料在创面中应用的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2025, 20(02): 163-168.
[2] 黄凤, 李文润, 冉永红, 谌莉, 刘泓伽, 王秋池, 郝玉徽. 贫铀对线粒体损伤影响的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2025, 20(02): 179-183.
[3] 校华, 张跃英, 吴秋月, 蒋天鹭, 何康萍, 杜宇森, 杨婧, 金作林, 李菲菲. 青少年患者隐形矫治导下颌向前咬合功能的变化[J/OL]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(02): 104-111.
[4] 张大山, 李贺鹏, 蒋福林, 商中华. 代谢功能障碍与免疫微环境关系在肝细胞癌发生发展的作用机制[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2025, 19(02): 124-129.
[5] 王振宁, 邹敏, 王得晨, 杨康, 归明彬, 王雅楠, 高峰. 经肛全直肠系膜切除术在低位直肠癌中的研究现状[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 55-61.
[6] 李华志, 孙海涛, 曹广, 张雅静. 基于膜解剖的完整系膜切除+D2根治术在进展期胃癌治疗中的应用[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(03): 262-265.
[7] 杜升兰, 张刘平, 肖燕玲. 三种手术策略在结直肠癌并肠梗阻中的临床观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(03): 294-297.
[8] 赵敏, 韩加刚. 保留左结肠动脉的腹腔镜直肠癌根治术的临床效果观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(03): 313-316.
[9] 翟耀君, 李丕嵩, 赵宏卿. 内镜下经乳晕径路实施单侧甲状腺癌手术对甲状腺功能的影响分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(03): 329-332.
[10] 中华医学会呼吸病学分会肺功能学组. 成人肺功能检查技术进展及临床应用推荐指南(2025版)[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2025, 18(02): 197-212.
[11] 陈晨, 裴永坚, 黄永康, 周童. AECOPD 患者血清CCN1、ECP、GSH-Px 与肺功能及免疫相关性分析[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2025, 18(01): 23-28.
[12] 兰永, 刘晶, 杨志琦, 吴浪, 沙小春, 李明皓. 肠道菌群在胰腺炎发生发展中的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(03): 481-486.
[13] 朱万涌, 王乐, 徐越, 王新军, 叶晨, 李宁, 陈启仪, 李龙. 肠道菌群失衡与功能性肠病:从机制探讨到肠菌移植疗法[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 142-147.
[14] 马强. 衰弱和肌少症对肾功能评估的影响及干预策略[J/OL]. 中华肾病研究电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 60-60.
[15] 盛鹏, 柏立哲, 张靖, 李丹, 曹宏. 低聚半乳糖增强去卵巢小鼠肠道屏障功能预防骨质流失[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 48-57.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?