切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华介入放射学电子杂志 ›› 2021, Vol. 09 ›› Issue (02) : 188 -193. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-5782.2021.02.013

所属专题: 文献

影像诊断

双能量CT冠脉、心肌成像辐射剂量的优化研究
潘存雪1, 肖虎2, 党军2, 张源3, 王晓睿1, 刘文亚2,()   
  1. 1. 519000 广东珠海,中山大学附属第五医院放射科;830054 新疆乌鲁木齐,新疆医科大学第一附属医院影像中心
    2. 830054 新疆乌鲁木齐,新疆医科大学第一附属医院影像中心
    3. 830001 新疆乌鲁木齐,新疆维吾尔自治区中医医院影像中心
  • 收稿日期:2020-10-23 出版日期:2021-05-25
  • 通信作者: 刘文亚

Dual energy coronary computed tomography angiography with low radiation dose-A feasibility study

Cunxue Pan1, Hu Xiao2, Jun Dang2, Yuan Zhang3, Xiaorui Wang1, Wenya Liu2,()   

  1. 1. Department of Radiology, the Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Zhuhai 519000; Imaging Center, the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Xinjiang Urumqi 830054
    2. Imaging Center, the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Xinjiang Urumqi 830054
    3. Imaging Center, Xingjiang Chinese medicine Hospital, Xinjiang Urumqi 830001, China
  • Received:2020-10-23 Published:2021-05-25
  • Corresponding author: Wenya Liu
引用本文:

潘存雪, 肖虎, 党军, 张源, 王晓睿, 刘文亚. 双能量CT冠脉、心肌成像辐射剂量的优化研究[J/OL]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2021, 09(02): 188-193.

Cunxue Pan, Hu Xiao, Jun Dang, Yuan Zhang, Xiaorui Wang, Wenya Liu. Dual energy coronary computed tomography angiography with low radiation dose-A feasibility study[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Interventional Radiology(Electronic Edition), 2021, 09(02): 188-193.

目的

通过对双能量冠状动脉CT造影(DE-CCTA)不同扫描方式及重建方式下冠脉、心肌成像质量的综合评价及对比分析,探讨DE-CCTA辐射剂量优化的可行性。

方法

连续收集2016年2月至2016年8月于新疆医科大学第一附属医院影像中心因体检或疑似冠心病行DE-CCTA检查的68例患者资料,纳入其中40例并随机分至常规剂量组及降剂量组,常规剂量组采取常规扫描模式,并对图像进行滤波反投影重建,降剂量组采用低剂量扫描模式,并对图像进行迭代算法重建;对两组成像的辐射剂量进行比较,测量并比较两组主动脉根部以及左心室外侧壁心肌的图像噪声、信噪比、对比噪声比,以及前降支及左心室心肌成像质量的主观评分。

结果

降剂量组有效辐射剂量(4.68 ± 0.86)mSv较常规剂量组有效辐射剂量(6.69 ± 0.85)mSv显著降低,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.01);降剂量组较常规剂量组主动脉对比噪声比升高(54.79 ± 10.35 vs 43.66 ± 10.79)、心肌对比噪声比升高(20.58 ± 4.04 vs 16.93 ± 3.60),差异有统计学意义(P值均< 0.05),主动脉及心肌的噪声、信号噪声比、主观评分在两组间差异无统计学意义(P值均> 0.05)。

结论

低剂量DE-CCTA扫描模式结合迭代重建能够在保证冠脉及心肌图像质量的前提下有效降低扫描辐射剂量,因此在临床实际操作过程中可根据临床需求适当开展DE-CCTA检查。

Objective

To explore feasibility of dual energy coronary computed tomography angiography (DE-CCTA) with low radiation dose.

Methods

40 of 68 patients undergoing DE-CCTA were enrolled in this study prospectively and equally assigned to control group and experimental group randomly. The controlgroup (Group A, n = 20) were scanned using the conventional tube output and reconstructed using filtered back projection (FBP). The experimental group (Group B, n = 20) were scanned using the low radiation dose tube outputand reconstructed using sinogram affirmed iterative reconstruction (SAFIRE). Noise, signal to noise ratio (SNR) and contrast to noise ratio (CNR) of aortic root and myocardium, subjective scoring of left anterior descending branch (LAD) and myocardium, and radiation dose were measured and comparied between the two groups.

Results

Radiation dose of experimental group (4.68 ± 0.86) mSv was significantly lower than that of control group (6.69 ± 0.85) mSv (P < 0.05); Aortic and myocardial CNR were higher in experimental group (54.79 ± 10.35, 20.58 ± 4.04) than those in control group (43.66 ± 10.79, 16.93 ± 3.60) (all P < 0.05); Aortic and myocardial noise, SNR and subjective scoring were not statistically different between the two groups (all P > 0.05).

Conclutions

By combined using of low tube current, automatic current adjustment, minidose and iterative reconstruction (IR) technique, DE-CCTA could reduce radiation dose effectively with precondition of ensuring image quality of coronary artery and myocardium.

表1 降剂量组/常规剂量组患者一般情况比较(±s
表2 降剂量组/常规剂量组辐射剂量比较(±s
表3 降剂量组/常规剂量组主动脉客观测量指标比较(±s
表4 降剂量组/常规剂量组前降支的主观评分
图1 常规剂量组与降剂量组DECCTA冠脉及心肌图像比较
表5 降剂量组/常规剂量组心肌客观测量指标比较(±s
表6 降剂量组/常规剂量组心肌主观评分比较
[1]
Halliburton SS, Abbara S, Chen MY, et al. SCCT guidelines on radiation dose and dose-optimization strategies in cardiovascular CT[J]. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr, 2011, 5(4): 198-224.
[2]
Im DJ, Youn JC, Lee HJ, et al. Role of cardiac computed tomography for etiology evaluation of newly diagnosed heart failure with reduced ejection fraction[J]. J Clin Med, 2020,9(7): 2270
[3]
李媛媛,潘存雪,刘文亚, 等. 双能量冠脉CTA评价急性心肌梗死的动物实验研究[J]. 中国医学计算机成像杂志, 2019, 5(3): 321-325.
[4]
Kay FU. Dual-energy CT and coronary imaging[J]. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther, 2020, 10(4): 1090-1107.
[5]
Prasad Reddy KV, Singhal M, Vijayvergiya R, et al. Role of DECT in coronary artery disease: a comparative study with ICA and SPECT[J]. Diagn Interv Radiol, 2020, 26(5): 420-428.
[6]
Yunaga H, Ohta Y, Kaetsu Y.et al. Diagnostic performance of calcification-suppressed coronary CT angiography using rapid kilovolt-switching dual-energy CT[J]. Eur Radiol, 2017, 27(7): 2794-2801
[7]
Abbara S, Arbab-Zadeh A, Callister T, et al. SCCT guidelines for performance of coronary computed topographic angiography: a report of the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography Guidelines Committee[J]. Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr, 2009, 3(3): 190-204.
[8]
潘存雪. 静息态双能量冠状动脉CT造影成像诊断慢性心肌梗死的可行性研究[D]. 新疆: 新疆医科大学, 2016.
[9]
肖虎,党军,刘文亚. 迭代重建联合单能谱成像在冠状动脉CT血管造影中的作用[J]. 中华实用诊断与治疗杂志, 2017, 31(9): 902-905.
[10]
Abdullah KA, McEntee MF, Reed W, et al. Radiation dose and diagnostic image quality associated with iterative reconstruction in coronary CT angiography: A systematic review[J]. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol, 2016, 60(4): 459-68.
[11]
Yin WH, Lu B, Li N, et al. Iterative reconstruction to preserve image quality and diagnostic accuracy at reduced radiation dose in coronary CT angiography: an intraindividual comparison[J]. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging, 2013, 6(12): 1239-1249.
[12]
Takx RA, Schoepf UJ, Moscariello A, et al. Coronary CT angiography: comparison of a novel iterative reconstruction with filtered back projection for reconstruction of low-dose CT dinitial experience[J]. Eur J Radiol, 2013, 82(2): 275-280.
[13]
Layritz C, Schmid J, Achenbach S, et al. Accuracy of prospectively ECG-triggered very low-dose coronary dual-source CT angiography using iterative reconstruction for the detection of coronary artery stenosis: comparison with invasive catheterization[J]. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging, 2014, 15(11): 1238-1245.
[1] 陈芬, 葛贝贝, 王小贤, 李明霞, 徐芳, 史坚, 郭冠军, 方爱娟, 史中青, 戚占如, 陈慧, 姚静. 左束支传导阻滞性心肌病心脏电-机械重构的实验研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(10): 978-985.
[2] 夏靖涵, 林凤娇, 王胰, 丁戈琦, 张清凤, 张红梅, 谢盛华, 李明星, 尹立雪, 李文华. 二尖瓣空间变化联合左心房应变对肥厚型心肌病合并左心室流出道梗阻的预测价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(06): 585-592.
[3] 王岚, 徐斌胜, 谢乐. 肥厚型心肌病的经胸超声心动图诊断与心电图表现特征[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(06): 593-596.
[4] 张霞, 张瑞, 郑志波, 张勤. 紫草素调控乳酸化修饰和线粒体功能改善脓毒症心肌病小鼠的预后[J/OL]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(04): 275-284.
[5] 江杰, 沈城, 潘永昇, 陈新风, 刘振民, 朱华, 郑兵. 尿酸结石的危险因素分析及双能量CT特征研究[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 361-365.
[6] 陈倩倩, 袁晨, 刘基, 尹婷婷. 多层螺旋CT 参数、癌胚抗原、错配修复基因及病理指标对结直肠癌预后的影响[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 507-511.
[7] 张立俊, 孙存杰, 胡春峰, 孟冲, 张辉. MSCT、DCE-MRI 评估术前胃癌TNM 分期的准确性研究[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 519-523.
[8] 崔健, 夏青, 林云, 李光玲, 李心娜, 王位. 血小板与淋巴细胞比值、免疫球蛋白、心肌酶谱及心电图对中老年肝硬化患者病情及预后的影响[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(05): 400-406.
[9] 袁梦晨, 刘译阳, 赵帅, 陈林, 高宇, 肖晓燕, 尤亚茹, 梁何俊, 高剑波. 增强CT的列线图在鉴别EB病毒相关的胃淋巴上皮瘤样癌与胃腺癌中的应用[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(02): 107-113.
[10] 孙兆男, 何江凯, 黄文鹏, 胡晓煜, 黄勇, 王霄英. 伪膜性结肠炎的CT表现及鉴别诊断[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(02): 172-176.
[11] 贾玲玲, 滕飞, 常键, 黄福, 刘剑萍. 心肺康复在各种疾病中应用的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(09): 859-862.
[12] 刘聪辉, 何浩然, 黄一诺, 张凤, 王凡月, 郝翰. 膳食铜补充对大鼠心肌梗死后心肌基质金属蛋白酶2表达水平及血流动力学的影响[J/OL]. 中华诊断学电子杂志, 2024, 12(03): 166-172.
[13] 魏冰倩, 蓝荣芳. 起搏诱导心肌病应对新策略:导线移除与希氏-浦肯野系统起搏升级[J/OL]. 中华心脏与心律电子杂志, 2024, 12(03): 155-160.
[14] 徐来英, 程效, 戴亨纷, 侯俊凉, 苏怡林, 张彦. 药物联合个体化精准恒定功率运动疗法治疗心肌梗死术后频发室性早搏一例[J/OL]. 中华心脏与心律电子杂志, 2024, 12(03): 176-179.
[15] 郑屹, 刘莹, 张煜坤, 李广平, 陈康寅, 刘彤. 既往及新发心房颤动对急性心肌梗死患者远期卒中风险的影响[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 406-417.
阅读次数
全文


摘要