切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华介入放射学电子杂志 ›› 2019, Vol. 07 ›› Issue (02) : 101 -105. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-5782.2019.02.003

所属专题: 文献

专题研究·肿瘤介入

TACE联合RFA及125I放射性粒子植入治疗巨块型肝癌的临床效果
应希慧1, 涂建飞1, 陈丽1, 张登科1, 吴发宗1, 纪建松1,()   
  1. 1. 323000 浙江大学丽水医院,浙江省影像诊断与介入微创研究重点实验室
  • 收稿日期:2019-01-25 出版日期:2019-05-01
  • 通信作者: 纪建松
  • 基金资助:
    浙江省基础公益研究计划(LGF18H220001); 浙江省医药卫生科技计划项目面上项目(201825360); 丽水市医学重点学科建设项目(2017ZDXK05); 浙江省公益技术研究国际合作项目(2015C34016)

Clinical effect of TACE combined with RFA and 125I radioactive seed implantation in treatment of massive liver cancer

Xihui Ying1, Jianfei Tu1, Li Chen1, Dengke Zhang1, Fazong Wu1, Jiansong Ji1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Radiology, Lishui Central Hospital, Lishui Hospital of Zhejiang University, Lishui 323000, China
  • Received:2019-01-25 Published:2019-05-01
  • Corresponding author: Jiansong Ji
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Ji Jiansong, Email:
引用本文:

应希慧, 涂建飞, 陈丽, 张登科, 吴发宗, 纪建松. TACE联合RFA及125I放射性粒子植入治疗巨块型肝癌的临床效果[J]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2019, 07(02): 101-105.

Xihui Ying, Jianfei Tu, Li Chen, Dengke Zhang, Fazong Wu, Jiansong Ji. Clinical effect of TACE combined with RFA and 125I radioactive seed implantation in treatment of massive liver cancer[J]. Chinese Journal of Interventional Radiology(Electronic Edition), 2019, 07(02): 101-105.

目的:

研究肝动脉化疗栓塞术(TACE)联合射频消融(RFA)及125I放射性粒子植入治疗直径≥10 cm的巨块型肝癌的临床效果。

方法:

选取经我院临床或病理确诊的直径≥10 cm肝癌患者54例,分为对照组28例,行TACE+RFA治疗;联合组26例,行TACE+RFA+125I放射性粒子植入治疗;比较两组的治疗有效率和临床控制率;所有患者随访1~37个月,采用Kaplan-Meier方法对两组的生存情况进行分析,Log-rank检验比较生存曲线的差异。

结果:

联合组的有效率高于对照组(61.5% vs. 32.1%),差异有统计学意义(χ2=4.685,P=0.030)。联合组的中位无进展生存期(PFS)为9个月,高于对照组的5个月,差异有统计学意义(P=0.010)。联合组的中位生存时间11个月,对照组中位生存时间6个月,联合组较对照组有延长趋势,但差异无统计学意义(P=0.079)。

结论:

对于直径≥10 cm的巨块型肝癌,TACE、RFA和125I放射性粒子三者序贯治疗在肿瘤无进展生存期、肿瘤缓解率方面较对照组治疗具有优势,实现了化疗栓塞、消融与局部放疗协同作用,不良反应小。

Objective:

To investigate the clinical value of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and 125I radioactive seed implantation for the treatment of liver cancer (≥10 cm) .

Methods:

Fifty-four patients with live cancer clinical or pathological verified of ≥10 cm in our hospital were selected, and all patients underwent TACE. Patients were randomly divided into radiofrequency ablation group (TACE+RFA, control group, n=28) and RFA plus 125I radioactivity seed implantation group (TACE+RFA+125I, combined group, n=26) . All patients were followed up for 1 to 37 months. The treatment efficiency and clinical control rate were compared between the two groups. Survival analysis was performed by Kaplan-Meier. Log-rank test was used to compare the survival curves.

Results:

The effective rate of the combined group was higher than that of the control group (61.5% vs. 32.1%) , with significant difference (χ2=4.685, P=0.030) . The median PFS in combined group and control group was 9 months and 5 months (P=0.010) , and the OS in combined group was longer than that in control group (11 months vs. 6 months, P=0.079) .

Conclusions:

The sequential therapy with TACE, RFA and radioactive particle has advantages in treating liver cancer with the diameter ≥10 cm. The PFS and tumor remission rate in combined group were more favorable than those in control group.

表1 两组患者的基线临床资料比较
表2 两组患者的疗效对比
图1 联合组与对照组生存曲线图
图2 联合组与对照组肿瘤无进展生存曲线图
[1]
Calvisi DF. Inhibition of hepatitis B virus-associated liver cancer by antiplatelet therapy: a revolution in hepatocellular carcinoma prevention?[J]. Hepatology,2013,57(2):848-850.
[2]
Chen W, Zheng R, Baade PD,et al. Cancer statistics in China,2015[J]. CA Cancer J Clin,2016,66(2):115-132.
[3]
Oh BS, Jang JW, Kwon JH,et al. Prognostic value of C-reactive protein and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. BMC Cancer,2013,13(1):78.
[4]
Peng ZW, Zhang YJ, Liang HH,et al. Recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma treated with sequential transcatheter arterial chemoembolization and RF ablation versus RF ablation alone: a prospective randomized trial[J]. Radiology,2012,262(2):689-700.
[5]
Iezzi R, Pompili M, Posa A,et al. Combined locoregional treatment of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: State of the art[J]. World J Gastroenterol,2016,22(6):1935-1942.
[6]
涂建飞,纪建松,吴发宗,等.射频消融联合131碘肿瘤细胞核人鼠嵌合单克隆抗体治疗原发性肝癌的疗效分析[J].中华医学杂志,2014,94(45):3586-3588.
[7]
中华医学会放射肿瘤学分会,中国医师学会放射治疗专业委员会,中国抗癌协会肿瘤微创治疗分会粒子治疗学组,等. CT引导放射性125I粒子组织间永久植入治疗肿瘤专家共识[J].中华医学杂志,2017,97(15):1132-1139.
[8]
Tu J, Ji J, Wu F,et al. Effectiveness of combined(131)I-chTNT and radiofrequency ablation therapy in treating advanced hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. Cell Biochem Biophys,2015,71(2):777-784.
[9]
高杰,朱继业.卫生部《原发性肝癌诊疗规范(2011年版)》解读[J].中华普通外科杂志,2012,27(8):693-695.
[10]
Cucchetti A, Piscaglia F, Cescon M,et al. Conditional survival after hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhotic patients[J]. Clin Cancer Res,2012,18(16):4397-4405.
[11]
Xu L, Peng ZW, Chen MS,et al. Prognostic nomogram for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma after transcatheter arterial chemoembolization[J].J Hepatol,2015,63(1):122-130.
[12]
陈丽,应希慧,涂建飞,等.射频消融联合其他介入综合技术治疗原发性肝癌研究进展[J/CD].中华介入放射学电子杂志,2019,7(1):75-80.
[13]
Tateishi R, Shiina S, Akahane M,et al. Frequency,risk factors and survival associated with an intrasubsegmental recurrence after radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. PLoS One,2013,8(4):e59040.
[14]
Lencioni R, de Baere T, Martin RC,et al. Image-guided ablation of malignant liver tumors:recommendations for clinical validation of novel thermal and non-thermal technologies-A western perspective[J]. Liver Cancer,2015,4(4):208-214.
[15]
Li CX, He X, Hu BS,et al. Efficacy of therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombus: chemoembolization and stent combined with iodine-125 seed[J]. Cancer Biol Ther,2011,12(10):865-871.
[16]
应希慧,纪建松,涂建飞,等.表皮生长因子受体酪氨酸激酶抑制剂联合125I放射性粒子植入治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的疗效分析[J].介入放射学杂志,2015,24(3):226-230.
[1] 韩丹, 王婷, 肖欢, 朱丽容, 陈镜宇, 唐毅. 超声造影与增强CT对儿童肝脏良恶性病变诊断价值的对比分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(09): 939-944.
[2] 张华, 孙宇, 乡世健, 李樱媚, 王小群. 循环肿瘤细胞预测晚期胃肠癌患者化疗药物敏感性的研究[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 422-425.
[3] 李建美, 邓静娟, 杨倩. 两种术式联合治疗肝癌合并肝硬化门静脉高压的安全性及随访评价[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 41-44.
[4] 莫波, 王佩, 王恒, 何志军, 梁俊, 郝志楠. 腹腔镜胃癌根治术与改良胃癌根治术治疗早期胃癌的疗效[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 644-647.
[5] 索郎多杰, 高红桥, 巴桑顿珠, 仁桑. 腹腔镜下不同术式治疗肝囊型包虫病的临床疗效分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 670-673.
[6] 唐浩, 梁平, 徐小江, 曾凯, 文拨辉. 三维重建指导下腹腔镜右半肝加尾状叶切除治疗Bismuth Ⅲa型肝门部胆管癌的临床研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 688-692.
[7] 杜锡林, 谭凯, 贺小军, 白亮亮, 赵瑶瑶. 肝细胞癌转化治疗方式[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 597-601.
[8] 唐灿, 李向阳, 秦浩然, 李婧, 王天云, 柯阳, 朱红. 原发性肝脏神经内分泌肿瘤单中心12例诊治与疗效分析[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 674-680.
[9] 崔佳琪, 吴迪, 陈海艳, 周惠敏, 顾元龙, 周光文, 杨军. TACE术后并发肝脓肿的临床诊治分析[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 688-693.
[10] 顾睿祈, 方洪生, 蔡国响. 循环肿瘤DNA检测在结直肠癌诊治中的应用与进展[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 453-459.
[11] 邰清亮, 施波, 侍新宇, 陈国梁, 陈俊杰, 武冠廷, 王索, 孙金兵, 顾闻, 叶建新, 何宋兵. 腹腔镜次全结肠切除术治疗顽固性慢传输型便秘的疗效分析[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 478-483.
[12] 梁文龙, 曹杰, 黄庆, 林泳, 黄红丽, 杨平, 李冠炜, 胡鹤. 信迪利单抗联合瑞戈非尼治疗晚期结直肠癌的疗效与安全性分析[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 409-413.
[13] 高显奎, 赵太云, 陆兴俊, 张洪领, 房修罗, 闫碧春, 王胤, 王永翠, 刘苗苗, 冉若男. 内镜电凝止血与组织胶注射治疗上消化道溃疡伴出血的疗效观察[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 452-455.
[14] 姜里蛟, 张峰, 周玉萍. 多学科诊疗模式救治老年急性非静脉曲张性上消化道大出血患者的临床观察[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 520-524.
[15] 李莹倩, 李华山. 基于真实世界的完全性直肠脱垂治疗方式评价[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 700-705.
阅读次数
全文


摘要