切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华介入放射学电子杂志 ›› 2018, Vol. 06 ›› Issue (02) : 118 -123. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-5782.2018.02.006

所属专题: 文献

专题研究·肿瘤介入

动脉化疗与静脉-动脉联合化疗治疗眼内晚期视网膜母细胞瘤的有效性与安全性
姜华1, 邓海浪1, 方倩2, 徐文婵1, 张靖1,()   
  1. 1. 510120 广州市妇女儿童医疗中心介入&血管瘤科
    2. 510120 广州市妇女儿童医疗中心超声科
  • 收稿日期:2017-12-13 出版日期:2018-05-01
  • 通信作者: 张靖

Efficacy and safety of primary intra-arterial chemotherapy and intravenous plus intra-arterial chemotherapy for treatment of late-stage retinoblastoma

Hua Jiang1, Hailang Deng1, Qian Fang2, Wenchan Xu1, Jing Zhang1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Interventional Radiology and Vascular Anomalies, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou 510623, China
    2. Department of Ultrasound, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou 510623, China
  • Received:2017-12-13 Published:2018-05-01
  • Corresponding author: Jing Zhang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Zhang Jing, Email:
引用本文:

姜华, 邓海浪, 方倩, 徐文婵, 张靖. 动脉化疗与静脉-动脉联合化疗治疗眼内晚期视网膜母细胞瘤的有效性与安全性[J/OL]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2018, 06(02): 118-123.

Hua Jiang, Hailang Deng, Qian Fang, Wenchan Xu, Jing Zhang. Efficacy and safety of primary intra-arterial chemotherapy and intravenous plus intra-arterial chemotherapy for treatment of late-stage retinoblastoma[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Interventional Radiology(Electronic Edition), 2018, 06(02): 118-123.

目的:

比较晚期视网膜母细胞瘤(RB)经眼动脉灌注化疗(IAC)与静脉化疗联合眼动脉灌注化疗(IV-IAC)的安全性与有效性。

方法:

选取2012年9月-2016年11月我院收治的眼内晚期(D/E期)初诊RB患者80例。42例进行经眼动脉灌注化疗,为IAC组;38例行2次静脉化疗后联合经眼动脉灌注化疗,为IV-IAC组;比较两组治疗方法的有效性与安全性。

结果:

(1)保眼与复发转移情况:IAC组42人46只眼球,平均随访20.2个月,39只眼成功保留,总体保眼率为84.7%。1例患者转移并死亡,转移率和死亡率为2.2%;IV-IAC组38人44只眼,平均随访21.4个月,34只眼成功保留,总体保眼率为77.3%,1例转移并死亡,转移率和死亡率为2.3%;两组复发率分别为13.0%(6/46)及15.9%(7/44)。两组保眼率、复发率、转移率、死亡率差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。(2)并发症:IAC组眼球内陷发生率为41.3%(19/46),4例患眼并发白内障,17只患眼眼睑水肿,12只眼睑下垂,1患眼斜视,1患眼玻璃体出血;IV-IAC组眼球内陷发生率为22.7%(10/44),15例眼睑水肿,12例眼睑下垂。IAC组眼球内陷发生率高于IV-IAC组(P=0.007)。

结论:

两次静脉化疗联合动脉化疗治疗晚期视网膜母细胞瘤对比单纯动脉化疗可能不会降低患者的总体转移率,但会降低患者眼球内陷和白内障的发生率。

Objective:

To compare the efficacy and safety of intra-arterial chemotherapy (IAC) and intravenous plus intra-arterial chemotherapy (IV-IAC) for patients with late-stage retinoblastoma.

Methods:

A total of 80 patients diagnosed with retinoblastoma between September 2013 and February 2016 without any treatment history were included. Forty-two patients treated with primary intra-arterial chemotherapy were defined as IAC group. Three-eight patients treated with primary twice intravenous plus intra-arterial chemotherapy were defined as IV-IAC group. Eye salvage rate, enucleation-free survival and mid-to-long term complications were assessed.

Results:

(1) Clinical results: A total of 46 eyes in group IAC were included. During the medium follow-up period of 20.2 months, the overall eye salvage rate was 84.7%, 1 patient was dead due to metastasis (2.2%) , 6 eyes developed recurrence (13.0%) ; Totally 49 eyes in group IV-IAC were included. Over all eye salvage rate was 77.3% with a medium follow-up period of 21.4 months. One patient died due to metastasis (2.3%) , 7 eyes developed recurrence (15.9%) . (2) Complications: Complications in group IAC were enophthalmos (n=19) , cataract (n=4) , vitreous haemorrhage (n=1) , orbital edema (n=17) and ptosis (n=12) . Complications in group IV-IAC were enophthalmos (n=10) , orbital edema (n=15) and ptosis (n=12) . The difference of the overall eye salvage rate, recurrence rate, metastatic rate and death rate between group IAC and group IV-IAC were not statistically significant (P>0.05) , but the enophthalmos rate was higher in group IAC (P=0.006) .

Conclusions:

The primary IV-IAC for retinoblastoma could not effectively lower the eye salvage rate, but it will reduce the incidence of enophthalmos and cataracts.

图1 经眼动脉灌注化疗造影表现
表1 IAC组与IV-IAC组患儿的一般资料比较
表2 IAC组与IV-IAC组患儿的并发症发生情况比较 只(%)
[1]
Dimaras H, Corson TW, Cobrinik D, et al. Retinoblastoma[J]. Nat Rev Dis Primers, 2015, 1:15021.
[2]
赵军阳.从从R-E到IRC分级:视网膜母细胞瘤治疗观念的转变[J].眼科,2007,16(6):368-372.
[3]
Shields CL, Kaliki S, Al-Dahmash S, et al. Management of advanced retinoblastoma with intravenous chemotherapy then intra-arterial chemotherapy as alternative to enucleation[J]. Retina, 2013, 33(10):2103-2109.
[4]
Wilson MW, Qaddoumi I, Billups C, et al. A clinicopathological correlation of 67 eyes primarily enucleated for advanced intraocular retinoblastoma [J]. Br J Ophthalmol, 2011, 95(4):553-558.
[5]
Kaliki S, Shields CL, Rojanaporn D, et al. High-risk retinoblastoma based on international classification of retinoblastoma: analysis of 519 enucleated eyes[J]. Ophthalmology, 2013, 120(5):997-1003.
[6]
Chantada GL, Guitter MR, Fandiño AC, et al. Treatment results in patients with retinoblastoma and invasion to the cut end of the optic nerve [J]. Pediatr Blood Cancer, 2009, 52(2):218-222.
[7]
Aerts I, Sastre-Garau X, Savignoni A, et al. Results of a multicenter prospective study on the postoperative treatment of unilateral retinoblastoma after primary enucleation [J]. J Clin Oncol, 2013, 31(11):1458-63.
[8]
Gobin YP, Dunkel IJ, Marr BP, et al. Combined, sequential intravenous and intra-arterial chemotherapy(bridge chemotherapy)for young infants with retinoblastoma [J]. PLoS One, 2012, 7(9):e44322.
[9]
Choi S, Han JW, Kim H, et al. Combined chemotherapy and intra-arterial chemotherapy of retinoblastoma [J]. Korean J Pediatr, 2013, 56(6):254-259.
[10]
Yarovaya V, Sioufi K, Shields CL. Parafoveolar retinoblastoma regression with foveal preservation following intra-arterial chemotherapy documented on hand-held optical coherence tomography in a newborn [J]. Int J Retina Vitreous, 2017, 3:43.
[11]
中国抗癌协会肿瘤介入分会儿童肿瘤专家委员会.选择性眼动脉化疗术治疗视网膜母细胞瘤中国专家共识[J/CD].中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2016, 4(3):129-131.
[12]
Shields CL, De Potter P, Himelstein BP, et al. Chemoreduction in the initial management of intraocular retinoblastoma [J]. Arch Ophthalmol, 1996, 114(11):1330-1338.
[13]
Hahn SM, Kim HS, Kim DJ, et al, Favorable outcome of alternate systemic and intra-arterial chemotherapy for retinoblastoma[J]. Pediatr Hematol Oncol, 2016, 33(1):74-82.
[14]
Abramson DH, Daniels AB, Marr BP, et al. Intra-arterial chemotherapy(ophthalmic artery chemosurgery)for group D retinoblastoma [J]. PLoS One, 2016, 11(1):e0146582.
[15]
Chen M, Jiang H, Zhang J, et al. Outcome of intra-arterial chemotherapy for retinoblastoma and its influencing factors: a retrospective study[J]. Acta Ophthalmol, 2017, 95(6):613-618.
[16]
Chantada G, Fandiño A, Casak S, et al. Treatment of overt extraocular retinoblastoma[J]. Med Pediatr Oncol, 2003, 40(3):158-161.
[17]
Antoneli CB, Steinhorst F, de Cássia Braga Ribeiro K, et al. Extraocular retinoblastoma: a 13-year experience[J]. Cancer, 2003, 98(6):1292-1298.
[18]
Gündüz K, Müftüoglu O, Günalp I, et al. Metastatic retinoblastoma clinical features, treatment, and prognosis[J]. Ophthalmology, 2006, 113(9):1558-1566.
[19]
Leal-Leal CA, Rivera-Luna R, Flores-Rojo M, et al. Survival in extra-orbital metastatic retinoblastoma: treatment results[J]. Clin Transl Oncol, 2006, 8(1):39-44.
[20]
Youself YA, Soliman SE, Astudillo PP, et al. Intra-arterial chemotherapy for retinoblastoma: A systematic review[J]. JAMA Ophthalmol, 2016 Mar 17. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2016.0244. [Epub ahead of print]
[21]
Shields CL, Bianciotto CG, Jabbour P, et al. Intra-arterial chemotherapy for retinoblastoma: report No. 1, control of retinal tumors, subretinal seeds, and vitreous seeds[J]. Arch Ophthalmol, 2011, 129(11):1399-1406.
[22]
Tuncer S, Sencer S, Kebudi R, et al. Superselective intra-arterial chemotherapy in the primary management of advanced intra-ocular retinoblastoma: first 4-year experience from a single institution in Turkey[J]. Acta Ophthalmol, 2016, 94(7):e644-e651.
[23]
Shields CL, Mashayekhi A, Au AK, et al. The international classification of retinoblastoma predicts chemoreduction success[J]. Ophthalmology, 2006, 113(12):2276-2280.
[24]
Shields CL, Ramasubramanian A, Thangappan A, et al. Chemoreduction for group E retinoblastoma: comparison of chemoreduction alone versus chemoreduction plus low-dose external radiotherapy in 76 eyes[J]. Ophthalmology, 2009, 116, 544-551.
[25]
Tse BC, Steinle JJ, Johnson D, et al. Superselective intraophthalmic artery chemotherapy in a nonhuman primate model: histopathologic findings[J]. JAMA Ophthalmol, 2013, 131(7):903-911.
[26]
Friendly DS, Parks MM. Concurrence of hereditary congenital cataracts and hereditary retinoblastoma[J]. Arch Ophthalmol, 1970, 84(4):525-527.
[27]
Brown GC, Shields JA, Oglesby RB. Anterior polar cataracts associated with bilateral retinoblastoma[J]. Am J Ophthalmol, 1979, 87(3):276.
[28]
Ainsbury EA, Bouffler SD, Dörr W, et al. Radiation cataractogenesis: a review of recent studies[J]. Radiat Res, 2009, 172(1):1-9.
[29]
Vijayakrishnan R, Shields CL, Ramasubramanian A, et al. Irradiation toxic effects during intra-arterial chemotherapy for retinoblastoma: should we be concerned? [J]. Arch Ophthalmol, 2010, 128(11):1427-1431.
[1] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[2] 刘世君, 马杰, 师鲁静. 胃癌完整系膜切除术+标准D2根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 27-30.
[3] 赵丽霞, 王春霞, 陈一锋, 胡东平, 张维胜, 王涛, 张洪来. 内脏型肥胖对腹腔镜直肠癌根治术后早期并发症的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 35-39.
[4] 李华志, 曹广, 刘殿刚, 张雅静. 不同入路下行肝切除术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的临床对比[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 52-55.
[5] 常小伟, 蔡瑜, 赵志勇, 张伟. 高强度聚焦超声消融术联合肝动脉化疗栓塞术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的效果及安全性分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 56-59.
[6] 徐逸男. 不同术式治疗梗阻性左半结直肠癌的疗效观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 72-75.
[7] 王露, 周丽君. 全腹腔镜下远端胃大部切除不同吻合方式对胃癌患者胃功能恢复、并发症发生率的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 92-95.
[8] 刘柏隆, 周祥福. 女性尿失禁吊带手术并发症处理的经验分享[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 127-127.
[9] 嵇振岭, 陈杰, 唐健雄. 重视复杂腹壁疝手术并发症的预防和处理[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 601-606.
[10] 江志鹏, 钟克力, 陈双. 复杂腹壁疝手术后腹腔高压与腹腔间室综合征的预防和处理[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 612-615.
[11] 王学虎, 赵渝. 复杂腹壁疝手术中血管损伤并发症的预防和处理[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 616-619.
[12] 马东扬, 李斌, 陆安清, 王光华, 雷文章, 宋应寒. Gilbert 与单层补片腹膜前疝修补术疗效的随机对照研究[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 629-633.
[13] 王浩源, 汪海洋, 孙建明, 陈以宽, 祁小桐, 唐博. 腹腔镜与开放修补对肝硬化腹外疝患者肝功能及凝血的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 654-659.
[14] 宋俊锋, 张珍珍. 单侧初发性腹股沟斜疝老年患者经腹腹膜前疝修补术中残余疝囊腹直肌下缘固定效果评估[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 670-674.
[15] 石阳, 于剑锋, 曹可, 翟志伟, 叶春祥, 王振军, 韩加刚. 可扩张金属支架置入联合新辅助化疗治疗完全梗阻性左半结肠癌围手术期并发症分析[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 464-471.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?