切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"
高级检索
中华介入放射学电子杂志

中华介入放射学电子杂志 ›› 2017, Vol. 05 ›› Issue (03) : 189 -193. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-5782.2017.03.016

所属专题： 文献；

医学影像

DTI检测阿尔茨海默病脑白质的改变
任津瑶1, 龙淼淼2, 祁吉3, 倪红艳3,†()   
  1. 1. 300222　天津医学高等专科学校
    2. 300192　天津市第一中心医院放射科
  • 收稿日期:2017-06-01 出版日期:2017-08-01
  • 通信作者: 倪红艳

Diffusion tensor imaging detection of white matter changes in Alzheimer's disease

Jinyao Ren1, Miaomiao Long2, Ji Qi3, Hongyan Ni3,†()   

  1. 1. Tianjin Medical College, Tianjin 300222, China
    3. Department of Radiology, Tianjin First Central Hospital, Tianjin 300192, China
  • Received:2017-06-01 Published:2017-08-01
  • Corresponding author: Hongyan Ni
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Email:
全文 ( ) 下载PDF ( ) 导出引用
引用本文：

任津瑶, 龙淼淼, 祁吉, 倪红艳. DTI检测阿尔茨海默病脑白质的改变[J]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2017, 05(03): 189-193.

Jinyao Ren, Miaomiao Long, Ji Qi, Hongyan Ni. Diffusion tensor imaging detection of white matter changes in Alzheimer's disease[J]. Chinese Journal of Interventional Radiology(Electronic Edition), 2017, 05(03): 189-193.

目的：

应用磁共振弥散张量成像（DTI）技术评价阿尔茨海默病（AD）患者脑白质的改变，分析部分各向异性（FA）和局域各向异性（GA）参数对AD患者脑白质损伤的诊断效率。

方法：

选取2014年8月—2015年8月确诊的AD患者12例（AD组），16例认知正常的健康老年志愿者为对照组，进行MRI常规扫描和DTI检查，测量上纵束、扣带束、胼胝体、内囊、额叶、顶叶、颞叶、枕叶脑白质的FA、GA值。应用ROC曲线评价FA、GA参数检出AD患者脑白质损伤的诊断效率。

结果：

与对照组比较，AD组的扣带束后部FA、GA值降低；上纵束FA、GA值降低；顶叶白质FA、GA降低；额叶白质GA值降低；颞叶白质GA值降低；胼胝体压部GA降低，差异均有统计学意义。ROC曲线评价AD患者扣带束后部、上纵束、顶叶GA值曲线下面积较FA大,顶叶GA值对于AD患者脑白质损伤具有较高的诊断效率。

结论：

AD患者表现为选择性脑白质域性损害，扣带束后部、上纵束、胼胝体压部、额叶、颞叶、顶叶皮层下脑白质损伤，GA诊断AD病患者脑白质异常的效率比FA更佳。

关键词: 磁共振成像, 扩散张量成像, 阿尔茨海默病, 脑白质
Objective:

To evaluate the changes of white matter in Alzheimer's disease(AD) patients by Magnetic resonance diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) and to analyze the diagnostic value of Fractional anisotropy (FA) and Geodesic anisotropy (GA) in detecting white matter abnormalities in AD patients.

Methods:

MRI routine scan and DTI were performed in 12 AD patients who were diagnosed from August 2014 to August 2015. 16 cognitively normal (NC) healthy elderly volunteers were enrolled, as control group, to this study. The FA and GA of superior longitudinal fasciculus, Cingulate, corpus callosum, internal capsule, frontal lobe, parietal lobe, temporal lobe and occipital lobe white matter were measured. The ROC curve was applied to analyze Fractional anisotropy (FA) and Geodesic anisotropy (GA) parameters to determine the diagnostic value in detecting white matter abnormalities in patients with AD.

Results:

Compared to the control group, the FA and GA values in the posterior cingulate were decreased, the FA and GA values of the superior longitudinal fasciculus were decreased, the FA and GA of the white matter in the parietal lobe were decreased, the GA value of the white matter in the frontal lobe was decreased, the GA value of the white matter in temporal lobe was decreased and the GA value of the splenium of corpus callosum was decreased. The differences were statistically significant. The area under the ROC curve was more than 0.700, which was larger than that of FA.

Conclusion:

AD patients usuaug show selective and regional damage in the posterior cingulated and the damage in superior longitudinal fasciculus, splenium of corpus callosum, frontal lobe, temporal lobe, parietal cortex and subcortical white matter lesions. The diagnostic value of GA in detection of white matter abnormalities in patients with AD was superior to FA.

Key words: Magnetic resonance Imaging, Diffusion tensor imaging, Alzheimer’s disease, White matter
图1 胼胝体膝部、双侧扣带束前部FA、GA图及ROI
图2 胼胝体体部、双侧上纵束FA、GA图及ROI
图3 胼胝体压部、双侧扣带束后部FA、GA图及ROI
图4 双侧内囊前、后肢FA、GA图及ROI
图5 双侧额叶白质FA、GA图及ROI
图6 双侧颞叶白质FA、GA图及ROI
图7 双侧顶叶白质FA、GA图及ROI
图8 双侧枕叶白质FA、GA图及ROI
表1 AD组与NC组的FA值比较（±s）
组别 例数 胼胝体膝部 胼胝体体部 胼胝体压部 扣带束前部
AD组 12 0.874±0.066 0.923±0.029 0.929±0.037 0.692±0.084
NC组 16 0.886±0.065 0.922±0.025 0.945±0.346 0.732±0.034
t值 ? -0.448 0.099. -1.107 -1.728
P值 ? 0.658 0.922 0.280 0.096
组别 例数 扣带束后部 上纵束 内囊前肢 内囊后肢
AD组 12 0.593±0.096 0.653±0.039 0.683±0.141 0.797±0.077
NC组 16 0.675±0.106 0.694±0.064 0.688±0.068 0.806±0.066
t值 ? -2.112 -2.119 0.126 -0.292
P值 ? 0.045 0.044 0.901 0.773
组别 例数 额叶白质 颞叶白质 顶叶白质 枕叶白质
AD组 12 0.442±0.082 0.610±0.040 0.542±0.137 0.529±0.079
NC组 16 0.472±0.073 0.645±0.067 0.671±0.099 0.522±0.078
t值 ? -1.012 -1.671 -2.770 -0.256
P值 ? 0.323 0.132 0.012 0.800
表2 AD组与NC组的GA值比较（±s）
组别 例数 胼胝体膝部 胼胝体体部 胼胝体压部 扣带束前部
AD组 12 2.322±0.482 2.677±0.350 2.739±0.329 1.344±0.362
NC组 16 2.463±0.613 2.694±0.321 3.078±0.464 1.555±0.258
t值 ? -0.681 -0.126 -2.257 -1.718
P值 ? 0.502 0.901 0.033 0.102
组别 例数 扣带束后部 上纵束 内囊前肢 内囊后肢
AD组 12 1.155±0.258 1.289±0.171 1.583±0.655 1.814±0.355
NC组 16 1.502±0.379 1.543±0.283 1.419±0.289 1.904±0.336
t值 ? -2.881 -2.942 0.892 -0.685
P值 ? 0.008 0.007 0.381 0.500
组别 例数 额叶白质 颞叶白质 顶叶白质 枕叶白质
AD组 12 0.664±0.153 1.098±0.128 0.872±0.202 0.922±0.185
NC组 16 0.826±0.199 1.306±0.225 1.178±0.209 0.893±0.187
t值 ? -2.430 -2.858 -3.906 0.420
P值 ? 0.022 0.008 0.001 0.678
表3 各部位FA、GA值对AD患者脑白质变化的诊断效率
参数 诊断临界值 曲线下面积
扣带束后部FA 0.601 0.678
扣带束后部GA 1.129 0.745
上纵束FA 0.685 0.703
上纵束GA 1.283 0.766
顶叶FA 0.547 0.776
顶叶GA 0.901 0.865
1
Bennett DA, Schneider JA, Arvanitakis Z, et al. Neuropathology of older persons without cognitive impairment from two community-based studies[J]. Neurology, 2006,66(12):1837-1844.
2
Jack CR, Petersen RC, Xu YC, et al. Prediction of AD with MRI-based hippocampal volume in mild cognitive impairment[J]. Neurology, 1999,52(7):1397-1403.
3
Sjöbeck M, Englund E. Glial levels determine severity of white matter disease in Alzheimer's disease: a neuropathological study of glial changes[J]. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol, 2003,29(2):159-169.
4
Sjöbeck M, Haglund M, Englund E. Decreasing myelin density reflected increasing white matter pathology in azheimer’s disease—a neuropathological study[J]. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2005 20(10):919-926.
5
Bartzokis G, Cummings JL, Sultzer D, et al. White matter structural integrity in healthy aging adults and patients with Alzheimer disease: a magnetic resonance imaging study[J]. Archives of Neurology 2003 60(3):393-398.
6
Thompson PM, Hayashi KM, Dutton RA, et al. Tracking Alzheimer's disease[J].Ann NY Acad Sci, 2007, 1097:183-214.
7
Fellgiebel A, Müller MJ, Wille P, et al. Color-coded diffusion-tensor-Imaging of posterior cingulate fiber tracts in mild cognitive impairment[J].Neurobiol Aging, 2005, 26(8):1193-1198.
8
Braak E, Griffing K, Arai K, et al. Neuropathology of Alzheimer’s disease: what is new since A[J]. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci, 1999, 249(suppl 3):14-22.
9
Mirra SS, Heyman A, McKeel D, et al. The Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer’s Disease (CERAD). Part II. Standardization of the neuropathologic assessment of Alzheimer’s disease[J]. Neurology, 1991, 41:479-486.
10
Hauw JJ, Duyckaerts C, Delaere P, et al. Alzheimer’s disease: neuropathological and etiological data[J]. Biomed Pharmacother, 1989, 43:468-482.
11
Pearson RC, Esiri MM, Hiorns RW, et al. Anatomical correlates of the distribution of the pathological changes in the neocortex in Alzheimer’s disease[J]. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 1985, 82:4531-4534.
12
Lee PH, Oh SH, Bang OY, et al. Pathogenesis of deep white matter medullary infarcts: a diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging study[J]. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 2005, 76:1659-1663.
13
Bucur B, Madden DJ, Spaniol J, et al. Age-related slowing of memory retrieval: contributions of perceptual speed and cerebral white matter integrity[J]. Neurobiol Aging, 2008, 29(7):1070-1079.
14
Jeurissen B, Leemans A, Tournier JD, et al. Investigating the prevalence of complex fiber configurations in white matter tissue with diffusion magnetic resonance imaging[J]. Hum Brain Mapp, 2013,34(11):2747-2766. doi: 10.1002/hbm.22099.
15
Petersen RC, Doody R, Kurz A, et al. Currentconcepts in mild cognitive impairment[J].Arch Neurol, 2001, 58(12):1985-1992.
16
Rose SE, McMahon KL, Janke AL, et al. MRI diffusion indices and neuropsychological performance in amnestic mild cognitive impairment[J]. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 2006, 77(10):1122-1128.
17
Stěpán-Buksakowska I, Keller J, Laczó J, et al. Diffusion tensor imaging in Alzheimer disease and mild cognitive impairment[J]. Neurol Neurochir Pol, 2012, 46(5):464-471.
18
Wegrzyn M, Teipel SJ, Oltmann I, et al. Structural and functional cortical disconnection in Alzheimer's disease: a combined study using diffusion tensor imaging and transcranial magnetic stimulation[J]. Psychiatry Res, 2013, 212(3):192-200. doi: 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2012.04.008.
19
孟京志，皇丽丽，郭李炜, 等.阿尔茨海默病患者联络纤维的DTI诊断价值[J].临床放射学杂志, 2012, (2):158-162.
20
Henley SM, Downey LE, Nicholas JM, et al. Degradation of cognitive timing mechanisms in behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia[J]. Neuropsychologia 2014, 65:88-101. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.10.009.
21
Lim JS, Park YH, Jang JW, et al. Differential white matter connectivity in early mild cognitive impairment according to CSF biomarkers[J]. PloS one, 2014, 9(3):e91400. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0091400.
22
Fletcher PT, Joshi S. Principal geodesic analysis on symmetric spaces: statistics of diffusion tensors[J].Proceedings of ECCV 200 Workshop on Computer Vision Approaches to Medical Image Analysis (CVAMIA)LNCS, 2004, 3117:87-98.
23
Corouge I, Fletcher PT, Joshi S, et al. Fiber tract-oriented statistics for quantitative diffusion tensor MRI analysis[J].Med Image Anal, 2006, 10(5):786-798.
24
Nir TM, Jahanshad N, Villalon-Reina JE, et al. Thompson PM. Effectiveness of regional DTI measures in distinguishing Alzheimer’s disease, MCI, and normal aging[J]. Neuroimage Clin, 2013, 3:180-195.doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2013.07.006.
[1] 丁建民, 秦正义, 张翔, 周燕, 周洪雨, 王彦冬, 经翔. 超声造影与普美显磁共振成像对具有高危因素的≤3 cm肝结节进行LI-RADS分类诊断的前瞻性研究[J]. 中华医学超声杂志（电子版）, 2023, 20(09): 930-938.
[2] 张莲莲, 惠品晶, 丁亚芳. 颈部血管超声在粥样硬化斑块易损性评估中的应用价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志（电子版）, 2023, 20(08): 816-821.
[3] 刘冰茹, 刘皓希, 陈莹, 赖世伟, 陈蓉. 疑似乳腺癌的韧带样纤维瘤病一例[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 314-317.
[4] 叶艳娜, 叶瑞婷, 陈艳玲, 彭雯, 刘乐, 肖文秋, 黄辉, 李明深, 钟慕仪, 叶娴. 基于影像学表现和临床病理特征预测良性与交界性乳腺叶状肿瘤复发的列线图模型[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 229-237.
[5] 方心俞, 黄昌瑜, 胡洪新, 林溢铭, 陈旸, 张楠心, 张文明. 膝关节软骨下不全骨折的治疗选择与疗效分析[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 583-587.
[6] 董晓燕, 赵琪, 唐军, 张莉, 杨晓燕, 李姣. 奥密克戎变异株感染所致新型冠状病毒感染疾病新生儿的临床特征分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 595-603.
[7] 韩宇, 张武, 李安琪, 陈文颖, 谢斯栋. MRI肝脏影像报告和数据系统对非肝硬化乙肝患者肝细胞癌的诊断价值[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 669-673.
[8] 雷漫诗, 邓锶锶, 汪昕蓉, 黄锦彬, 向青, 熊安妮, 孟占鳌. 人工智能辅助压缩感知技术在上腹部T2WI压脂序列中的应用[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(05): 551-556.
[9] 钟广俊, 刘春华, 朱万森, 徐晓雷, 王兆军. MRI联合不同扫描序列在胃癌术前分期诊断及化疗效果和预后的评估[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 378-382.
[10] 吴钰娴, 冯亚园, 霍雷, 贾宁阳, 张娟. 原发性肝脏淋巴瘤的影像学诊断价值研究[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(05): 349-353.
[11] 冯海涛, 徐涛, 刘文阳, 孙晨, 曹尚超. 三维动脉自旋标记联合动态对比增强MRI对脑胶质瘤术后复发及放射性脑坏死诊断的研究[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(04): 262-265.
[12] 耿磊, 张照婷, 许磊, 黄海, 孙毅, 杨伏猛, 徐凯, 胡春峰. 帕金森病前驱期基底神经节环路磁共振弥散张量成像的应用研究[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 995-1003.
[13] 王志文, 郑雪梅, 张庆坤, 王海江. 自发性低颅压综合征75例临床分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 398-401.
[14] 赵暾, 徐霁华, 何有娣, 鲁明. 误诊为脑梗死且险些溶栓的急性自发微量脑出血一例[J]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 369-372.
[15] 刘天姿, 王宝军. Toll样受体4在阿尔茨海默病中的研究进展[J]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 404-409.
阅读次数
全文


摘要

版权所有 中华医学会 中华医学电子音像出版社有限责任公司  京ICP备14006079号-1  网络出版服务许可证：(署)网出证(京)字第075号