切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华介入放射学电子杂志 ›› 2019, Vol. 07 ›› Issue (03) : 190 -196. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-5782.2019.03.004

所属专题: 文献

专题研究·肿瘤介入

超声引导下经皮微波消融与冷冻消融治疗高风险部位肝癌的对照研究
周亮1, 陈志贤1, 潘忠保1, 李蓉蓉1, 李书英1, 金利1, 牛立志1,()   
  1. 1. 510000 广州复大肿瘤医院微创治疗室
  • 收稿日期:2019-04-29 出版日期:2019-08-01
  • 通信作者: 牛立志

Ultrasound-guided percutaneous microwave ablation versus cryoablation for treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma on the high-risk location

Liang Zhou1, Zhixian Chen1, Zhongbao Pan1, Rongrong Li1, Shuying Li1, Li Jin1, Lizhi Niu1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Minimally Invasive Treatment, Guangzhou Fuda Cancer Hospital, Guangzhou 510000, China
  • Received:2019-04-29 Published:2019-08-01
  • Corresponding author: Lizhi Niu
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Niu Lizhi, Email:
引用本文:

周亮, 陈志贤, 潘忠保, 李蓉蓉, 李书英, 金利, 牛立志. 超声引导下经皮微波消融与冷冻消融治疗高风险部位肝癌的对照研究[J]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2019, 07(03): 190-196.

Liang Zhou, Zhixian Chen, Zhongbao Pan, Rongrong Li, Shuying Li, Li Jin, Lizhi Niu. Ultrasound-guided percutaneous microwave ablation versus cryoablation for treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma on the high-risk location[J]. Chinese Journal of Interventional Radiology(Electronic Edition), 2019, 07(03): 190-196.

目的:

比较超声引导下经皮微波消融与冷冻消融治疗高风险部位肝癌的临床结局及术后并发症,并分析影响预后和术后复发的因素。

方法:

选取2014年4月至2018年3月广州复大肿瘤医院收治的120例高风险部位肝癌患者,其中64例接受微波消融治疗(微波组),56例接受冷冻消融治疗(冷冻组)。比较两组的治疗结局,主要包括生存、复发及术后并发症。用Cox回归模型分析预后和术后复发的影响因素。

结果:

微波消融组1、3、5年总生存率分别为85.8%、63.5%、63.5%,冷冻消融组为92.0%、87.4%、74.9%,两组差异无统计学意义(P=0.141)。微波消融组1、3、5年无复发生存率分别为77.8%、49.0%、49.0%,冷冻消融组分别为81.4%、58.5%、46.8%,两组差异无统计学意义(P=0.469)。微波消融组的3、6、9、12个月的局部进展率分别为3.1%、6.3%、9.4%、15.9%,高于冷冻消融组(分别为0%、0%、3.7%、19.0%),差异有统计学意义(P=0.003)。微波组的主要和次要并发症发生率(分别为6.3%、82.8%)均高于冷冻组(分别为0%、32.1%),差异有统计学意义。年龄≥65岁,直径3~5 cm及Child-Pugh分级B级是肝癌术后预后较差的危险因素;直径3~5 cm、多个肿瘤以及多次消融是消融术后复发的危险因素。

结论:

冷冻消融治疗高风险部位的肝癌具有与微波消融接近的生存结局,但具有更好的局部肿瘤控制率及更少的并发症,适合在临床中推广应用。

Objective:

The aims of this study were to compare the clinical outcomes between ultrasound-guided percutaneous microwave ablation (MWA) and cryoablation (CRA) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) on the high-risk location and to identify the prognostic factors associated with the two treatment methods.

Methods:

Retrospective study on 120 patients (88 men and 32 women) with one hundred and thirty-four HCCs on the high-risk location in our hospital from April 2014 to March 2018 were reviewed. Sixty-four patients underwent MWA and 56 patients underwent CRA. The treatment outcomes between the two groups were compared, including survival, recurrence, and postoperative complications., Cox regression models were used to analyze the influencing factors of prognosis and postoperative recurrence. Effect of changes in key parameters [overall survival (OS) , recurrence-free survival (RFS) and local tumor progression (LTP) ] was statistically analyzed with the log-rank test. Univariate and multivariate analysis were performed on clinicopathological variables to identify factors affecting intermediate-term outcome.

Results:

The cumulative OS rates at 1, 3, and 5-years were 85.8%, 63.5% and 63.5%, respectively, in MWA group, and 92.0%, 87.4% and 74.9%, respectively, in CRA group. There were no significant statistical difference (P=0.141) . The cumulative RFS rates at 1, 3, and 5-years were 77.8%, 49.0%, 49.0%, respectively, in MWA group, and 81.4%, 58.5%, 46.8%, respectively, in CRA group. There were no significant statistical difference (P=0.469) . The LTP rates at 3, 6, 9, 12 month were 3.1%, 6.3%, 9.4%, 15.9%, respectively in MWA group, which were higher than those in CRA group (0%, 0%, 3.7%, and 19.0%, respectively) with statistically significant differences (P=0.003) . The major and minor complications in MWA group (6.3%, 82.8%, respectively) were higher than those in CRA goup (0%, 32.1%, respectively) with statistically significant differences. Univariate analysis showed that age (P=0.007) , tumor size (P=0.001) , and CTP grade (P=0.003) were risk factors for OS, and multivariate analysis results showed that age ≥65 years, 3.0-5.0 cm in size and CTP grade B were independently associated with poor OS. 3~5 cm in diameter, multiple tumors and multiple ablation are risk factors for recurrence after ablation.

Conclusions:

CRA had comparable oncologic outcomes with MWA and could be a safe and effective treatment for HCC on the high-risk location.

图1 超声引导下经皮穿刺进入肿瘤内部
图2 微波消融
图3 典型病例(女性,62岁,肝癌结节位于膈顶)行冷冻消融术前术后表现
图4 典型病例(男性,56岁,肝癌结节位于近第二肝门处)行冷冻消融术前术后表现
表1 微波消融组与冷冻消融组肝癌患者的一般资料比较 [±s或例(%)]
临床特征 微波消融组(n=64) 冷冻消融组(n=56) 统计量 P
年龄(岁) 55.2±7.2 54.9±11.3 t=1.271 0.758
性别 ? ? χ2=2.278 0.785
? 18(28.1) 14(25.0) ? ?
? 46(71.9) 42(75.0) ? ?
共病 ? ? χ2=1.562 0.929
? 52(81.3) 46(82.1) ? ?
? 12(18.7) 10(17.9) ? ?
乙肝 ? ? χ2=2.336 0.821
? 20(31.3) 16(28.6) ? ?
? 44(68.7) 40(71.4) ? ?
肝硬化 ? ? χ2=0.782 0.929
? 52(81.3) 46(82.1) ? ?
? 12(18.7) 10(17.9) ? ?
KPS评分(分) 42±22 44±21 t=0.123 0.932
肿瘤直径(cm) 2.7±0.5 2.8±0.4 t=0.912 0.717
肿瘤数量 ? ? χ2=2.228 0.533
? 单发 60(93.8) 50(89.3) ? ?
? 多发 4(6.2) 6(10.7) ? ?
白蛋白(g/L) 36.2±5.1 35.4±4.7 t=1.298 0.582
总胆红素(μmol/L) 14.3±4.4 28.9±5.6 t=2.673 0.002
血小板(×109/L) 156.8±32.6 78.6±13.8 t=3.892 0.032
甲胎蛋白(ng/ml) 17.8±8.3 12.4±7.2 t=1.523 0.116
Child-Pugh分级 ? ? χ2=1.723 0.726
? A级 50(78.1) 46(82.1) ? ?
? B级 14(11.9) 10(17.9) ? ?
临近脏器 ? ? χ2=1.293 0.777
? 14(21.9) 10(17.9) ? ?
? 结肠 16(25.0) 10(17.9) ? ?
? 胆囊 6(9.3) 4(7.1) ? ?
? 肾脏 8(12.5) 8(14.2) ? ?
? 膈肌 10(15.6) 10(17.9) ? ?
? 腹壁 10(15.6) 14(25.0) ? ?
治疗次数* ? ? χ2=3.283 0.086
? 1次 64(91.4) 60(93.6) ? ?
? >1次 6(8.6) 4(6.4) ? ?
手术时间(min) 32.5±7.2 36.5±8.5 t=1.222 0.145
失血量(ml) 5.8±2.2 4.2±2.0 t=0.983 0.879
住院时间(d) 4.8±0.5 4.6±0.5 t=0.920 0.817
平均消费(元) 27256.3±352.5 247417.5±673.8 t=1.892 0.245
局部进展 48(75.0) 14(25.0) χ2=5.837 0.009
远处转移 14(19.6) 10(17.8) χ2=1.834 0.698
技术有效率* 70(100) 64(100) χ2=2.694 1.000
死亡 12(18.8) 8(14.3) χ2=1.948 0.573
图5 微波消融组与冷冻消融组的总生存率(4A)、无复发生存率(4B)及局部肿瘤进展率(4C)比较
表2 微波消融组与冷冻消融组的术后并发症比较
表3 影响消融术后生存情况的Cox回归分析
表4 影响消融术后复发的Cox回归分析
[1]
Forner A, Reig M, Bruix J. Hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. Lancet,2018,391(10127): 1301-1314.
[2]
Siegel R, Ma JM, Zou ZH,et al. Cancer statistics,2014[J]. CA Cancer J Clin,2014,64(1): 9-29.
[3]
Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I,et al. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries[J]. CA Cancer J Clin,2018,68(6): 394-424.
[4]
Piñero F, Poniachik J, Ridruejo E,et al. Hepatocellular carcinoma in Latin America: diagnosis and treatment challenges[J]. World J Gastroenterol,2018,24(37): 4224-4229.
[5]
Ng KKC, Cheung TT, Wong TCL,et al. Long-term survival comparison between primary transplant and upfront curative treatment with salvage transplant for early stage hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. Asian J Surg,2019,42(2): 433-442.
[6]
Dimitroulis D, Damaskos C, Valsami S,et al. From diagnosis to treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: An epidemic problem for both developed and developing world[J]. World J Gastroenterol,2017,23(29): 5282-5294.
[7]
Medhat E, Abdel Aziz A, Nabeel M,et al. Value of microwave ablation in treatment of large lesions of hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. J Dig Dis,2015,16(8): 456-463.
[8]
Han Y, Shao N, Xi XM,et al. Use of microwave ablation in the treatment of patients with multiple primary malignant tumors[J]. Thorac Cancer,2017,8(4): 365-371.
[9]
Yu J, Liang P. Status and advancement of microwave ablation in China[J]. Int J Hyperthermia,2017,33(3):278-287.
[10]
Littrup PJ, Aoun HD, Adam B,et al. Percutaneous cryoablation of hepatic tumors: long-term experience of a large US series[J]. Abdom Radiol(NY),2016,41(4): 767-780.
[11]
Hu KQ. Advances in clinical application of cryoablation therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma and metastatic liver tumor[J]. J Clin Gastroenterol,2014,48(10): 830-836.
[12]
Rong GH, Bai WL, Dong Z,et al. Long-term outcomes of percutaneous cryoablation for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma within Milan criteria[J]. PLoS One,2015,10(4): e0123065.
[13]
Lo GH. Is cryoablation really more effective than radiofrequency ablation in hepatocellular carcinoma?[J]. Hepatology,2016,63(6):2061.
[14]
Xu J, Noda C, Erickson A,et al. Radiofrequency ablation vs. cryoablation for localized hepatocellular carcinoma: A propensity-matched population study[J]. Anticancer Res,2018,38(11): 6381-6386.
[15]
Liu CH, Yu CY, Chang WC,et al. Computed tomographic-guided percutaneous radiofrequency ablation with hydrodissection of hepatic malignancies in the subcapsular location: Evaluation of safety and technical efficacy[J]. J Chin Med Assoc,2016,79(2): 93-100.
[16]
Cardella JF, Kundu S, Miller DL,et al. Society of interventional radiology clinical practice guidelines[J]. J Vasc Interv Radiol,2009,20(Suppl 7): S189-S191.
[17]
Wang CP, Wang HM, Yang WW,et al. Multicenter randomized controlled trial of percutaneous cryoablation versus radiofrequency ablation in hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. Hepatology,2015,61(5): 1579-1590.
[18]
Yu J, Yu XL, Han ZY,et al. Percutaneous cooled-probe microwave versus radiofrequency ablation in early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma: a phase III randomised controlled trial[J]. Gut,2017,66(6): 1172-1173.
[19]
Filippiadis DK, Gkizas C, Chrysofos M,et al. Percutaneous microwave ablation of renal cell carcinoma using a high power microwave system: focus upon safety and efficacy[J]. Int J Hyperthermia,2018,34(7): 1077-1081.
[20]
Gao YY, Wang Y, Duan YQ,et al. 915MHz microwave ablation with high output power in in vivo porcine spleens[J]. Eur J Radiol,2010,75(1): 87-90.
[21]
Knavel EM, Hinshaw JL, Lubner MG,et al. High-powered gas-cooled microwave ablation: shaft cooling creates an effective stick function without altering the ablation zone[J]. AJR Am J Roentgenol,2012,198(3): W260-W265.
[22]
Smolock AR, Lubner MG, Ziemlewicz TJ,et al. Microwave ablation of hepatic tumors abutting the diaphragm is safe and effective[J]. AJR Am J Roentgenol,2015,204(1): 197-203.
[23]
Zhang H, Fan WJ, Huang ZL,et al. Computed tomography-guided percutaneous microwave ablation for diaphragm-abutting liver tumors: assessments of safety and short-term therapeutic efficacies[J]. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi,2014,94(17): 1313-1317.
[24]
Zhang DD, Xie DL, Wei XL,et al. Microwave ablation of the liver abutting the stomach: insulating effect of a chitosan-based thermosensitive hydrogel[J]. Int J Hyperthermia,2014,30(2): 126-133.
[25]
Filippiadis DK, Spiliopoulos S, Konstantos C,et al. Computed tomography-guided percutaneous microwave ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma in challenging locations: safety and efficacy of high-power microwave platforms[J]. Int J Hyperthermia,2018,34(6): 863-869.
[26]
Hyun MH, Chung SM. Randomized,controlled trial of percutaneous cryoablation versus radiofrequency ablation in hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. Hepatology,2015,62(3): 980.
[27]
Orlacchio A, Bazzocchi G, Pastorelli D,et al. Percutaneous cryoablation of small hepatocellular carcinoma with US guidance and CT monitoring: initial experience[J]. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol,2008,31(3): 587-594.
[28]
Hsieh YC, Limquiaco JL, Lin CC,et al. Radiofrequency ablation following artificial ascites and pleural effusion creation may improve outcomes for hepatocellular carcinoma in high-risk locations[J]. Abdom Radiol(NY),2019,44(3): 1141-1151.
[29]
Kim GM, Won JY, Kim MD,et al. Cryoablation of hepatocellular carcinoma with high-risk for percutaneous ablation: safety and efficacy[J]. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol,2016,39(10): 1447-1454.
[30]
Wong SN, Lin CJ, Lin CC,et al. Combined percutaneous radiofrequency ablation and ethanol injection for hepatocellular carcinoma in high-risk locations[J]. AJR Am J Roentgenol,2008,190(3): W187-W195.
[1] 杨皓媛, 龚杰, 邹青伟, 阮航. 哮喘孕妇的母婴不良妊娠结局研究现状[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 522-529.
[2] 陈甜甜, 王晓东, 余海燕. 双胎妊娠合并Gitelman综合征孕妇的妊娠结局及文献复习[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 559-568.
[3] 居晓庆, 金蕴洁, 王晓燕. 剖宫产术后瘢痕子宫患者再次妊娠阴道分娩发生子宫破裂的影响因素分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 575-581.
[4] 顾娟, 孙擎擎, 胡方方, 曹义娟, 祁玉娟. 子宫内膜容受性检测改善胚胎反复种植失败患者妊娠结局的临床应用[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 582-587.
[5] 周梦玲, 薛志伟, 周淑. 妊娠合并子宫肌瘤的孕期变化及其与不良妊娠结局的关系[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 611-615.
[6] 杨倩, 李翠芳, 张婉秋. 原发性肝癌自发性破裂出血急诊TACE术后的近远期预后及影响因素分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 33-36.
[7] 任茂玲, 孙晓容, 何晓丽. CT引导下微波消融术在肺部结节治疗中的应用及术后并发症的危险因素分析[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(05): 718-720.
[8] 蒙姣姣, 胡刚, 欧阳涣堃. 肺癌术前淋巴结转移及MWA手术效果预测分析[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(04): 547-549.
[9] 张文华, 陶焠, 胡添松. 不同部位外生型肝癌临床病理特点及其对术后肝内复发和预后影响[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 651-655.
[10] 张海涛, 贾哲, 马超, 张其坤, 武聚山, 郭庆良, 曾道炳, 栗光明, 王孟龙. 手术切除与射频消融治疗血管周围型单发小肝癌临床疗效分析[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(05): 523-527.
[11] 李翠平, 陈晓燕, 钱师宇, 林惠珠, 曾彩辉, 阳莉, 卢建溪. 不同抗凝剂保存液对脐血培养的NK细胞增殖及杀伤效应的影响[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(05): 572-576.
[12] 韩冰, 顾劲扬. 深度学习神经网络在肝癌诊疗中的研究及应用前景[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(05): 480-485.
[13] 萨仁高娃, 张英霞, 邓伟, 闫诺, 樊宁. 超声引导下鼠肝消融术后组织病理特征的变化规律及影响[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 394-398.
[14] 张郁妍, 胡滨, 张伟红, 徐楣, 朱慧, 羊馨玥, 刘海玲. 妊娠中期心血管超声参数与肝功能的相关性及对不良妊娠结局的预测价值[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 499-504.
[15] 朱敏, 李法强. 血清GFAP、UCH-L1联合VILIP-1水平对急性脑梗死神经功能预后不良的预测研究[J]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 452-457.
阅读次数
全文


摘要